Galaxies in the EAGLE hydrodynamical simulation and in the Durham and Munich semi-analytical models

We compare global predictions from the eagle hydrodynamical simulation, and two semi-analytic (SA) models of galaxy formation, l-galaxies and galform. All three models include the key physical processes for the formation and evolution of galaxies and their parameters are calibrated against a small n...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Monthly notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 2016-10, Vol.461 (4), p.3457-3482
Hauptverfasser: Guo, Quan, Gonzalez-Perez, Violeta, Guo, Qi, Schaller, Matthieu, Furlong, Michelle, Bower, Richard G., Cole, Shaun, Crain, Robert A., Frenk, Carlos S., Helly, John C., Lacey, Cedric G., Lagos, Claudia del P., Mitchell, Peter, Schaye, Joop, Theuns, Tom
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 3482
container_issue 4
container_start_page 3457
container_title Monthly notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
container_volume 461
creator Guo, Quan
Gonzalez-Perez, Violeta
Guo, Qi
Schaller, Matthieu
Furlong, Michelle
Bower, Richard G.
Cole, Shaun
Crain, Robert A.
Frenk, Carlos S.
Helly, John C.
Lacey, Cedric G.
Lagos, Claudia del P.
Mitchell, Peter
Schaye, Joop
Theuns, Tom
description We compare global predictions from the eagle hydrodynamical simulation, and two semi-analytic (SA) models of galaxy formation, l-galaxies and galform. All three models include the key physical processes for the formation and evolution of galaxies and their parameters are calibrated against a small number of observables at z ≈ 0. The two SA models have been applied to merger trees constructed from the eagle dark matter only simulation. We find that at z ≤ 2, both the galaxy stellar mass functions for stellar masses M * < 1010.5 M⊙ and the median specific star formation rates (sSFRs) in the three models agree to better than 0.4 dex. The evolution of the sSFR predicted by the three models closely follows the mass assembly history of dark matter haloes. In both eagle and l-galaxies there are more central passive galaxies with M * < 109.5 M⊙ than in galform. This difference is related to galaxies that have entered and then left a larger halo and which are treated as satellites in galform. In the range 0 < z < 1, the slope of the evolution of the star formation rate density in eagle is a factor of ≈1.5 steeper than for the two SA models. The median sizes for galaxies with M * > 109.5 M⊙ differ in some instances by an order of magnitude, while the stellar mass–size relation in eagle is a factor of ≈2 tighter than for the two SA models. Our results suggest the need for a revision of how SA models treat the effect of baryonic self-gravity on the underlying dark matter. The treatment of gas flows in the models needs to be revised based on detailed comparison with observations to understand in particular the evolution of the stellar mass–metallicity relation.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/mnras/stw1525
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_TOX</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1845836648</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/mnras/stw1525</oup_id><sourcerecordid>4176869061</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c469t-2132d90000943d969d3533a46ebcb673ea8ff9104e9a859362d599cee74a2e663</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0U1Lw0AQBuBFFKzVo_eAFy-x-53ssdRahYoXPYdpdkO3JLt1N0Hz700_RPCip4HhmWGGF6Frgu8IVmzSuABxEtsPIqg4QSPCpEipkvIUjTBmIs0zQs7RRYwbjDFnVI5QuYAaPq2JiXVJuzbJfLpYzpN1r4PXvYPGllAn0TZdDa31LgGnv-l9F9bQ7DvPnbPlOommsSk4qPt2P9d4bep4ic4qqKO5OtYxenuYv84e0-XL4mk2XaYll6pNKWFUq-EyrDjTSirNBGPApVmVK5kxA3lVKYK5UZALxSTVQqnSmIwDNVKyMbo97N0G_96Z2BaNjaWpa3DGd7EgORc5k5Ln_6A0U4xwIQZ684tufBeGH3eK5FhkGWGDSg-qDD7GYKpiG2wDoS8ILnbpFPt0imM6Pwf4bvsH_QLuTJDM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1818057713</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Galaxies in the EAGLE hydrodynamical simulation and in the Durham and Munich semi-analytical models</title><source>Oxford Journals Open Access Collection</source><creator>Guo, Quan ; Gonzalez-Perez, Violeta ; Guo, Qi ; Schaller, Matthieu ; Furlong, Michelle ; Bower, Richard G. ; Cole, Shaun ; Crain, Robert A. ; Frenk, Carlos S. ; Helly, John C. ; Lacey, Cedric G. ; Lagos, Claudia del P. ; Mitchell, Peter ; Schaye, Joop ; Theuns, Tom</creator><creatorcontrib>Guo, Quan ; Gonzalez-Perez, Violeta ; Guo, Qi ; Schaller, Matthieu ; Furlong, Michelle ; Bower, Richard G. ; Cole, Shaun ; Crain, Robert A. ; Frenk, Carlos S. ; Helly, John C. ; Lacey, Cedric G. ; Lagos, Claudia del P. ; Mitchell, Peter ; Schaye, Joop ; Theuns, Tom</creatorcontrib><description>We compare global predictions from the eagle hydrodynamical simulation, and two semi-analytic (SA) models of galaxy formation, l-galaxies and galform. All three models include the key physical processes for the formation and evolution of galaxies and their parameters are calibrated against a small number of observables at z ≈ 0. The two SA models have been applied to merger trees constructed from the eagle dark matter only simulation. We find that at z ≤ 2, both the galaxy stellar mass functions for stellar masses M * &lt; 1010.5 M⊙ and the median specific star formation rates (sSFRs) in the three models agree to better than 0.4 dex. The evolution of the sSFR predicted by the three models closely follows the mass assembly history of dark matter haloes. In both eagle and l-galaxies there are more central passive galaxies with M * &lt; 109.5 M⊙ than in galform. This difference is related to galaxies that have entered and then left a larger halo and which are treated as satellites in galform. In the range 0 &lt; z &lt; 1, the slope of the evolution of the star formation rate density in eagle is a factor of ≈1.5 steeper than for the two SA models. The median sizes for galaxies with M * &gt; 109.5 M⊙ differ in some instances by an order of magnitude, while the stellar mass–size relation in eagle is a factor of ≈2 tighter than for the two SA models. Our results suggest the need for a revision of how SA models treat the effect of baryonic self-gravity on the underlying dark matter. The treatment of gas flows in the models needs to be revised based on detailed comparison with observations to understand in particular the evolution of the stellar mass–metallicity relation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0035-8711</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2966</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stw1525</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Astronomical models ; Astronomy ; Comparative analysis ; Computer simulation ; Dark matter ; Fluid mechanics ; Galaxies ; Mathematical models ; Simulation ; Star formation rate ; Stars &amp; galaxies ; Stellar evolution ; Stellar mass</subject><ispartof>Monthly notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 2016-10, Vol.461 (4), p.3457-3482</ispartof><rights>2016 The Authors Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Royal Astronomical Society 2016</rights><rights>Copyright Oxford University Press, UK Oct 1, 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c469t-2132d90000943d969d3533a46ebcb673ea8ff9104e9a859362d599cee74a2e663</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c469t-2132d90000943d969d3533a46ebcb673ea8ff9104e9a859362d599cee74a2e663</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1598,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stw1525$$EView_record_in_Oxford_University_Press$$FView_record_in_$$GOxford_University_Press</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Guo, Quan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gonzalez-Perez, Violeta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guo, Qi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schaller, Matthieu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Furlong, Michelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bower, Richard G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cole, Shaun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crain, Robert A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frenk, Carlos S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Helly, John C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lacey, Cedric G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lagos, Claudia del P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mitchell, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schaye, Joop</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Theuns, Tom</creatorcontrib><title>Galaxies in the EAGLE hydrodynamical simulation and in the Durham and Munich semi-analytical models</title><title>Monthly notices of the Royal Astronomical Society</title><description>We compare global predictions from the eagle hydrodynamical simulation, and two semi-analytic (SA) models of galaxy formation, l-galaxies and galform. All three models include the key physical processes for the formation and evolution of galaxies and their parameters are calibrated against a small number of observables at z ≈ 0. The two SA models have been applied to merger trees constructed from the eagle dark matter only simulation. We find that at z ≤ 2, both the galaxy stellar mass functions for stellar masses M * &lt; 1010.5 M⊙ and the median specific star formation rates (sSFRs) in the three models agree to better than 0.4 dex. The evolution of the sSFR predicted by the three models closely follows the mass assembly history of dark matter haloes. In both eagle and l-galaxies there are more central passive galaxies with M * &lt; 109.5 M⊙ than in galform. This difference is related to galaxies that have entered and then left a larger halo and which are treated as satellites in galform. In the range 0 &lt; z &lt; 1, the slope of the evolution of the star formation rate density in eagle is a factor of ≈1.5 steeper than for the two SA models. The median sizes for galaxies with M * &gt; 109.5 M⊙ differ in some instances by an order of magnitude, while the stellar mass–size relation in eagle is a factor of ≈2 tighter than for the two SA models. Our results suggest the need for a revision of how SA models treat the effect of baryonic self-gravity on the underlying dark matter. The treatment of gas flows in the models needs to be revised based on detailed comparison with observations to understand in particular the evolution of the stellar mass–metallicity relation.</description><subject>Astronomical models</subject><subject>Astronomy</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>Dark matter</subject><subject>Fluid mechanics</subject><subject>Galaxies</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><subject>Star formation rate</subject><subject>Stars &amp; galaxies</subject><subject>Stellar evolution</subject><subject>Stellar mass</subject><issn>0035-8711</issn><issn>1365-2966</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqN0U1Lw0AQBuBFFKzVo_eAFy-x-53ssdRahYoXPYdpdkO3JLt1N0Hz700_RPCip4HhmWGGF6Frgu8IVmzSuABxEtsPIqg4QSPCpEipkvIUjTBmIs0zQs7RRYwbjDFnVI5QuYAaPq2JiXVJuzbJfLpYzpN1r4PXvYPGllAn0TZdDa31LgGnv-l9F9bQ7DvPnbPlOommsSk4qPt2P9d4bep4ic4qqKO5OtYxenuYv84e0-XL4mk2XaYll6pNKWFUq-EyrDjTSirNBGPApVmVK5kxA3lVKYK5UZALxSTVQqnSmIwDNVKyMbo97N0G_96Z2BaNjaWpa3DGd7EgORc5k5Ln_6A0U4xwIQZ684tufBeGH3eK5FhkGWGDSg-qDD7GYKpiG2wDoS8ILnbpFPt0imM6Pwf4bvsH_QLuTJDM</recordid><startdate>20161001</startdate><enddate>20161001</enddate><creator>Guo, Quan</creator><creator>Gonzalez-Perez, Violeta</creator><creator>Guo, Qi</creator><creator>Schaller, Matthieu</creator><creator>Furlong, Michelle</creator><creator>Bower, Richard G.</creator><creator>Cole, Shaun</creator><creator>Crain, Robert A.</creator><creator>Frenk, Carlos S.</creator><creator>Helly, John C.</creator><creator>Lacey, Cedric G.</creator><creator>Lagos, Claudia del P.</creator><creator>Mitchell, Peter</creator><creator>Schaye, Joop</creator><creator>Theuns, Tom</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>KL.</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20161001</creationdate><title>Galaxies in the EAGLE hydrodynamical simulation and in the Durham and Munich semi-analytical models</title><author>Guo, Quan ; Gonzalez-Perez, Violeta ; Guo, Qi ; Schaller, Matthieu ; Furlong, Michelle ; Bower, Richard G. ; Cole, Shaun ; Crain, Robert A. ; Frenk, Carlos S. ; Helly, John C. ; Lacey, Cedric G. ; Lagos, Claudia del P. ; Mitchell, Peter ; Schaye, Joop ; Theuns, Tom</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c469t-2132d90000943d969d3533a46ebcb673ea8ff9104e9a859362d599cee74a2e663</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Astronomical models</topic><topic>Astronomy</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>Dark matter</topic><topic>Fluid mechanics</topic><topic>Galaxies</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><topic>Star formation rate</topic><topic>Stars &amp; galaxies</topic><topic>Stellar evolution</topic><topic>Stellar mass</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Guo, Quan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gonzalez-Perez, Violeta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guo, Qi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schaller, Matthieu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Furlong, Michelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bower, Richard G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cole, Shaun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crain, Robert A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frenk, Carlos S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Helly, John C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lacey, Cedric G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lagos, Claudia del P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mitchell, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schaye, Joop</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Theuns, Tom</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><jtitle>Monthly notices of the Royal Astronomical Society</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Guo, Quan</au><au>Gonzalez-Perez, Violeta</au><au>Guo, Qi</au><au>Schaller, Matthieu</au><au>Furlong, Michelle</au><au>Bower, Richard G.</au><au>Cole, Shaun</au><au>Crain, Robert A.</au><au>Frenk, Carlos S.</au><au>Helly, John C.</au><au>Lacey, Cedric G.</au><au>Lagos, Claudia del P.</au><au>Mitchell, Peter</au><au>Schaye, Joop</au><au>Theuns, Tom</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Galaxies in the EAGLE hydrodynamical simulation and in the Durham and Munich semi-analytical models</atitle><jtitle>Monthly notices of the Royal Astronomical Society</jtitle><date>2016-10-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>461</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>3457</spage><epage>3482</epage><pages>3457-3482</pages><issn>0035-8711</issn><eissn>1365-2966</eissn><abstract>We compare global predictions from the eagle hydrodynamical simulation, and two semi-analytic (SA) models of galaxy formation, l-galaxies and galform. All three models include the key physical processes for the formation and evolution of galaxies and their parameters are calibrated against a small number of observables at z ≈ 0. The two SA models have been applied to merger trees constructed from the eagle dark matter only simulation. We find that at z ≤ 2, both the galaxy stellar mass functions for stellar masses M * &lt; 1010.5 M⊙ and the median specific star formation rates (sSFRs) in the three models agree to better than 0.4 dex. The evolution of the sSFR predicted by the three models closely follows the mass assembly history of dark matter haloes. In both eagle and l-galaxies there are more central passive galaxies with M * &lt; 109.5 M⊙ than in galform. This difference is related to galaxies that have entered and then left a larger halo and which are treated as satellites in galform. In the range 0 &lt; z &lt; 1, the slope of the evolution of the star formation rate density in eagle is a factor of ≈1.5 steeper than for the two SA models. The median sizes for galaxies with M * &gt; 109.5 M⊙ differ in some instances by an order of magnitude, while the stellar mass–size relation in eagle is a factor of ≈2 tighter than for the two SA models. Our results suggest the need for a revision of how SA models treat the effect of baryonic self-gravity on the underlying dark matter. The treatment of gas flows in the models needs to be revised based on detailed comparison with observations to understand in particular the evolution of the stellar mass–metallicity relation.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/mnras/stw1525</doi><tpages>26</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier ISSN: 0035-8711
ispartof Monthly notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 2016-10, Vol.461 (4), p.3457-3482
issn 0035-8711
1365-2966
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1845836648
source Oxford Journals Open Access Collection
subjects Astronomical models
Astronomy
Comparative analysis
Computer simulation
Dark matter
Fluid mechanics
Galaxies
Mathematical models
Simulation
Star formation rate
Stars & galaxies
Stellar evolution
Stellar mass
title Galaxies in the EAGLE hydrodynamical simulation and in the Durham and Munich semi-analytical models
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-11T11%3A34%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_TOX&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Galaxies%20in%20the%20EAGLE%20hydrodynamical%20simulation%20and%20in%20the%20Durham%20and%20Munich%20semi-analytical%20models&rft.jtitle=Monthly%20notices%20of%20the%20Royal%20Astronomical%20Society&rft.au=Guo,%20Quan&rft.date=2016-10-01&rft.volume=461&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=3457&rft.epage=3482&rft.pages=3457-3482&rft.issn=0035-8711&rft.eissn=1365-2966&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/mnras/stw1525&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_TOX%3E4176869061%3C/proquest_TOX%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1818057713&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_oup_id=10.1093/mnras/stw1525&rfr_iscdi=true