Beyond procedures: Team reflection in a rail control centre to enhance resilience
[Display omitted] •Team reflection is proposed to enhance resilience of a rail sociotechnical system, complementing its proceduralization.•A reflection tool is designed and prototyped to present weak resilience signals and support analysis to locate identifiable details.•An observational study revea...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Safety science 2017-01, Vol.91, p.181-191 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 191 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 181 |
container_title | Safety science |
container_volume | 91 |
creator | Siegel, A.W. Schraagen, J.M.C. |
description | [Display omitted]
•Team reflection is proposed to enhance resilience of a rail sociotechnical system, complementing its proceduralization.•A reflection tool is designed and prototyped to present weak resilience signals and support analysis to locate identifiable details.•An observational study revealed discussion topics, similar to a near accident, making resilience related knowledge, beyond procedures, explicit.
Resilience engineering concepts can complement proceduralization of complex sociotechnical systems (STS). Proceduralization aims at defining precise and quantified system objectives, and at defining a process that describes and prescribes how to achieve those objectives. Although proceduralization has been successfully implemented to capture knowledge and experience, it is limited when the unexpected and unforeseen occurs. Resilience engineering focuses on this drawback and seeks for concepts to enable adaptive responses in these situations. We propose a team reflection process to enhance resilience of a rail STS, complementing its proceduralization. In the present study, we describe how rail signallers used team reflection, supported by a tool that allowed in-depth post-shift inspection of train movements. A near accident, occurring during a one-week observation, is described and used for two purposes. First, it was used as an example to explain the usage of the support tool. Second, it was used as a reference case of topics playing a role in evolving accidents. The analysis showed that the topic categories discussed during the team reflections were similar to the incident categories. This means that relevant topics are available, when things go right, to learn from and anticipate on. In addition, we showed that rail signallers, over the course of the observations, increasingly analysed and reasoned about their work. This enriched knowledge beyond procedures, enhancing the ability to cope with the unexpected and unforeseen. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.ssci.2016.08.013 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1845812158</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0925753516301758</els_id><sourcerecordid>1845812158</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-4cb62f6ff8f768baf5112585c8f754376a608f29d2d17196d8d7fdea53d1718b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkE1LxDAQhoMouK7-AU85emnNpE2bihdd_IIFEdZzyCYTzNJt1qQr-O9NWc_i6Z2B5w2Zh5BLYCUwaK43ZUrGlzzPJZMlg-qIzEC2XQGs5sdkxjouilZU4pScpbRhLCMNzMjbPX6HwdJdDAbtPmK6oSvUWxrR9WhGHwbqB6pp1L6nJgxjDDkxJ9IxUBw-9GAw48n3HvN4Tk6c7hNe_OacvD8-rBbPxfL16WVxtyxMDWwsarNuuGuck65t5Fo7AcCFFCbvoq7aRjdMOt5ZbqGFrrHSts6iFtW0y3U1J1eHd_PXP_eYRrX1yWDf6wHDPimQtZDAQch_oFVbcS7rLqP8gJoYUsoS1C76rY7fCpiaVKuNmlSrSbViUmWPuXR7KGG-98tjVJmYXFgfs0Nlg_-r_gNPe4cb</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1837322849</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Beyond procedures: Team reflection in a rail control centre to enhance resilience</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Siegel, A.W. ; Schraagen, J.M.C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Siegel, A.W. ; Schraagen, J.M.C.</creatorcontrib><description>[Display omitted]
•Team reflection is proposed to enhance resilience of a rail sociotechnical system, complementing its proceduralization.•A reflection tool is designed and prototyped to present weak resilience signals and support analysis to locate identifiable details.•An observational study revealed discussion topics, similar to a near accident, making resilience related knowledge, beyond procedures, explicit.
Resilience engineering concepts can complement proceduralization of complex sociotechnical systems (STS). Proceduralization aims at defining precise and quantified system objectives, and at defining a process that describes and prescribes how to achieve those objectives. Although proceduralization has been successfully implemented to capture knowledge and experience, it is limited when the unexpected and unforeseen occurs. Resilience engineering focuses on this drawback and seeks for concepts to enable adaptive responses in these situations. We propose a team reflection process to enhance resilience of a rail STS, complementing its proceduralization. In the present study, we describe how rail signallers used team reflection, supported by a tool that allowed in-depth post-shift inspection of train movements. A near accident, occurring during a one-week observation, is described and used for two purposes. First, it was used as an example to explain the usage of the support tool. Second, it was used as a reference case of topics playing a role in evolving accidents. The analysis showed that the topic categories discussed during the team reflections were similar to the incident categories. This means that relevant topics are available, when things go right, to learn from and anticipate on. In addition, we showed that rail signallers, over the course of the observations, increasingly analysed and reasoned about their work. This enriched knowledge beyond procedures, enhancing the ability to cope with the unexpected and unforeseen.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0925-7535</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1042</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2016.08.013</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Accidents ; Categories ; Evolution ; Inspection ; Movements ; Naturalistic observation ; Proceduralization ; Rail control centre ; Rail signaller ; Rails ; Reflection ; Resilience ; Resilience engineering ; Sociotechnical system ; Team reflection</subject><ispartof>Safety science, 2017-01, Vol.91, p.181-191</ispartof><rights>2016 The Author(s)</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-4cb62f6ff8f768baf5112585c8f754376a608f29d2d17196d8d7fdea53d1718b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-4cb62f6ff8f768baf5112585c8f754376a608f29d2d17196d8d7fdea53d1718b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925753516301758$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Siegel, A.W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schraagen, J.M.C.</creatorcontrib><title>Beyond procedures: Team reflection in a rail control centre to enhance resilience</title><title>Safety science</title><description>[Display omitted]
•Team reflection is proposed to enhance resilience of a rail sociotechnical system, complementing its proceduralization.•A reflection tool is designed and prototyped to present weak resilience signals and support analysis to locate identifiable details.•An observational study revealed discussion topics, similar to a near accident, making resilience related knowledge, beyond procedures, explicit.
Resilience engineering concepts can complement proceduralization of complex sociotechnical systems (STS). Proceduralization aims at defining precise and quantified system objectives, and at defining a process that describes and prescribes how to achieve those objectives. Although proceduralization has been successfully implemented to capture knowledge and experience, it is limited when the unexpected and unforeseen occurs. Resilience engineering focuses on this drawback and seeks for concepts to enable adaptive responses in these situations. We propose a team reflection process to enhance resilience of a rail STS, complementing its proceduralization. In the present study, we describe how rail signallers used team reflection, supported by a tool that allowed in-depth post-shift inspection of train movements. A near accident, occurring during a one-week observation, is described and used for two purposes. First, it was used as an example to explain the usage of the support tool. Second, it was used as a reference case of topics playing a role in evolving accidents. The analysis showed that the topic categories discussed during the team reflections were similar to the incident categories. This means that relevant topics are available, when things go right, to learn from and anticipate on. In addition, we showed that rail signallers, over the course of the observations, increasingly analysed and reasoned about their work. This enriched knowledge beyond procedures, enhancing the ability to cope with the unexpected and unforeseen.</description><subject>Accidents</subject><subject>Categories</subject><subject>Evolution</subject><subject>Inspection</subject><subject>Movements</subject><subject>Naturalistic observation</subject><subject>Proceduralization</subject><subject>Rail control centre</subject><subject>Rail signaller</subject><subject>Rails</subject><subject>Reflection</subject><subject>Resilience</subject><subject>Resilience engineering</subject><subject>Sociotechnical system</subject><subject>Team reflection</subject><issn>0925-7535</issn><issn>1879-1042</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkE1LxDAQhoMouK7-AU85emnNpE2bihdd_IIFEdZzyCYTzNJt1qQr-O9NWc_i6Z2B5w2Zh5BLYCUwaK43ZUrGlzzPJZMlg-qIzEC2XQGs5sdkxjouilZU4pScpbRhLCMNzMjbPX6HwdJdDAbtPmK6oSvUWxrR9WhGHwbqB6pp1L6nJgxjDDkxJ9IxUBw-9GAw48n3HvN4Tk6c7hNe_OacvD8-rBbPxfL16WVxtyxMDWwsarNuuGuck65t5Fo7AcCFFCbvoq7aRjdMOt5ZbqGFrrHSts6iFtW0y3U1J1eHd_PXP_eYRrX1yWDf6wHDPimQtZDAQch_oFVbcS7rLqP8gJoYUsoS1C76rY7fCpiaVKuNmlSrSbViUmWPuXR7KGG-98tjVJmYXFgfs0Nlg_-r_gNPe4cb</recordid><startdate>201701</startdate><enddate>201701</enddate><creator>Siegel, A.W.</creator><creator>Schraagen, J.M.C.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201701</creationdate><title>Beyond procedures: Team reflection in a rail control centre to enhance resilience</title><author>Siegel, A.W. ; Schraagen, J.M.C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c410t-4cb62f6ff8f768baf5112585c8f754376a608f29d2d17196d8d7fdea53d1718b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Accidents</topic><topic>Categories</topic><topic>Evolution</topic><topic>Inspection</topic><topic>Movements</topic><topic>Naturalistic observation</topic><topic>Proceduralization</topic><topic>Rail control centre</topic><topic>Rail signaller</topic><topic>Rails</topic><topic>Reflection</topic><topic>Resilience</topic><topic>Resilience engineering</topic><topic>Sociotechnical system</topic><topic>Team reflection</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Siegel, A.W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schraagen, J.M.C.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Safety science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Siegel, A.W.</au><au>Schraagen, J.M.C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Beyond procedures: Team reflection in a rail control centre to enhance resilience</atitle><jtitle>Safety science</jtitle><date>2017-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>91</volume><spage>181</spage><epage>191</epage><pages>181-191</pages><issn>0925-7535</issn><eissn>1879-1042</eissn><abstract>[Display omitted]
•Team reflection is proposed to enhance resilience of a rail sociotechnical system, complementing its proceduralization.•A reflection tool is designed and prototyped to present weak resilience signals and support analysis to locate identifiable details.•An observational study revealed discussion topics, similar to a near accident, making resilience related knowledge, beyond procedures, explicit.
Resilience engineering concepts can complement proceduralization of complex sociotechnical systems (STS). Proceduralization aims at defining precise and quantified system objectives, and at defining a process that describes and prescribes how to achieve those objectives. Although proceduralization has been successfully implemented to capture knowledge and experience, it is limited when the unexpected and unforeseen occurs. Resilience engineering focuses on this drawback and seeks for concepts to enable adaptive responses in these situations. We propose a team reflection process to enhance resilience of a rail STS, complementing its proceduralization. In the present study, we describe how rail signallers used team reflection, supported by a tool that allowed in-depth post-shift inspection of train movements. A near accident, occurring during a one-week observation, is described and used for two purposes. First, it was used as an example to explain the usage of the support tool. Second, it was used as a reference case of topics playing a role in evolving accidents. The analysis showed that the topic categories discussed during the team reflections were similar to the incident categories. This means that relevant topics are available, when things go right, to learn from and anticipate on. In addition, we showed that rail signallers, over the course of the observations, increasingly analysed and reasoned about their work. This enriched knowledge beyond procedures, enhancing the ability to cope with the unexpected and unforeseen.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.ssci.2016.08.013</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0925-7535 |
ispartof | Safety science, 2017-01, Vol.91, p.181-191 |
issn | 0925-7535 1879-1042 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1845812158 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
subjects | Accidents Categories Evolution Inspection Movements Naturalistic observation Proceduralization Rail control centre Rail signaller Rails Reflection Resilience Resilience engineering Sociotechnical system Team reflection |
title | Beyond procedures: Team reflection in a rail control centre to enhance resilience |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T09%3A49%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Beyond%20procedures:%20Team%20reflection%20in%20a%20rail%20control%20centre%20to%20enhance%20resilience&rft.jtitle=Safety%20science&rft.au=Siegel,%20A.W.&rft.date=2017-01&rft.volume=91&rft.spage=181&rft.epage=191&rft.pages=181-191&rft.issn=0925-7535&rft.eissn=1879-1042&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ssci.2016.08.013&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1845812158%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1837322849&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0925753516301758&rfr_iscdi=true |