Implementing sustainable drainage systems for urban surface water management within the regulatory framework in England and Wales

The UK 2007 floods resulted in damages estimated to exceed over £4 billion. This triggered a national review of strategic flood risk management (Pitt, 2008) with its recommendations informing and implemented by the Flood and Water Management, Act (FWMA, 2010). Estimating that up to two-thirds of pro...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of environmental management 2016-12, Vol.183 (Pt 3), p.630-636
Hauptverfasser: Ellis, J. Bryan, Lundy, Lian
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 636
container_issue Pt 3
container_start_page 630
container_title Journal of environmental management
container_volume 183
creator Ellis, J. Bryan
Lundy, Lian
description The UK 2007 floods resulted in damages estimated to exceed over £4 billion. This triggered a national review of strategic flood risk management (Pitt, 2008) with its recommendations informing and implemented by the Flood and Water Management, Act (FWMA, 2010). Estimating that up to two-thirds of properties flooded in the 2007 event as a direct result of overloaded sewer systems, the FWMA set out an ambitious overhaul of flood risk management approaches including identifying bodies responsible for the management of local flood risk (local municipalities) and the development of over-arching Lead Local Flood Authorities (LLFAs) at a regional level. LLFAs duties include developing local flood risk management strategies and, aligned with this, many LLFAs and local municipalities produced sustainable drainage system (SUDS) guidance notes. In parallel, changes to the national planning policy framework (NPPF) in England give priority to the use of SUDS in new major developments, as does the related Town and Country Planning Order (2015). However, whilst all three pieces of legislation refer to the preferential use of SUDs, these requirements remain “economically proportionate” and thus the inclusion of SUDS within development controls remain desirable - but not mandatory - obligations. Within this dynamic policy context, reignited most recently by the December 2015 floods, this paper examines some of the challenges to the implementation of SUDS in England and Wales posed by the new regulatory frameworks. In particular, it examines how emerging organisational procedures and processes are likely to impact on future SUDS implementation, and highlights the need for further cross-sectoral working to ensure opportunities for cross-sectoral benefits– such as that accrued by reducing stormwater flows within combined sewer systems for water companies, property developers and environmental protection – are not lost. •Maps legislative developments influencing use of SUDS in England and Wales.•Identifies key challenges to the use of SUDS posed by emerging frameworks.•Examines how evolving procedures will impact on future use of SUDS.•Highlights the need for cross-sectoral working to ensure full benefits are realised.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.09.022
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1840624310</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0301479716306715</els_id><sourcerecordid>4218079381</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c473t-1f4987722fd72b8f26ef1115313e3a1fd7b0b13e23f375a76ec6474378bb372e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU1v1DAQhi0EotvCTwBZ4sIlwV-J4xNCVSmVKnFpxdFykvHWIXEW2-lqj_3nONqFAxd6sDxjP_N6xi9C7ygpKaH1p6EcwD9OxpcspyVRJWHsBdpQoqqiqTl5iTaEE1oIqeQZOo9xIIRwRuVrdMZkzWVDmg16upl2I0zgk_NbHJeYjPOmHQH3YY22gOMhJpgitnPAS2iNz1iwpgO8NwkCzj1kbJXAe5cenMfpAXCA7TKaNIcDtsFMsJ_DT5zvrvx2NL7H6_phRohv0CtrxghvT_sFuv96dXf5rbj9fn1z-eW26ITkqaBWqEZKxmwvWdtYVoOllFaccuCG5tOWtDlm3HJZGVlDVwsp8phtyyUDfoE-HnV3Yf61QEx6crGDMXcD8xI1bQSpmeCUPAPlFZdKiSajH_5Bh3kJPg-SKaakaIRQmaqOVBfmGANYvQtuMuGgKdGrnXrQJzv1aqcmSmc7c937k_rSTtD_rfrjXwY-HwHIP_foIOjYOfAd9C5Al3Q_u_888RuYG7TL</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1829748449</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Implementing sustainable drainage systems for urban surface water management within the regulatory framework in England and Wales</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Ellis, J. Bryan ; Lundy, Lian</creator><creatorcontrib>Ellis, J. Bryan ; Lundy, Lian</creatorcontrib><description>The UK 2007 floods resulted in damages estimated to exceed over £4 billion. This triggered a national review of strategic flood risk management (Pitt, 2008) with its recommendations informing and implemented by the Flood and Water Management, Act (FWMA, 2010). Estimating that up to two-thirds of properties flooded in the 2007 event as a direct result of overloaded sewer systems, the FWMA set out an ambitious overhaul of flood risk management approaches including identifying bodies responsible for the management of local flood risk (local municipalities) and the development of over-arching Lead Local Flood Authorities (LLFAs) at a regional level. LLFAs duties include developing local flood risk management strategies and, aligned with this, many LLFAs and local municipalities produced sustainable drainage system (SUDS) guidance notes. In parallel, changes to the national planning policy framework (NPPF) in England give priority to the use of SUDS in new major developments, as does the related Town and Country Planning Order (2015). However, whilst all three pieces of legislation refer to the preferential use of SUDs, these requirements remain “economically proportionate” and thus the inclusion of SUDS within development controls remain desirable - but not mandatory - obligations. Within this dynamic policy context, reignited most recently by the December 2015 floods, this paper examines some of the challenges to the implementation of SUDS in England and Wales posed by the new regulatory frameworks. In particular, it examines how emerging organisational procedures and processes are likely to impact on future SUDS implementation, and highlights the need for further cross-sectoral working to ensure opportunities for cross-sectoral benefits– such as that accrued by reducing stormwater flows within combined sewer systems for water companies, property developers and environmental protection – are not lost. •Maps legislative developments influencing use of SUDS in England and Wales.•Identifies key challenges to the use of SUDS posed by emerging frameworks.•Examines how evolving procedures will impact on future use of SUDS.•Highlights the need for cross-sectoral working to ensure full benefits are realised.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0301-4797</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-8630</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.09.022</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27637808</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JEVMAW</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Cities - legislation &amp; jurisprudence ; City Planning ; Conservation of Natural Resources ; Drainage ; England ; Environmental law ; Flood control ; Floods - economics ; Floods - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Permeable paving ; Policy making ; Regulation and planning ; Risk ; Risk Management ; Sewer systems ; SUDS ; Surface water ; Sustainable development ; Wales ; Water ; Water resources management</subject><ispartof>Journal of environmental management, 2016-12, Vol.183 (Pt 3), p.630-636</ispartof><rights>2016 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Academic Press Ltd. Dec 1, 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c473t-1f4987722fd72b8f26ef1115313e3a1fd7b0b13e23f375a76ec6474378bb372e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c473t-1f4987722fd72b8f26ef1115313e3a1fd7b0b13e23f375a76ec6474378bb372e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301479716306715$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27637808$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ellis, J. Bryan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lundy, Lian</creatorcontrib><title>Implementing sustainable drainage systems for urban surface water management within the regulatory framework in England and Wales</title><title>Journal of environmental management</title><addtitle>J Environ Manage</addtitle><description>The UK 2007 floods resulted in damages estimated to exceed over £4 billion. This triggered a national review of strategic flood risk management (Pitt, 2008) with its recommendations informing and implemented by the Flood and Water Management, Act (FWMA, 2010). Estimating that up to two-thirds of properties flooded in the 2007 event as a direct result of overloaded sewer systems, the FWMA set out an ambitious overhaul of flood risk management approaches including identifying bodies responsible for the management of local flood risk (local municipalities) and the development of over-arching Lead Local Flood Authorities (LLFAs) at a regional level. LLFAs duties include developing local flood risk management strategies and, aligned with this, many LLFAs and local municipalities produced sustainable drainage system (SUDS) guidance notes. In parallel, changes to the national planning policy framework (NPPF) in England give priority to the use of SUDS in new major developments, as does the related Town and Country Planning Order (2015). However, whilst all three pieces of legislation refer to the preferential use of SUDs, these requirements remain “economically proportionate” and thus the inclusion of SUDS within development controls remain desirable - but not mandatory - obligations. Within this dynamic policy context, reignited most recently by the December 2015 floods, this paper examines some of the challenges to the implementation of SUDS in England and Wales posed by the new regulatory frameworks. In particular, it examines how emerging organisational procedures and processes are likely to impact on future SUDS implementation, and highlights the need for further cross-sectoral working to ensure opportunities for cross-sectoral benefits– such as that accrued by reducing stormwater flows within combined sewer systems for water companies, property developers and environmental protection – are not lost. •Maps legislative developments influencing use of SUDS in England and Wales.•Identifies key challenges to the use of SUDS posed by emerging frameworks.•Examines how evolving procedures will impact on future use of SUDS.•Highlights the need for cross-sectoral working to ensure full benefits are realised.</description><subject>Cities - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</subject><subject>City Planning</subject><subject>Conservation of Natural Resources</subject><subject>Drainage</subject><subject>England</subject><subject>Environmental law</subject><subject>Flood control</subject><subject>Floods - economics</subject><subject>Floods - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Permeable paving</subject><subject>Policy making</subject><subject>Regulation and planning</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>Risk Management</subject><subject>Sewer systems</subject><subject>SUDS</subject><subject>Surface water</subject><subject>Sustainable development</subject><subject>Wales</subject><subject>Water</subject><subject>Water resources management</subject><issn>0301-4797</issn><issn>1095-8630</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkU1v1DAQhi0EotvCTwBZ4sIlwV-J4xNCVSmVKnFpxdFykvHWIXEW2-lqj_3nONqFAxd6sDxjP_N6xi9C7ygpKaH1p6EcwD9OxpcspyVRJWHsBdpQoqqiqTl5iTaEE1oIqeQZOo9xIIRwRuVrdMZkzWVDmg16upl2I0zgk_NbHJeYjPOmHQH3YY22gOMhJpgitnPAS2iNz1iwpgO8NwkCzj1kbJXAe5cenMfpAXCA7TKaNIcDtsFMsJ_DT5zvrvx2NL7H6_phRohv0CtrxghvT_sFuv96dXf5rbj9fn1z-eW26ITkqaBWqEZKxmwvWdtYVoOllFaccuCG5tOWtDlm3HJZGVlDVwsp8phtyyUDfoE-HnV3Yf61QEx6crGDMXcD8xI1bQSpmeCUPAPlFZdKiSajH_5Bh3kJPg-SKaakaIRQmaqOVBfmGANYvQtuMuGgKdGrnXrQJzv1aqcmSmc7c937k_rSTtD_rfrjXwY-HwHIP_foIOjYOfAd9C5Al3Q_u_888RuYG7TL</recordid><startdate>20161201</startdate><enddate>20161201</enddate><creator>Ellis, J. Bryan</creator><creator>Lundy, Lian</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Academic Press Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20161201</creationdate><title>Implementing sustainable drainage systems for urban surface water management within the regulatory framework in England and Wales</title><author>Ellis, J. Bryan ; Lundy, Lian</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c473t-1f4987722fd72b8f26ef1115313e3a1fd7b0b13e23f375a76ec6474378bb372e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Cities - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</topic><topic>City Planning</topic><topic>Conservation of Natural Resources</topic><topic>Drainage</topic><topic>England</topic><topic>Environmental law</topic><topic>Flood control</topic><topic>Floods - economics</topic><topic>Floods - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Permeable paving</topic><topic>Policy making</topic><topic>Regulation and planning</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>Risk Management</topic><topic>Sewer systems</topic><topic>SUDS</topic><topic>Surface water</topic><topic>Sustainable development</topic><topic>Wales</topic><topic>Water</topic><topic>Water resources management</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ellis, J. Bryan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lundy, Lian</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of environmental management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ellis, J. Bryan</au><au>Lundy, Lian</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Implementing sustainable drainage systems for urban surface water management within the regulatory framework in England and Wales</atitle><jtitle>Journal of environmental management</jtitle><addtitle>J Environ Manage</addtitle><date>2016-12-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>183</volume><issue>Pt 3</issue><spage>630</spage><epage>636</epage><pages>630-636</pages><issn>0301-4797</issn><eissn>1095-8630</eissn><coden>JEVMAW</coden><abstract>The UK 2007 floods resulted in damages estimated to exceed over £4 billion. This triggered a national review of strategic flood risk management (Pitt, 2008) with its recommendations informing and implemented by the Flood and Water Management, Act (FWMA, 2010). Estimating that up to two-thirds of properties flooded in the 2007 event as a direct result of overloaded sewer systems, the FWMA set out an ambitious overhaul of flood risk management approaches including identifying bodies responsible for the management of local flood risk (local municipalities) and the development of over-arching Lead Local Flood Authorities (LLFAs) at a regional level. LLFAs duties include developing local flood risk management strategies and, aligned with this, many LLFAs and local municipalities produced sustainable drainage system (SUDS) guidance notes. In parallel, changes to the national planning policy framework (NPPF) in England give priority to the use of SUDS in new major developments, as does the related Town and Country Planning Order (2015). However, whilst all three pieces of legislation refer to the preferential use of SUDs, these requirements remain “economically proportionate” and thus the inclusion of SUDS within development controls remain desirable - but not mandatory - obligations. Within this dynamic policy context, reignited most recently by the December 2015 floods, this paper examines some of the challenges to the implementation of SUDS in England and Wales posed by the new regulatory frameworks. In particular, it examines how emerging organisational procedures and processes are likely to impact on future SUDS implementation, and highlights the need for further cross-sectoral working to ensure opportunities for cross-sectoral benefits– such as that accrued by reducing stormwater flows within combined sewer systems for water companies, property developers and environmental protection – are not lost. •Maps legislative developments influencing use of SUDS in England and Wales.•Identifies key challenges to the use of SUDS posed by emerging frameworks.•Examines how evolving procedures will impact on future use of SUDS.•Highlights the need for cross-sectoral working to ensure full benefits are realised.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>27637808</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.09.022</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0301-4797
ispartof Journal of environmental management, 2016-12, Vol.183 (Pt 3), p.630-636
issn 0301-4797
1095-8630
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1840624310
source MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Cities - legislation & jurisprudence
City Planning
Conservation of Natural Resources
Drainage
England
Environmental law
Flood control
Floods - economics
Floods - statistics & numerical data
Permeable paving
Policy making
Regulation and planning
Risk
Risk Management
Sewer systems
SUDS
Surface water
Sustainable development
Wales
Water
Water resources management
title Implementing sustainable drainage systems for urban surface water management within the regulatory framework in England and Wales
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-12T15%3A37%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Implementing%20sustainable%20drainage%20systems%20for%20urban%20surface%20water%20management%20within%20the%20regulatory%20framework%20in%20England%20and%20Wales&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20environmental%20management&rft.au=Ellis,%20J.%20Bryan&rft.date=2016-12-01&rft.volume=183&rft.issue=Pt%203&rft.spage=630&rft.epage=636&rft.pages=630-636&rft.issn=0301-4797&rft.eissn=1095-8630&rft.coden=JEVMAW&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.09.022&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4218079381%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1829748449&rft_id=info:pmid/27637808&rft_els_id=S0301479716306715&rfr_iscdi=true