Feasibility of three-dimensional ultrashort echo time magnetic resonance imaging at 1.5 T for the diagnosis of skull fractures
Objectives To investigate the feasibility of ultrashort echo time (UTE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the diagnosis of skull fractures. Methods The skull fracture models of ten Bama pigs and 364 patients with craniocerebral trauma were subjected to computed tomography (CT), UTE and convention...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | European radiology 2016-01, Vol.26 (1), p.138-146 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 146 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 138 |
| container_title | European radiology |
| container_volume | 26 |
| creator | Wu, Hao Zhong, Yu-min Nie, Quan-min Chen, Wei-bo Guo, Lie-mei Yang, Xi Zhang, Hong Lin, Yi Xu, Jian-rong Dai, Yong-ming Zhu, Ming |
| description | Objectives
To investigate the feasibility of ultrashort echo time (UTE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the diagnosis of skull fractures.
Methods
The skull fracture models of ten Bama pigs and 364 patients with craniocerebral trauma were subjected to computed tomography (CT), UTE and conventional MRI sequences. The accuracy of UTE imaging in skull fracture diagnosis was analysed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, McNemar’s test and Kappa values. Differences among CT, UTE imaging and anatomical measurement (AM) values for linear fractures (LFs) and depressed fractures (DFs) were compared using one-way ANOVA and a paired-samples t-test.
Results
UTE imaging clearly demonstrated skull structures and fractures. The accuracy, validity and reliability of UTE MRI were excellent, with no significant differences between expert readings (
P
> 0.05; Kappa, 0.899). The values obtained for 42 LFs and 13 DFs in the ten specimens were not significantly different among CT, UTE MRI and AMs, while those obtained for 55 LFs and ten DFs in 44 patients were not significantly different between CT and UTE MRI (
P
> 0.05).
Conclusions
UTE MRI sequences are feasible for the evaluation of skull structures and fractures, with no radiation exposure, particularly for paediatric and pregnant patients.
Key Points
•
Despite ionising radiation, CT is standard for skull fracture assessment
.
•
Conventional MRI cannot depict skull structures
.
•
3D-UTE sequences clearly demonstrate skull structures and fractures
.
•
UTE plus conventional MRI are superior to CT in craniocerebral trauma assessment
.
•
Paediatric and pregnant patients will benefit from this imaging modality
. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00330-015-3804-2 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1842511625</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3897205261</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c516t-7a0835982c6da206ea845eafe71874857b0dd705d826d254eed1161e05a0bbde3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkcFqFTEUhoMo9lp9ADcScOMm9SSTTJKllFaFgpu6DpnJmXtT505qkll047Ob4VYRQVwFzvn-L3B-Ql5zuOAA-n0B6DpgwBXrDEgmnpAdl51gHIx8SnZgO8O0tfKMvCjlDgAsl_o5OROqDbntd-THNfoShzjH-kDTROshI7IQj7iUmBY_03Wu2ZdDypXieEi0th09-v2CNY40Y2nUMiKNbRaXPfWV8gtFb-mUctMhDbHBqcSy-cu3dZ7plP1Y15Z9SZ5Nfi746vE9J1-vr24vP7GbLx8_X364YaPifWXag-mUNWLsgxfQozdSoZ9Qc6OlUXqAEDSoYEQfhJKIgfOeIygPwxCwOyfvTt77nL6vWKo7xjLiPPsF01ocN1KoFhHq_6jujBEcpG3o27_Qu7TmdrSNkrYHLaxoFD9RY06lZJzcfW7Hyg-Og9t6dKceXevRbT26LfPm0bwORwy_E7-Ka4A4AaWtlj3mP77-p_UnCDyoEA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1749607292</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Feasibility of three-dimensional ultrashort echo time magnetic resonance imaging at 1.5 T for the diagnosis of skull fractures</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Wu, Hao ; Zhong, Yu-min ; Nie, Quan-min ; Chen, Wei-bo ; Guo, Lie-mei ; Yang, Xi ; Zhang, Hong ; Lin, Yi ; Xu, Jian-rong ; Dai, Yong-ming ; Zhu, Ming</creator><creatorcontrib>Wu, Hao ; Zhong, Yu-min ; Nie, Quan-min ; Chen, Wei-bo ; Guo, Lie-mei ; Yang, Xi ; Zhang, Hong ; Lin, Yi ; Xu, Jian-rong ; Dai, Yong-ming ; Zhu, Ming</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives
To investigate the feasibility of ultrashort echo time (UTE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the diagnosis of skull fractures.
Methods
The skull fracture models of ten Bama pigs and 364 patients with craniocerebral trauma were subjected to computed tomography (CT), UTE and conventional MRI sequences. The accuracy of UTE imaging in skull fracture diagnosis was analysed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, McNemar’s test and Kappa values. Differences among CT, UTE imaging and anatomical measurement (AM) values for linear fractures (LFs) and depressed fractures (DFs) were compared using one-way ANOVA and a paired-samples t-test.
Results
UTE imaging clearly demonstrated skull structures and fractures. The accuracy, validity and reliability of UTE MRI were excellent, with no significant differences between expert readings (
P
> 0.05; Kappa, 0.899). The values obtained for 42 LFs and 13 DFs in the ten specimens were not significantly different among CT, UTE MRI and AMs, while those obtained for 55 LFs and ten DFs in 44 patients were not significantly different between CT and UTE MRI (
P
> 0.05).
Conclusions
UTE MRI sequences are feasible for the evaluation of skull structures and fractures, with no radiation exposure, particularly for paediatric and pregnant patients.
Key Points
•
Despite ionising radiation, CT is standard for skull fracture assessment
.
•
Conventional MRI cannot depict skull structures
.
•
3D-UTE sequences clearly demonstrate skull structures and fractures
.
•
UTE plus conventional MRI are superior to CT in craniocerebral trauma assessment
.
•
Paediatric and pregnant patients will benefit from this imaging modality
.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0938-7994</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1084</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00330-015-3804-2</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25994196</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Animals ; Cancer ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Coma ; Diagnostic Radiology ; Disease Models, Animal ; Drug dosages ; Echo-Planar Imaging - methods ; Feasibility Studies ; Female ; Fractures ; Hospitals ; Humans ; Imaging ; Imaging, Three-Dimensional - methods ; Infant ; Infant, Newborn ; Internal Medicine ; Interventional Radiology ; Magnetic Resonance ; Magnetic resonance imaging ; Male ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Middle Aged ; Neuroradiology ; Neurosurgery ; Patients ; Pediatrics ; Radiation ; Radiology ; Reproducibility of Results ; ROC Curve ; Skull Fractures - diagnosis ; Swine ; Swine, Miniature ; Tomography ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed ; Trauma ; Ultrasound ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>European radiology, 2016-01, Vol.26 (1), p.138-146</ispartof><rights>European Society of Radiology 2015</rights><rights>European Society of Radiology 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c516t-7a0835982c6da206ea845eafe71874857b0dd705d826d254eed1161e05a0bbde3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c516t-7a0835982c6da206ea845eafe71874857b0dd705d826d254eed1161e05a0bbde3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00330-015-3804-2$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00330-015-3804-2$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25994196$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wu, Hao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhong, Yu-min</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nie, Quan-min</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Wei-bo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guo, Lie-mei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Xi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Hong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Yi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Jian-rong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dai, Yong-ming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Ming</creatorcontrib><title>Feasibility of three-dimensional ultrashort echo time magnetic resonance imaging at 1.5 T for the diagnosis of skull fractures</title><title>European radiology</title><addtitle>Eur Radiol</addtitle><addtitle>Eur Radiol</addtitle><description>Objectives
To investigate the feasibility of ultrashort echo time (UTE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the diagnosis of skull fractures.
Methods
The skull fracture models of ten Bama pigs and 364 patients with craniocerebral trauma were subjected to computed tomography (CT), UTE and conventional MRI sequences. The accuracy of UTE imaging in skull fracture diagnosis was analysed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, McNemar’s test and Kappa values. Differences among CT, UTE imaging and anatomical measurement (AM) values for linear fractures (LFs) and depressed fractures (DFs) were compared using one-way ANOVA and a paired-samples t-test.
Results
UTE imaging clearly demonstrated skull structures and fractures. The accuracy, validity and reliability of UTE MRI were excellent, with no significant differences between expert readings (
P
> 0.05; Kappa, 0.899). The values obtained for 42 LFs and 13 DFs in the ten specimens were not significantly different among CT, UTE MRI and AMs, while those obtained for 55 LFs and ten DFs in 44 patients were not significantly different between CT and UTE MRI (
P
> 0.05).
Conclusions
UTE MRI sequences are feasible for the evaluation of skull structures and fractures, with no radiation exposure, particularly for paediatric and pregnant patients.
Key Points
•
Despite ionising radiation, CT is standard for skull fracture assessment
.
•
Conventional MRI cannot depict skull structures
.
•
3D-UTE sequences clearly demonstrate skull structures and fractures
.
•
UTE plus conventional MRI are superior to CT in craniocerebral trauma assessment
.
•
Paediatric and pregnant patients will benefit from this imaging modality
.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Coma</subject><subject>Diagnostic Radiology</subject><subject>Disease Models, Animal</subject><subject>Drug dosages</subject><subject>Echo-Planar Imaging - methods</subject><subject>Feasibility Studies</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fractures</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Imaging</subject><subject>Imaging, Three-Dimensional - methods</subject><subject>Infant</subject><subject>Infant, Newborn</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Interventional Radiology</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance</subject><subject>Magnetic resonance imaging</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neuroradiology</subject><subject>Neurosurgery</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><subject>Radiation</subject><subject>Radiology</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>ROC Curve</subject><subject>Skull Fractures - diagnosis</subject><subject>Swine</subject><subject>Swine, Miniature</subject><subject>Tomography</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</subject><subject>Trauma</subject><subject>Ultrasound</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0938-7994</issn><issn>1432-1084</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkcFqFTEUhoMo9lp9ADcScOMm9SSTTJKllFaFgpu6DpnJmXtT505qkll047Ob4VYRQVwFzvn-L3B-Ql5zuOAA-n0B6DpgwBXrDEgmnpAdl51gHIx8SnZgO8O0tfKMvCjlDgAsl_o5OROqDbntd-THNfoShzjH-kDTROshI7IQj7iUmBY_03Wu2ZdDypXieEi0th09-v2CNY40Y2nUMiKNbRaXPfWV8gtFb-mUctMhDbHBqcSy-cu3dZ7plP1Y15Z9SZ5Nfi746vE9J1-vr24vP7GbLx8_X364YaPifWXag-mUNWLsgxfQozdSoZ9Qc6OlUXqAEDSoYEQfhJKIgfOeIygPwxCwOyfvTt77nL6vWKo7xjLiPPsF01ocN1KoFhHq_6jujBEcpG3o27_Qu7TmdrSNkrYHLaxoFD9RY06lZJzcfW7Hyg-Og9t6dKceXevRbT26LfPm0bwORwy_E7-Ka4A4AaWtlj3mP77-p_UnCDyoEA</recordid><startdate>20160101</startdate><enddate>20160101</enddate><creator>Wu, Hao</creator><creator>Zhong, Yu-min</creator><creator>Nie, Quan-min</creator><creator>Chen, Wei-bo</creator><creator>Guo, Lie-mei</creator><creator>Yang, Xi</creator><creator>Zhang, Hong</creator><creator>Lin, Yi</creator><creator>Xu, Jian-rong</creator><creator>Dai, Yong-ming</creator><creator>Zhu, Ming</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160101</creationdate><title>Feasibility of three-dimensional ultrashort echo time magnetic resonance imaging at 1.5 T for the diagnosis of skull fractures</title><author>Wu, Hao ; Zhong, Yu-min ; Nie, Quan-min ; Chen, Wei-bo ; Guo, Lie-mei ; Yang, Xi ; Zhang, Hong ; Lin, Yi ; Xu, Jian-rong ; Dai, Yong-ming ; Zhu, Ming</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c516t-7a0835982c6da206ea845eafe71874857b0dd705d826d254eed1161e05a0bbde3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Coma</topic><topic>Diagnostic Radiology</topic><topic>Disease Models, Animal</topic><topic>Drug dosages</topic><topic>Echo-Planar Imaging - methods</topic><topic>Feasibility Studies</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fractures</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Imaging</topic><topic>Imaging, Three-Dimensional - methods</topic><topic>Infant</topic><topic>Infant, Newborn</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Interventional Radiology</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance</topic><topic>Magnetic resonance imaging</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neuroradiology</topic><topic>Neurosurgery</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><topic>Radiation</topic><topic>Radiology</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>ROC Curve</topic><topic>Skull Fractures - diagnosis</topic><topic>Swine</topic><topic>Swine, Miniature</topic><topic>Tomography</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</topic><topic>Trauma</topic><topic>Ultrasound</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wu, Hao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhong, Yu-min</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nie, Quan-min</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Wei-bo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guo, Lie-mei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Xi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Hong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Yi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Jian-rong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dai, Yong-ming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Ming</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>European radiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wu, Hao</au><au>Zhong, Yu-min</au><au>Nie, Quan-min</au><au>Chen, Wei-bo</au><au>Guo, Lie-mei</au><au>Yang, Xi</au><au>Zhang, Hong</au><au>Lin, Yi</au><au>Xu, Jian-rong</au><au>Dai, Yong-ming</au><au>Zhu, Ming</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Feasibility of three-dimensional ultrashort echo time magnetic resonance imaging at 1.5 T for the diagnosis of skull fractures</atitle><jtitle>European radiology</jtitle><stitle>Eur Radiol</stitle><addtitle>Eur Radiol</addtitle><date>2016-01-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>138</spage><epage>146</epage><pages>138-146</pages><issn>0938-7994</issn><eissn>1432-1084</eissn><abstract>Objectives
To investigate the feasibility of ultrashort echo time (UTE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the diagnosis of skull fractures.
Methods
The skull fracture models of ten Bama pigs and 364 patients with craniocerebral trauma were subjected to computed tomography (CT), UTE and conventional MRI sequences. The accuracy of UTE imaging in skull fracture diagnosis was analysed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, McNemar’s test and Kappa values. Differences among CT, UTE imaging and anatomical measurement (AM) values for linear fractures (LFs) and depressed fractures (DFs) were compared using one-way ANOVA and a paired-samples t-test.
Results
UTE imaging clearly demonstrated skull structures and fractures. The accuracy, validity and reliability of UTE MRI were excellent, with no significant differences between expert readings (
P
> 0.05; Kappa, 0.899). The values obtained for 42 LFs and 13 DFs in the ten specimens were not significantly different among CT, UTE MRI and AMs, while those obtained for 55 LFs and ten DFs in 44 patients were not significantly different between CT and UTE MRI (
P
> 0.05).
Conclusions
UTE MRI sequences are feasible for the evaluation of skull structures and fractures, with no radiation exposure, particularly for paediatric and pregnant patients.
Key Points
•
Despite ionising radiation, CT is standard for skull fracture assessment
.
•
Conventional MRI cannot depict skull structures
.
•
3D-UTE sequences clearly demonstrate skull structures and fractures
.
•
UTE plus conventional MRI are superior to CT in craniocerebral trauma assessment
.
•
Paediatric and pregnant patients will benefit from this imaging modality
.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>25994196</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00330-015-3804-2</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0938-7994 |
| ispartof | European radiology, 2016-01, Vol.26 (1), p.138-146 |
| issn | 0938-7994 1432-1084 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1842511625 |
| source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
| subjects | Adolescent Adult Aged Animals Cancer Child Child, Preschool Coma Diagnostic Radiology Disease Models, Animal Drug dosages Echo-Planar Imaging - methods Feasibility Studies Female Fractures Hospitals Humans Imaging Imaging, Three-Dimensional - methods Infant Infant, Newborn Internal Medicine Interventional Radiology Magnetic Resonance Magnetic resonance imaging Male Medicine Medicine & Public Health Middle Aged Neuroradiology Neurosurgery Patients Pediatrics Radiation Radiology Reproducibility of Results ROC Curve Skull Fractures - diagnosis Swine Swine, Miniature Tomography Tomography, X-Ray Computed Trauma Ultrasound Young Adult |
| title | Feasibility of three-dimensional ultrashort echo time magnetic resonance imaging at 1.5 T for the diagnosis of skull fractures |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T14%3A25%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Feasibility%20of%20three-dimensional%20ultrashort%20echo%20time%20magnetic%20resonance%20imaging%20at%201.5%20T%20for%20the%20diagnosis%20of%20skull%20fractures&rft.jtitle=European%20radiology&rft.au=Wu,%20Hao&rft.date=2016-01-01&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=138&rft.epage=146&rft.pages=138-146&rft.issn=0938-7994&rft.eissn=1432-1084&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00330-015-3804-2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3897205261%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1749607292&rft_id=info:pmid/25994196&rfr_iscdi=true |