Back to the Future? What the Politics of the Late Nineteenth Century Can Tell Us about the 2016 Election
The politics and party system of the late Civil War era are strikingly similar to what we have in the present day. Elections were consistently close; race, culture, immigration, and populism were salient issues; and states almost always voted for the same party in election after election. The states...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 2016-09, Vol.667 (1), p.92-109 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 109 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 92 |
container_title | The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science |
container_volume | 667 |
creator | AZARI, JULIA HETHERINGTON, MARC J. |
description | The politics and party system of the late Civil War era are strikingly similar to what we have in the present day. Elections were consistently close; race, culture, immigration, and populism were salient issues; and states almost always voted for the same party in election after election. The states that supported Democrats then, however, mostly support Republicans now, and vice versa. In 1896, though, a new party system began to emerge. In this article, we evaluate bygone elections alongside contemporary ones to assess whether 2016 might be the beginning of something new in American electoral politics. Are national politics likely to follow the familiar pattern of the last four presidential races, or are Americans going to be presented altogether different choices? Our analysis suggests that race and populism are guideposts for potential change in 2016: if the concerns of race continue to define political conflict, the electoral map should change little, but if economic populism eclipses race as it did in 1896, a new political era may be ushered in in America. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/0002716216662604 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1840624229</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>24756145</jstor_id><sage_id>10.1177_0002716216662604</sage_id><sourcerecordid>24756145</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-8832f4926e42a48e14048238e7fb0ca26605c3521bcb2ac4ec71c708d4a7ec063</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1LAzEQxYMoWKt3L0LAi5fVyccmuyfR0qpQ1EOLxyWNs3brdqNJ9tD_3m1XRARzSJjM7715DCGnDC4Z0_oKALhmijOlFFcg98iApSlPhJD5Phls28m2f0iOQljB9rB8QJa3xr7T6GhcIp20sfV4TV-WJu4-nl1dxcoG6spdPTUR6WPVYERs4pKOurv1GzoyDZ1hXdN5oGbh2l7NgSk6rtHGyjXH5KA0dcCT73dI5pPxbHSfTJ_uHkY308SKXMckywQvZc4VSm5khkyCzLjIUJcLsIYrBakVKWcLu-DGSrSaWQ3ZqzQaLSgxJBe974d3ny2GWKyrYLtspkHXhoJlEhSXnOcdev4HXbnWN126jhIAQotu9JBAT1nvQvBYFh--Whu_KRgU29UXf1ffSZJeEswb_jL9nz_r-VWIzv_4c6lTxWQqvgBIK4kc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1830037382</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Back to the Future? What the Politics of the Late Nineteenth Century Can Tell Us about the 2016 Election</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><creator>AZARI, JULIA ; HETHERINGTON, MARC J.</creator><contributor>Bartels, Larry M</contributor><creatorcontrib>AZARI, JULIA ; HETHERINGTON, MARC J. ; Bartels, Larry M</creatorcontrib><description>The politics and party system of the late Civil War era are strikingly similar to what we have in the present day. Elections were consistently close; race, culture, immigration, and populism were salient issues; and states almost always voted for the same party in election after election. The states that supported Democrats then, however, mostly support Republicans now, and vice versa. In 1896, though, a new party system began to emerge. In this article, we evaluate bygone elections alongside contemporary ones to assess whether 2016 might be the beginning of something new in American electoral politics. Are national politics likely to follow the familiar pattern of the last four presidential races, or are Americans going to be presented altogether different choices? Our analysis suggests that race and populism are guideposts for potential change in 2016: if the concerns of race continue to define political conflict, the electoral map should change little, but if economic populism eclipses race as it did in 1896, a new political era may be ushered in in America.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-7162</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-3349</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0002716216662604</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AAYPAV</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>19th century ; American history ; Civil war ; Conflict ; Economic change ; Elections ; Elections in America ; Immigration ; Political conflict ; Political elections ; Political parties ; Political partisanship ; Politics ; Populism ; Presidential elections ; Presidents ; Race ; State elections ; Voting ; Voting behavior</subject><ispartof>The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 2016-09, Vol.667 (1), p.92-109</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2016 The American Academy of Political and Social Science</rights><rights>2016 by The American Academy of Political and Social Science</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-8832f4926e42a48e14048238e7fb0ca26605c3521bcb2ac4ec71c708d4a7ec063</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-8832f4926e42a48e14048238e7fb0ca26605c3521bcb2ac4ec71c708d4a7ec063</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0002716216662604$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0002716216662604$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,21800,27905,27906,33755,43602,43603</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Bartels, Larry M</contributor><creatorcontrib>AZARI, JULIA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HETHERINGTON, MARC J.</creatorcontrib><title>Back to the Future? What the Politics of the Late Nineteenth Century Can Tell Us about the 2016 Election</title><title>The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science</title><description>The politics and party system of the late Civil War era are strikingly similar to what we have in the present day. Elections were consistently close; race, culture, immigration, and populism were salient issues; and states almost always voted for the same party in election after election. The states that supported Democrats then, however, mostly support Republicans now, and vice versa. In 1896, though, a new party system began to emerge. In this article, we evaluate bygone elections alongside contemporary ones to assess whether 2016 might be the beginning of something new in American electoral politics. Are national politics likely to follow the familiar pattern of the last four presidential races, or are Americans going to be presented altogether different choices? Our analysis suggests that race and populism are guideposts for potential change in 2016: if the concerns of race continue to define political conflict, the electoral map should change little, but if economic populism eclipses race as it did in 1896, a new political era may be ushered in in America.</description><subject>19th century</subject><subject>American history</subject><subject>Civil war</subject><subject>Conflict</subject><subject>Economic change</subject><subject>Elections</subject><subject>Elections in America</subject><subject>Immigration</subject><subject>Political conflict</subject><subject>Political elections</subject><subject>Political parties</subject><subject>Political partisanship</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Populism</subject><subject>Presidential elections</subject><subject>Presidents</subject><subject>Race</subject><subject>State elections</subject><subject>Voting</subject><subject>Voting behavior</subject><issn>0002-7162</issn><issn>1552-3349</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kM1LAzEQxYMoWKt3L0LAi5fVyccmuyfR0qpQ1EOLxyWNs3brdqNJ9tD_3m1XRARzSJjM7715DCGnDC4Z0_oKALhmijOlFFcg98iApSlPhJD5Phls28m2f0iOQljB9rB8QJa3xr7T6GhcIp20sfV4TV-WJu4-nl1dxcoG6spdPTUR6WPVYERs4pKOurv1GzoyDZ1hXdN5oGbh2l7NgSk6rtHGyjXH5KA0dcCT73dI5pPxbHSfTJ_uHkY308SKXMckywQvZc4VSm5khkyCzLjIUJcLsIYrBakVKWcLu-DGSrSaWQ3ZqzQaLSgxJBe974d3ny2GWKyrYLtspkHXhoJlEhSXnOcdev4HXbnWN126jhIAQotu9JBAT1nvQvBYFh--Whu_KRgU29UXf1ffSZJeEswb_jL9nz_r-VWIzv_4c6lTxWQqvgBIK4kc</recordid><startdate>20160901</startdate><enddate>20160901</enddate><creator>AZARI, JULIA</creator><creator>HETHERINGTON, MARC J.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160901</creationdate><title>Back to the Future? What the Politics of the Late Nineteenth Century Can Tell Us about the 2016 Election</title><author>AZARI, JULIA ; HETHERINGTON, MARC J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-8832f4926e42a48e14048238e7fb0ca26605c3521bcb2ac4ec71c708d4a7ec063</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>19th century</topic><topic>American history</topic><topic>Civil war</topic><topic>Conflict</topic><topic>Economic change</topic><topic>Elections</topic><topic>Elections in America</topic><topic>Immigration</topic><topic>Political conflict</topic><topic>Political elections</topic><topic>Political parties</topic><topic>Political partisanship</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Populism</topic><topic>Presidential elections</topic><topic>Presidents</topic><topic>Race</topic><topic>State elections</topic><topic>Voting</topic><topic>Voting behavior</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>AZARI, JULIA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HETHERINGTON, MARC J.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>AZARI, JULIA</au><au>HETHERINGTON, MARC J.</au><au>Bartels, Larry M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Back to the Future? What the Politics of the Late Nineteenth Century Can Tell Us about the 2016 Election</atitle><jtitle>The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science</jtitle><date>2016-09-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>667</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>92</spage><epage>109</epage><pages>92-109</pages><issn>0002-7162</issn><eissn>1552-3349</eissn><coden>AAYPAV</coden><abstract>The politics and party system of the late Civil War era are strikingly similar to what we have in the present day. Elections were consistently close; race, culture, immigration, and populism were salient issues; and states almost always voted for the same party in election after election. The states that supported Democrats then, however, mostly support Republicans now, and vice versa. In 1896, though, a new party system began to emerge. In this article, we evaluate bygone elections alongside contemporary ones to assess whether 2016 might be the beginning of something new in American electoral politics. Are national politics likely to follow the familiar pattern of the last four presidential races, or are Americans going to be presented altogether different choices? Our analysis suggests that race and populism are guideposts for potential change in 2016: if the concerns of race continue to define political conflict, the electoral map should change little, but if economic populism eclipses race as it did in 1896, a new political era may be ushered in in America.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/0002716216662604</doi><tpages>18</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0002-7162 |
ispartof | The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 2016-09, Vol.667 (1), p.92-109 |
issn | 0002-7162 1552-3349 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1840624229 |
source | Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; HeinOnline Law Journal Library; Sociological Abstracts; SAGE Complete A-Z List |
subjects | 19th century American history Civil war Conflict Economic change Elections Elections in America Immigration Political conflict Political elections Political parties Political partisanship Politics Populism Presidential elections Presidents Race State elections Voting Voting behavior |
title | Back to the Future? What the Politics of the Late Nineteenth Century Can Tell Us about the 2016 Election |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T09%3A24%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Back%20to%20the%20Future?%20What%20the%20Politics%20of%20the%20Late%20Nineteenth%20Century%20Can%20Tell%20Us%20about%20the%202016%20Election&rft.jtitle=The%20Annals%20of%20the%20American%20Academy%20of%20Political%20and%20Social%20Science&rft.au=AZARI,%20JULIA&rft.date=2016-09-01&rft.volume=667&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=92&rft.epage=109&rft.pages=92-109&rft.issn=0002-7162&rft.eissn=1552-3349&rft.coden=AAYPAV&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0002716216662604&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E24756145%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1830037382&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=24756145&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0002716216662604&rfr_iscdi=true |