China's forest tenure reform and institutional change at a crossroads
China's latest rural forest reforms have made headway by further devolving the use rights of collectively owned forestland and relaxing government control over private forestry operations. However, there have been policy inconsistencies, conflicts, and even maladaptions such as harvest restrict...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Forest policy and economics 2016-11, Vol.72, p.92-98 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 98 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 92 |
container_title | Forest policy and economics |
container_volume | 72 |
creator | Liu, Ping Yin, Runsheng Li, Hua |
description | China's latest rural forest reforms have made headway by further devolving the use rights of collectively owned forestland and relaxing government control over private forestry operations. However, there have been policy inconsistencies, conflicts, and even maladaptions such as harvest restrictions, taking of devolved forestland without fair compensation, lack of flexibility in local execution, and a rush to forming co-ops. Building on recent research advances, this paper attempts to further elucidate practical solutions to these challenges. The authors argue that the stake is high to address these challenges in a timely manner, and that effective and coherent resolutions to them are urgently needed. To that end, it is essential to better understand the institutional economics in regard to property rights, collective action, transaction costs, and governance, and to better understand the primary features of forest ecosystems and forestry as well as the rural society of China. It is hoped that this effort will contribute to the continued discussion and more effective implementation of the forest devolution and institutional transition in China and elsewhere.
•China has encountered challenges in reforming and restructuring its rural forestry.•Harvest restrictions must be relaxed to improve the forest management incentive.•Parcelization of forestland and a rush to form forest co-ops need to be dealt with.•Boundary disputes and conflicting claims should be carefully resolved.•Rules of classified management and ecosystem service compensation ought to be adjusted. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.forpol.2016.06.019 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1846335367</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1389934116301381</els_id><sourcerecordid>1846335367</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c339t-8f041de879645d8f5a7ca2506bb3812b44a3a405a1667913b598c4f134ef9de53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UE1LxDAUDKLguvoPPOSml65Jk7TJRZDFL1jwoueQpq9ulm6yJqngvzdLPQsP3huYGeYNQteUrCihzd1uNYR4COOqLmhFylB1ghZUtnXVEkFOy82kqhTj9BxdpLQjhLaEsgV6XG-dNzcJFwdIGWfwUwQcoeA9Nr7Hzqfs8pRd8GbEdmv8J2CTscE2hpRiMH26RGeDGRNc_e0l-nh6fF-_VJu359f1w6ayjKlcyYFw2oNsVcNFLwdhWmtqQZquY5LWHeeGGU6EoU3TKso6oaTlA2UcBtWDYEt0O_seYviaSl69d8nCOBoPYUqaSt4wJljTFiqfqXNKGPQhur2JP5oSfWxN7_Tcmj62pkkZqorsfpZBeePbQdTJOvAWehfBZt0H97_BL3FAd2c</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1846335367</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>China's forest tenure reform and institutional change at a crossroads</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Liu, Ping ; Yin, Runsheng ; Li, Hua</creator><creatorcontrib>Liu, Ping ; Yin, Runsheng ; Li, Hua</creatorcontrib><description>China's latest rural forest reforms have made headway by further devolving the use rights of collectively owned forestland and relaxing government control over private forestry operations. However, there have been policy inconsistencies, conflicts, and even maladaptions such as harvest restrictions, taking of devolved forestland without fair compensation, lack of flexibility in local execution, and a rush to forming co-ops. Building on recent research advances, this paper attempts to further elucidate practical solutions to these challenges. The authors argue that the stake is high to address these challenges in a timely manner, and that effective and coherent resolutions to them are urgently needed. To that end, it is essential to better understand the institutional economics in regard to property rights, collective action, transaction costs, and governance, and to better understand the primary features of forest ecosystems and forestry as well as the rural society of China. It is hoped that this effort will contribute to the continued discussion and more effective implementation of the forest devolution and institutional transition in China and elsewhere.
•China has encountered challenges in reforming and restructuring its rural forestry.•Harvest restrictions must be relaxed to improve the forest management incentive.•Parcelization of forestland and a rush to form forest co-ops need to be dealt with.•Boundary disputes and conflicting claims should be carefully resolved.•Rules of classified management and ecosystem service compensation ought to be adjusted.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1389-9341</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-7050</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2016.06.019</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>China ; Collective action ; cooperatives ; Devolution ; Ecosystem services ; forest ecosystems ; forests ; Governance ; issues and policy ; Land use rights ; private forestry ; property rights ; rural society ; Tenure ; Transaction cost</subject><ispartof>Forest policy and economics, 2016-11, Vol.72, p.92-98</ispartof><rights>2016 Elsevier B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c339t-8f041de879645d8f5a7ca2506bb3812b44a3a405a1667913b598c4f134ef9de53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c339t-8f041de879645d8f5a7ca2506bb3812b44a3a405a1667913b598c4f134ef9de53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389934116301381$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Liu, Ping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yin, Runsheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Hua</creatorcontrib><title>China's forest tenure reform and institutional change at a crossroads</title><title>Forest policy and economics</title><description>China's latest rural forest reforms have made headway by further devolving the use rights of collectively owned forestland and relaxing government control over private forestry operations. However, there have been policy inconsistencies, conflicts, and even maladaptions such as harvest restrictions, taking of devolved forestland without fair compensation, lack of flexibility in local execution, and a rush to forming co-ops. Building on recent research advances, this paper attempts to further elucidate practical solutions to these challenges. The authors argue that the stake is high to address these challenges in a timely manner, and that effective and coherent resolutions to them are urgently needed. To that end, it is essential to better understand the institutional economics in regard to property rights, collective action, transaction costs, and governance, and to better understand the primary features of forest ecosystems and forestry as well as the rural society of China. It is hoped that this effort will contribute to the continued discussion and more effective implementation of the forest devolution and institutional transition in China and elsewhere.
•China has encountered challenges in reforming and restructuring its rural forestry.•Harvest restrictions must be relaxed to improve the forest management incentive.•Parcelization of forestland and a rush to form forest co-ops need to be dealt with.•Boundary disputes and conflicting claims should be carefully resolved.•Rules of classified management and ecosystem service compensation ought to be adjusted.</description><subject>China</subject><subject>Collective action</subject><subject>cooperatives</subject><subject>Devolution</subject><subject>Ecosystem services</subject><subject>forest ecosystems</subject><subject>forests</subject><subject>Governance</subject><subject>issues and policy</subject><subject>Land use rights</subject><subject>private forestry</subject><subject>property rights</subject><subject>rural society</subject><subject>Tenure</subject><subject>Transaction cost</subject><issn>1389-9341</issn><issn>1872-7050</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9UE1LxDAUDKLguvoPPOSml65Jk7TJRZDFL1jwoueQpq9ulm6yJqngvzdLPQsP3huYGeYNQteUrCihzd1uNYR4COOqLmhFylB1ghZUtnXVEkFOy82kqhTj9BxdpLQjhLaEsgV6XG-dNzcJFwdIGWfwUwQcoeA9Nr7Hzqfs8pRd8GbEdmv8J2CTscE2hpRiMH26RGeDGRNc_e0l-nh6fF-_VJu359f1w6ayjKlcyYFw2oNsVcNFLwdhWmtqQZquY5LWHeeGGU6EoU3TKso6oaTlA2UcBtWDYEt0O_seYviaSl69d8nCOBoPYUqaSt4wJljTFiqfqXNKGPQhur2JP5oSfWxN7_Tcmj62pkkZqorsfpZBeePbQdTJOvAWehfBZt0H97_BL3FAd2c</recordid><startdate>201611</startdate><enddate>201611</enddate><creator>Liu, Ping</creator><creator>Yin, Runsheng</creator><creator>Li, Hua</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7S9</scope><scope>L.6</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201611</creationdate><title>China's forest tenure reform and institutional change at a crossroads</title><author>Liu, Ping ; Yin, Runsheng ; Li, Hua</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c339t-8f041de879645d8f5a7ca2506bb3812b44a3a405a1667913b598c4f134ef9de53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>China</topic><topic>Collective action</topic><topic>cooperatives</topic><topic>Devolution</topic><topic>Ecosystem services</topic><topic>forest ecosystems</topic><topic>forests</topic><topic>Governance</topic><topic>issues and policy</topic><topic>Land use rights</topic><topic>private forestry</topic><topic>property rights</topic><topic>rural society</topic><topic>Tenure</topic><topic>Transaction cost</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Liu, Ping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yin, Runsheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Hua</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>AGRICOLA</collection><collection>AGRICOLA - Academic</collection><jtitle>Forest policy and economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Liu, Ping</au><au>Yin, Runsheng</au><au>Li, Hua</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>China's forest tenure reform and institutional change at a crossroads</atitle><jtitle>Forest policy and economics</jtitle><date>2016-11</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>72</volume><spage>92</spage><epage>98</epage><pages>92-98</pages><issn>1389-9341</issn><eissn>1872-7050</eissn><abstract>China's latest rural forest reforms have made headway by further devolving the use rights of collectively owned forestland and relaxing government control over private forestry operations. However, there have been policy inconsistencies, conflicts, and even maladaptions such as harvest restrictions, taking of devolved forestland without fair compensation, lack of flexibility in local execution, and a rush to forming co-ops. Building on recent research advances, this paper attempts to further elucidate practical solutions to these challenges. The authors argue that the stake is high to address these challenges in a timely manner, and that effective and coherent resolutions to them are urgently needed. To that end, it is essential to better understand the institutional economics in regard to property rights, collective action, transaction costs, and governance, and to better understand the primary features of forest ecosystems and forestry as well as the rural society of China. It is hoped that this effort will contribute to the continued discussion and more effective implementation of the forest devolution and institutional transition in China and elsewhere.
•China has encountered challenges in reforming and restructuring its rural forestry.•Harvest restrictions must be relaxed to improve the forest management incentive.•Parcelization of forestland and a rush to form forest co-ops need to be dealt with.•Boundary disputes and conflicting claims should be carefully resolved.•Rules of classified management and ecosystem service compensation ought to be adjusted.</abstract><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.forpol.2016.06.019</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1389-9341 |
ispartof | Forest policy and economics, 2016-11, Vol.72, p.92-98 |
issn | 1389-9341 1872-7050 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1846335367 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | China Collective action cooperatives Devolution Ecosystem services forest ecosystems forests Governance issues and policy Land use rights private forestry property rights rural society Tenure Transaction cost |
title | China's forest tenure reform and institutional change at a crossroads |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T03%3A36%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=China's%20forest%20tenure%20reform%20and%20institutional%20change%20at%20a%20crossroads&rft.jtitle=Forest%20policy%20and%20economics&rft.au=Liu,%20Ping&rft.date=2016-11&rft.volume=72&rft.spage=92&rft.epage=98&rft.pages=92-98&rft.issn=1389-9341&rft.eissn=1872-7050&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.forpol.2016.06.019&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1846335367%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1846335367&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S1389934116301381&rfr_iscdi=true |