Modelling Chemical Reasoning to Predict and Invent Reactions

The ability to reason beyond established knowledge allows organic chemists to solve synthetic problems and invent novel transformations. Herein, we propose a model that mimics chemical reasoning, and formalises reaction prediction as finding missing links in a knowledge graph. We have constructed a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Chemistry : a European journal 2017-05, Vol.23 (25), p.6118-6128
Hauptverfasser: Segler, Marwin H. S., Waller, Mark P.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 6128
container_issue 25
container_start_page 6118
container_title Chemistry : a European journal
container_volume 23
creator Segler, Marwin H. S.
Waller, Mark P.
description The ability to reason beyond established knowledge allows organic chemists to solve synthetic problems and invent novel transformations. Herein, we propose a model that mimics chemical reasoning, and formalises reaction prediction as finding missing links in a knowledge graph. We have constructed a knowledge graph containing 14.4 million molecules and 8.2 million binary reactions, which represents the bulk of all chemical reactions ever published in the scientific literature. Our model outperforms a rule‐based expert system in the reaction prediction task for 180 000 randomly selected binary reactions. The data‐driven model generalises even beyond known reaction types, and is thus capable of effectively (re‐)discovering novel transformations (even including transition metal‐catalysed reactions). Our model enables computers to infer hypotheses about reactivity and reactions by only considering the intrinsic local structure of the graph and because each single reaction prediction is typically achieved in a sub‐second time frame, the model can be used as a high‐throughput generator of reaction hypotheses for reaction discovery. Learn from past experience: The ability to reason beyond established knowledge allows organic chemists to solve synthetic problems and invent novel transformations (see figure). A model has been developed to mimic chemical reasoning by formalising reaction prediction as finding missing links in a knowledge graph.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/chem.201604556
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1841796490</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1841796490</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4106-f20d1691e3dbc47d53bad0d922f4a8c785142f3865c0a86939783d0ae5863f923</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1Lw0AQhhdRbK1ePUrAi5fU2e9d8CKhWqFFET2H7e5GU9KkZhOl_96E1gpePA3MPPPw8iJ0jmGMAci1fferMQEsgHEuDtAQc4JjKgU_REPQTMaCUz1AJyEsAUALSo_RgEglCJNyiG7mlfNFkZdvUdKpcmuK6NmbUJX9qqmip9q73DaRKV30UH76sunvtsmrMpyio8wUwZ_t5gi93k1ekmk8e7x_SG5nsWUYRJwRcFho7KlbWCYdpwvjwGlCMmaUlYpjRjKqBLdglNBUS0UdGM-VoJkmdISutt51XX20PjTpKg-2i21KX7UhxYphqQXT0KGXf9Bl1dZll66jNAfFCe2p8ZaydRVC7bN0XecrU29SDGnfa9r3mu577R4udtp2sfJuj_8U2QF6C3zlhd_8o0uT6WT-K_8G_pKB5A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1895085230</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Modelling Chemical Reasoning to Predict and Invent Reactions</title><source>Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals</source><creator>Segler, Marwin H. S. ; Waller, Mark P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Segler, Marwin H. S. ; Waller, Mark P.</creatorcontrib><description>The ability to reason beyond established knowledge allows organic chemists to solve synthetic problems and invent novel transformations. Herein, we propose a model that mimics chemical reasoning, and formalises reaction prediction as finding missing links in a knowledge graph. We have constructed a knowledge graph containing 14.4 million molecules and 8.2 million binary reactions, which represents the bulk of all chemical reactions ever published in the scientific literature. Our model outperforms a rule‐based expert system in the reaction prediction task for 180 000 randomly selected binary reactions. The data‐driven model generalises even beyond known reaction types, and is thus capable of effectively (re‐)discovering novel transformations (even including transition metal‐catalysed reactions). Our model enables computers to infer hypotheses about reactivity and reactions by only considering the intrinsic local structure of the graph and because each single reaction prediction is typically achieved in a sub‐second time frame, the model can be used as a high‐throughput generator of reaction hypotheses for reaction discovery. Learn from past experience: The ability to reason beyond established knowledge allows organic chemists to solve synthetic problems and invent novel transformations (see figure). A model has been developed to mimic chemical reasoning by formalising reaction prediction as finding missing links in a knowledge graph.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0947-6539</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1521-3765</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/chem.201604556</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27862477</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Germany: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>artificial intelligence ; augmented scientific discovery ; Chemical reactions ; Chemistry ; Chemists ; computational chemistry ; Computers ; Expert systems ; graph theory ; Hypotheses ; Knowledge representation ; organic chemistry ; Predictions ; Reasoning ; Transition metals</subject><ispartof>Chemistry : a European journal, 2017-05, Vol.23 (25), p.6118-6128</ispartof><rights>2017 Wiley‐VCH Verlag GmbH &amp; Co. KGaA, Weinheim</rights><rights>2017 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH &amp; Co. KGaA, Weinheim.</rights><rights>2017 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH &amp; Co. KGaA, Weinheim</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4106-f20d1691e3dbc47d53bad0d922f4a8c785142f3865c0a86939783d0ae5863f923</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4106-f20d1691e3dbc47d53bad0d922f4a8c785142f3865c0a86939783d0ae5863f923</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fchem.201604556$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fchem.201604556$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27862477$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Segler, Marwin H. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Waller, Mark P.</creatorcontrib><title>Modelling Chemical Reasoning to Predict and Invent Reactions</title><title>Chemistry : a European journal</title><addtitle>Chemistry</addtitle><description>The ability to reason beyond established knowledge allows organic chemists to solve synthetic problems and invent novel transformations. Herein, we propose a model that mimics chemical reasoning, and formalises reaction prediction as finding missing links in a knowledge graph. We have constructed a knowledge graph containing 14.4 million molecules and 8.2 million binary reactions, which represents the bulk of all chemical reactions ever published in the scientific literature. Our model outperforms a rule‐based expert system in the reaction prediction task for 180 000 randomly selected binary reactions. The data‐driven model generalises even beyond known reaction types, and is thus capable of effectively (re‐)discovering novel transformations (even including transition metal‐catalysed reactions). Our model enables computers to infer hypotheses about reactivity and reactions by only considering the intrinsic local structure of the graph and because each single reaction prediction is typically achieved in a sub‐second time frame, the model can be used as a high‐throughput generator of reaction hypotheses for reaction discovery. Learn from past experience: The ability to reason beyond established knowledge allows organic chemists to solve synthetic problems and invent novel transformations (see figure). A model has been developed to mimic chemical reasoning by formalising reaction prediction as finding missing links in a knowledge graph.</description><subject>artificial intelligence</subject><subject>augmented scientific discovery</subject><subject>Chemical reactions</subject><subject>Chemistry</subject><subject>Chemists</subject><subject>computational chemistry</subject><subject>Computers</subject><subject>Expert systems</subject><subject>graph theory</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Knowledge representation</subject><subject>organic chemistry</subject><subject>Predictions</subject><subject>Reasoning</subject><subject>Transition metals</subject><issn>0947-6539</issn><issn>1521-3765</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkE1Lw0AQhhdRbK1ePUrAi5fU2e9d8CKhWqFFET2H7e5GU9KkZhOl_96E1gpePA3MPPPw8iJ0jmGMAci1fferMQEsgHEuDtAQc4JjKgU_REPQTMaCUz1AJyEsAUALSo_RgEglCJNyiG7mlfNFkZdvUdKpcmuK6NmbUJX9qqmip9q73DaRKV30UH76sunvtsmrMpyio8wUwZ_t5gi93k1ekmk8e7x_SG5nsWUYRJwRcFho7KlbWCYdpwvjwGlCMmaUlYpjRjKqBLdglNBUS0UdGM-VoJkmdISutt51XX20PjTpKg-2i21KX7UhxYphqQXT0KGXf9Bl1dZll66jNAfFCe2p8ZaydRVC7bN0XecrU29SDGnfa9r3mu577R4udtp2sfJuj_8U2QF6C3zlhd_8o0uT6WT-K_8G_pKB5A</recordid><startdate>20170502</startdate><enddate>20170502</enddate><creator>Segler, Marwin H. S.</creator><creator>Waller, Mark P.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170502</creationdate><title>Modelling Chemical Reasoning to Predict and Invent Reactions</title><author>Segler, Marwin H. S. ; Waller, Mark P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4106-f20d1691e3dbc47d53bad0d922f4a8c785142f3865c0a86939783d0ae5863f923</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>artificial intelligence</topic><topic>augmented scientific discovery</topic><topic>Chemical reactions</topic><topic>Chemistry</topic><topic>Chemists</topic><topic>computational chemistry</topic><topic>Computers</topic><topic>Expert systems</topic><topic>graph theory</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Knowledge representation</topic><topic>organic chemistry</topic><topic>Predictions</topic><topic>Reasoning</topic><topic>Transition metals</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Segler, Marwin H. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Waller, Mark P.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Chemistry : a European journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Segler, Marwin H. S.</au><au>Waller, Mark P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Modelling Chemical Reasoning to Predict and Invent Reactions</atitle><jtitle>Chemistry : a European journal</jtitle><addtitle>Chemistry</addtitle><date>2017-05-02</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>25</issue><spage>6118</spage><epage>6128</epage><pages>6118-6128</pages><issn>0947-6539</issn><eissn>1521-3765</eissn><abstract>The ability to reason beyond established knowledge allows organic chemists to solve synthetic problems and invent novel transformations. Herein, we propose a model that mimics chemical reasoning, and formalises reaction prediction as finding missing links in a knowledge graph. We have constructed a knowledge graph containing 14.4 million molecules and 8.2 million binary reactions, which represents the bulk of all chemical reactions ever published in the scientific literature. Our model outperforms a rule‐based expert system in the reaction prediction task for 180 000 randomly selected binary reactions. The data‐driven model generalises even beyond known reaction types, and is thus capable of effectively (re‐)discovering novel transformations (even including transition metal‐catalysed reactions). Our model enables computers to infer hypotheses about reactivity and reactions by only considering the intrinsic local structure of the graph and because each single reaction prediction is typically achieved in a sub‐second time frame, the model can be used as a high‐throughput generator of reaction hypotheses for reaction discovery. Learn from past experience: The ability to reason beyond established knowledge allows organic chemists to solve synthetic problems and invent novel transformations (see figure). A model has been developed to mimic chemical reasoning by formalising reaction prediction as finding missing links in a knowledge graph.</abstract><cop>Germany</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>27862477</pmid><doi>10.1002/chem.201604556</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0947-6539
ispartof Chemistry : a European journal, 2017-05, Vol.23 (25), p.6118-6128
issn 0947-6539
1521-3765
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1841796490
source Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals
subjects artificial intelligence
augmented scientific discovery
Chemical reactions
Chemistry
Chemists
computational chemistry
Computers
Expert systems
graph theory
Hypotheses
Knowledge representation
organic chemistry
Predictions
Reasoning
Transition metals
title Modelling Chemical Reasoning to Predict and Invent Reactions
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T12%3A59%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Modelling%20Chemical%20Reasoning%20to%20Predict%20and%20Invent%20Reactions&rft.jtitle=Chemistry%20:%20a%20European%20journal&rft.au=Segler,%20Marwin%20H.%20S.&rft.date=2017-05-02&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=25&rft.spage=6118&rft.epage=6128&rft.pages=6118-6128&rft.issn=0947-6539&rft.eissn=1521-3765&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/chem.201604556&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1841796490%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1895085230&rft_id=info:pmid/27862477&rfr_iscdi=true