Radiological, stereological, and microscopic evaluation of the quality of canal fillings in oval‐shaped root canals prepared with self‐adjusting file
Summary The aim of this study was to evaluate the quality of the canal fillings performed by thermoplastic technique (Herofill) and cold lateral condensation (CLC) techniques in oval shaped canals following self‐adjusting file (SAF) preparation using radiological, stereological, and microscopic eval...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Scanning 2016-09, Vol.38 (5), p.427-433 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 433 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 5 |
| container_start_page | 427 |
| container_title | Scanning |
| container_volume | 38 |
| creator | Uzunoglu, Emel Ilgın, Can Yuruker, Sinan Görduysus, Melahat |
| description | Summary
The aim of this study was to evaluate the quality of the canal fillings performed by thermoplastic technique (Herofill) and cold lateral condensation (CLC) techniques in oval shaped canals following self‐adjusting file (SAF) preparation using radiological, stereological, and microscopic evaluation methods. Twelve pairs of oval‐shaped root canals were prepared with SAF and filled using CLC (n = 12) or the Herofill system (n = 12). The quality of the root canal filling was evaluated by (i) scoring bidirectional storage phosphor plate images, (ii) stereological (volumetric) analysis of cone beam computerized tomography (CBCT) images, and (iii) microscopic analysis of the cross‐sectioned area of the canal and gutta‐percha via image analysis software. Chi‐square test, t‐test, and Mann–Whitney U‐tests were used respectively (p |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1002/sca.21289 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1845801149</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4205965591</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4919-20d493ec3c58f7a8f1dab7551023fa798939b1dfa7f7bc9b2fa8df97ffe41f933</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkcuKFDEUhoMoTtu68AUk4EbBmsml0pUsh8YbDAhe1sWpXKbTpCs1SZVD73yE2c7r-SSmrFFBEFfJCd_5kpwfoaeUnFJC2FnWcMook-oeWlHFWSWbWtxHK0I3tCK1aE7Qo5z3pLBK0ofohG0aQkvDCt1-BONjiJdeQ3iF82iT_VNCb_DB6xSzjoPX2H6FMMHoY4-jw-PO4qsJgh-Pc6mhh4CdD8H3lxn7whT8-7ebvIPBGpxiHBco4yHZAVI5vPbjDmcbXOHA7Kc8luZZYh-jB66g9sndukZf3rz-vH1XXXx4-357flHpWlFVMWJqxa3mWkjXgHTUQNcIQQnjDholFVcdNWXrmk6rjjmQxqnGOVtTpzhfoxeLd0jxarJ5bA8-axsC9DZOuaWyFrJMq9zyf5QLrqjYzNbnf6H7OKX574ViGyY4Lw9co5cLNY84J-vaIfkDpGNLSTtH25Zo25_RFvbZnXHqDtb8Jn9lWYCzBbgu0zv-29R-2p4vyh8WbrGu</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1826253302</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Radiological, stereological, and microscopic evaluation of the quality of canal fillings in oval‐shaped root canals prepared with self‐adjusting file</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Uzunoglu, Emel ; Ilgın, Can ; Yuruker, Sinan ; Görduysus, Melahat</creator><creatorcontrib>Uzunoglu, Emel ; Ilgın, Can ; Yuruker, Sinan ; Görduysus, Melahat</creatorcontrib><description>Summary
The aim of this study was to evaluate the quality of the canal fillings performed by thermoplastic technique (Herofill) and cold lateral condensation (CLC) techniques in oval shaped canals following self‐adjusting file (SAF) preparation using radiological, stereological, and microscopic evaluation methods. Twelve pairs of oval‐shaped root canals were prepared with SAF and filled using CLC (n = 12) or the Herofill system (n = 12). The quality of the root canal filling was evaluated by (i) scoring bidirectional storage phosphor plate images, (ii) stereological (volumetric) analysis of cone beam computerized tomography (CBCT) images, and (iii) microscopic analysis of the cross‐sectioned area of the canal and gutta‐percha via image analysis software. Chi‐square test, t‐test, and Mann–Whitney U‐tests were used respectively (p < 0.05) for the aforementioned evaluations. 58.33% of the fillings (total n = 24) that were found to be sufficient in a bucco‐lingual (BL) projection were considered insufficient in the mesio‐distal (MD) projection according to radiological scoring. The difference in the findings between the two types of projections (BL and MD) was significant (p < 0.05). The results of the stereological evaluation of CBCT images and image analysis of cross‐sections showed no statistically significant difference between the CLC and Herofill (p > 0.05). Herofill was not superior to cold lateral compaction. Stereology can be used to obtain unbiased information about the volume of root canal fillings. Both filling techniques failed to achieve the desirable goal of 0% empty volume in all of the cases and all evaluation systems confirmed this result. SCANNING 38:427–433, 2016. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0161-0457</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-8745</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/sca.21289</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26701128</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Hindawi Limited</publisher><subject>Adjustment ; Canals ; Cross sections ; dentistry ; Image analysis ; Image quality ; imaging processing ; Projection ; Scanning ; Scoring ; stereology ; tomography</subject><ispartof>Scanning, 2016-09, Vol.38 (5), p.427-433</ispartof><rights>Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4919-20d493ec3c58f7a8f1dab7551023fa798939b1dfa7f7bc9b2fa8df97ffe41f933</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4919-20d493ec3c58f7a8f1dab7551023fa798939b1dfa7f7bc9b2fa8df97ffe41f933</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26701128$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Uzunoglu, Emel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ilgın, Can</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yuruker, Sinan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Görduysus, Melahat</creatorcontrib><title>Radiological, stereological, and microscopic evaluation of the quality of canal fillings in oval‐shaped root canals prepared with self‐adjusting file</title><title>Scanning</title><addtitle>Scanning</addtitle><description>Summary
The aim of this study was to evaluate the quality of the canal fillings performed by thermoplastic technique (Herofill) and cold lateral condensation (CLC) techniques in oval shaped canals following self‐adjusting file (SAF) preparation using radiological, stereological, and microscopic evaluation methods. Twelve pairs of oval‐shaped root canals were prepared with SAF and filled using CLC (n = 12) or the Herofill system (n = 12). The quality of the root canal filling was evaluated by (i) scoring bidirectional storage phosphor plate images, (ii) stereological (volumetric) analysis of cone beam computerized tomography (CBCT) images, and (iii) microscopic analysis of the cross‐sectioned area of the canal and gutta‐percha via image analysis software. Chi‐square test, t‐test, and Mann–Whitney U‐tests were used respectively (p < 0.05) for the aforementioned evaluations. 58.33% of the fillings (total n = 24) that were found to be sufficient in a bucco‐lingual (BL) projection were considered insufficient in the mesio‐distal (MD) projection according to radiological scoring. The difference in the findings between the two types of projections (BL and MD) was significant (p < 0.05). The results of the stereological evaluation of CBCT images and image analysis of cross‐sections showed no statistically significant difference between the CLC and Herofill (p > 0.05). Herofill was not superior to cold lateral compaction. Stereology can be used to obtain unbiased information about the volume of root canal fillings. Both filling techniques failed to achieve the desirable goal of 0% empty volume in all of the cases and all evaluation systems confirmed this result. SCANNING 38:427–433, 2016. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</description><subject>Adjustment</subject><subject>Canals</subject><subject>Cross sections</subject><subject>dentistry</subject><subject>Image analysis</subject><subject>Image quality</subject><subject>imaging processing</subject><subject>Projection</subject><subject>Scanning</subject><subject>Scoring</subject><subject>stereology</subject><subject>tomography</subject><issn>0161-0457</issn><issn>1932-8745</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkcuKFDEUhoMoTtu68AUk4EbBmsml0pUsh8YbDAhe1sWpXKbTpCs1SZVD73yE2c7r-SSmrFFBEFfJCd_5kpwfoaeUnFJC2FnWcMook-oeWlHFWSWbWtxHK0I3tCK1aE7Qo5z3pLBK0ofohG0aQkvDCt1-BONjiJdeQ3iF82iT_VNCb_DB6xSzjoPX2H6FMMHoY4-jw-PO4qsJgh-Pc6mhh4CdD8H3lxn7whT8-7ebvIPBGpxiHBco4yHZAVI5vPbjDmcbXOHA7Kc8luZZYh-jB66g9sndukZf3rz-vH1XXXx4-357flHpWlFVMWJqxa3mWkjXgHTUQNcIQQnjDholFVcdNWXrmk6rjjmQxqnGOVtTpzhfoxeLd0jxarJ5bA8-axsC9DZOuaWyFrJMq9zyf5QLrqjYzNbnf6H7OKX574ViGyY4Lw9co5cLNY84J-vaIfkDpGNLSTtH25Zo25_RFvbZnXHqDtb8Jn9lWYCzBbgu0zv-29R-2p4vyh8WbrGu</recordid><startdate>201609</startdate><enddate>201609</enddate><creator>Uzunoglu, Emel</creator><creator>Ilgın, Can</creator><creator>Yuruker, Sinan</creator><creator>Görduysus, Melahat</creator><general>Hindawi Limited</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201609</creationdate><title>Radiological, stereological, and microscopic evaluation of the quality of canal fillings in oval‐shaped root canals prepared with self‐adjusting file</title><author>Uzunoglu, Emel ; Ilgın, Can ; Yuruker, Sinan ; Görduysus, Melahat</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4919-20d493ec3c58f7a8f1dab7551023fa798939b1dfa7f7bc9b2fa8df97ffe41f933</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Adjustment</topic><topic>Canals</topic><topic>Cross sections</topic><topic>dentistry</topic><topic>Image analysis</topic><topic>Image quality</topic><topic>imaging processing</topic><topic>Projection</topic><topic>Scanning</topic><topic>Scoring</topic><topic>stereology</topic><topic>tomography</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Uzunoglu, Emel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ilgın, Can</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yuruker, Sinan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Görduysus, Melahat</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Computer Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Scanning</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Uzunoglu, Emel</au><au>Ilgın, Can</au><au>Yuruker, Sinan</au><au>Görduysus, Melahat</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Radiological, stereological, and microscopic evaluation of the quality of canal fillings in oval‐shaped root canals prepared with self‐adjusting file</atitle><jtitle>Scanning</jtitle><addtitle>Scanning</addtitle><date>2016-09</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>427</spage><epage>433</epage><pages>427-433</pages><issn>0161-0457</issn><eissn>1932-8745</eissn><abstract>Summary
The aim of this study was to evaluate the quality of the canal fillings performed by thermoplastic technique (Herofill) and cold lateral condensation (CLC) techniques in oval shaped canals following self‐adjusting file (SAF) preparation using radiological, stereological, and microscopic evaluation methods. Twelve pairs of oval‐shaped root canals were prepared with SAF and filled using CLC (n = 12) or the Herofill system (n = 12). The quality of the root canal filling was evaluated by (i) scoring bidirectional storage phosphor plate images, (ii) stereological (volumetric) analysis of cone beam computerized tomography (CBCT) images, and (iii) microscopic analysis of the cross‐sectioned area of the canal and gutta‐percha via image analysis software. Chi‐square test, t‐test, and Mann–Whitney U‐tests were used respectively (p < 0.05) for the aforementioned evaluations. 58.33% of the fillings (total n = 24) that were found to be sufficient in a bucco‐lingual (BL) projection were considered insufficient in the mesio‐distal (MD) projection according to radiological scoring. The difference in the findings between the two types of projections (BL and MD) was significant (p < 0.05). The results of the stereological evaluation of CBCT images and image analysis of cross‐sections showed no statistically significant difference between the CLC and Herofill (p > 0.05). Herofill was not superior to cold lateral compaction. Stereology can be used to obtain unbiased information about the volume of root canal fillings. Both filling techniques failed to achieve the desirable goal of 0% empty volume in all of the cases and all evaluation systems confirmed this result. SCANNING 38:427–433, 2016. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Hindawi Limited</pub><pmid>26701128</pmid><doi>10.1002/sca.21289</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0161-0457 |
| ispartof | Scanning, 2016-09, Vol.38 (5), p.427-433 |
| issn | 0161-0457 1932-8745 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1845801149 |
| source | EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
| subjects | Adjustment Canals Cross sections dentistry Image analysis Image quality imaging processing Projection Scanning Scoring stereology tomography |
| title | Radiological, stereological, and microscopic evaluation of the quality of canal fillings in oval‐shaped root canals prepared with self‐adjusting file |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T08%3A48%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Radiological,%20stereological,%20and%20microscopic%20evaluation%20of%20the%20quality%20of%20canal%20fillings%20in%20oval%E2%80%90shaped%20root%20canals%20prepared%20with%20self%E2%80%90adjusting%20file&rft.jtitle=Scanning&rft.au=Uzunoglu,%20Emel&rft.date=2016-09&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=427&rft.epage=433&rft.pages=427-433&rft.issn=0161-0457&rft.eissn=1932-8745&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/sca.21289&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4205965591%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1826253302&rft_id=info:pmid/26701128&rfr_iscdi=true |