Dutch guideline on food allergy

The diagnosis of food allergy is established in cases where an immediate allergic reaction has occurred in the last year to a clearly identifiable allergenic food combined with sensitisation to this allergenic food. In all other cases, a food challenge test is required to establish or reject the dia...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Netherlands journal of medicine 2016-11, Vol.74 (9), p.376-382
Hauptverfasser: van Maaren, M S, Dubois, A E J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 382
container_issue 9
container_start_page 376
container_title Netherlands journal of medicine
container_volume 74
creator van Maaren, M S
Dubois, A E J
description The diagnosis of food allergy is established in cases where an immediate allergic reaction has occurred in the last year to a clearly identifiable allergenic food combined with sensitisation to this allergenic food. In all other cases, a food challenge test is required to establish or reject the diagnosis of food allergy. Although the double-blind placebo-controlled food challenge (DBPCFC) test is considered the gold standard, false-positive and false-negative outcomes occur. The incidence of false-positive outcomes is unknown because the results of DBPCFC tests cannot be further confirmed by other tests. If possible, it is important to perform double-blind challenges with recipes that have been validated for blinding and to use challenge procedures that have been proven safe in clinical practice, in order to reduce the risk of unwanted false-positive and false-negative outcomes and severe challenge reactions. The national guideline of the Dutch Society of Allergology describes when challenges are indicated and contraindicated, how food challenges are best conducted and how patients could best be managed and followed-up after the challenge tests have been completed.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1845253701</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1845253701</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p211t-1366b5fbeb94cd30f3f970050c992dcaa4ba2a6e14325a6ba9e6afc29a2a94c13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1j0tLAzEUhYMgtrb-BZ2lm4G80yylPqHgxq6Hm-SmjmQeTiaL_nsr1tWBw_cdOBdkyTaG15ZqtiDXOX9RSrWx6oosuLFUCSaX5O6xzP6zOpQ2YGp7rIa-isMQKkgJp8NxTS4jpIw351yR_fPTx_a13r2_vG0fdvXIGZtrJrR2Kjp0VvogaBTRGkoV9dby4AGkAw4amRRcgXZgUUP03J7ak8HEitz_7Y7T8F0wz03XZo8pQY9DyQ3bSMWVMPQXvT2jxXUYmnFqO5iOzf8p8QNxFEYF</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1845253701</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Dutch guideline on food allergy</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>van Maaren, M S ; Dubois, A E J</creator><creatorcontrib>van Maaren, M S ; Dubois, A E J</creatorcontrib><description>The diagnosis of food allergy is established in cases where an immediate allergic reaction has occurred in the last year to a clearly identifiable allergenic food combined with sensitisation to this allergenic food. In all other cases, a food challenge test is required to establish or reject the diagnosis of food allergy. Although the double-blind placebo-controlled food challenge (DBPCFC) test is considered the gold standard, false-positive and false-negative outcomes occur. The incidence of false-positive outcomes is unknown because the results of DBPCFC tests cannot be further confirmed by other tests. If possible, it is important to perform double-blind challenges with recipes that have been validated for blinding and to use challenge procedures that have been proven safe in clinical practice, in order to reduce the risk of unwanted false-positive and false-negative outcomes and severe challenge reactions. The national guideline of the Dutch Society of Allergology describes when challenges are indicated and contraindicated, how food challenges are best conducted and how patients could best be managed and followed-up after the challenge tests have been completed.</description><identifier>EISSN: 1872-9061</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27905314</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands</publisher><subject>Allergens ; Double-Blind Method ; Food Hypersensitivity - diagnosis ; Humans ; Netherlands ; Practice Guidelines as Topic</subject><ispartof>Netherlands journal of medicine, 2016-11, Vol.74 (9), p.376-382</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27905314$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>van Maaren, M S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dubois, A E J</creatorcontrib><title>Dutch guideline on food allergy</title><title>Netherlands journal of medicine</title><addtitle>Neth J Med</addtitle><description>The diagnosis of food allergy is established in cases where an immediate allergic reaction has occurred in the last year to a clearly identifiable allergenic food combined with sensitisation to this allergenic food. In all other cases, a food challenge test is required to establish or reject the diagnosis of food allergy. Although the double-blind placebo-controlled food challenge (DBPCFC) test is considered the gold standard, false-positive and false-negative outcomes occur. The incidence of false-positive outcomes is unknown because the results of DBPCFC tests cannot be further confirmed by other tests. If possible, it is important to perform double-blind challenges with recipes that have been validated for blinding and to use challenge procedures that have been proven safe in clinical practice, in order to reduce the risk of unwanted false-positive and false-negative outcomes and severe challenge reactions. The national guideline of the Dutch Society of Allergology describes when challenges are indicated and contraindicated, how food challenges are best conducted and how patients could best be managed and followed-up after the challenge tests have been completed.</description><subject>Allergens</subject><subject>Double-Blind Method</subject><subject>Food Hypersensitivity - diagnosis</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Netherlands</subject><subject>Practice Guidelines as Topic</subject><issn>1872-9061</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo1j0tLAzEUhYMgtrb-BZ2lm4G80yylPqHgxq6Hm-SmjmQeTiaL_nsr1tWBw_cdOBdkyTaG15ZqtiDXOX9RSrWx6oosuLFUCSaX5O6xzP6zOpQ2YGp7rIa-isMQKkgJp8NxTS4jpIw351yR_fPTx_a13r2_vG0fdvXIGZtrJrR2Kjp0VvogaBTRGkoV9dby4AGkAw4amRRcgXZgUUP03J7ak8HEitz_7Y7T8F0wz03XZo8pQY9DyQ3bSMWVMPQXvT2jxXUYmnFqO5iOzf8p8QNxFEYF</recordid><startdate>201611</startdate><enddate>201611</enddate><creator>van Maaren, M S</creator><creator>Dubois, A E J</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201611</creationdate><title>Dutch guideline on food allergy</title><author>van Maaren, M S ; Dubois, A E J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p211t-1366b5fbeb94cd30f3f970050c992dcaa4ba2a6e14325a6ba9e6afc29a2a94c13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Allergens</topic><topic>Double-Blind Method</topic><topic>Food Hypersensitivity - diagnosis</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Netherlands</topic><topic>Practice Guidelines as Topic</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>van Maaren, M S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dubois, A E J</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Netherlands journal of medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>van Maaren, M S</au><au>Dubois, A E J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Dutch guideline on food allergy</atitle><jtitle>Netherlands journal of medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Neth J Med</addtitle><date>2016-11</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>74</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>376</spage><epage>382</epage><pages>376-382</pages><eissn>1872-9061</eissn><abstract>The diagnosis of food allergy is established in cases where an immediate allergic reaction has occurred in the last year to a clearly identifiable allergenic food combined with sensitisation to this allergenic food. In all other cases, a food challenge test is required to establish or reject the diagnosis of food allergy. Although the double-blind placebo-controlled food challenge (DBPCFC) test is considered the gold standard, false-positive and false-negative outcomes occur. The incidence of false-positive outcomes is unknown because the results of DBPCFC tests cannot be further confirmed by other tests. If possible, it is important to perform double-blind challenges with recipes that have been validated for blinding and to use challenge procedures that have been proven safe in clinical practice, in order to reduce the risk of unwanted false-positive and false-negative outcomes and severe challenge reactions. The national guideline of the Dutch Society of Allergology describes when challenges are indicated and contraindicated, how food challenges are best conducted and how patients could best be managed and followed-up after the challenge tests have been completed.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pmid>27905314</pmid><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier EISSN: 1872-9061
ispartof Netherlands journal of medicine, 2016-11, Vol.74 (9), p.376-382
issn 1872-9061
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1845253701
source MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Allergens
Double-Blind Method
Food Hypersensitivity - diagnosis
Humans
Netherlands
Practice Guidelines as Topic
title Dutch guideline on food allergy
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T10%3A12%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Dutch%20guideline%20on%20food%20allergy&rft.jtitle=Netherlands%20journal%20of%20medicine&rft.au=van%20Maaren,%20M%20S&rft.date=2016-11&rft.volume=74&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=376&rft.epage=382&rft.pages=376-382&rft.eissn=1872-9061&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1845253701%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1845253701&rft_id=info:pmid/27905314&rfr_iscdi=true