Back to the Future? What the Politics of the Late Nineteenth Century Can Tell Us about the 2016 Election

The politics and party system of the late Civil War era are strikingly similar to what we have in the present day. Elections were consistently close; race, culture, immigration, and populism were salient issues; and states almost always voted for the same party in election after election. The states...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 2016-09, Vol.667 (1), p.92-109
Hauptverfasser: AZARI, JULIA, HETHERINGTON, MARC J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 109
container_issue 1
container_start_page 92
container_title The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science
container_volume 667
creator AZARI, JULIA
HETHERINGTON, MARC J.
description The politics and party system of the late Civil War era are strikingly similar to what we have in the present day. Elections were consistently close; race, culture, immigration, and populism were salient issues; and states almost always voted for the same party in election after election. The states that supported Democrats then, however, mostly support Republicans now, and vice versa. In 1896, though, a new party system began to emerge. In this article, we evaluate bygone elections alongside contemporary ones to assess whether 2016 might be the beginning of something new in American electoral politics. Are national politics likely to follow the familiar pattern of the last four presidential races, or are Americans going to be presented altogether different choices? Our analysis suggests that race and populism are guideposts for potential change in 2016: if the concerns of race continue to define political conflict, the electoral map should change little, but if economic populism eclipses race as it did in 1896, a new political era may be ushered in in America.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/0002716216662604
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1840624229</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>24756145</jstor_id><sage_id>10.1177_0002716216662604</sage_id><sourcerecordid>24756145</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-8832f4926e42a48e14048238e7fb0ca26605c3521bcb2ac4ec71c708d4a7ec063</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1LAzEQxYMoWKt3L0LAi5fVyccmuyfR0qpQ1EOLxyWNs3brdqNJ9tD_3m1XRARzSJjM7715DCGnDC4Z0_oKALhmijOlFFcg98iApSlPhJD5Phls28m2f0iOQljB9rB8QJa3xr7T6GhcIp20sfV4TV-WJu4-nl1dxcoG6spdPTUR6WPVYERs4pKOurv1GzoyDZ1hXdN5oGbh2l7NgSk6rtHGyjXH5KA0dcCT73dI5pPxbHSfTJ_uHkY308SKXMckywQvZc4VSm5khkyCzLjIUJcLsIYrBakVKWcLu-DGSrSaWQ3ZqzQaLSgxJBe974d3ny2GWKyrYLtspkHXhoJlEhSXnOcdev4HXbnWN126jhIAQotu9JBAT1nvQvBYFh--Whu_KRgU29UXf1ffSZJeEswb_jL9nz_r-VWIzv_4c6lTxWQqvgBIK4kc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1830037382</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Back to the Future? What the Politics of the Late Nineteenth Century Can Tell Us about the 2016 Election</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><creator>AZARI, JULIA ; HETHERINGTON, MARC J.</creator><contributor>Bartels, Larry M</contributor><creatorcontrib>AZARI, JULIA ; HETHERINGTON, MARC J. ; Bartels, Larry M</creatorcontrib><description>The politics and party system of the late Civil War era are strikingly similar to what we have in the present day. Elections were consistently close; race, culture, immigration, and populism were salient issues; and states almost always voted for the same party in election after election. The states that supported Democrats then, however, mostly support Republicans now, and vice versa. In 1896, though, a new party system began to emerge. In this article, we evaluate bygone elections alongside contemporary ones to assess whether 2016 might be the beginning of something new in American electoral politics. Are national politics likely to follow the familiar pattern of the last four presidential races, or are Americans going to be presented altogether different choices? Our analysis suggests that race and populism are guideposts for potential change in 2016: if the concerns of race continue to define political conflict, the electoral map should change little, but if economic populism eclipses race as it did in 1896, a new political era may be ushered in in America.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-7162</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-3349</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0002716216662604</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AAYPAV</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>19th century ; American history ; Civil war ; Conflict ; Economic change ; Elections ; Elections in America ; Immigration ; Political conflict ; Political elections ; Political parties ; Political partisanship ; Politics ; Populism ; Presidential elections ; Presidents ; Race ; State elections ; Voting ; Voting behavior</subject><ispartof>The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 2016-09, Vol.667 (1), p.92-109</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2016 The American Academy of Political and Social Science</rights><rights>2016 by The American Academy of Political and Social Science</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-8832f4926e42a48e14048238e7fb0ca26605c3521bcb2ac4ec71c708d4a7ec063</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-8832f4926e42a48e14048238e7fb0ca26605c3521bcb2ac4ec71c708d4a7ec063</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0002716216662604$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0002716216662604$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,21800,27905,27906,33755,43602,43603</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Bartels, Larry M</contributor><creatorcontrib>AZARI, JULIA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HETHERINGTON, MARC J.</creatorcontrib><title>Back to the Future? What the Politics of the Late Nineteenth Century Can Tell Us about the 2016 Election</title><title>The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science</title><description>The politics and party system of the late Civil War era are strikingly similar to what we have in the present day. Elections were consistently close; race, culture, immigration, and populism were salient issues; and states almost always voted for the same party in election after election. The states that supported Democrats then, however, mostly support Republicans now, and vice versa. In 1896, though, a new party system began to emerge. In this article, we evaluate bygone elections alongside contemporary ones to assess whether 2016 might be the beginning of something new in American electoral politics. Are national politics likely to follow the familiar pattern of the last four presidential races, or are Americans going to be presented altogether different choices? Our analysis suggests that race and populism are guideposts for potential change in 2016: if the concerns of race continue to define political conflict, the electoral map should change little, but if economic populism eclipses race as it did in 1896, a new political era may be ushered in in America.</description><subject>19th century</subject><subject>American history</subject><subject>Civil war</subject><subject>Conflict</subject><subject>Economic change</subject><subject>Elections</subject><subject>Elections in America</subject><subject>Immigration</subject><subject>Political conflict</subject><subject>Political elections</subject><subject>Political parties</subject><subject>Political partisanship</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Populism</subject><subject>Presidential elections</subject><subject>Presidents</subject><subject>Race</subject><subject>State elections</subject><subject>Voting</subject><subject>Voting behavior</subject><issn>0002-7162</issn><issn>1552-3349</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kM1LAzEQxYMoWKt3L0LAi5fVyccmuyfR0qpQ1EOLxyWNs3brdqNJ9tD_3m1XRARzSJjM7715DCGnDC4Z0_oKALhmijOlFFcg98iApSlPhJD5Phls28m2f0iOQljB9rB8QJa3xr7T6GhcIp20sfV4TV-WJu4-nl1dxcoG6spdPTUR6WPVYERs4pKOurv1GzoyDZ1hXdN5oGbh2l7NgSk6rtHGyjXH5KA0dcCT73dI5pPxbHSfTJ_uHkY308SKXMckywQvZc4VSm5khkyCzLjIUJcLsIYrBakVKWcLu-DGSrSaWQ3ZqzQaLSgxJBe974d3ny2GWKyrYLtspkHXhoJlEhSXnOcdev4HXbnWN126jhIAQotu9JBAT1nvQvBYFh--Whu_KRgU29UXf1ffSZJeEswb_jL9nz_r-VWIzv_4c6lTxWQqvgBIK4kc</recordid><startdate>20160901</startdate><enddate>20160901</enddate><creator>AZARI, JULIA</creator><creator>HETHERINGTON, MARC J.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160901</creationdate><title>Back to the Future? What the Politics of the Late Nineteenth Century Can Tell Us about the 2016 Election</title><author>AZARI, JULIA ; HETHERINGTON, MARC J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c397t-8832f4926e42a48e14048238e7fb0ca26605c3521bcb2ac4ec71c708d4a7ec063</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>19th century</topic><topic>American history</topic><topic>Civil war</topic><topic>Conflict</topic><topic>Economic change</topic><topic>Elections</topic><topic>Elections in America</topic><topic>Immigration</topic><topic>Political conflict</topic><topic>Political elections</topic><topic>Political parties</topic><topic>Political partisanship</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Populism</topic><topic>Presidential elections</topic><topic>Presidents</topic><topic>Race</topic><topic>State elections</topic><topic>Voting</topic><topic>Voting behavior</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>AZARI, JULIA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HETHERINGTON, MARC J.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>AZARI, JULIA</au><au>HETHERINGTON, MARC J.</au><au>Bartels, Larry M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Back to the Future? What the Politics of the Late Nineteenth Century Can Tell Us about the 2016 Election</atitle><jtitle>The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science</jtitle><date>2016-09-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>667</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>92</spage><epage>109</epage><pages>92-109</pages><issn>0002-7162</issn><eissn>1552-3349</eissn><coden>AAYPAV</coden><abstract>The politics and party system of the late Civil War era are strikingly similar to what we have in the present day. Elections were consistently close; race, culture, immigration, and populism were salient issues; and states almost always voted for the same party in election after election. The states that supported Democrats then, however, mostly support Republicans now, and vice versa. In 1896, though, a new party system began to emerge. In this article, we evaluate bygone elections alongside contemporary ones to assess whether 2016 might be the beginning of something new in American electoral politics. Are national politics likely to follow the familiar pattern of the last four presidential races, or are Americans going to be presented altogether different choices? Our analysis suggests that race and populism are guideposts for potential change in 2016: if the concerns of race continue to define political conflict, the electoral map should change little, but if economic populism eclipses race as it did in 1896, a new political era may be ushered in in America.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/0002716216662604</doi><tpages>18</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0002-7162
ispartof The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 2016-09, Vol.667 (1), p.92-109
issn 0002-7162
1552-3349
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1840624229
source Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; HeinOnline Law Journal Library; Sociological Abstracts; SAGE Complete A-Z List
subjects 19th century
American history
Civil war
Conflict
Economic change
Elections
Elections in America
Immigration
Political conflict
Political elections
Political parties
Political partisanship
Politics
Populism
Presidential elections
Presidents
Race
State elections
Voting
Voting behavior
title Back to the Future? What the Politics of the Late Nineteenth Century Can Tell Us about the 2016 Election
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T09%3A24%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Back%20to%20the%20Future?%20What%20the%20Politics%20of%20the%20Late%20Nineteenth%20Century%20Can%20Tell%20Us%20about%20the%202016%20Election&rft.jtitle=The%20Annals%20of%20the%20American%20Academy%20of%20Political%20and%20Social%20Science&rft.au=AZARI,%20JULIA&rft.date=2016-09-01&rft.volume=667&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=92&rft.epage=109&rft.pages=92-109&rft.issn=0002-7162&rft.eissn=1552-3349&rft.coden=AAYPAV&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0002716216662604&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E24756145%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1830037382&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=24756145&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0002716216662604&rfr_iscdi=true