Is There Any Difference Between Seminomas and Nonseminomatous Germ Cell Tumors on Shear Wave Elastography? A Preliminary Study

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the ability of shear wave elastography (SWE) to differentiate seminomas from nonseminomatous germ cell tumors. Approval for this retrospective study was obtained from the local Ethics Committee of Istanbul University Cerrahpasa Medical School. Fifteen patien...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of ultrasound in medicine 2016-12, Vol.35 (12), p.2575-2580
Hauptverfasser: Dikici, Atilla Suleyman, Er, Mehmet Emin, Alis, Deniz, Samanci, Cesur, Ustabasioglu, Fethi Emre, Demirdag, Cetin, Durak, Haydar, Kantarci, Fatih, Mihmanli, Ismail
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2580
container_issue 12
container_start_page 2575
container_title Journal of ultrasound in medicine
container_volume 35
creator Dikici, Atilla Suleyman
Er, Mehmet Emin
Alis, Deniz
Samanci, Cesur
Ustabasioglu, Fethi Emre
Demirdag, Cetin
Durak, Haydar
Kantarci, Fatih
Mihmanli, Ismail
description The purpose of this study was to evaluate the ability of shear wave elastography (SWE) to differentiate seminomas from nonseminomatous germ cell tumors. Approval for this retrospective study was obtained from the local Ethics Committee of Istanbul University Cerrahpasa Medical School. Fifteen patients with malignant testicular lesions were examined by grayscale sonography, color or power Doppler sonography, and SWE between February 2011 and October 2015. The size of each lesion, Doppler signal parameters, echogenicity, presence of microlithiasis, unifocality or multifocality, and histopathologic findings were the main factors evaluated. The mean age of the patients was 33 years (range, 25-55 years). There were no differences between seminomas and nonseminomatous germ cell tumors in terms of Doppler signals, echogenicity, microlithiasis, or focality. Only the homogeneous and heterogeneous echogenicity patterns differed significantly. However, a significant difference was evident in SWE-derived quantitative data. Seminomas and nonseminomatous germ cell tumors do not differ significantly on grayscale or Doppler sonography, except in terms of homogeneity. However, SWE seems to differentiate seminomas from nonseminomatous germ cell tumors.
doi_str_mv 10.7863/ultra.15.12067
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1842598774</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1842598774</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c250t-9a4bb2e2923ca7769540b11305796438e31aa4b7d0c2b62107af181ab1e0eb463</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kL1PwzAQxS0EoqWwMiKPLAk-24mTCZVSSiUESC1ijJz0QoPyUewElIW_HdMWpjud3nt69yPkHJivolBcdWVrtA-BD5yF6oAMIQiYF4cgDsmQcRV5ksdqQE6sfWeMM1DymAzcXXEJYki-55Yu12iQjuue3hZ57vY6Q3qD7RdiTRdYFXVTaUt1vaKPTW33h7bpLJ2hqegEy5Iuu6oxljbOsUZt6Kv-RDottW2bN6M36_6ajumzwbJwdm16umi7VX9KjnJdWjzbzxF5uZsuJ_few9NsPhk_eBkPWOvFWqYpRx5zkWmlwjiQLAUQLFBxKEWEArSTqBXLeBpyYErnEIFOARmmMhQjcrnL3Zjmo0PbJlVhM9db1-j-SCCSPIgjpaST-jtpZhprDebJxhSVa5wAS36ZJ1vmCQTJlrkzXOyzu7TC1b_8D7L4AcPrfjk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1842598774</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Is There Any Difference Between Seminomas and Nonseminomatous Germ Cell Tumors on Shear Wave Elastography? A Preliminary Study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Dikici, Atilla Suleyman ; Er, Mehmet Emin ; Alis, Deniz ; Samanci, Cesur ; Ustabasioglu, Fethi Emre ; Demirdag, Cetin ; Durak, Haydar ; Kantarci, Fatih ; Mihmanli, Ismail</creator><creatorcontrib>Dikici, Atilla Suleyman ; Er, Mehmet Emin ; Alis, Deniz ; Samanci, Cesur ; Ustabasioglu, Fethi Emre ; Demirdag, Cetin ; Durak, Haydar ; Kantarci, Fatih ; Mihmanli, Ismail</creatorcontrib><description>The purpose of this study was to evaluate the ability of shear wave elastography (SWE) to differentiate seminomas from nonseminomatous germ cell tumors. Approval for this retrospective study was obtained from the local Ethics Committee of Istanbul University Cerrahpasa Medical School. Fifteen patients with malignant testicular lesions were examined by grayscale sonography, color or power Doppler sonography, and SWE between February 2011 and October 2015. The size of each lesion, Doppler signal parameters, echogenicity, presence of microlithiasis, unifocality or multifocality, and histopathologic findings were the main factors evaluated. The mean age of the patients was 33 years (range, 25-55 years). There were no differences between seminomas and nonseminomatous germ cell tumors in terms of Doppler signals, echogenicity, microlithiasis, or focality. Only the homogeneous and heterogeneous echogenicity patterns differed significantly. However, a significant difference was evident in SWE-derived quantitative data. Seminomas and nonseminomatous germ cell tumors do not differ significantly on grayscale or Doppler sonography, except in terms of homogeneity. However, SWE seems to differentiate seminomas from nonseminomatous germ cell tumors.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0278-4297</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1550-9613</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.7863/ultra.15.12067</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27872413</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England</publisher><subject>Adult ; Diagnosis, Differential ; Elasticity Imaging Techniques - methods ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasms, Germ Cell and Embryonal - diagnostic imaging ; Reproducibility of Results ; Retrospective Studies ; Seminoma - diagnostic imaging ; Testicular Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Testis - diagnostic imaging</subject><ispartof>Journal of ultrasound in medicine, 2016-12, Vol.35 (12), p.2575-2580</ispartof><rights>2016 by the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c250t-9a4bb2e2923ca7769540b11305796438e31aa4b7d0c2b62107af181ab1e0eb463</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27872413$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dikici, Atilla Suleyman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Er, Mehmet Emin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alis, Deniz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Samanci, Cesur</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ustabasioglu, Fethi Emre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Demirdag, Cetin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Durak, Haydar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kantarci, Fatih</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mihmanli, Ismail</creatorcontrib><title>Is There Any Difference Between Seminomas and Nonseminomatous Germ Cell Tumors on Shear Wave Elastography? A Preliminary Study</title><title>Journal of ultrasound in medicine</title><addtitle>J Ultrasound Med</addtitle><description>The purpose of this study was to evaluate the ability of shear wave elastography (SWE) to differentiate seminomas from nonseminomatous germ cell tumors. Approval for this retrospective study was obtained from the local Ethics Committee of Istanbul University Cerrahpasa Medical School. Fifteen patients with malignant testicular lesions were examined by grayscale sonography, color or power Doppler sonography, and SWE between February 2011 and October 2015. The size of each lesion, Doppler signal parameters, echogenicity, presence of microlithiasis, unifocality or multifocality, and histopathologic findings were the main factors evaluated. The mean age of the patients was 33 years (range, 25-55 years). There were no differences between seminomas and nonseminomatous germ cell tumors in terms of Doppler signals, echogenicity, microlithiasis, or focality. Only the homogeneous and heterogeneous echogenicity patterns differed significantly. However, a significant difference was evident in SWE-derived quantitative data. Seminomas and nonseminomatous germ cell tumors do not differ significantly on grayscale or Doppler sonography, except in terms of homogeneity. However, SWE seems to differentiate seminomas from nonseminomatous germ cell tumors.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Diagnosis, Differential</subject><subject>Elasticity Imaging Techniques - methods</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neoplasms, Germ Cell and Embryonal - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Seminoma - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Testicular Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Testis - diagnostic imaging</subject><issn>0278-4297</issn><issn>1550-9613</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kL1PwzAQxS0EoqWwMiKPLAk-24mTCZVSSiUESC1ijJz0QoPyUewElIW_HdMWpjud3nt69yPkHJivolBcdWVrtA-BD5yF6oAMIQiYF4cgDsmQcRV5ksdqQE6sfWeMM1DymAzcXXEJYki-55Yu12iQjuue3hZ57vY6Q3qD7RdiTRdYFXVTaUt1vaKPTW33h7bpLJ2hqegEy5Iuu6oxljbOsUZt6Kv-RDottW2bN6M36_6ajumzwbJwdm16umi7VX9KjnJdWjzbzxF5uZsuJ_few9NsPhk_eBkPWOvFWqYpRx5zkWmlwjiQLAUQLFBxKEWEArSTqBXLeBpyYErnEIFOARmmMhQjcrnL3Zjmo0PbJlVhM9db1-j-SCCSPIgjpaST-jtpZhprDebJxhSVa5wAS36ZJ1vmCQTJlrkzXOyzu7TC1b_8D7L4AcPrfjk</recordid><startdate>201612</startdate><enddate>201612</enddate><creator>Dikici, Atilla Suleyman</creator><creator>Er, Mehmet Emin</creator><creator>Alis, Deniz</creator><creator>Samanci, Cesur</creator><creator>Ustabasioglu, Fethi Emre</creator><creator>Demirdag, Cetin</creator><creator>Durak, Haydar</creator><creator>Kantarci, Fatih</creator><creator>Mihmanli, Ismail</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201612</creationdate><title>Is There Any Difference Between Seminomas and Nonseminomatous Germ Cell Tumors on Shear Wave Elastography? A Preliminary Study</title><author>Dikici, Atilla Suleyman ; Er, Mehmet Emin ; Alis, Deniz ; Samanci, Cesur ; Ustabasioglu, Fethi Emre ; Demirdag, Cetin ; Durak, Haydar ; Kantarci, Fatih ; Mihmanli, Ismail</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c250t-9a4bb2e2923ca7769540b11305796438e31aa4b7d0c2b62107af181ab1e0eb463</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Diagnosis, Differential</topic><topic>Elasticity Imaging Techniques - methods</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neoplasms, Germ Cell and Embryonal - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Seminoma - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Testicular Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Testis - diagnostic imaging</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dikici, Atilla Suleyman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Er, Mehmet Emin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alis, Deniz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Samanci, Cesur</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ustabasioglu, Fethi Emre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Demirdag, Cetin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Durak, Haydar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kantarci, Fatih</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mihmanli, Ismail</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of ultrasound in medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dikici, Atilla Suleyman</au><au>Er, Mehmet Emin</au><au>Alis, Deniz</au><au>Samanci, Cesur</au><au>Ustabasioglu, Fethi Emre</au><au>Demirdag, Cetin</au><au>Durak, Haydar</au><au>Kantarci, Fatih</au><au>Mihmanli, Ismail</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Is There Any Difference Between Seminomas and Nonseminomatous Germ Cell Tumors on Shear Wave Elastography? A Preliminary Study</atitle><jtitle>Journal of ultrasound in medicine</jtitle><addtitle>J Ultrasound Med</addtitle><date>2016-12</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>2575</spage><epage>2580</epage><pages>2575-2580</pages><issn>0278-4297</issn><eissn>1550-9613</eissn><abstract>The purpose of this study was to evaluate the ability of shear wave elastography (SWE) to differentiate seminomas from nonseminomatous germ cell tumors. Approval for this retrospective study was obtained from the local Ethics Committee of Istanbul University Cerrahpasa Medical School. Fifteen patients with malignant testicular lesions were examined by grayscale sonography, color or power Doppler sonography, and SWE between February 2011 and October 2015. The size of each lesion, Doppler signal parameters, echogenicity, presence of microlithiasis, unifocality or multifocality, and histopathologic findings were the main factors evaluated. The mean age of the patients was 33 years (range, 25-55 years). There were no differences between seminomas and nonseminomatous germ cell tumors in terms of Doppler signals, echogenicity, microlithiasis, or focality. Only the homogeneous and heterogeneous echogenicity patterns differed significantly. However, a significant difference was evident in SWE-derived quantitative data. Seminomas and nonseminomatous germ cell tumors do not differ significantly on grayscale or Doppler sonography, except in terms of homogeneity. However, SWE seems to differentiate seminomas from nonseminomatous germ cell tumors.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pmid>27872413</pmid><doi>10.7863/ultra.15.12067</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0278-4297
ispartof Journal of ultrasound in medicine, 2016-12, Vol.35 (12), p.2575-2580
issn 0278-4297
1550-9613
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1842598774
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Adult
Diagnosis, Differential
Elasticity Imaging Techniques - methods
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Neoplasms, Germ Cell and Embryonal - diagnostic imaging
Reproducibility of Results
Retrospective Studies
Seminoma - diagnostic imaging
Testicular Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging
Testis - diagnostic imaging
title Is There Any Difference Between Seminomas and Nonseminomatous Germ Cell Tumors on Shear Wave Elastography? A Preliminary Study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T20%3A33%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Is%20There%20Any%20Difference%20Between%20Seminomas%20and%20Nonseminomatous%20Germ%20Cell%20Tumors%20on%20Shear%20Wave%20Elastography?%20A%20Preliminary%20Study&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20ultrasound%20in%20medicine&rft.au=Dikici,%20Atilla%20Suleyman&rft.date=2016-12&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=2575&rft.epage=2580&rft.pages=2575-2580&rft.issn=0278-4297&rft.eissn=1550-9613&rft_id=info:doi/10.7863/ultra.15.12067&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1842598774%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1842598774&rft_id=info:pmid/27872413&rfr_iscdi=true