The Development, Validation, and Feasibility of the Experienced Coercion Scale

Existing scales for experienced coercion have limitations. We developed and validated a short self-report form for experienced coercion for use across care settings, care phases, and care measures. In Stage 1, we developed an item pool, based on the literature, patient accounts, interviews, and expe...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Psychological assessment 2017-10, Vol.29 (10), p.1210-1220
Hauptverfasser: Nyttingnes, Olav, Rugkåsa, Jorun, Holmén, Aina, Ruud, Torleif
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1220
container_issue 10
container_start_page 1210
container_title Psychological assessment
container_volume 29
creator Nyttingnes, Olav
Rugkåsa, Jorun
Holmén, Aina
Ruud, Torleif
description Existing scales for experienced coercion have limitations. We developed and validated a short self-report form for experienced coercion for use across care settings, care phases, and care measures. In Stage 1, we developed an item pool, based on the literature, patient accounts, interviews, and expert feedback. Stages 2 and 3 consisted of 2 cross-sectional studies, with patients from acute and nonacute inpatient wards, outpatient care, and supported housing. In Stage 2, patients (N = 212) responded to the Coercion Ladder and the experienced coercion items from Stage 1. We selected 20 items for Stage 3 based on item performance in typically coercive versus voluntary care settings, each items' relation to the Coercion Ladder score, and with regard to the component structure from principal component analysis (PCA). In Stage 3, we collected and examined item responses and clinical and coercion data from a new sample of patients (N = 219). We selected 15 items based on factor loadings to form part of the final Experienced Coercion Scale (ECS). The internal consistency was high and score distribution approached the normal curve. ECS sum scores correlated strongly with scores on the Coercion Ladder. In a regression analysis, demographic variables, diagnosis, duration of treatment, and care setting did not predict ECS scores, while legal status and continuing involuntary medication significantly predicted scores. In this initial study, the ECS scores showed promising psychometric properties, suggesting it can be used across care settings and is suitable for research and service evaluation. Public Significance Statement It is possible to measure how much coercion mental health patients feel with a new 15-item questionnaire, which can be used both in inpatient and outpatient treatment. The Experienced Coercion Scale will make it easier to compare the coerciveness of different forms of mental health care or to find out how experienced coercion change as the care proceeds.
doi_str_mv 10.1037/pas0000404
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1846368989</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1848714789</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a381t-84dd4178c6e9496554bbedda34e2af3f5d7965f7b72daa039f2ff38df040d1ec3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kcFO3DAQhi1UVCj0wgOgSL0gRMCOnbV9RAvbIiF6KK16syb2WBhlk9ROKvbt8e5SkHrAl7FGnz7NzE_IEaPnjHJ5MUCi-Qkqdsg-01yXjIvfH_I_90pea7pHPqX0SCkTXNUfyV4lNVNM8n1yd_-AxRX-xbYfltiNZ8UvaIODMfTdWQGdKxYIKTShDeOq6H0xZv76acAYsLPoinmP0Wa4-GGhxUOy66FN-PmlHpCfi-v7-bfy9vvXm_nlbQlcsbFUwjnBpLIz1ELP6lo0DToHXGAFnvvaydz1spGVA6Bc-8p7rpzPCzmGlh-Qk613iP2fCdNoliFZbFvosJ-SYUrM-ExppTP65T_0sZ9il6czTCuq873Y-5QSSjIhN67TLWVjn1JEb4YYlhBXhlGzzsK8ZZHh4xfl1CzRvaL_jp-BcgvAAGZIKwtxDLbFZKcYcxZrman0xl1l-zMi7JKY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1848714789</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Development, Validation, and Feasibility of the Experienced Coercion Scale</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES</source><creator>Nyttingnes, Olav ; Rugkåsa, Jorun ; Holmén, Aina ; Ruud, Torleif</creator><contributor>Ben-Porath, Yossef S</contributor><creatorcontrib>Nyttingnes, Olav ; Rugkåsa, Jorun ; Holmén, Aina ; Ruud, Torleif ; Ben-Porath, Yossef S</creatorcontrib><description>Existing scales for experienced coercion have limitations. We developed and validated a short self-report form for experienced coercion for use across care settings, care phases, and care measures. In Stage 1, we developed an item pool, based on the literature, patient accounts, interviews, and expert feedback. Stages 2 and 3 consisted of 2 cross-sectional studies, with patients from acute and nonacute inpatient wards, outpatient care, and supported housing. In Stage 2, patients (N = 212) responded to the Coercion Ladder and the experienced coercion items from Stage 1. We selected 20 items for Stage 3 based on item performance in typically coercive versus voluntary care settings, each items' relation to the Coercion Ladder score, and with regard to the component structure from principal component analysis (PCA). In Stage 3, we collected and examined item responses and clinical and coercion data from a new sample of patients (N = 219). We selected 15 items based on factor loadings to form part of the final Experienced Coercion Scale (ECS). The internal consistency was high and score distribution approached the normal curve. ECS sum scores correlated strongly with scores on the Coercion Ladder. In a regression analysis, demographic variables, diagnosis, duration of treatment, and care setting did not predict ECS scores, while legal status and continuing involuntary medication significantly predicted scores. In this initial study, the ECS scores showed promising psychometric properties, suggesting it can be used across care settings and is suitable for research and service evaluation. Public Significance Statement It is possible to measure how much coercion mental health patients feel with a new 15-item questionnaire, which can be used both in inpatient and outpatient treatment. The Experienced Coercion Scale will make it easier to compare the coerciveness of different forms of mental health care or to find out how experienced coercion change as the care proceeds.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1040-3590</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-134X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/pas0000404</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27918173</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Adult ; Coercion ; Commitment of Mentally Ill ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Feasibility Studies ; Female ; Health care ; Human ; Humans ; Inpatient ; Male ; Mental Disorders ; Mental Disorders - psychology ; Mental Health Commitment ; Middle Aged ; Outpatient ; Outpatient Commitment ; Patients ; Psychometrics - methods ; Quantitative psychology ; Regression analysis ; Reproducibility of Results ; Self Report - standards ; Self-Report ; Studies ; Surveys and Questionnaires - standards ; Test Construction ; Test Items ; Test Validity</subject><ispartof>Psychological assessment, 2017-10, Vol.29 (10), p.1210-1220</ispartof><rights>2016 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>(c) 2017 APA, all rights reserved).</rights><rights>2016, American Psychological Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychological Association Oct 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a381t-84dd4178c6e9496554bbedda34e2af3f5d7965f7b72daa039f2ff38df040d1ec3</citedby><orcidid>0000-0003-0991-7176</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27918173$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Ben-Porath, Yossef S</contributor><creatorcontrib>Nyttingnes, Olav</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rugkåsa, Jorun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holmén, Aina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruud, Torleif</creatorcontrib><title>The Development, Validation, and Feasibility of the Experienced Coercion Scale</title><title>Psychological assessment</title><addtitle>Psychol Assess</addtitle><description>Existing scales for experienced coercion have limitations. We developed and validated a short self-report form for experienced coercion for use across care settings, care phases, and care measures. In Stage 1, we developed an item pool, based on the literature, patient accounts, interviews, and expert feedback. Stages 2 and 3 consisted of 2 cross-sectional studies, with patients from acute and nonacute inpatient wards, outpatient care, and supported housing. In Stage 2, patients (N = 212) responded to the Coercion Ladder and the experienced coercion items from Stage 1. We selected 20 items for Stage 3 based on item performance in typically coercive versus voluntary care settings, each items' relation to the Coercion Ladder score, and with regard to the component structure from principal component analysis (PCA). In Stage 3, we collected and examined item responses and clinical and coercion data from a new sample of patients (N = 219). We selected 15 items based on factor loadings to form part of the final Experienced Coercion Scale (ECS). The internal consistency was high and score distribution approached the normal curve. ECS sum scores correlated strongly with scores on the Coercion Ladder. In a regression analysis, demographic variables, diagnosis, duration of treatment, and care setting did not predict ECS scores, while legal status and continuing involuntary medication significantly predicted scores. In this initial study, the ECS scores showed promising psychometric properties, suggesting it can be used across care settings and is suitable for research and service evaluation. Public Significance Statement It is possible to measure how much coercion mental health patients feel with a new 15-item questionnaire, which can be used both in inpatient and outpatient treatment. The Experienced Coercion Scale will make it easier to compare the coerciveness of different forms of mental health care or to find out how experienced coercion change as the care proceeds.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Coercion</subject><subject>Commitment of Mentally Ill</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Feasibility Studies</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Inpatient</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mental Disorders</subject><subject>Mental Disorders - psychology</subject><subject>Mental Health Commitment</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Outpatient</subject><subject>Outpatient Commitment</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Psychometrics - methods</subject><subject>Quantitative psychology</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Self Report - standards</subject><subject>Self-Report</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires - standards</subject><subject>Test Construction</subject><subject>Test Items</subject><subject>Test Validity</subject><issn>1040-3590</issn><issn>1939-134X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kcFO3DAQhi1UVCj0wgOgSL0gRMCOnbV9RAvbIiF6KK16syb2WBhlk9ROKvbt8e5SkHrAl7FGnz7NzE_IEaPnjHJ5MUCi-Qkqdsg-01yXjIvfH_I_90pea7pHPqX0SCkTXNUfyV4lNVNM8n1yd_-AxRX-xbYfltiNZ8UvaIODMfTdWQGdKxYIKTShDeOq6H0xZv76acAYsLPoinmP0Wa4-GGhxUOy66FN-PmlHpCfi-v7-bfy9vvXm_nlbQlcsbFUwjnBpLIz1ELP6lo0DToHXGAFnvvaydz1spGVA6Bc-8p7rpzPCzmGlh-Qk613iP2fCdNoliFZbFvosJ-SYUrM-ExppTP65T_0sZ9il6czTCuq873Y-5QSSjIhN67TLWVjn1JEb4YYlhBXhlGzzsK8ZZHh4xfl1CzRvaL_jp-BcgvAAGZIKwtxDLbFZKcYcxZrman0xl1l-zMi7JKY</recordid><startdate>201710</startdate><enddate>201710</enddate><creator>Nyttingnes, Olav</creator><creator>Rugkåsa, Jorun</creator><creator>Holmén, Aina</creator><creator>Ruud, Torleif</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0991-7176</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201710</creationdate><title>The Development, Validation, and Feasibility of the Experienced Coercion Scale</title><author>Nyttingnes, Olav ; Rugkåsa, Jorun ; Holmén, Aina ; Ruud, Torleif</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a381t-84dd4178c6e9496554bbedda34e2af3f5d7965f7b72daa039f2ff38df040d1ec3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Coercion</topic><topic>Commitment of Mentally Ill</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Feasibility Studies</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Inpatient</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mental Disorders</topic><topic>Mental Disorders - psychology</topic><topic>Mental Health Commitment</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Outpatient</topic><topic>Outpatient Commitment</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Psychometrics - methods</topic><topic>Quantitative psychology</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Self Report - standards</topic><topic>Self-Report</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires - standards</topic><topic>Test Construction</topic><topic>Test Items</topic><topic>Test Validity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nyttingnes, Olav</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rugkåsa, Jorun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holmén, Aina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruud, Torleif</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>APA PsycArticles®</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Psychological assessment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nyttingnes, Olav</au><au>Rugkåsa, Jorun</au><au>Holmén, Aina</au><au>Ruud, Torleif</au><au>Ben-Porath, Yossef S</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Development, Validation, and Feasibility of the Experienced Coercion Scale</atitle><jtitle>Psychological assessment</jtitle><addtitle>Psychol Assess</addtitle><date>2017-10</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1210</spage><epage>1220</epage><pages>1210-1220</pages><issn>1040-3590</issn><eissn>1939-134X</eissn><abstract>Existing scales for experienced coercion have limitations. We developed and validated a short self-report form for experienced coercion for use across care settings, care phases, and care measures. In Stage 1, we developed an item pool, based on the literature, patient accounts, interviews, and expert feedback. Stages 2 and 3 consisted of 2 cross-sectional studies, with patients from acute and nonacute inpatient wards, outpatient care, and supported housing. In Stage 2, patients (N = 212) responded to the Coercion Ladder and the experienced coercion items from Stage 1. We selected 20 items for Stage 3 based on item performance in typically coercive versus voluntary care settings, each items' relation to the Coercion Ladder score, and with regard to the component structure from principal component analysis (PCA). In Stage 3, we collected and examined item responses and clinical and coercion data from a new sample of patients (N = 219). We selected 15 items based on factor loadings to form part of the final Experienced Coercion Scale (ECS). The internal consistency was high and score distribution approached the normal curve. ECS sum scores correlated strongly with scores on the Coercion Ladder. In a regression analysis, demographic variables, diagnosis, duration of treatment, and care setting did not predict ECS scores, while legal status and continuing involuntary medication significantly predicted scores. In this initial study, the ECS scores showed promising psychometric properties, suggesting it can be used across care settings and is suitable for research and service evaluation. Public Significance Statement It is possible to measure how much coercion mental health patients feel with a new 15-item questionnaire, which can be used both in inpatient and outpatient treatment. The Experienced Coercion Scale will make it easier to compare the coerciveness of different forms of mental health care or to find out how experienced coercion change as the care proceeds.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><pmid>27918173</pmid><doi>10.1037/pas0000404</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0991-7176</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1040-3590
ispartof Psychological assessment, 2017-10, Vol.29 (10), p.1210-1220
issn 1040-3590
1939-134X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1846368989
source MEDLINE; EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES
subjects Adult
Coercion
Commitment of Mentally Ill
Cross-Sectional Studies
Feasibility Studies
Female
Health care
Human
Humans
Inpatient
Male
Mental Disorders
Mental Disorders - psychology
Mental Health Commitment
Middle Aged
Outpatient
Outpatient Commitment
Patients
Psychometrics - methods
Quantitative psychology
Regression analysis
Reproducibility of Results
Self Report - standards
Self-Report
Studies
Surveys and Questionnaires - standards
Test Construction
Test Items
Test Validity
title The Development, Validation, and Feasibility of the Experienced Coercion Scale
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T22%3A36%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Development,%20Validation,%20and%20Feasibility%20of%20the%20Experienced%20Coercion%20Scale&rft.jtitle=Psychological%20assessment&rft.au=Nyttingnes,%20Olav&rft.date=2017-10&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1210&rft.epage=1220&rft.pages=1210-1220&rft.issn=1040-3590&rft.eissn=1939-134X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/pas0000404&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1848714789%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1848714789&rft_id=info:pmid/27918173&rfr_iscdi=true