Mycorrhizal fungi and roots are complementary in foraging within nutrient patches
The roots of the majority of tree species are associated with either arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) or ectomycorrhizal (EM) fungi. The absorptive roots of tree species also vary widely in their diameter. The linkages between root thickness, mycorrhiza type and nutrient foraging are poorly understood. W...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Ecology (Durham) 2016-10, Vol.97 (10), p.2815-2823 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2823 |
---|---|
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | 2815 |
container_title | Ecology (Durham) |
container_volume | 97 |
creator | Cheng, Lei Chen, Weile Adams, Thomas S. Wei, Xing Le Li Mccormack, Michael Luke Deforest, Jared L. Koide, Roger T. Eissenstat, David M. |
description | The roots of the majority of tree species are associated with either arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) or ectomycorrhizal (EM) fungi. The absorptive roots of tree species also vary widely in their diameter. The linkages between root thickness, mycorrhiza type and nutrient foraging are poorly understood. We conducted a large root ingrowth experiment in the field to investigate how absorptive roots of varying thickness and their associated fungi (AM vs. EM) exploit different nutrient patches (inorganic and organic) in a common garden. In nutrient-rich patches, thin-root tree species more effectively proliferated absorptive roots than thick-root tree species, whereas thick-root tree species proliferated more mycorrhizal fungal biomass than thin-root tree species. Moreover, nutrient patches enriched with organic materials resulted in greater root and mycorrhizal fungal proliferation compared to those enriched with inorganic nutrients. Irrespective of root morphology, AM tree species had higher root foraging precision than mycorrhizal hyphae foraging precision within organic patches, whereas EM tree species exhibited the opposite. Our findings that roots and mycorrhizal fungi are complementary in foraging within nutrient patches provide new insights into species coexistence and element cycling in terrestrial ecosystems. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/ecy.1514 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1841795640</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>44081858</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>44081858</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4984-95089a61e6878526959649210163025a7cc285996dbb4633c07a5bb8a9d51f833</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU2LFDEQhoMo7rgK_gGlYS9eek3lq1NHGdYPWFkW9OAppDPpmQzdnTHpZhl_vRlmXEHYxVxCqIcnVfUS8hroJVDK3nu3vwQJ4glZAHKsERr6lCwoBVajkvqMvMh5S8sBoZ-TM9ZoiQBsQW6_7l1MaRN-2b7q5nEdKjuuqhTjlCubfOXisOv94MfJpn0VxqqLya7DuK7uwrQp73GeUijlamcnt_H5JXnW2T77V6f7nHz_ePVt-bm-vvn0ZfnhunYCtahRUo1WgVe6NMMUSlQCGVBQnDJpG-dYaRLVqm2F4tzRxsq21RZXEjrN-Tl5d_TuUvw5-zyZIWTn-96OPs7ZgBbQoFSC_gfKG4YK-cF68Q-6jXMayyAGEERZXEPxUUpzhqJMwf5-61LMOfnO7FIYyhoNUHPIzZTczCG3gr49Ced28Kt78E9QBaiPwF3o_f5Bkbla_jgJ3xz5bZ5iuueFoBq01Pw3pianXA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1832940162</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Mycorrhizal fungi and roots are complementary in foraging within nutrient patches</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Journals</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Cheng, Lei ; Chen, Weile ; Adams, Thomas S. ; Wei, Xing ; Le Li ; Mccormack, Michael Luke ; Deforest, Jared L. ; Koide, Roger T. ; Eissenstat, David M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Cheng, Lei ; Chen, Weile ; Adams, Thomas S. ; Wei, Xing ; Le Li ; Mccormack, Michael Luke ; Deforest, Jared L. ; Koide, Roger T. ; Eissenstat, David M.</creatorcontrib><description>The roots of the majority of tree species are associated with either arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) or ectomycorrhizal (EM) fungi. The absorptive roots of tree species also vary widely in their diameter. The linkages between root thickness, mycorrhiza type and nutrient foraging are poorly understood. We conducted a large root ingrowth experiment in the field to investigate how absorptive roots of varying thickness and their associated fungi (AM vs. EM) exploit different nutrient patches (inorganic and organic) in a common garden. In nutrient-rich patches, thin-root tree species more effectively proliferated absorptive roots than thick-root tree species, whereas thick-root tree species proliferated more mycorrhizal fungal biomass than thin-root tree species. Moreover, nutrient patches enriched with organic materials resulted in greater root and mycorrhizal fungal proliferation compared to those enriched with inorganic nutrients. Irrespective of root morphology, AM tree species had higher root foraging precision than mycorrhizal hyphae foraging precision within organic patches, whereas EM tree species exhibited the opposite. Our findings that roots and mycorrhizal fungi are complementary in foraging within nutrient patches provide new insights into species coexistence and element cycling in terrestrial ecosystems.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0012-9658</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-9170</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ecy.1514</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27859112</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ECGYAQ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Absorptivity ; arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi ; Arbuscular mycorrhizas ; Biomass ; Coexistence ; ectomycorrhizal fungi ; Ectomycorrhizas ; Forage ; Foraging behavior ; functional complementarity ; Fungi ; Hyphae ; Linkages ; Morphology ; Mycorrhizae ; nutrient foraging ; Nutrients ; Organic materials ; Patches (structures) ; Plant Roots ; Rainforests ; root morphology ; Roots ; Soil ; Species ; species coexistence ; Terrestrial ecosystems ; Terrestrial environments ; tree species ; Trees</subject><ispartof>Ecology (Durham), 2016-10, Vol.97 (10), p.2815-2823</ispartof><rights>2016 The Ecological Society of America</rights><rights>2016 by the Ecological Society of America</rights><rights>2016 by the Ecological Society of America.</rights><rights>Copyright Ecological Society of America Oct 2016</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 by the Ecological Society of America</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4984-95089a61e6878526959649210163025a7cc285996dbb4633c07a5bb8a9d51f833</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4984-95089a61e6878526959649210163025a7cc285996dbb4633c07a5bb8a9d51f833</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/44081858$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/44081858$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575,58017,58250</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27859112$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cheng, Lei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Weile</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adams, Thomas S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wei, Xing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Le Li</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mccormack, Michael Luke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deforest, Jared L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koide, Roger T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eissenstat, David M.</creatorcontrib><title>Mycorrhizal fungi and roots are complementary in foraging within nutrient patches</title><title>Ecology (Durham)</title><addtitle>Ecology</addtitle><description>The roots of the majority of tree species are associated with either arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) or ectomycorrhizal (EM) fungi. The absorptive roots of tree species also vary widely in their diameter. The linkages between root thickness, mycorrhiza type and nutrient foraging are poorly understood. We conducted a large root ingrowth experiment in the field to investigate how absorptive roots of varying thickness and their associated fungi (AM vs. EM) exploit different nutrient patches (inorganic and organic) in a common garden. In nutrient-rich patches, thin-root tree species more effectively proliferated absorptive roots than thick-root tree species, whereas thick-root tree species proliferated more mycorrhizal fungal biomass than thin-root tree species. Moreover, nutrient patches enriched with organic materials resulted in greater root and mycorrhizal fungal proliferation compared to those enriched with inorganic nutrients. Irrespective of root morphology, AM tree species had higher root foraging precision than mycorrhizal hyphae foraging precision within organic patches, whereas EM tree species exhibited the opposite. Our findings that roots and mycorrhizal fungi are complementary in foraging within nutrient patches provide new insights into species coexistence and element cycling in terrestrial ecosystems.</description><subject>Absorptivity</subject><subject>arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi</subject><subject>Arbuscular mycorrhizas</subject><subject>Biomass</subject><subject>Coexistence</subject><subject>ectomycorrhizal fungi</subject><subject>Ectomycorrhizas</subject><subject>Forage</subject><subject>Foraging behavior</subject><subject>functional complementarity</subject><subject>Fungi</subject><subject>Hyphae</subject><subject>Linkages</subject><subject>Morphology</subject><subject>Mycorrhizae</subject><subject>nutrient foraging</subject><subject>Nutrients</subject><subject>Organic materials</subject><subject>Patches (structures)</subject><subject>Plant Roots</subject><subject>Rainforests</subject><subject>root morphology</subject><subject>Roots</subject><subject>Soil</subject><subject>Species</subject><subject>species coexistence</subject><subject>Terrestrial ecosystems</subject><subject>Terrestrial environments</subject><subject>tree species</subject><subject>Trees</subject><issn>0012-9658</issn><issn>1939-9170</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkU2LFDEQhoMo7rgK_gGlYS9eek3lq1NHGdYPWFkW9OAppDPpmQzdnTHpZhl_vRlmXEHYxVxCqIcnVfUS8hroJVDK3nu3vwQJ4glZAHKsERr6lCwoBVajkvqMvMh5S8sBoZ-TM9ZoiQBsQW6_7l1MaRN-2b7q5nEdKjuuqhTjlCubfOXisOv94MfJpn0VxqqLya7DuK7uwrQp73GeUijlamcnt_H5JXnW2T77V6f7nHz_ePVt-bm-vvn0ZfnhunYCtahRUo1WgVe6NMMUSlQCGVBQnDJpG-dYaRLVqm2F4tzRxsq21RZXEjrN-Tl5d_TuUvw5-zyZIWTn-96OPs7ZgBbQoFSC_gfKG4YK-cF68Q-6jXMayyAGEERZXEPxUUpzhqJMwf5-61LMOfnO7FIYyhoNUHPIzZTczCG3gr49Ced28Kt78E9QBaiPwF3o_f5Bkbla_jgJ3xz5bZ5iuueFoBq01Pw3pianXA</recordid><startdate>201610</startdate><enddate>201610</enddate><creator>Cheng, Lei</creator><creator>Chen, Weile</creator><creator>Adams, Thomas S.</creator><creator>Wei, Xing</creator><creator>Le Li</creator><creator>Mccormack, Michael Luke</creator><creator>Deforest, Jared L.</creator><creator>Koide, Roger T.</creator><creator>Eissenstat, David M.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><general>Ecological Society of America</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201610</creationdate><title>Mycorrhizal fungi and roots are complementary in foraging within nutrient patches</title><author>Cheng, Lei ; Chen, Weile ; Adams, Thomas S. ; Wei, Xing ; Le Li ; Mccormack, Michael Luke ; Deforest, Jared L. ; Koide, Roger T. ; Eissenstat, David M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4984-95089a61e6878526959649210163025a7cc285996dbb4633c07a5bb8a9d51f833</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Absorptivity</topic><topic>arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi</topic><topic>Arbuscular mycorrhizas</topic><topic>Biomass</topic><topic>Coexistence</topic><topic>ectomycorrhizal fungi</topic><topic>Ectomycorrhizas</topic><topic>Forage</topic><topic>Foraging behavior</topic><topic>functional complementarity</topic><topic>Fungi</topic><topic>Hyphae</topic><topic>Linkages</topic><topic>Morphology</topic><topic>Mycorrhizae</topic><topic>nutrient foraging</topic><topic>Nutrients</topic><topic>Organic materials</topic><topic>Patches (structures)</topic><topic>Plant Roots</topic><topic>Rainforests</topic><topic>root morphology</topic><topic>Roots</topic><topic>Soil</topic><topic>Species</topic><topic>species coexistence</topic><topic>Terrestrial ecosystems</topic><topic>Terrestrial environments</topic><topic>tree species</topic><topic>Trees</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cheng, Lei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Weile</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adams, Thomas S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wei, Xing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Le Li</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mccormack, Michael Luke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deforest, Jared L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koide, Roger T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eissenstat, David M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Ecology (Durham)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cheng, Lei</au><au>Chen, Weile</au><au>Adams, Thomas S.</au><au>Wei, Xing</au><au>Le Li</au><au>Mccormack, Michael Luke</au><au>Deforest, Jared L.</au><au>Koide, Roger T.</au><au>Eissenstat, David M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Mycorrhizal fungi and roots are complementary in foraging within nutrient patches</atitle><jtitle>Ecology (Durham)</jtitle><addtitle>Ecology</addtitle><date>2016-10</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>97</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>2815</spage><epage>2823</epage><pages>2815-2823</pages><issn>0012-9658</issn><eissn>1939-9170</eissn><coden>ECGYAQ</coden><abstract>The roots of the majority of tree species are associated with either arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) or ectomycorrhizal (EM) fungi. The absorptive roots of tree species also vary widely in their diameter. The linkages between root thickness, mycorrhiza type and nutrient foraging are poorly understood. We conducted a large root ingrowth experiment in the field to investigate how absorptive roots of varying thickness and their associated fungi (AM vs. EM) exploit different nutrient patches (inorganic and organic) in a common garden. In nutrient-rich patches, thin-root tree species more effectively proliferated absorptive roots than thick-root tree species, whereas thick-root tree species proliferated more mycorrhizal fungal biomass than thin-root tree species. Moreover, nutrient patches enriched with organic materials resulted in greater root and mycorrhizal fungal proliferation compared to those enriched with inorganic nutrients. Irrespective of root morphology, AM tree species had higher root foraging precision than mycorrhizal hyphae foraging precision within organic patches, whereas EM tree species exhibited the opposite. Our findings that roots and mycorrhizal fungi are complementary in foraging within nutrient patches provide new insights into species coexistence and element cycling in terrestrial ecosystems.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>27859112</pmid><doi>10.1002/ecy.1514</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0012-9658 |
ispartof | Ecology (Durham), 2016-10, Vol.97 (10), p.2815-2823 |
issn | 0012-9658 1939-9170 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1841795640 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Journals; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing |
subjects | Absorptivity arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi Arbuscular mycorrhizas Biomass Coexistence ectomycorrhizal fungi Ectomycorrhizas Forage Foraging behavior functional complementarity Fungi Hyphae Linkages Morphology Mycorrhizae nutrient foraging Nutrients Organic materials Patches (structures) Plant Roots Rainforests root morphology Roots Soil Species species coexistence Terrestrial ecosystems Terrestrial environments tree species Trees |
title | Mycorrhizal fungi and roots are complementary in foraging within nutrient patches |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T14%3A36%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Mycorrhizal%20fungi%20and%20roots%20are%20complementary%20in%20foraging%20within%20nutrient%20patches&rft.jtitle=Ecology%20(Durham)&rft.au=Cheng,%20Lei&rft.date=2016-10&rft.volume=97&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=2815&rft.epage=2823&rft.pages=2815-2823&rft.issn=0012-9658&rft.eissn=1939-9170&rft.coden=ECGYAQ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ecy.1514&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E44081858%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1832940162&rft_id=info:pmid/27859112&rft_jstor_id=44081858&rfr_iscdi=true |