Holistic and Iterative Development and Dissemination of Conceptual Traffic Signal Questions
AbstractConceptual questions can be used to improve student’s understanding through interactive engagement and formative assessment; however, there is a lack of developed conceptual questions in transportation engineering. This paper reports on the development, implementation, refinement, and evalua...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of professional issues in engineering education and practice 2016-10, Vol.142 (4) |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | |
container_title | Journal of professional issues in engineering education and practice |
container_volume | 142 |
creator | Abadi, Masoud Ghodrat Hurwitz, David S Brown, Shane |
description | AbstractConceptual questions can be used to improve student’s understanding through interactive engagement and formative assessment; however, there is a lack of developed conceptual questions in transportation engineering. This paper reports on the development, implementation, refinement, and evaluation of conceptual questions about traffic signals that include students rating of confidence in their solution. Based on student and practicing engineer traffic signal misconceptions, 94 conceptual questions were developed and implemented by 10 public university instructors. Five patterns of student responses were identified in terms of correctness and student confidence: all correct, all confident, all lack confidence, correct-confident combined with incorrect-lacks confidence, and correct-lacks confidence combined with incorrect-confident. Furthermore, the experiences of instructors using conceptual questions with students were considered through semistructured interviews. Conceptual questions about fundamental aspects of traffic engineering were most frequently selected, conventional multiple choice questions were the most popular type of questions, and enriching exam materials or creating challenging discussions were the primary goals of implementation. While every participant expressed that they will use the material again in the future, potential barriers to adoption remain. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943-5541.0000289 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1845828406</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1845828406</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a385t-2b035679f77bbe2d4d85bdf8c0807c86ca21ff0f5fb5bffe96b2aaf922d41fbf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMFPwyAUxonRxDn9HxpP89AJtLTU21Kra7LEmM2TBwItGJa2VGiX-N9L3bKb78J7vO_7CD8A7hFcIpigx8VqmxcPRblEWRyFhMRoCX1hml2A2fnu0veQ4DDKML0GN87tJw2J4Ax8rk2j3aCrgHd1UA7S8kEfZPAsD7IxfSu74W_zrJ2Tre781nSBUUFuukr2w8ibYGe5Uj5hq786P76P0k0qdwuuFG-cvDudc_DxUuzydbh5ey3z1SbkESVDiAWMSJJmKk2FkLiOa0pErWgFKUwrmlQcI6WgIkoQoZTMEoE5Vxn2UqSEiuZgccztrfmeHmetdpVsGt5JMzqGaEwopjFMvPTpKK2scc5KxXqrW25_GIJsIsrYRJQVJZvosYkeOxH15uRo5j6d7c1o_Xfd2fm_8Re5F3yM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1845828406</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Holistic and Iterative Development and Dissemination of Conceptual Traffic Signal Questions</title><source>American Society of Civil Engineers:NESLI2:Journals:2014</source><creator>Abadi, Masoud Ghodrat ; Hurwitz, David S ; Brown, Shane</creator><creatorcontrib>Abadi, Masoud Ghodrat ; Hurwitz, David S ; Brown, Shane</creatorcontrib><description>AbstractConceptual questions can be used to improve student’s understanding through interactive engagement and formative assessment; however, there is a lack of developed conceptual questions in transportation engineering. This paper reports on the development, implementation, refinement, and evaluation of conceptual questions about traffic signals that include students rating of confidence in their solution. Based on student and practicing engineer traffic signal misconceptions, 94 conceptual questions were developed and implemented by 10 public university instructors. Five patterns of student responses were identified in terms of correctness and student confidence: all correct, all confident, all lack confidence, correct-confident combined with incorrect-lacks confidence, and correct-lacks confidence combined with incorrect-confident. Furthermore, the experiences of instructors using conceptual questions with students were considered through semistructured interviews. Conceptual questions about fundamental aspects of traffic engineering were most frequently selected, conventional multiple choice questions were the most popular type of questions, and enriching exam materials or creating challenging discussions were the primary goals of implementation. While every participant expressed that they will use the material again in the future, potential barriers to adoption remain.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1052-3928</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1943-5541</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943-5541.0000289</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>American Society of Civil Engineers</publisher><subject>Assessments ; Confidence ; Instructors ; Materials selection ; Potential barriers ; Students ; Technical Papers ; Traffic signals ; Transportation engineering</subject><ispartof>Journal of professional issues in engineering education and practice, 2016-10, Vol.142 (4)</ispartof><rights>2016 American Society of Civil Engineers</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a385t-2b035679f77bbe2d4d85bdf8c0807c86ca21ff0f5fb5bffe96b2aaf922d41fbf3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a385t-2b035679f77bbe2d4d85bdf8c0807c86ca21ff0f5fb5bffe96b2aaf922d41fbf3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttp://ascelibrary.org/doi/pdf/10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943-5541.0000289$$EPDF$$P50$$Gasce$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://ascelibrary.org/doi/abs/10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943-5541.0000289$$EHTML$$P50$$Gasce$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,76193,76201</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Abadi, Masoud Ghodrat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hurwitz, David S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, Shane</creatorcontrib><title>Holistic and Iterative Development and Dissemination of Conceptual Traffic Signal Questions</title><title>Journal of professional issues in engineering education and practice</title><description>AbstractConceptual questions can be used to improve student’s understanding through interactive engagement and formative assessment; however, there is a lack of developed conceptual questions in transportation engineering. This paper reports on the development, implementation, refinement, and evaluation of conceptual questions about traffic signals that include students rating of confidence in their solution. Based on student and practicing engineer traffic signal misconceptions, 94 conceptual questions were developed and implemented by 10 public university instructors. Five patterns of student responses were identified in terms of correctness and student confidence: all correct, all confident, all lack confidence, correct-confident combined with incorrect-lacks confidence, and correct-lacks confidence combined with incorrect-confident. Furthermore, the experiences of instructors using conceptual questions with students were considered through semistructured interviews. Conceptual questions about fundamental aspects of traffic engineering were most frequently selected, conventional multiple choice questions were the most popular type of questions, and enriching exam materials or creating challenging discussions were the primary goals of implementation. While every participant expressed that they will use the material again in the future, potential barriers to adoption remain.</description><subject>Assessments</subject><subject>Confidence</subject><subject>Instructors</subject><subject>Materials selection</subject><subject>Potential barriers</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Technical Papers</subject><subject>Traffic signals</subject><subject>Transportation engineering</subject><issn>1052-3928</issn><issn>1943-5541</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kMFPwyAUxonRxDn9HxpP89AJtLTU21Kra7LEmM2TBwItGJa2VGiX-N9L3bKb78J7vO_7CD8A7hFcIpigx8VqmxcPRblEWRyFhMRoCX1hml2A2fnu0veQ4DDKML0GN87tJw2J4Ax8rk2j3aCrgHd1UA7S8kEfZPAsD7IxfSu74W_zrJ2Tre781nSBUUFuukr2w8ibYGe5Uj5hq786P76P0k0qdwuuFG-cvDudc_DxUuzydbh5ey3z1SbkESVDiAWMSJJmKk2FkLiOa0pErWgFKUwrmlQcI6WgIkoQoZTMEoE5Vxn2UqSEiuZgccztrfmeHmetdpVsGt5JMzqGaEwopjFMvPTpKK2scc5KxXqrW25_GIJsIsrYRJQVJZvosYkeOxH15uRo5j6d7c1o_Xfd2fm_8Re5F3yM</recordid><startdate>20161001</startdate><enddate>20161001</enddate><creator>Abadi, Masoud Ghodrat</creator><creator>Hurwitz, David S</creator><creator>Brown, Shane</creator><general>American Society of Civil Engineers</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20161001</creationdate><title>Holistic and Iterative Development and Dissemination of Conceptual Traffic Signal Questions</title><author>Abadi, Masoud Ghodrat ; Hurwitz, David S ; Brown, Shane</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a385t-2b035679f77bbe2d4d85bdf8c0807c86ca21ff0f5fb5bffe96b2aaf922d41fbf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Assessments</topic><topic>Confidence</topic><topic>Instructors</topic><topic>Materials selection</topic><topic>Potential barriers</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Technical Papers</topic><topic>Traffic signals</topic><topic>Transportation engineering</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Abadi, Masoud Ghodrat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hurwitz, David S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, Shane</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of professional issues in engineering education and practice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Abadi, Masoud Ghodrat</au><au>Hurwitz, David S</au><au>Brown, Shane</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Holistic and Iterative Development and Dissemination of Conceptual Traffic Signal Questions</atitle><jtitle>Journal of professional issues in engineering education and practice</jtitle><date>2016-10-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>142</volume><issue>4</issue><issn>1052-3928</issn><eissn>1943-5541</eissn><abstract>AbstractConceptual questions can be used to improve student’s understanding through interactive engagement and formative assessment; however, there is a lack of developed conceptual questions in transportation engineering. This paper reports on the development, implementation, refinement, and evaluation of conceptual questions about traffic signals that include students rating of confidence in their solution. Based on student and practicing engineer traffic signal misconceptions, 94 conceptual questions were developed and implemented by 10 public university instructors. Five patterns of student responses were identified in terms of correctness and student confidence: all correct, all confident, all lack confidence, correct-confident combined with incorrect-lacks confidence, and correct-lacks confidence combined with incorrect-confident. Furthermore, the experiences of instructors using conceptual questions with students were considered through semistructured interviews. Conceptual questions about fundamental aspects of traffic engineering were most frequently selected, conventional multiple choice questions were the most popular type of questions, and enriching exam materials or creating challenging discussions were the primary goals of implementation. While every participant expressed that they will use the material again in the future, potential barriers to adoption remain.</abstract><pub>American Society of Civil Engineers</pub><doi>10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943-5541.0000289</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1052-3928 |
ispartof | Journal of professional issues in engineering education and practice, 2016-10, Vol.142 (4) |
issn | 1052-3928 1943-5541 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1845828406 |
source | American Society of Civil Engineers:NESLI2:Journals:2014 |
subjects | Assessments Confidence Instructors Materials selection Potential barriers Students Technical Papers Traffic signals Transportation engineering |
title | Holistic and Iterative Development and Dissemination of Conceptual Traffic Signal Questions |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-30T22%3A12%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Holistic%20and%20Iterative%20Development%20and%20Dissemination%20of%20Conceptual%20Traffic%20Signal%20Questions&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20professional%20issues%20in%20engineering%20education%20and%20practice&rft.au=Abadi,%20Masoud%20Ghodrat&rft.date=2016-10-01&rft.volume=142&rft.issue=4&rft.issn=1052-3928&rft.eissn=1943-5541&rft_id=info:doi/10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943-5541.0000289&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1845828406%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1845828406&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |