Impact of molecular subtypes classification concordance between preoperative core needle biopsy and surgical specimen on early breast cancer management: single-institution experience and review of published literature

Abstract Background Core needle biopsy (CNB) plays a crucial role as diagnostic tool for breast cancer (BC). The characterization of biomarkers status before surgical treatment is crucial when primary systemic therapy is a therapeutic option. The aim of this analysis was to report concordance betwee...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European journal of surgical oncology 2017-04, Vol.43 (4), p.642-648
Hauptverfasser: Meattini, I, Bicchierai, G, Saieva, C, De Benedetto, D, Desideri, I, Becherini, C, Abdulcadir, D, Vanzi, E, Boeri, C, Gabbrielli, S, Lucci, F, Sanchez, L, Casella, D, Bernini, M, Orzalesi, L, Vezzosi, V, Greto, D, Mangoni, M, Bianchi, S, Livi, L, Nori, J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 648
container_issue 4
container_start_page 642
container_title European journal of surgical oncology
container_volume 43
creator Meattini, I
Bicchierai, G
Saieva, C
De Benedetto, D
Desideri, I
Becherini, C
Abdulcadir, D
Vanzi, E
Boeri, C
Gabbrielli, S
Lucci, F
Sanchez, L
Casella, D
Bernini, M
Orzalesi, L
Vezzosi, V
Greto, D
Mangoni, M
Bianchi, S
Livi, L
Nori, J
description Abstract Background Core needle biopsy (CNB) plays a crucial role as diagnostic tool for breast cancer (BC). The characterization of biomarkers status before surgical treatment is crucial when primary systemic therapy is a therapeutic option. The aim of this analysis was to report concordance between preoperative CNB and surgical specimen (SS) in evaluating biomarkers and molecular subtypes. Methods Data have been collected from a cohort of 101 patients affected by early BC treated at Careggi Florence University Hospital, between January 2014 and March 2015. The conformity between molecular subtype classification was tested using kappa (κ) test. Results Mean age was 57.5 years (range 29-86). There was concordance between the estrogen receptor (ER) assessment on CNB and SS in 95 cases (94.1%). Concordance of the progesterone receptor (PgR) assessment was observed in 89 cases (88.1%). Concordance for detecting immunohistochemistry-assessed BC molecular subtypes was 87.1% (κ=0.78). Concerning Ki-67 evaluation, we report a concordance rate of 88.1% (κ=0.68). The evaluation of luminal A plus luminal B/HER negative subgroup showed a κ-value of 0.65. Conclusions CNB showed good accuracy in evaluating hormonal receptors status, HER2, and BC molecular subtypes. Evaluation of Ki67 status was less accurate than other biomarkers; therefore, we recommend that it should be detected both on CNB and SS samples, especially in hormonal positive HER2 negative tumors, in order to avoid a misclassification of tumor subtypes that could lead to an omission of potential effective systemic therapy.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ejso.2016.10.025
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1844354151</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0748798316309659</els_id><sourcerecordid>1844354151</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c477t-e1a3d49b596ce09facab79203e366d1734fb4e612d988f59556bd22d764973133</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9ksuOFSEQhjtG4xxHX8CFYemmj1z6hjEmk4mXSSZxoa4JDdVHjjS0QM_Yj-rbCHNGFy5cQcj3_1XUX1X1nOA9waR7ddzDMfo9zff8sMe0fVDtSMtoTUnbP6x2uG-GuucDO6uexHjEGHPW88fVGe2HgRPe7apfV_MiVUJ-QrO3oFYrA4rrmLYFIlJWxmgmo2Qy3iHlnfJBS6cAjZBuARxaAvgFQgZuIAMBkAPQNgPGL3FD0unsFw7Zw6K4gDJzVmUzkMFuaAwgY0KqeAY0SycPkIH0GkXjDhZq42Iyab2rDz9zJQOlfLENcGPgtrS-rKM18RtoZE0qzawBnlaPJmkjPLs_z6uv7999ufxYX3_6cHV5cV2rpu9TDUQy3fCx5Z0CzCep5NhzihmwrtOkZ800NtARqvkwTC1v227UlOq-a3jPCGPn1cuT7xL8jxViErOJCqyVDvwaBRmahrUNaUlG6QlVwccYYBJLMLMMmyBYlEjFUZRIRYm0vOVIs-jFvf86zqD_Sv5kmIE3JwDyL_NEgojqbkjaBFBJaG_-7__2H7myxpW4vsMG8ejX4PL8BBGRCiw-l6UqO0U6hnnXcvYbTybOtA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1844354151</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Impact of molecular subtypes classification concordance between preoperative core needle biopsy and surgical specimen on early breast cancer management: single-institution experience and review of published literature</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Meattini, I ; Bicchierai, G ; Saieva, C ; De Benedetto, D ; Desideri, I ; Becherini, C ; Abdulcadir, D ; Vanzi, E ; Boeri, C ; Gabbrielli, S ; Lucci, F ; Sanchez, L ; Casella, D ; Bernini, M ; Orzalesi, L ; Vezzosi, V ; Greto, D ; Mangoni, M ; Bianchi, S ; Livi, L ; Nori, J</creator><creatorcontrib>Meattini, I ; Bicchierai, G ; Saieva, C ; De Benedetto, D ; Desideri, I ; Becherini, C ; Abdulcadir, D ; Vanzi, E ; Boeri, C ; Gabbrielli, S ; Lucci, F ; Sanchez, L ; Casella, D ; Bernini, M ; Orzalesi, L ; Vezzosi, V ; Greto, D ; Mangoni, M ; Bianchi, S ; Livi, L ; Nori, J</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Background Core needle biopsy (CNB) plays a crucial role as diagnostic tool for breast cancer (BC). The characterization of biomarkers status before surgical treatment is crucial when primary systemic therapy is a therapeutic option. The aim of this analysis was to report concordance between preoperative CNB and surgical specimen (SS) in evaluating biomarkers and molecular subtypes. Methods Data have been collected from a cohort of 101 patients affected by early BC treated at Careggi Florence University Hospital, between January 2014 and March 2015. The conformity between molecular subtype classification was tested using kappa (κ) test. Results Mean age was 57.5 years (range 29-86). There was concordance between the estrogen receptor (ER) assessment on CNB and SS in 95 cases (94.1%). Concordance of the progesterone receptor (PgR) assessment was observed in 89 cases (88.1%). Concordance for detecting immunohistochemistry-assessed BC molecular subtypes was 87.1% (κ=0.78). Concerning Ki-67 evaluation, we report a concordance rate of 88.1% (κ=0.68). The evaluation of luminal A plus luminal B/HER negative subgroup showed a κ-value of 0.65. Conclusions CNB showed good accuracy in evaluating hormonal receptors status, HER2, and BC molecular subtypes. Evaluation of Ki67 status was less accurate than other biomarkers; therefore, we recommend that it should be detected both on CNB and SS samples, especially in hormonal positive HER2 negative tumors, in order to avoid a misclassification of tumor subtypes that could lead to an omission of potential effective systemic therapy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0748-7983</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-2157</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2016.10.025</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27889196</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Biomarkers, Tumor - metabolism ; Biopsy, Large-Core Needle ; Breast cancer ; Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Breast Neoplasms - metabolism ; Breast Neoplasms - pathology ; Breast Neoplasms - therapy ; Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast - diagnostic imaging ; Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast - metabolism ; Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast - pathology ; Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast - therapy ; Carcinoma, Lobular - diagnostic imaging ; Carcinoma, Lobular - metabolism ; Carcinoma, Lobular - pathology ; Carcinoma, Lobular - therapy ; Core needle biopsy ; Disease Management ; Estrogen receptor ; Female ; Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine ; Humans ; Image-Guided Biopsy ; Immunohistochemistry ; Ki-67 Antigen - metabolism ; Ki-67 proliferative index ; Middle Aged ; Molecular subtypes ; Neoplasm Staging ; Receptor, ErbB-2 - metabolism ; Receptors, Estrogen - metabolism ; Receptors, Progesterone - metabolism ; Surgery ; Surgical specimen ; Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms - metabolism ; Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms - pathology ; Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms - therapy ; Ultrasonography, Mammary</subject><ispartof>European journal of surgical oncology, 2017-04, Vol.43 (4), p.642-648</ispartof><rights>2016 Elsevier Ltd, BASO ~ The Association for Cancer Surgery, and the European Society of Surgical Oncology</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd, BASO ~ The Association for Cancer Surgery, and the European Society of Surgical Oncology. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c477t-e1a3d49b596ce09facab79203e366d1734fb4e612d988f59556bd22d764973133</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c477t-e1a3d49b596ce09facab79203e366d1734fb4e612d988f59556bd22d764973133</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3131-0338 ; 0000-0002-1861-2895</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2016.10.025$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27889196$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Meattini, I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bicchierai, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saieva, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Benedetto, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Desideri, I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Becherini, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abdulcadir, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vanzi, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boeri, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gabbrielli, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lucci, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sanchez, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Casella, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bernini, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Orzalesi, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vezzosi, V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greto, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mangoni, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bianchi, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Livi, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nori, J</creatorcontrib><title>Impact of molecular subtypes classification concordance between preoperative core needle biopsy and surgical specimen on early breast cancer management: single-institution experience and review of published literature</title><title>European journal of surgical oncology</title><addtitle>Eur J Surg Oncol</addtitle><description>Abstract Background Core needle biopsy (CNB) plays a crucial role as diagnostic tool for breast cancer (BC). The characterization of biomarkers status before surgical treatment is crucial when primary systemic therapy is a therapeutic option. The aim of this analysis was to report concordance between preoperative CNB and surgical specimen (SS) in evaluating biomarkers and molecular subtypes. Methods Data have been collected from a cohort of 101 patients affected by early BC treated at Careggi Florence University Hospital, between January 2014 and March 2015. The conformity between molecular subtype classification was tested using kappa (κ) test. Results Mean age was 57.5 years (range 29-86). There was concordance between the estrogen receptor (ER) assessment on CNB and SS in 95 cases (94.1%). Concordance of the progesterone receptor (PgR) assessment was observed in 89 cases (88.1%). Concordance for detecting immunohistochemistry-assessed BC molecular subtypes was 87.1% (κ=0.78). Concerning Ki-67 evaluation, we report a concordance rate of 88.1% (κ=0.68). The evaluation of luminal A plus luminal B/HER negative subgroup showed a κ-value of 0.65. Conclusions CNB showed good accuracy in evaluating hormonal receptors status, HER2, and BC molecular subtypes. Evaluation of Ki67 status was less accurate than other biomarkers; therefore, we recommend that it should be detected both on CNB and SS samples, especially in hormonal positive HER2 negative tumors, in order to avoid a misclassification of tumor subtypes that could lead to an omission of potential effective systemic therapy.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Biomarkers, Tumor - metabolism</subject><subject>Biopsy, Large-Core Needle</subject><subject>Breast cancer</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - metabolism</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - therapy</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast - metabolism</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast - pathology</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast - therapy</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Lobular - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Lobular - metabolism</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Lobular - pathology</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Lobular - therapy</subject><subject>Core needle biopsy</subject><subject>Disease Management</subject><subject>Estrogen receptor</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Image-Guided Biopsy</subject><subject>Immunohistochemistry</subject><subject>Ki-67 Antigen - metabolism</subject><subject>Ki-67 proliferative index</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Molecular subtypes</subject><subject>Neoplasm Staging</subject><subject>Receptor, ErbB-2 - metabolism</subject><subject>Receptors, Estrogen - metabolism</subject><subject>Receptors, Progesterone - metabolism</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surgical specimen</subject><subject>Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms - metabolism</subject><subject>Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms - therapy</subject><subject>Ultrasonography, Mammary</subject><issn>0748-7983</issn><issn>1532-2157</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9ksuOFSEQhjtG4xxHX8CFYemmj1z6hjEmk4mXSSZxoa4JDdVHjjS0QM_Yj-rbCHNGFy5cQcj3_1XUX1X1nOA9waR7ddzDMfo9zff8sMe0fVDtSMtoTUnbP6x2uG-GuucDO6uexHjEGHPW88fVGe2HgRPe7apfV_MiVUJ-QrO3oFYrA4rrmLYFIlJWxmgmo2Qy3iHlnfJBS6cAjZBuARxaAvgFQgZuIAMBkAPQNgPGL3FD0unsFw7Zw6K4gDJzVmUzkMFuaAwgY0KqeAY0SycPkIH0GkXjDhZq42Iyab2rDz9zJQOlfLENcGPgtrS-rKM18RtoZE0qzawBnlaPJmkjPLs_z6uv7999ufxYX3_6cHV5cV2rpu9TDUQy3fCx5Z0CzCep5NhzihmwrtOkZ800NtARqvkwTC1v227UlOq-a3jPCGPn1cuT7xL8jxViErOJCqyVDvwaBRmahrUNaUlG6QlVwccYYBJLMLMMmyBYlEjFUZRIRYm0vOVIs-jFvf86zqD_Sv5kmIE3JwDyL_NEgojqbkjaBFBJaG_-7__2H7myxpW4vsMG8ejX4PL8BBGRCiw-l6UqO0U6hnnXcvYbTybOtA</recordid><startdate>20170401</startdate><enddate>20170401</enddate><creator>Meattini, I</creator><creator>Bicchierai, G</creator><creator>Saieva, C</creator><creator>De Benedetto, D</creator><creator>Desideri, I</creator><creator>Becherini, C</creator><creator>Abdulcadir, D</creator><creator>Vanzi, E</creator><creator>Boeri, C</creator><creator>Gabbrielli, S</creator><creator>Lucci, F</creator><creator>Sanchez, L</creator><creator>Casella, D</creator><creator>Bernini, M</creator><creator>Orzalesi, L</creator><creator>Vezzosi, V</creator><creator>Greto, D</creator><creator>Mangoni, M</creator><creator>Bianchi, S</creator><creator>Livi, L</creator><creator>Nori, J</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3131-0338</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1861-2895</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20170401</creationdate><title>Impact of molecular subtypes classification concordance between preoperative core needle biopsy and surgical specimen on early breast cancer management: single-institution experience and review of published literature</title><author>Meattini, I ; Bicchierai, G ; Saieva, C ; De Benedetto, D ; Desideri, I ; Becherini, C ; Abdulcadir, D ; Vanzi, E ; Boeri, C ; Gabbrielli, S ; Lucci, F ; Sanchez, L ; Casella, D ; Bernini, M ; Orzalesi, L ; Vezzosi, V ; Greto, D ; Mangoni, M ; Bianchi, S ; Livi, L ; Nori, J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c477t-e1a3d49b596ce09facab79203e366d1734fb4e612d988f59556bd22d764973133</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Biomarkers, Tumor - metabolism</topic><topic>Biopsy, Large-Core Needle</topic><topic>Breast cancer</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - metabolism</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - therapy</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast - metabolism</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast - pathology</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast - therapy</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Lobular - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Lobular - metabolism</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Lobular - pathology</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Lobular - therapy</topic><topic>Core needle biopsy</topic><topic>Disease Management</topic><topic>Estrogen receptor</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Image-Guided Biopsy</topic><topic>Immunohistochemistry</topic><topic>Ki-67 Antigen - metabolism</topic><topic>Ki-67 proliferative index</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Molecular subtypes</topic><topic>Neoplasm Staging</topic><topic>Receptor, ErbB-2 - metabolism</topic><topic>Receptors, Estrogen - metabolism</topic><topic>Receptors, Progesterone - metabolism</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surgical specimen</topic><topic>Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms - metabolism</topic><topic>Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms - therapy</topic><topic>Ultrasonography, Mammary</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Meattini, I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bicchierai, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saieva, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Benedetto, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Desideri, I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Becherini, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abdulcadir, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vanzi, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boeri, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gabbrielli, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lucci, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sanchez, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Casella, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bernini, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Orzalesi, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vezzosi, V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greto, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mangoni, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bianchi, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Livi, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nori, J</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European journal of surgical oncology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Meattini, I</au><au>Bicchierai, G</au><au>Saieva, C</au><au>De Benedetto, D</au><au>Desideri, I</au><au>Becherini, C</au><au>Abdulcadir, D</au><au>Vanzi, E</au><au>Boeri, C</au><au>Gabbrielli, S</au><au>Lucci, F</au><au>Sanchez, L</au><au>Casella, D</au><au>Bernini, M</au><au>Orzalesi, L</au><au>Vezzosi, V</au><au>Greto, D</au><au>Mangoni, M</au><au>Bianchi, S</au><au>Livi, L</au><au>Nori, J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Impact of molecular subtypes classification concordance between preoperative core needle biopsy and surgical specimen on early breast cancer management: single-institution experience and review of published literature</atitle><jtitle>European journal of surgical oncology</jtitle><addtitle>Eur J Surg Oncol</addtitle><date>2017-04-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>43</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>642</spage><epage>648</epage><pages>642-648</pages><issn>0748-7983</issn><eissn>1532-2157</eissn><abstract>Abstract Background Core needle biopsy (CNB) plays a crucial role as diagnostic tool for breast cancer (BC). The characterization of biomarkers status before surgical treatment is crucial when primary systemic therapy is a therapeutic option. The aim of this analysis was to report concordance between preoperative CNB and surgical specimen (SS) in evaluating biomarkers and molecular subtypes. Methods Data have been collected from a cohort of 101 patients affected by early BC treated at Careggi Florence University Hospital, between January 2014 and March 2015. The conformity between molecular subtype classification was tested using kappa (κ) test. Results Mean age was 57.5 years (range 29-86). There was concordance between the estrogen receptor (ER) assessment on CNB and SS in 95 cases (94.1%). Concordance of the progesterone receptor (PgR) assessment was observed in 89 cases (88.1%). Concordance for detecting immunohistochemistry-assessed BC molecular subtypes was 87.1% (κ=0.78). Concerning Ki-67 evaluation, we report a concordance rate of 88.1% (κ=0.68). The evaluation of luminal A plus luminal B/HER negative subgroup showed a κ-value of 0.65. Conclusions CNB showed good accuracy in evaluating hormonal receptors status, HER2, and BC molecular subtypes. Evaluation of Ki67 status was less accurate than other biomarkers; therefore, we recommend that it should be detected both on CNB and SS samples, especially in hormonal positive HER2 negative tumors, in order to avoid a misclassification of tumor subtypes that could lead to an omission of potential effective systemic therapy.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>27889196</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ejso.2016.10.025</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3131-0338</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1861-2895</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0748-7983
ispartof European journal of surgical oncology, 2017-04, Vol.43 (4), p.642-648
issn 0748-7983
1532-2157
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1844354151
source MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Biomarkers, Tumor - metabolism
Biopsy, Large-Core Needle
Breast cancer
Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging
Breast Neoplasms - metabolism
Breast Neoplasms - pathology
Breast Neoplasms - therapy
Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast - diagnostic imaging
Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast - metabolism
Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast - pathology
Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast - therapy
Carcinoma, Lobular - diagnostic imaging
Carcinoma, Lobular - metabolism
Carcinoma, Lobular - pathology
Carcinoma, Lobular - therapy
Core needle biopsy
Disease Management
Estrogen receptor
Female
Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine
Humans
Image-Guided Biopsy
Immunohistochemistry
Ki-67 Antigen - metabolism
Ki-67 proliferative index
Middle Aged
Molecular subtypes
Neoplasm Staging
Receptor, ErbB-2 - metabolism
Receptors, Estrogen - metabolism
Receptors, Progesterone - metabolism
Surgery
Surgical specimen
Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging
Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms - metabolism
Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms - pathology
Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms - therapy
Ultrasonography, Mammary
title Impact of molecular subtypes classification concordance between preoperative core needle biopsy and surgical specimen on early breast cancer management: single-institution experience and review of published literature
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T22%3A53%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Impact%20of%20molecular%20subtypes%20classification%20concordance%20between%20preoperative%20core%20needle%20biopsy%20and%20surgical%20specimen%20on%20early%20breast%20cancer%20management:%20single-institution%20experience%20and%20review%20of%20published%20literature&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20surgical%20oncology&rft.au=Meattini,%20I&rft.date=2017-04-01&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=642&rft.epage=648&rft.pages=642-648&rft.issn=0748-7983&rft.eissn=1532-2157&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ejso.2016.10.025&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1844354151%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1844354151&rft_id=info:pmid/27889196&rft_els_id=S0748798316309659&rfr_iscdi=true