Impact of molecular subtypes classification concordance between preoperative core needle biopsy and surgical specimen on early breast cancer management: single-institution experience and review of published literature
Abstract Background Core needle biopsy (CNB) plays a crucial role as diagnostic tool for breast cancer (BC). The characterization of biomarkers status before surgical treatment is crucial when primary systemic therapy is a therapeutic option. The aim of this analysis was to report concordance betwee...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European journal of surgical oncology 2017-04, Vol.43 (4), p.642-648 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 648 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 642 |
container_title | European journal of surgical oncology |
container_volume | 43 |
creator | Meattini, I Bicchierai, G Saieva, C De Benedetto, D Desideri, I Becherini, C Abdulcadir, D Vanzi, E Boeri, C Gabbrielli, S Lucci, F Sanchez, L Casella, D Bernini, M Orzalesi, L Vezzosi, V Greto, D Mangoni, M Bianchi, S Livi, L Nori, J |
description | Abstract Background Core needle biopsy (CNB) plays a crucial role as diagnostic tool for breast cancer (BC). The characterization of biomarkers status before surgical treatment is crucial when primary systemic therapy is a therapeutic option. The aim of this analysis was to report concordance between preoperative CNB and surgical specimen (SS) in evaluating biomarkers and molecular subtypes. Methods Data have been collected from a cohort of 101 patients affected by early BC treated at Careggi Florence University Hospital, between January 2014 and March 2015. The conformity between molecular subtype classification was tested using kappa (κ) test. Results Mean age was 57.5 years (range 29-86). There was concordance between the estrogen receptor (ER) assessment on CNB and SS in 95 cases (94.1%). Concordance of the progesterone receptor (PgR) assessment was observed in 89 cases (88.1%). Concordance for detecting immunohistochemistry-assessed BC molecular subtypes was 87.1% (κ=0.78). Concerning Ki-67 evaluation, we report a concordance rate of 88.1% (κ=0.68). The evaluation of luminal A plus luminal B/HER negative subgroup showed a κ-value of 0.65. Conclusions CNB showed good accuracy in evaluating hormonal receptors status, HER2, and BC molecular subtypes. Evaluation of Ki67 status was less accurate than other biomarkers; therefore, we recommend that it should be detected both on CNB and SS samples, especially in hormonal positive HER2 negative tumors, in order to avoid a misclassification of tumor subtypes that could lead to an omission of potential effective systemic therapy. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.ejso.2016.10.025 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1844354151</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0748798316309659</els_id><sourcerecordid>1844354151</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c477t-e1a3d49b596ce09facab79203e366d1734fb4e612d988f59556bd22d764973133</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9ksuOFSEQhjtG4xxHX8CFYemmj1z6hjEmk4mXSSZxoa4JDdVHjjS0QM_Yj-rbCHNGFy5cQcj3_1XUX1X1nOA9waR7ddzDMfo9zff8sMe0fVDtSMtoTUnbP6x2uG-GuucDO6uexHjEGHPW88fVGe2HgRPe7apfV_MiVUJ-QrO3oFYrA4rrmLYFIlJWxmgmo2Qy3iHlnfJBS6cAjZBuARxaAvgFQgZuIAMBkAPQNgPGL3FD0unsFw7Zw6K4gDJzVmUzkMFuaAwgY0KqeAY0SycPkIH0GkXjDhZq42Iyab2rDz9zJQOlfLENcGPgtrS-rKM18RtoZE0qzawBnlaPJmkjPLs_z6uv7999ufxYX3_6cHV5cV2rpu9TDUQy3fCx5Z0CzCep5NhzihmwrtOkZ800NtARqvkwTC1v227UlOq-a3jPCGPn1cuT7xL8jxViErOJCqyVDvwaBRmahrUNaUlG6QlVwccYYBJLMLMMmyBYlEjFUZRIRYm0vOVIs-jFvf86zqD_Sv5kmIE3JwDyL_NEgojqbkjaBFBJaG_-7__2H7myxpW4vsMG8ejX4PL8BBGRCiw-l6UqO0U6hnnXcvYbTybOtA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1844354151</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Impact of molecular subtypes classification concordance between preoperative core needle biopsy and surgical specimen on early breast cancer management: single-institution experience and review of published literature</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Meattini, I ; Bicchierai, G ; Saieva, C ; De Benedetto, D ; Desideri, I ; Becherini, C ; Abdulcadir, D ; Vanzi, E ; Boeri, C ; Gabbrielli, S ; Lucci, F ; Sanchez, L ; Casella, D ; Bernini, M ; Orzalesi, L ; Vezzosi, V ; Greto, D ; Mangoni, M ; Bianchi, S ; Livi, L ; Nori, J</creator><creatorcontrib>Meattini, I ; Bicchierai, G ; Saieva, C ; De Benedetto, D ; Desideri, I ; Becherini, C ; Abdulcadir, D ; Vanzi, E ; Boeri, C ; Gabbrielli, S ; Lucci, F ; Sanchez, L ; Casella, D ; Bernini, M ; Orzalesi, L ; Vezzosi, V ; Greto, D ; Mangoni, M ; Bianchi, S ; Livi, L ; Nori, J</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Background Core needle biopsy (CNB) plays a crucial role as diagnostic tool for breast cancer (BC). The characterization of biomarkers status before surgical treatment is crucial when primary systemic therapy is a therapeutic option. The aim of this analysis was to report concordance between preoperative CNB and surgical specimen (SS) in evaluating biomarkers and molecular subtypes. Methods Data have been collected from a cohort of 101 patients affected by early BC treated at Careggi Florence University Hospital, between January 2014 and March 2015. The conformity between molecular subtype classification was tested using kappa (κ) test. Results Mean age was 57.5 years (range 29-86). There was concordance between the estrogen receptor (ER) assessment on CNB and SS in 95 cases (94.1%). Concordance of the progesterone receptor (PgR) assessment was observed in 89 cases (88.1%). Concordance for detecting immunohistochemistry-assessed BC molecular subtypes was 87.1% (κ=0.78). Concerning Ki-67 evaluation, we report a concordance rate of 88.1% (κ=0.68). The evaluation of luminal A plus luminal B/HER negative subgroup showed a κ-value of 0.65. Conclusions CNB showed good accuracy in evaluating hormonal receptors status, HER2, and BC molecular subtypes. Evaluation of Ki67 status was less accurate than other biomarkers; therefore, we recommend that it should be detected both on CNB and SS samples, especially in hormonal positive HER2 negative tumors, in order to avoid a misclassification of tumor subtypes that could lead to an omission of potential effective systemic therapy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0748-7983</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-2157</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2016.10.025</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27889196</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Biomarkers, Tumor - metabolism ; Biopsy, Large-Core Needle ; Breast cancer ; Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Breast Neoplasms - metabolism ; Breast Neoplasms - pathology ; Breast Neoplasms - therapy ; Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast - diagnostic imaging ; Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast - metabolism ; Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast - pathology ; Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast - therapy ; Carcinoma, Lobular - diagnostic imaging ; Carcinoma, Lobular - metabolism ; Carcinoma, Lobular - pathology ; Carcinoma, Lobular - therapy ; Core needle biopsy ; Disease Management ; Estrogen receptor ; Female ; Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine ; Humans ; Image-Guided Biopsy ; Immunohistochemistry ; Ki-67 Antigen - metabolism ; Ki-67 proliferative index ; Middle Aged ; Molecular subtypes ; Neoplasm Staging ; Receptor, ErbB-2 - metabolism ; Receptors, Estrogen - metabolism ; Receptors, Progesterone - metabolism ; Surgery ; Surgical specimen ; Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms - metabolism ; Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms - pathology ; Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms - therapy ; Ultrasonography, Mammary</subject><ispartof>European journal of surgical oncology, 2017-04, Vol.43 (4), p.642-648</ispartof><rights>2016 Elsevier Ltd, BASO ~ The Association for Cancer Surgery, and the European Society of Surgical Oncology</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd, BASO ~ The Association for Cancer Surgery, and the European Society of Surgical Oncology. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c477t-e1a3d49b596ce09facab79203e366d1734fb4e612d988f59556bd22d764973133</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c477t-e1a3d49b596ce09facab79203e366d1734fb4e612d988f59556bd22d764973133</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3131-0338 ; 0000-0002-1861-2895</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2016.10.025$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27889196$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Meattini, I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bicchierai, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saieva, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Benedetto, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Desideri, I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Becherini, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abdulcadir, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vanzi, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boeri, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gabbrielli, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lucci, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sanchez, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Casella, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bernini, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Orzalesi, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vezzosi, V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greto, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mangoni, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bianchi, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Livi, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nori, J</creatorcontrib><title>Impact of molecular subtypes classification concordance between preoperative core needle biopsy and surgical specimen on early breast cancer management: single-institution experience and review of published literature</title><title>European journal of surgical oncology</title><addtitle>Eur J Surg Oncol</addtitle><description>Abstract Background Core needle biopsy (CNB) plays a crucial role as diagnostic tool for breast cancer (BC). The characterization of biomarkers status before surgical treatment is crucial when primary systemic therapy is a therapeutic option. The aim of this analysis was to report concordance between preoperative CNB and surgical specimen (SS) in evaluating biomarkers and molecular subtypes. Methods Data have been collected from a cohort of 101 patients affected by early BC treated at Careggi Florence University Hospital, between January 2014 and March 2015. The conformity between molecular subtype classification was tested using kappa (κ) test. Results Mean age was 57.5 years (range 29-86). There was concordance between the estrogen receptor (ER) assessment on CNB and SS in 95 cases (94.1%). Concordance of the progesterone receptor (PgR) assessment was observed in 89 cases (88.1%). Concordance for detecting immunohistochemistry-assessed BC molecular subtypes was 87.1% (κ=0.78). Concerning Ki-67 evaluation, we report a concordance rate of 88.1% (κ=0.68). The evaluation of luminal A plus luminal B/HER negative subgroup showed a κ-value of 0.65. Conclusions CNB showed good accuracy in evaluating hormonal receptors status, HER2, and BC molecular subtypes. Evaluation of Ki67 status was less accurate than other biomarkers; therefore, we recommend that it should be detected both on CNB and SS samples, especially in hormonal positive HER2 negative tumors, in order to avoid a misclassification of tumor subtypes that could lead to an omission of potential effective systemic therapy.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Biomarkers, Tumor - metabolism</subject><subject>Biopsy, Large-Core Needle</subject><subject>Breast cancer</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - metabolism</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - therapy</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast - metabolism</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast - pathology</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast - therapy</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Lobular - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Lobular - metabolism</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Lobular - pathology</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Lobular - therapy</subject><subject>Core needle biopsy</subject><subject>Disease Management</subject><subject>Estrogen receptor</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Image-Guided Biopsy</subject><subject>Immunohistochemistry</subject><subject>Ki-67 Antigen - metabolism</subject><subject>Ki-67 proliferative index</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Molecular subtypes</subject><subject>Neoplasm Staging</subject><subject>Receptor, ErbB-2 - metabolism</subject><subject>Receptors, Estrogen - metabolism</subject><subject>Receptors, Progesterone - metabolism</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surgical specimen</subject><subject>Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms - metabolism</subject><subject>Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms - therapy</subject><subject>Ultrasonography, Mammary</subject><issn>0748-7983</issn><issn>1532-2157</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9ksuOFSEQhjtG4xxHX8CFYemmj1z6hjEmk4mXSSZxoa4JDdVHjjS0QM_Yj-rbCHNGFy5cQcj3_1XUX1X1nOA9waR7ddzDMfo9zff8sMe0fVDtSMtoTUnbP6x2uG-GuucDO6uexHjEGHPW88fVGe2HgRPe7apfV_MiVUJ-QrO3oFYrA4rrmLYFIlJWxmgmo2Qy3iHlnfJBS6cAjZBuARxaAvgFQgZuIAMBkAPQNgPGL3FD0unsFw7Zw6K4gDJzVmUzkMFuaAwgY0KqeAY0SycPkIH0GkXjDhZq42Iyab2rDz9zJQOlfLENcGPgtrS-rKM18RtoZE0qzawBnlaPJmkjPLs_z6uv7999ufxYX3_6cHV5cV2rpu9TDUQy3fCx5Z0CzCep5NhzihmwrtOkZ800NtARqvkwTC1v227UlOq-a3jPCGPn1cuT7xL8jxViErOJCqyVDvwaBRmahrUNaUlG6QlVwccYYBJLMLMMmyBYlEjFUZRIRYm0vOVIs-jFvf86zqD_Sv5kmIE3JwDyL_NEgojqbkjaBFBJaG_-7__2H7myxpW4vsMG8ejX4PL8BBGRCiw-l6UqO0U6hnnXcvYbTybOtA</recordid><startdate>20170401</startdate><enddate>20170401</enddate><creator>Meattini, I</creator><creator>Bicchierai, G</creator><creator>Saieva, C</creator><creator>De Benedetto, D</creator><creator>Desideri, I</creator><creator>Becherini, C</creator><creator>Abdulcadir, D</creator><creator>Vanzi, E</creator><creator>Boeri, C</creator><creator>Gabbrielli, S</creator><creator>Lucci, F</creator><creator>Sanchez, L</creator><creator>Casella, D</creator><creator>Bernini, M</creator><creator>Orzalesi, L</creator><creator>Vezzosi, V</creator><creator>Greto, D</creator><creator>Mangoni, M</creator><creator>Bianchi, S</creator><creator>Livi, L</creator><creator>Nori, J</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3131-0338</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1861-2895</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20170401</creationdate><title>Impact of molecular subtypes classification concordance between preoperative core needle biopsy and surgical specimen on early breast cancer management: single-institution experience and review of published literature</title><author>Meattini, I ; Bicchierai, G ; Saieva, C ; De Benedetto, D ; Desideri, I ; Becherini, C ; Abdulcadir, D ; Vanzi, E ; Boeri, C ; Gabbrielli, S ; Lucci, F ; Sanchez, L ; Casella, D ; Bernini, M ; Orzalesi, L ; Vezzosi, V ; Greto, D ; Mangoni, M ; Bianchi, S ; Livi, L ; Nori, J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c477t-e1a3d49b596ce09facab79203e366d1734fb4e612d988f59556bd22d764973133</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Biomarkers, Tumor - metabolism</topic><topic>Biopsy, Large-Core Needle</topic><topic>Breast cancer</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - metabolism</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - therapy</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast - metabolism</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast - pathology</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast - therapy</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Lobular - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Lobular - metabolism</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Lobular - pathology</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Lobular - therapy</topic><topic>Core needle biopsy</topic><topic>Disease Management</topic><topic>Estrogen receptor</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Image-Guided Biopsy</topic><topic>Immunohistochemistry</topic><topic>Ki-67 Antigen - metabolism</topic><topic>Ki-67 proliferative index</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Molecular subtypes</topic><topic>Neoplasm Staging</topic><topic>Receptor, ErbB-2 - metabolism</topic><topic>Receptors, Estrogen - metabolism</topic><topic>Receptors, Progesterone - metabolism</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surgical specimen</topic><topic>Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms - metabolism</topic><topic>Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms - therapy</topic><topic>Ultrasonography, Mammary</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Meattini, I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bicchierai, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saieva, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Benedetto, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Desideri, I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Becherini, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abdulcadir, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vanzi, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boeri, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gabbrielli, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lucci, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sanchez, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Casella, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bernini, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Orzalesi, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vezzosi, V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greto, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mangoni, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bianchi, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Livi, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nori, J</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European journal of surgical oncology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Meattini, I</au><au>Bicchierai, G</au><au>Saieva, C</au><au>De Benedetto, D</au><au>Desideri, I</au><au>Becherini, C</au><au>Abdulcadir, D</au><au>Vanzi, E</au><au>Boeri, C</au><au>Gabbrielli, S</au><au>Lucci, F</au><au>Sanchez, L</au><au>Casella, D</au><au>Bernini, M</au><au>Orzalesi, L</au><au>Vezzosi, V</au><au>Greto, D</au><au>Mangoni, M</au><au>Bianchi, S</au><au>Livi, L</au><au>Nori, J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Impact of molecular subtypes classification concordance between preoperative core needle biopsy and surgical specimen on early breast cancer management: single-institution experience and review of published literature</atitle><jtitle>European journal of surgical oncology</jtitle><addtitle>Eur J Surg Oncol</addtitle><date>2017-04-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>43</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>642</spage><epage>648</epage><pages>642-648</pages><issn>0748-7983</issn><eissn>1532-2157</eissn><abstract>Abstract Background Core needle biopsy (CNB) plays a crucial role as diagnostic tool for breast cancer (BC). The characterization of biomarkers status before surgical treatment is crucial when primary systemic therapy is a therapeutic option. The aim of this analysis was to report concordance between preoperative CNB and surgical specimen (SS) in evaluating biomarkers and molecular subtypes. Methods Data have been collected from a cohort of 101 patients affected by early BC treated at Careggi Florence University Hospital, between January 2014 and March 2015. The conformity between molecular subtype classification was tested using kappa (κ) test. Results Mean age was 57.5 years (range 29-86). There was concordance between the estrogen receptor (ER) assessment on CNB and SS in 95 cases (94.1%). Concordance of the progesterone receptor (PgR) assessment was observed in 89 cases (88.1%). Concordance for detecting immunohistochemistry-assessed BC molecular subtypes was 87.1% (κ=0.78). Concerning Ki-67 evaluation, we report a concordance rate of 88.1% (κ=0.68). The evaluation of luminal A plus luminal B/HER negative subgroup showed a κ-value of 0.65. Conclusions CNB showed good accuracy in evaluating hormonal receptors status, HER2, and BC molecular subtypes. Evaluation of Ki67 status was less accurate than other biomarkers; therefore, we recommend that it should be detected both on CNB and SS samples, especially in hormonal positive HER2 negative tumors, in order to avoid a misclassification of tumor subtypes that could lead to an omission of potential effective systemic therapy.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>27889196</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ejso.2016.10.025</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3131-0338</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1861-2895</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0748-7983 |
ispartof | European journal of surgical oncology, 2017-04, Vol.43 (4), p.642-648 |
issn | 0748-7983 1532-2157 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1844354151 |
source | MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present) |
subjects | Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Biomarkers, Tumor - metabolism Biopsy, Large-Core Needle Breast cancer Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging Breast Neoplasms - metabolism Breast Neoplasms - pathology Breast Neoplasms - therapy Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast - diagnostic imaging Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast - metabolism Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast - pathology Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast - therapy Carcinoma, Lobular - diagnostic imaging Carcinoma, Lobular - metabolism Carcinoma, Lobular - pathology Carcinoma, Lobular - therapy Core needle biopsy Disease Management Estrogen receptor Female Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine Humans Image-Guided Biopsy Immunohistochemistry Ki-67 Antigen - metabolism Ki-67 proliferative index Middle Aged Molecular subtypes Neoplasm Staging Receptor, ErbB-2 - metabolism Receptors, Estrogen - metabolism Receptors, Progesterone - metabolism Surgery Surgical specimen Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms - metabolism Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms - pathology Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms - therapy Ultrasonography, Mammary |
title | Impact of molecular subtypes classification concordance between preoperative core needle biopsy and surgical specimen on early breast cancer management: single-institution experience and review of published literature |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T22%3A53%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Impact%20of%20molecular%20subtypes%20classification%20concordance%20between%20preoperative%20core%20needle%20biopsy%20and%20surgical%20specimen%20on%20early%20breast%20cancer%20management:%20single-institution%20experience%20and%20review%20of%20published%20literature&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20surgical%20oncology&rft.au=Meattini,%20I&rft.date=2017-04-01&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=642&rft.epage=648&rft.pages=642-648&rft.issn=0748-7983&rft.eissn=1532-2157&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ejso.2016.10.025&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1844354151%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1844354151&rft_id=info:pmid/27889196&rft_els_id=S0748798316309659&rfr_iscdi=true |