Assessment of the Psychometric Properties of a Questionnaire Assessing Patient-Reported Outcomes With Laser In Situ Keratomileusis (PROWL)

IMPORTANCE: Patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures for laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) are needed. OBJECTIVE: To develop PRO measures to assess satisfaction, eye-related symptoms, and their effect on functioning and well-being following LASIK based on patient and expert input. DESIGN, SETTING,...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:JAMA ophthalmology 2017-01, Vol.135 (1), p.3-12
Hauptverfasser: Hays, Ron D, Tarver, Michelle E, Spritzer, Karen L, Reise, Steve, Hilmantel, Gene, Hofmeister, Elizabeth M, Hammel, Keri, May, Jeanine, Ferris, Frederick, Eydelman, Malvina
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 12
container_issue 1
container_start_page 3
container_title JAMA ophthalmology
container_volume 135
creator Hays, Ron D
Tarver, Michelle E
Spritzer, Karen L
Reise, Steve
Hilmantel, Gene
Hofmeister, Elizabeth M
Hammel, Keri
May, Jeanine
Ferris, Frederick
Eydelman, Malvina
description IMPORTANCE: Patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures for laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) are needed. OBJECTIVE: To develop PRO measures to assess satisfaction, eye-related symptoms, and their effect on functioning and well-being following LASIK based on patient and expert input. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The Patient-Reported Outcomes With LASIK (PROWL) studies were prospective observational studies of patients undergoing LASIK surgery for myopia, hyperopia, or astigmatism. PROWL-1 was a single-center study of active-duty US Navy personnel and PROWL-2 was a 5-center study of civilians. PROWL-1 enrolled 262 active-duty service personnel and PROWL-2 enrolled 312 civilians 21 years or older who spoke English; 241 individuals in PROWL-1 and 280 in PROWL-2 completed a baseline questionnaire before surgery. The analytic sample included those also completing 1 or more follow-up questionnaires: 240 (99.6%) of those in PROWL-1 and 271 (94.4%) of those in PROWL-2. Questionnaires were self-administered through the internet preoperatively and at 1 and 3 months postoperatively in both studies and at 6 months postoperatively in PROWL-1. PROWL-1 began in August 2011 and was completed May 30, 2014; PROWL-2 began in July 2012 and was completed June 27, 2014. Data were analyzed from June 28, 2014, to October 24, 2016. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Scales assessing visual symptoms (double images, glare, halos, and starbursts), dry eye symptoms, satisfaction with vision, and satisfaction with LASIK surgery. Items from the National Eye Institute (NEI) Refractive Error Quality of Life Instrument (NEI-RQL-42), NEI Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI-VFQ), and the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) were included. All scales are scored on a 0 to 100 possible range. Construct validity and responsiveness to change were evaluated (comparing scores before and after surgery). RESULTS: The median age of the 240-person PROWL-1 analytic sample was 27 years (range, 21-52 years); 49 were women (20.4%). The median age of the 271-person PROWL-2 analytic sample was 30 years (range, 21-57 years); 147 were women (54.2%). Internal consistency reliabilities for the 4 visual symptom scales ranged from 0.96 to 0.98 in PROWL-1 and from 0.95 to 0.97 in PROWL-2. The median (interquartile range) test-retest intraclass correlation was 0.69 (0.57-0.79) and 0.76 (0.68-0.84) in PROWL-1 and PROWL-2, respectively. Product-moment correlations of satisfaction with surgery with visual symptom scales at
doi_str_mv 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2016.4597
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1844355333</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ama_id>2587832</ama_id><sourcerecordid>1844355333</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a384t-1a82fa9e3012ebbac228944e260c8635ff1887e7496b9d096412dffa94433cde3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkc9O3DAQxq0KVNCWF-ih8hEO2fpfHOeIEBTUlXahrThG3mTSGCVx8DgHXqFPjaOlVJ3LjDS_7xvZHyGUszVnjH99soP1Uxc72w--XwvG9VrlZfGBnAquTaZ5IY_eZ52fkDPEJ5bKMKZk_pGciMKUkml5Sv5cIgLiAGOkvqWxA7rDl7rzA8TgaroLfoIQHeCytvR-BozOj6N1AehB7MbfdGcTM8bsASYfIjR0O8c6mSB9dLGjG4sQ6N1If7g40-8QbPSD62FGh_R897B93Fx8Iset7RHO3vqK_Lq5_nl1m2223-6uLjeZlUbFjFsjWluCZFzAfm9rIUypFAjNaqNl3rbcmAIKVep92bBSKy6aNimUkrJuQK7I-cF3Cv55eU41OKyh7-0IfsaKm0TmuUy1IuaA1sEjBmirKbjBhpeKs2oJo_o_jGoJo1rCSNIvb1fm_QDNu_Dv1yfg8wFIDv-2uSmMFPIV0cqUbg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1844355333</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessment of the Psychometric Properties of a Questionnaire Assessing Patient-Reported Outcomes With Laser In Situ Keratomileusis (PROWL)</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>American Medical Association Journals</source><creator>Hays, Ron D ; Tarver, Michelle E ; Spritzer, Karen L ; Reise, Steve ; Hilmantel, Gene ; Hofmeister, Elizabeth M ; Hammel, Keri ; May, Jeanine ; Ferris, Frederick ; Eydelman, Malvina</creator><creatorcontrib>Hays, Ron D ; Tarver, Michelle E ; Spritzer, Karen L ; Reise, Steve ; Hilmantel, Gene ; Hofmeister, Elizabeth M ; Hammel, Keri ; May, Jeanine ; Ferris, Frederick ; Eydelman, Malvina</creatorcontrib><description>IMPORTANCE: Patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures for laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) are needed. OBJECTIVE: To develop PRO measures to assess satisfaction, eye-related symptoms, and their effect on functioning and well-being following LASIK based on patient and expert input. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The Patient-Reported Outcomes With LASIK (PROWL) studies were prospective observational studies of patients undergoing LASIK surgery for myopia, hyperopia, or astigmatism. PROWL-1 was a single-center study of active-duty US Navy personnel and PROWL-2 was a 5-center study of civilians. PROWL-1 enrolled 262 active-duty service personnel and PROWL-2 enrolled 312 civilians 21 years or older who spoke English; 241 individuals in PROWL-1 and 280 in PROWL-2 completed a baseline questionnaire before surgery. The analytic sample included those also completing 1 or more follow-up questionnaires: 240 (99.6%) of those in PROWL-1 and 271 (94.4%) of those in PROWL-2. Questionnaires were self-administered through the internet preoperatively and at 1 and 3 months postoperatively in both studies and at 6 months postoperatively in PROWL-1. PROWL-1 began in August 2011 and was completed May 30, 2014; PROWL-2 began in July 2012 and was completed June 27, 2014. Data were analyzed from June 28, 2014, to October 24, 2016. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Scales assessing visual symptoms (double images, glare, halos, and starbursts), dry eye symptoms, satisfaction with vision, and satisfaction with LASIK surgery. Items from the National Eye Institute (NEI) Refractive Error Quality of Life Instrument (NEI-RQL-42), NEI Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI-VFQ), and the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) were included. All scales are scored on a 0 to 100 possible range. Construct validity and responsiveness to change were evaluated (comparing scores before and after surgery). RESULTS: The median age of the 240-person PROWL-1 analytic sample was 27 years (range, 21-52 years); 49 were women (20.4%). The median age of the 271-person PROWL-2 analytic sample was 30 years (range, 21-57 years); 147 were women (54.2%). Internal consistency reliabilities for the 4 visual symptom scales ranged from 0.96 to 0.98 in PROWL-1 and from 0.95 to 0.97 in PROWL-2. The median (interquartile range) test-retest intraclass correlation was 0.69 (0.57-0.79) and 0.76 (0.68-0.84) in PROWL-1 and PROWL-2, respectively. Product-moment correlations of satisfaction with surgery with visual symptom scales at follow-up evaluations ranged from r = 0.24 to r = 0.49. Measures improved from baseline to follow-up, with effect sizes of 0.14 to 1.98, but scores on the NEI-RQL-42 glare scale worsened at the 1-month follow-up. Hours of work did not change significantly from baseline to 1-month follow-up, with the mean number (mean [SD] difference) in PROWL-1 of 41.7 vs 40.9 hours (−0.8 [18.7]) and in PROWL-2 of 38.8 vs 38.2 hours (−0.6 [17.1]). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The results of these studies support the reliability and validity of visual symptom scales to evaluate the effects of LASIK surgery in future studies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2168-6165</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2168-6173</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2016.4597</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27893063</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Medical Association</publisher><subject>Adult ; Female ; Humans ; Keratomileusis, Laser In Situ - methods ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Myopia - physiopathology ; Myopia - psychology ; Myopia - surgery ; Patient Reported Outcome Measures ; Patient Satisfaction ; Prospective Studies ; Psychometrics - methods ; Quality of Life ; Reproducibility of Results ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>JAMA ophthalmology, 2017-01, Vol.135 (1), p.3-12</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a384t-1a82fa9e3012ebbac228944e260c8635ff1887e7496b9d096412dffa94433cde3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamaophthalmology/articlepdf/10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2016.4597$$EPDF$$P50$$Gama$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamaophthalmology/fullarticle/10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2016.4597$$EHTML$$P50$$Gama$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>64,314,777,781,3327,27905,27906,76238,76241</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27893063$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hays, Ron D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tarver, Michelle E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spritzer, Karen L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reise, Steve</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hilmantel, Gene</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hofmeister, Elizabeth M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hammel, Keri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>May, Jeanine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferris, Frederick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eydelman, Malvina</creatorcontrib><title>Assessment of the Psychometric Properties of a Questionnaire Assessing Patient-Reported Outcomes With Laser In Situ Keratomileusis (PROWL)</title><title>JAMA ophthalmology</title><addtitle>JAMA Ophthalmol</addtitle><description>IMPORTANCE: Patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures for laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) are needed. OBJECTIVE: To develop PRO measures to assess satisfaction, eye-related symptoms, and their effect on functioning and well-being following LASIK based on patient and expert input. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The Patient-Reported Outcomes With LASIK (PROWL) studies were prospective observational studies of patients undergoing LASIK surgery for myopia, hyperopia, or astigmatism. PROWL-1 was a single-center study of active-duty US Navy personnel and PROWL-2 was a 5-center study of civilians. PROWL-1 enrolled 262 active-duty service personnel and PROWL-2 enrolled 312 civilians 21 years or older who spoke English; 241 individuals in PROWL-1 and 280 in PROWL-2 completed a baseline questionnaire before surgery. The analytic sample included those also completing 1 or more follow-up questionnaires: 240 (99.6%) of those in PROWL-1 and 271 (94.4%) of those in PROWL-2. Questionnaires were self-administered through the internet preoperatively and at 1 and 3 months postoperatively in both studies and at 6 months postoperatively in PROWL-1. PROWL-1 began in August 2011 and was completed May 30, 2014; PROWL-2 began in July 2012 and was completed June 27, 2014. Data were analyzed from June 28, 2014, to October 24, 2016. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Scales assessing visual symptoms (double images, glare, halos, and starbursts), dry eye symptoms, satisfaction with vision, and satisfaction with LASIK surgery. Items from the National Eye Institute (NEI) Refractive Error Quality of Life Instrument (NEI-RQL-42), NEI Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI-VFQ), and the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) were included. All scales are scored on a 0 to 100 possible range. Construct validity and responsiveness to change were evaluated (comparing scores before and after surgery). RESULTS: The median age of the 240-person PROWL-1 analytic sample was 27 years (range, 21-52 years); 49 were women (20.4%). The median age of the 271-person PROWL-2 analytic sample was 30 years (range, 21-57 years); 147 were women (54.2%). Internal consistency reliabilities for the 4 visual symptom scales ranged from 0.96 to 0.98 in PROWL-1 and from 0.95 to 0.97 in PROWL-2. The median (interquartile range) test-retest intraclass correlation was 0.69 (0.57-0.79) and 0.76 (0.68-0.84) in PROWL-1 and PROWL-2, respectively. Product-moment correlations of satisfaction with surgery with visual symptom scales at follow-up evaluations ranged from r = 0.24 to r = 0.49. Measures improved from baseline to follow-up, with effect sizes of 0.14 to 1.98, but scores on the NEI-RQL-42 glare scale worsened at the 1-month follow-up. Hours of work did not change significantly from baseline to 1-month follow-up, with the mean number (mean [SD] difference) in PROWL-1 of 41.7 vs 40.9 hours (−0.8 [18.7]) and in PROWL-2 of 38.8 vs 38.2 hours (−0.6 [17.1]). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The results of these studies support the reliability and validity of visual symptom scales to evaluate the effects of LASIK surgery in future studies.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Keratomileusis, Laser In Situ - methods</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Myopia - physiopathology</subject><subject>Myopia - psychology</subject><subject>Myopia - surgery</subject><subject>Patient Reported Outcome Measures</subject><subject>Patient Satisfaction</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Psychometrics - methods</subject><subject>Quality of Life</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>2168-6165</issn><issn>2168-6173</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkc9O3DAQxq0KVNCWF-ih8hEO2fpfHOeIEBTUlXahrThG3mTSGCVx8DgHXqFPjaOlVJ3LjDS_7xvZHyGUszVnjH99soP1Uxc72w--XwvG9VrlZfGBnAquTaZ5IY_eZ52fkDPEJ5bKMKZk_pGciMKUkml5Sv5cIgLiAGOkvqWxA7rDl7rzA8TgaroLfoIQHeCytvR-BozOj6N1AehB7MbfdGcTM8bsASYfIjR0O8c6mSB9dLGjG4sQ6N1If7g40-8QbPSD62FGh_R897B93Fx8Iset7RHO3vqK_Lq5_nl1m2223-6uLjeZlUbFjFsjWluCZFzAfm9rIUypFAjNaqNl3rbcmAIKVep92bBSKy6aNimUkrJuQK7I-cF3Cv55eU41OKyh7-0IfsaKm0TmuUy1IuaA1sEjBmirKbjBhpeKs2oJo_o_jGoJo1rCSNIvb1fm_QDNu_Dv1yfg8wFIDv-2uSmMFPIV0cqUbg</recordid><startdate>20170101</startdate><enddate>20170101</enddate><creator>Hays, Ron D</creator><creator>Tarver, Michelle E</creator><creator>Spritzer, Karen L</creator><creator>Reise, Steve</creator><creator>Hilmantel, Gene</creator><creator>Hofmeister, Elizabeth M</creator><creator>Hammel, Keri</creator><creator>May, Jeanine</creator><creator>Ferris, Frederick</creator><creator>Eydelman, Malvina</creator><general>American Medical Association</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170101</creationdate><title>Assessment of the Psychometric Properties of a Questionnaire Assessing Patient-Reported Outcomes With Laser In Situ Keratomileusis (PROWL)</title><author>Hays, Ron D ; Tarver, Michelle E ; Spritzer, Karen L ; Reise, Steve ; Hilmantel, Gene ; Hofmeister, Elizabeth M ; Hammel, Keri ; May, Jeanine ; Ferris, Frederick ; Eydelman, Malvina</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a384t-1a82fa9e3012ebbac228944e260c8635ff1887e7496b9d096412dffa94433cde3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Keratomileusis, Laser In Situ - methods</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Myopia - physiopathology</topic><topic>Myopia - psychology</topic><topic>Myopia - surgery</topic><topic>Patient Reported Outcome Measures</topic><topic>Patient Satisfaction</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Psychometrics - methods</topic><topic>Quality of Life</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hays, Ron D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tarver, Michelle E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spritzer, Karen L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reise, Steve</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hilmantel, Gene</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hofmeister, Elizabeth M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hammel, Keri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>May, Jeanine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferris, Frederick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eydelman, Malvina</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>JAMA ophthalmology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hays, Ron D</au><au>Tarver, Michelle E</au><au>Spritzer, Karen L</au><au>Reise, Steve</au><au>Hilmantel, Gene</au><au>Hofmeister, Elizabeth M</au><au>Hammel, Keri</au><au>May, Jeanine</au><au>Ferris, Frederick</au><au>Eydelman, Malvina</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessment of the Psychometric Properties of a Questionnaire Assessing Patient-Reported Outcomes With Laser In Situ Keratomileusis (PROWL)</atitle><jtitle>JAMA ophthalmology</jtitle><addtitle>JAMA Ophthalmol</addtitle><date>2017-01-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>135</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>3</spage><epage>12</epage><pages>3-12</pages><issn>2168-6165</issn><eissn>2168-6173</eissn><abstract>IMPORTANCE: Patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures for laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) are needed. OBJECTIVE: To develop PRO measures to assess satisfaction, eye-related symptoms, and their effect on functioning and well-being following LASIK based on patient and expert input. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The Patient-Reported Outcomes With LASIK (PROWL) studies were prospective observational studies of patients undergoing LASIK surgery for myopia, hyperopia, or astigmatism. PROWL-1 was a single-center study of active-duty US Navy personnel and PROWL-2 was a 5-center study of civilians. PROWL-1 enrolled 262 active-duty service personnel and PROWL-2 enrolled 312 civilians 21 years or older who spoke English; 241 individuals in PROWL-1 and 280 in PROWL-2 completed a baseline questionnaire before surgery. The analytic sample included those also completing 1 or more follow-up questionnaires: 240 (99.6%) of those in PROWL-1 and 271 (94.4%) of those in PROWL-2. Questionnaires were self-administered through the internet preoperatively and at 1 and 3 months postoperatively in both studies and at 6 months postoperatively in PROWL-1. PROWL-1 began in August 2011 and was completed May 30, 2014; PROWL-2 began in July 2012 and was completed June 27, 2014. Data were analyzed from June 28, 2014, to October 24, 2016. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Scales assessing visual symptoms (double images, glare, halos, and starbursts), dry eye symptoms, satisfaction with vision, and satisfaction with LASIK surgery. Items from the National Eye Institute (NEI) Refractive Error Quality of Life Instrument (NEI-RQL-42), NEI Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI-VFQ), and the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) were included. All scales are scored on a 0 to 100 possible range. Construct validity and responsiveness to change were evaluated (comparing scores before and after surgery). RESULTS: The median age of the 240-person PROWL-1 analytic sample was 27 years (range, 21-52 years); 49 were women (20.4%). The median age of the 271-person PROWL-2 analytic sample was 30 years (range, 21-57 years); 147 were women (54.2%). Internal consistency reliabilities for the 4 visual symptom scales ranged from 0.96 to 0.98 in PROWL-1 and from 0.95 to 0.97 in PROWL-2. The median (interquartile range) test-retest intraclass correlation was 0.69 (0.57-0.79) and 0.76 (0.68-0.84) in PROWL-1 and PROWL-2, respectively. Product-moment correlations of satisfaction with surgery with visual symptom scales at follow-up evaluations ranged from r = 0.24 to r = 0.49. Measures improved from baseline to follow-up, with effect sizes of 0.14 to 1.98, but scores on the NEI-RQL-42 glare scale worsened at the 1-month follow-up. Hours of work did not change significantly from baseline to 1-month follow-up, with the mean number (mean [SD] difference) in PROWL-1 of 41.7 vs 40.9 hours (−0.8 [18.7]) and in PROWL-2 of 38.8 vs 38.2 hours (−0.6 [17.1]). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The results of these studies support the reliability and validity of visual symptom scales to evaluate the effects of LASIK surgery in future studies.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Medical Association</pub><pmid>27893063</pmid><doi>10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2016.4597</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2168-6165
ispartof JAMA ophthalmology, 2017-01, Vol.135 (1), p.3-12
issn 2168-6165
2168-6173
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1844355333
source MEDLINE; American Medical Association Journals
subjects Adult
Female
Humans
Keratomileusis, Laser In Situ - methods
Male
Middle Aged
Myopia - physiopathology
Myopia - psychology
Myopia - surgery
Patient Reported Outcome Measures
Patient Satisfaction
Prospective Studies
Psychometrics - methods
Quality of Life
Reproducibility of Results
Surveys and Questionnaires
Young Adult
title Assessment of the Psychometric Properties of a Questionnaire Assessing Patient-Reported Outcomes With Laser In Situ Keratomileusis (PROWL)
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T11%3A07%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessment%20of%20the%20Psychometric%20Properties%20of%20a%20Questionnaire%20Assessing%20Patient-Reported%20Outcomes%20With%20Laser%20In%20Situ%20Keratomileusis%20(PROWL)&rft.jtitle=JAMA%20ophthalmology&rft.au=Hays,%20Ron%20D&rft.date=2017-01-01&rft.volume=135&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=3&rft.epage=12&rft.pages=3-12&rft.issn=2168-6165&rft.eissn=2168-6173&rft_id=info:doi/10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2016.4597&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1844355333%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1844355333&rft_id=info:pmid/27893063&rft_ama_id=2587832&rfr_iscdi=true