A prospective algorithm to reduce anastomotic leaks after rectosigmoid resection for gynecologic malignancies

Abstract Objective Determine whether a standardized protocol for temporary bowel diversion after rectosigmoid resection (RSR) for cytoreduction can reduce the rate of anastomotic leak (AL). Methods A prospective quality improvement project for patients undergoing RSR during debulking surgery from 07...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Gynecologic oncology 2017-02, Vol.144 (2), p.343-347
Hauptverfasser: Kalogera, E, Nitschmann, C.C, Dowdy, S.C, Cliby, W.A, Langstraat, C.L
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 347
container_issue 2
container_start_page 343
container_title Gynecologic oncology
container_volume 144
creator Kalogera, E
Nitschmann, C.C
Dowdy, S.C
Cliby, W.A
Langstraat, C.L
description Abstract Objective Determine whether a standardized protocol for temporary bowel diversion after rectosigmoid resection (RSR) for cytoreduction can reduce the rate of anastomotic leak (AL). Methods A prospective quality improvement project for patients undergoing RSR during debulking surgery from 07/2013 to 01/2016 was conducted. Patients with any of the following underwent temporary diversion: preoperative albumin ≤ 3.0 g/dL, prior pelvic radiation, RSR plus additional large bowel resection (LBR), anastomosis (AS) ≤ 6 cm from the anal verge, failed leak test or contamination of the pelvis with stool. The AL rate was compared to the historic AL rate from 01/04–06/11. Results Seventy-seven patients underwent RSR, with 27 (35.1%) receiving diverting stomas vs. 25/309 (8.1%) in the historic cohort. Additional LBR (33.3%) and AS at ≤ 6 cm from anal verge (26.3%) were the most common indications for diversion. No AL was observed among diverted patients. If one AL which occurred following protocol violation (failed leak test but not diverted) is excluded, the theoretical AL rate is 1.3% (1/77) vs. 7.8% (24/309; P = 0.039) in the historic cohort. Not excluding this case, the AL rate was 2.6% (2/77) vs. 7.8% ( P = 0.11). Short-term outcomes following primary surgery were not different between diverted and non-diverted patients. Stoma-related complications were observed in 7/27 (25.9%) patients, primarily related to dehydration. Reversal surgery was successfully performed in 24/75 (88.9%) patients. Conclusions Criteria-based temporary bowel diversion for patients undergoing RSR for gynecologic cancer reduced the AL rate. Diversion was associated with acceptable morbidity and high reversal rate.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.11.032
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1846366290</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0090825816316018</els_id><sourcerecordid>1846366290</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-fc3a00ba2a3bfdee851c884edf59dfc018699e72917b9d7ea83b6269bd9c1a323</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU9v1DAQxS0EokvhEyChHLkkeOyNEx9Aqir-SZU4AGfLsSfBW8de7KTSfvs63cKBCydr7PfmeX5DyGugDVAQ7w7NaTqF2LBSNAAN5ewJ2QGVbS36Vj4lO0olrXvW9hfkRc4HSimnwJ6TC9ZJkG3X7sh8VR1TzEc0i7vDSvspJrf8mqslVgntaspd0HmJc1ycqTzq21zpccFUns0Ss5vm6Gwp8tYihmqMqSr_QhN9nIpl1t5NQQfjML8kz0btM756PC_Jz08ff1x_qW--ff56fXVTmz3sl3o0XFM6aKb5MFrEvgXT93u0YyvtaCj0QkrsmIRukLZD3fNBMCEHKw1ozvgleXvuW2b7vWJe1OyyQe91wLhmBf1ecCGYpEXKz1JTMOSEozomN-t0UkDVxlkd1ANntXFWAIo-BLx5DFiHGe1fzx-wRfD-LMAy5p3DpHIBEAxat3FTNrr_BHz4x2-8C85of4snzIe4plAIKlCZKaq-b6veNg2CgyiA-D3L46f0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1846366290</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A prospective algorithm to reduce anastomotic leaks after rectosigmoid resection for gynecologic malignancies</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Kalogera, E ; Nitschmann, C.C ; Dowdy, S.C ; Cliby, W.A ; Langstraat, C.L</creator><creatorcontrib>Kalogera, E ; Nitschmann, C.C ; Dowdy, S.C ; Cliby, W.A ; Langstraat, C.L</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Objective Determine whether a standardized protocol for temporary bowel diversion after rectosigmoid resection (RSR) for cytoreduction can reduce the rate of anastomotic leak (AL). Methods A prospective quality improvement project for patients undergoing RSR during debulking surgery from 07/2013 to 01/2016 was conducted. Patients with any of the following underwent temporary diversion: preoperative albumin ≤ 3.0 g/dL, prior pelvic radiation, RSR plus additional large bowel resection (LBR), anastomosis (AS) ≤ 6 cm from the anal verge, failed leak test or contamination of the pelvis with stool. The AL rate was compared to the historic AL rate from 01/04–06/11. Results Seventy-seven patients underwent RSR, with 27 (35.1%) receiving diverting stomas vs. 25/309 (8.1%) in the historic cohort. Additional LBR (33.3%) and AS at ≤ 6 cm from anal verge (26.3%) were the most common indications for diversion. No AL was observed among diverted patients. If one AL which occurred following protocol violation (failed leak test but not diverted) is excluded, the theoretical AL rate is 1.3% (1/77) vs. 7.8% (24/309; P = 0.039) in the historic cohort. Not excluding this case, the AL rate was 2.6% (2/77) vs. 7.8% ( P = 0.11). Short-term outcomes following primary surgery were not different between diverted and non-diverted patients. Stoma-related complications were observed in 7/27 (25.9%) patients, primarily related to dehydration. Reversal surgery was successfully performed in 24/75 (88.9%) patients. Conclusions Criteria-based temporary bowel diversion for patients undergoing RSR for gynecologic cancer reduced the AL rate. Diversion was associated with acceptable morbidity and high reversal rate.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0090-8258</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-6859</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.11.032</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27919575</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Aged ; Algorithms ; Anastomotic leak ; Anastomotic Leak - prevention &amp; control ; Colon, Sigmoid - surgery ; Female ; Genital Neoplasms, Female - surgery ; Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine ; Humans ; Large bowel resection ; Middle Aged ; Obstetrics and Gynecology ; Ovarian cancer ; Postoperative Complications - prevention &amp; control ; Prospective Studies ; Protective stoma ; Rectosigmoid resection ; Rectum - surgery</subject><ispartof>Gynecologic oncology, 2017-02, Vol.144 (2), p.343-347</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2016 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-fc3a00ba2a3bfdee851c884edf59dfc018699e72917b9d7ea83b6269bd9c1a323</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-fc3a00ba2a3bfdee851c884edf59dfc018699e72917b9d7ea83b6269bd9c1a323</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.11.032$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27919575$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kalogera, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nitschmann, C.C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dowdy, S.C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cliby, W.A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Langstraat, C.L</creatorcontrib><title>A prospective algorithm to reduce anastomotic leaks after rectosigmoid resection for gynecologic malignancies</title><title>Gynecologic oncology</title><addtitle>Gynecol Oncol</addtitle><description>Abstract Objective Determine whether a standardized protocol for temporary bowel diversion after rectosigmoid resection (RSR) for cytoreduction can reduce the rate of anastomotic leak (AL). Methods A prospective quality improvement project for patients undergoing RSR during debulking surgery from 07/2013 to 01/2016 was conducted. Patients with any of the following underwent temporary diversion: preoperative albumin ≤ 3.0 g/dL, prior pelvic radiation, RSR plus additional large bowel resection (LBR), anastomosis (AS) ≤ 6 cm from the anal verge, failed leak test or contamination of the pelvis with stool. The AL rate was compared to the historic AL rate from 01/04–06/11. Results Seventy-seven patients underwent RSR, with 27 (35.1%) receiving diverting stomas vs. 25/309 (8.1%) in the historic cohort. Additional LBR (33.3%) and AS at ≤ 6 cm from anal verge (26.3%) were the most common indications for diversion. No AL was observed among diverted patients. If one AL which occurred following protocol violation (failed leak test but not diverted) is excluded, the theoretical AL rate is 1.3% (1/77) vs. 7.8% (24/309; P = 0.039) in the historic cohort. Not excluding this case, the AL rate was 2.6% (2/77) vs. 7.8% ( P = 0.11). Short-term outcomes following primary surgery were not different between diverted and non-diverted patients. Stoma-related complications were observed in 7/27 (25.9%) patients, primarily related to dehydration. Reversal surgery was successfully performed in 24/75 (88.9%) patients. Conclusions Criteria-based temporary bowel diversion for patients undergoing RSR for gynecologic cancer reduced the AL rate. Diversion was associated with acceptable morbidity and high reversal rate.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Anastomotic leak</subject><subject>Anastomotic Leak - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Colon, Sigmoid - surgery</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Genital Neoplasms, Female - surgery</subject><subject>Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Large bowel resection</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Obstetrics and Gynecology</subject><subject>Ovarian cancer</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Protective stoma</subject><subject>Rectosigmoid resection</subject><subject>Rectum - surgery</subject><issn>0090-8258</issn><issn>1095-6859</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU9v1DAQxS0EokvhEyChHLkkeOyNEx9Aqir-SZU4AGfLsSfBW8de7KTSfvs63cKBCydr7PfmeX5DyGugDVAQ7w7NaTqF2LBSNAAN5ewJ2QGVbS36Vj4lO0olrXvW9hfkRc4HSimnwJ6TC9ZJkG3X7sh8VR1TzEc0i7vDSvspJrf8mqslVgntaspd0HmJc1ycqTzq21zpccFUns0Ss5vm6Gwp8tYihmqMqSr_QhN9nIpl1t5NQQfjML8kz0btM756PC_Jz08ff1x_qW--ff56fXVTmz3sl3o0XFM6aKb5MFrEvgXT93u0YyvtaCj0QkrsmIRukLZD3fNBMCEHKw1ozvgleXvuW2b7vWJe1OyyQe91wLhmBf1ecCGYpEXKz1JTMOSEozomN-t0UkDVxlkd1ANntXFWAIo-BLx5DFiHGe1fzx-wRfD-LMAy5p3DpHIBEAxat3FTNrr_BHz4x2-8C85of4snzIe4plAIKlCZKaq-b6veNg2CgyiA-D3L46f0</recordid><startdate>20170201</startdate><enddate>20170201</enddate><creator>Kalogera, E</creator><creator>Nitschmann, C.C</creator><creator>Dowdy, S.C</creator><creator>Cliby, W.A</creator><creator>Langstraat, C.L</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170201</creationdate><title>A prospective algorithm to reduce anastomotic leaks after rectosigmoid resection for gynecologic malignancies</title><author>Kalogera, E ; Nitschmann, C.C ; Dowdy, S.C ; Cliby, W.A ; Langstraat, C.L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-fc3a00ba2a3bfdee851c884edf59dfc018699e72917b9d7ea83b6269bd9c1a323</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Anastomotic leak</topic><topic>Anastomotic Leak - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Colon, Sigmoid - surgery</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Genital Neoplasms, Female - surgery</topic><topic>Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Large bowel resection</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Obstetrics and Gynecology</topic><topic>Ovarian cancer</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Protective stoma</topic><topic>Rectosigmoid resection</topic><topic>Rectum - surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kalogera, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nitschmann, C.C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dowdy, S.C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cliby, W.A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Langstraat, C.L</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Gynecologic oncology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kalogera, E</au><au>Nitschmann, C.C</au><au>Dowdy, S.C</au><au>Cliby, W.A</au><au>Langstraat, C.L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A prospective algorithm to reduce anastomotic leaks after rectosigmoid resection for gynecologic malignancies</atitle><jtitle>Gynecologic oncology</jtitle><addtitle>Gynecol Oncol</addtitle><date>2017-02-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>144</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>343</spage><epage>347</epage><pages>343-347</pages><issn>0090-8258</issn><eissn>1095-6859</eissn><abstract>Abstract Objective Determine whether a standardized protocol for temporary bowel diversion after rectosigmoid resection (RSR) for cytoreduction can reduce the rate of anastomotic leak (AL). Methods A prospective quality improvement project for patients undergoing RSR during debulking surgery from 07/2013 to 01/2016 was conducted. Patients with any of the following underwent temporary diversion: preoperative albumin ≤ 3.0 g/dL, prior pelvic radiation, RSR plus additional large bowel resection (LBR), anastomosis (AS) ≤ 6 cm from the anal verge, failed leak test or contamination of the pelvis with stool. The AL rate was compared to the historic AL rate from 01/04–06/11. Results Seventy-seven patients underwent RSR, with 27 (35.1%) receiving diverting stomas vs. 25/309 (8.1%) in the historic cohort. Additional LBR (33.3%) and AS at ≤ 6 cm from anal verge (26.3%) were the most common indications for diversion. No AL was observed among diverted patients. If one AL which occurred following protocol violation (failed leak test but not diverted) is excluded, the theoretical AL rate is 1.3% (1/77) vs. 7.8% (24/309; P = 0.039) in the historic cohort. Not excluding this case, the AL rate was 2.6% (2/77) vs. 7.8% ( P = 0.11). Short-term outcomes following primary surgery were not different between diverted and non-diverted patients. Stoma-related complications were observed in 7/27 (25.9%) patients, primarily related to dehydration. Reversal surgery was successfully performed in 24/75 (88.9%) patients. Conclusions Criteria-based temporary bowel diversion for patients undergoing RSR for gynecologic cancer reduced the AL rate. Diversion was associated with acceptable morbidity and high reversal rate.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>27919575</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.11.032</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0090-8258
ispartof Gynecologic oncology, 2017-02, Vol.144 (2), p.343-347
issn 0090-8258
1095-6859
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1846366290
source MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Aged
Algorithms
Anastomotic leak
Anastomotic Leak - prevention & control
Colon, Sigmoid - surgery
Female
Genital Neoplasms, Female - surgery
Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine
Humans
Large bowel resection
Middle Aged
Obstetrics and Gynecology
Ovarian cancer
Postoperative Complications - prevention & control
Prospective Studies
Protective stoma
Rectosigmoid resection
Rectum - surgery
title A prospective algorithm to reduce anastomotic leaks after rectosigmoid resection for gynecologic malignancies
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-30T01%3A59%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20prospective%20algorithm%20to%20reduce%20anastomotic%20leaks%20after%20rectosigmoid%20resection%20for%20gynecologic%20malignancies&rft.jtitle=Gynecologic%20oncology&rft.au=Kalogera,%20E&rft.date=2017-02-01&rft.volume=144&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=343&rft.epage=347&rft.pages=343-347&rft.issn=0090-8258&rft.eissn=1095-6859&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.11.032&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1846366290%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1846366290&rft_id=info:pmid/27919575&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0090825816316018&rfr_iscdi=true