Engaging Patients and Clinicians in Establishing Research Priorities for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus

Abstract Objectives We involved patients and clinicians in Alberta, Canada, to establish research priorities in gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), using an approach based on a model proposed by the James Lind Alliance (JLA). Methods We adapted the 4-step JLA process to engage women with GDM and cl...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Canadian journal of diabetes 2017-04, Vol.41 (2), p.156-163
Hauptverfasser: Rees, Sandra E., MPH, Chadha, Rati, MD, Donovan, Lois E., MD, Guitard, Adrienne L.T, Koppula, Sudha, MD, Laupacis, Andreas, MD, Simpson, Sara, FRSA, Johnson, Jeffrey A., PhD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 163
container_issue 2
container_start_page 156
container_title Canadian journal of diabetes
container_volume 41
creator Rees, Sandra E., MPH
Chadha, Rati, MD
Donovan, Lois E., MD
Guitard, Adrienne L.T
Koppula, Sudha, MD
Laupacis, Andreas, MD
Simpson, Sara, FRSA
Johnson, Jeffrey A., PhD
description Abstract Objectives We involved patients and clinicians in Alberta, Canada, to establish research priorities in gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), using an approach based on a model proposed by the James Lind Alliance (JLA). Methods We adapted the 4-step JLA process to engage women with GDM and clinicians to identify uncertainties about the management of GDM. Uncertainties were identified through a survey and a review of the clinical practice guidelines (CPG). Uncertainties were short-listed by a steering committee, followed by a 1-day facilitated workshop using a nominal group format and involving a similar number of patients and clinicians, who identified the top 10 research priorities. Results Across the various survey formats, 75 individuals submitted 389 uncertainties, the majority (44; 59%) coming from patients. We removed 9 questions as being out of scope or unclear, and 41 were identified on a review of CPG, resulting in a total of 421 uncertainties. After the priority setting process, the final top 10 research priorities included questions about a simpler, more accurate and convenient screening test; risk factors for GDM; improving postpartum diabetes screening; the impact of GDM on the future health of the children; lifestyle challenges and mental health issues; safety, effectiveness and/or impact of diet and/or medication treatments; appropriate timing for delivery; and how care is provided, organized or communicated. Conclusions These top 10 research priorities were informed through a comprehensive and transparent process involving women who have experienced GDM as well as clinicians, and they may be regarded as research priorities for GDM.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jcjd.2016.08.219
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1843969207</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1499267116301952</els_id><sourcerecordid>1843969207</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-a539ebfe193235268a32abbe9c4e1037eae3c47a986daa8c97ca9b065f309c903</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUtP3DAUha2qVZlS_kAXlZfdJPUjD1tCSNUwpZWoQLRdWzfOzeCQccBOkPj3dRhgwaIrX8nnXN3zHUI-cZZzxquvfd7bvs1FmnOmcsH1G7ISshSZVAV7S1a80DoTVc0PyIcYe8ZKVnP9nhyIWikutFqRbuO3sHV-Sy9hcuinSMG3dD0476wDH6nzdBMnaAYXrxfdFUaEYK_pZXBjcMkUaTcGeoZJNbnRw0BPHTQ4pY9fOAxumuNH8q6DIeLR03tI_n7f_Fn_yM4vzn6uv51ntuB8yqCUGpsOuZZLjkqBFNA0qG2BnMkaAaUtatCqagGU1bUF3bCq7CTTVjN5SL7s996G8W5OF5mdizYdAR7HORquCqkrLVidpGIvtWGMMWBnboPbQXgwnJmFr-nNwtcsfA1TJvFNps9P--dmh-2L5RloEhzvBZhS3jsMJtqE1WLrAtrJtKP7__6TV3b72AQMN_iAsR_nkPimHCYKw8zvpeGlYF5JxnUp5D97A6Ik</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1843969207</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Engaging Patients and Clinicians in Establishing Research Priorities for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Rees, Sandra E., MPH ; Chadha, Rati, MD ; Donovan, Lois E., MD ; Guitard, Adrienne L.T ; Koppula, Sudha, MD ; Laupacis, Andreas, MD ; Simpson, Sara, FRSA ; Johnson, Jeffrey A., PhD</creator><creatorcontrib>Rees, Sandra E., MPH ; Chadha, Rati, MD ; Donovan, Lois E., MD ; Guitard, Adrienne L.T ; Koppula, Sudha, MD ; Laupacis, Andreas, MD ; Simpson, Sara, FRSA ; Johnson, Jeffrey A., PhD</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Objectives We involved patients and clinicians in Alberta, Canada, to establish research priorities in gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), using an approach based on a model proposed by the James Lind Alliance (JLA). Methods We adapted the 4-step JLA process to engage women with GDM and clinicians to identify uncertainties about the management of GDM. Uncertainties were identified through a survey and a review of the clinical practice guidelines (CPG). Uncertainties were short-listed by a steering committee, followed by a 1-day facilitated workshop using a nominal group format and involving a similar number of patients and clinicians, who identified the top 10 research priorities. Results Across the various survey formats, 75 individuals submitted 389 uncertainties, the majority (44; 59%) coming from patients. We removed 9 questions as being out of scope or unclear, and 41 were identified on a review of CPG, resulting in a total of 421 uncertainties. After the priority setting process, the final top 10 research priorities included questions about a simpler, more accurate and convenient screening test; risk factors for GDM; improving postpartum diabetes screening; the impact of GDM on the future health of the children; lifestyle challenges and mental health issues; safety, effectiveness and/or impact of diet and/or medication treatments; appropriate timing for delivery; and how care is provided, organized or communicated. Conclusions These top 10 research priorities were informed through a comprehensive and transparent process involving women who have experienced GDM as well as clinicians, and they may be regarded as research priorities for GDM.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1499-2671</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2352-3840</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jcjd.2016.08.219</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27881298</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Canada: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>clinical uncertainties ; Diabetes, Gestational ; diabète gestationnel ; Endocrinology &amp; Metabolism ; Female ; gestational diabetes ; grossesse ; Humans ; incertitudes cliniques ; Other ; participation des patientes ; patient engagement ; Patient Participation ; Physicians - psychology ; Practice Guidelines as Topic ; Pregnancy ; priorités de recherche ; research priorities ; Uncertainty ; Women - psychology</subject><ispartof>Canadian journal of diabetes, 2017-04, Vol.41 (2), p.156-163</ispartof><rights>Canadian Diabetes Association</rights><rights>2016 Canadian Diabetes Association</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 Canadian Diabetes Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-a539ebfe193235268a32abbe9c4e1037eae3c47a986daa8c97ca9b065f309c903</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-a539ebfe193235268a32abbe9c4e1037eae3c47a986daa8c97ca9b065f309c903</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27881298$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rees, Sandra E., MPH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chadha, Rati, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Donovan, Lois E., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guitard, Adrienne L.T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koppula, Sudha, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laupacis, Andreas, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simpson, Sara, FRSA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Jeffrey A., PhD</creatorcontrib><title>Engaging Patients and Clinicians in Establishing Research Priorities for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus</title><title>Canadian journal of diabetes</title><addtitle>Can J Diabetes</addtitle><description>Abstract Objectives We involved patients and clinicians in Alberta, Canada, to establish research priorities in gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), using an approach based on a model proposed by the James Lind Alliance (JLA). Methods We adapted the 4-step JLA process to engage women with GDM and clinicians to identify uncertainties about the management of GDM. Uncertainties were identified through a survey and a review of the clinical practice guidelines (CPG). Uncertainties were short-listed by a steering committee, followed by a 1-day facilitated workshop using a nominal group format and involving a similar number of patients and clinicians, who identified the top 10 research priorities. Results Across the various survey formats, 75 individuals submitted 389 uncertainties, the majority (44; 59%) coming from patients. We removed 9 questions as being out of scope or unclear, and 41 were identified on a review of CPG, resulting in a total of 421 uncertainties. After the priority setting process, the final top 10 research priorities included questions about a simpler, more accurate and convenient screening test; risk factors for GDM; improving postpartum diabetes screening; the impact of GDM on the future health of the children; lifestyle challenges and mental health issues; safety, effectiveness and/or impact of diet and/or medication treatments; appropriate timing for delivery; and how care is provided, organized or communicated. Conclusions These top 10 research priorities were informed through a comprehensive and transparent process involving women who have experienced GDM as well as clinicians, and they may be regarded as research priorities for GDM.</description><subject>clinical uncertainties</subject><subject>Diabetes, Gestational</subject><subject>diabète gestationnel</subject><subject>Endocrinology &amp; Metabolism</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>gestational diabetes</subject><subject>grossesse</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>incertitudes cliniques</subject><subject>Other</subject><subject>participation des patientes</subject><subject>patient engagement</subject><subject>Patient Participation</subject><subject>Physicians - psychology</subject><subject>Practice Guidelines as Topic</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>priorités de recherche</subject><subject>research priorities</subject><subject>Uncertainty</subject><subject>Women - psychology</subject><issn>1499-2671</issn><issn>2352-3840</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kUtP3DAUha2qVZlS_kAXlZfdJPUjD1tCSNUwpZWoQLRdWzfOzeCQccBOkPj3dRhgwaIrX8nnXN3zHUI-cZZzxquvfd7bvs1FmnOmcsH1G7ISshSZVAV7S1a80DoTVc0PyIcYe8ZKVnP9nhyIWikutFqRbuO3sHV-Sy9hcuinSMG3dD0476wDH6nzdBMnaAYXrxfdFUaEYK_pZXBjcMkUaTcGeoZJNbnRw0BPHTQ4pY9fOAxumuNH8q6DIeLR03tI_n7f_Fn_yM4vzn6uv51ntuB8yqCUGpsOuZZLjkqBFNA0qG2BnMkaAaUtatCqagGU1bUF3bCq7CTTVjN5SL7s996G8W5OF5mdizYdAR7HORquCqkrLVidpGIvtWGMMWBnboPbQXgwnJmFr-nNwtcsfA1TJvFNps9P--dmh-2L5RloEhzvBZhS3jsMJtqE1WLrAtrJtKP7__6TV3b72AQMN_iAsR_nkPimHCYKw8zvpeGlYF5JxnUp5D97A6Ik</recordid><startdate>20170401</startdate><enddate>20170401</enddate><creator>Rees, Sandra E., MPH</creator><creator>Chadha, Rati, MD</creator><creator>Donovan, Lois E., MD</creator><creator>Guitard, Adrienne L.T</creator><creator>Koppula, Sudha, MD</creator><creator>Laupacis, Andreas, MD</creator><creator>Simpson, Sara, FRSA</creator><creator>Johnson, Jeffrey A., PhD</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170401</creationdate><title>Engaging Patients and Clinicians in Establishing Research Priorities for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus</title><author>Rees, Sandra E., MPH ; Chadha, Rati, MD ; Donovan, Lois E., MD ; Guitard, Adrienne L.T ; Koppula, Sudha, MD ; Laupacis, Andreas, MD ; Simpson, Sara, FRSA ; Johnson, Jeffrey A., PhD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-a539ebfe193235268a32abbe9c4e1037eae3c47a986daa8c97ca9b065f309c903</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>clinical uncertainties</topic><topic>Diabetes, Gestational</topic><topic>diabète gestationnel</topic><topic>Endocrinology &amp; Metabolism</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>gestational diabetes</topic><topic>grossesse</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>incertitudes cliniques</topic><topic>Other</topic><topic>participation des patientes</topic><topic>patient engagement</topic><topic>Patient Participation</topic><topic>Physicians - psychology</topic><topic>Practice Guidelines as Topic</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>priorités de recherche</topic><topic>research priorities</topic><topic>Uncertainty</topic><topic>Women - psychology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rees, Sandra E., MPH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chadha, Rati, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Donovan, Lois E., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guitard, Adrienne L.T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koppula, Sudha, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laupacis, Andreas, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simpson, Sara, FRSA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Jeffrey A., PhD</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Canadian journal of diabetes</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rees, Sandra E., MPH</au><au>Chadha, Rati, MD</au><au>Donovan, Lois E., MD</au><au>Guitard, Adrienne L.T</au><au>Koppula, Sudha, MD</au><au>Laupacis, Andreas, MD</au><au>Simpson, Sara, FRSA</au><au>Johnson, Jeffrey A., PhD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Engaging Patients and Clinicians in Establishing Research Priorities for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus</atitle><jtitle>Canadian journal of diabetes</jtitle><addtitle>Can J Diabetes</addtitle><date>2017-04-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>156</spage><epage>163</epage><pages>156-163</pages><issn>1499-2671</issn><eissn>2352-3840</eissn><abstract>Abstract Objectives We involved patients and clinicians in Alberta, Canada, to establish research priorities in gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), using an approach based on a model proposed by the James Lind Alliance (JLA). Methods We adapted the 4-step JLA process to engage women with GDM and clinicians to identify uncertainties about the management of GDM. Uncertainties were identified through a survey and a review of the clinical practice guidelines (CPG). Uncertainties were short-listed by a steering committee, followed by a 1-day facilitated workshop using a nominal group format and involving a similar number of patients and clinicians, who identified the top 10 research priorities. Results Across the various survey formats, 75 individuals submitted 389 uncertainties, the majority (44; 59%) coming from patients. We removed 9 questions as being out of scope or unclear, and 41 were identified on a review of CPG, resulting in a total of 421 uncertainties. After the priority setting process, the final top 10 research priorities included questions about a simpler, more accurate and convenient screening test; risk factors for GDM; improving postpartum diabetes screening; the impact of GDM on the future health of the children; lifestyle challenges and mental health issues; safety, effectiveness and/or impact of diet and/or medication treatments; appropriate timing for delivery; and how care is provided, organized or communicated. Conclusions These top 10 research priorities were informed through a comprehensive and transparent process involving women who have experienced GDM as well as clinicians, and they may be regarded as research priorities for GDM.</abstract><cop>Canada</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>27881298</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jcjd.2016.08.219</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1499-2671
ispartof Canadian journal of diabetes, 2017-04, Vol.41 (2), p.156-163
issn 1499-2671
2352-3840
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1843969207
source MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects clinical uncertainties
Diabetes, Gestational
diabète gestationnel
Endocrinology & Metabolism
Female
gestational diabetes
grossesse
Humans
incertitudes cliniques
Other
participation des patientes
patient engagement
Patient Participation
Physicians - psychology
Practice Guidelines as Topic
Pregnancy
priorités de recherche
research priorities
Uncertainty
Women - psychology
title Engaging Patients and Clinicians in Establishing Research Priorities for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T01%3A01%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Engaging%20Patients%20and%20Clinicians%20in%20Establishing%20Research%20Priorities%20for%20Gestational%20Diabetes%20Mellitus&rft.jtitle=Canadian%20journal%20of%20diabetes&rft.au=Rees,%20Sandra%20E.,%20MPH&rft.date=2017-04-01&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=156&rft.epage=163&rft.pages=156-163&rft.issn=1499-2671&rft.eissn=2352-3840&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jcjd.2016.08.219&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1843969207%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1843969207&rft_id=info:pmid/27881298&rft_els_id=S1499267116301952&rfr_iscdi=true