Decoding dispossession: Eviction and urban regeneration in Johannesburg's dark buildings
In January 2012 the residents of an inner‐city tenement building in Doornfontein, Johannesburg, were evicted on a court order. The building was situated in a post‐industrial neighbourhood in which thousands of South Africans and foreign nationals, many blind or disabled, live in unlawfully occupied...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Singapore journal of tropical geography 2016-09, Vol.37 (3), p.378-395 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 395 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 378 |
container_title | Singapore journal of tropical geography |
container_volume | 37 |
creator | Wilhelm-Solomon, Matthew |
description | In January 2012 the residents of an inner‐city tenement building in Doornfontein, Johannesburg, were evicted on a court order. The building was situated in a post‐industrial neighbourhood in which thousands of South Africans and foreign nationals, many blind or disabled, live in unlawfully occupied buildings without access to water, basic sanitation, electricity and waste management services. Such buildings are known in policy discourse as ‘bad buildings’, and informally as ‘dark buildings’, invoking both a sense of developmental failure and spiritual insecurity. In this paper I analyse how urban renewal policies created social divisions and alliances not only among the residents of Chambers, which were channelled along nationalist lines, but also between the able‐bodied and disabled, and produced new social alliances. In particular, I document how a group of blind Zimbabweans experienced threats of violence and accusations of betrayal, as they were offered alternate accommodation by the evicting company because of their disability. I argue here that the pressures of private‐sector housing developments intersected with the insecurities and divisions of inner‐city social spaces and also fostered new alliances. Following the work of Deleuze and Guattari, I invoke the concept of ‘decoding dispossession’, proposing that ongoing evictions and dispossessions are characterized by simultaneous movements of ‘decoding and deterritorialization’ and ‘overcoding‐reterritorialization’. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/sjtg.12165 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1840623874</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4214063941</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3725-e9a5abb3b7a8ba62bcbbc90c6534b3f37b19b1b8ca091f2edf6742a8c9088bfa3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90E1LwzAYB_AgCg714icoeFCEapO0efEmc5tOnYiK3kKSpjNa05m0vnx7s009ePC5JITf_yH8AdiG2QGMcxie2ukBRJAUK6AHc0JTnnO8CnoZRDylBPJ1sBWCVRnKeBEn74GHE6Ob0rppUtowa0IwETTuKBm8Wd3GWyJdmXReSZd4MzXOeLl4ti4ZN4_SORNU56e7ISmlf05UZ-v5urAJ1ipZB7P1fW6Au-Hgtn-aXlyNzvrHF6nGFBWp4bKQSmFFJVOSIKWV0jzTpMC5whWmCnIFFdMy47BCpqwIzZFk0TCmKok3wN5y78w3r50JrXixQZu6ls40XRCQ5RlBmNE80p0_9KnpvIu_iwqxvGAFI1HtL5X2sQ5vKjHz9kX6TwEzMe9ZzHsWi54jhkv8bmvz-Y8UN-Pb0U8mXWZsaM3Hbya2JwjFtBD3k1EMDeE5up6IS_wFpwGQQA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1828458586</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Decoding dispossession: Eviction and urban regeneration in Johannesburg's dark buildings</title><source>Wiley Journals</source><creator>Wilhelm-Solomon, Matthew</creator><creatorcontrib>Wilhelm-Solomon, Matthew</creatorcontrib><description>In January 2012 the residents of an inner‐city tenement building in Doornfontein, Johannesburg, were evicted on a court order. The building was situated in a post‐industrial neighbourhood in which thousands of South Africans and foreign nationals, many blind or disabled, live in unlawfully occupied buildings without access to water, basic sanitation, electricity and waste management services. Such buildings are known in policy discourse as ‘bad buildings’, and informally as ‘dark buildings’, invoking both a sense of developmental failure and spiritual insecurity. In this paper I analyse how urban renewal policies created social divisions and alliances not only among the residents of Chambers, which were channelled along nationalist lines, but also between the able‐bodied and disabled, and produced new social alliances. In particular, I document how a group of blind Zimbabweans experienced threats of violence and accusations of betrayal, as they were offered alternate accommodation by the evicting company because of their disability. I argue here that the pressures of private‐sector housing developments intersected with the insecurities and divisions of inner‐city social spaces and also fostered new alliances. Following the work of Deleuze and Guattari, I invoke the concept of ‘decoding dispossession’, proposing that ongoing evictions and dispossessions are characterized by simultaneous movements of ‘decoding and deterritorialization’ and ‘overcoding‐reterritorialization’.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0129-7619</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-9493</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/sjtg.12165</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Singapore: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>blindness ; dispossession ; Evictions ; Housing developments ; Inner city ; Johannesburg ; Johannesburg South Africa ; migration ; stigma ; urban regeneration ; Urban renewal</subject><ispartof>Singapore journal of tropical geography, 2016-09, Vol.37 (3), p.378-395</ispartof><rights>2016 Department of Geography, National University of Singapore and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3725-e9a5abb3b7a8ba62bcbbc90c6534b3f37b19b1b8ca091f2edf6742a8c9088bfa3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3725-e9a5abb3b7a8ba62bcbbc90c6534b3f37b19b1b8ca091f2edf6742a8c9088bfa3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fsjtg.12165$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fsjtg.12165$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wilhelm-Solomon, Matthew</creatorcontrib><title>Decoding dispossession: Eviction and urban regeneration in Johannesburg's dark buildings</title><title>Singapore journal of tropical geography</title><addtitle>Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography</addtitle><description>In January 2012 the residents of an inner‐city tenement building in Doornfontein, Johannesburg, were evicted on a court order. The building was situated in a post‐industrial neighbourhood in which thousands of South Africans and foreign nationals, many blind or disabled, live in unlawfully occupied buildings without access to water, basic sanitation, electricity and waste management services. Such buildings are known in policy discourse as ‘bad buildings’, and informally as ‘dark buildings’, invoking both a sense of developmental failure and spiritual insecurity. In this paper I analyse how urban renewal policies created social divisions and alliances not only among the residents of Chambers, which were channelled along nationalist lines, but also between the able‐bodied and disabled, and produced new social alliances. In particular, I document how a group of blind Zimbabweans experienced threats of violence and accusations of betrayal, as they were offered alternate accommodation by the evicting company because of their disability. I argue here that the pressures of private‐sector housing developments intersected with the insecurities and divisions of inner‐city social spaces and also fostered new alliances. Following the work of Deleuze and Guattari, I invoke the concept of ‘decoding dispossession’, proposing that ongoing evictions and dispossessions are characterized by simultaneous movements of ‘decoding and deterritorialization’ and ‘overcoding‐reterritorialization’.</description><subject>blindness</subject><subject>dispossession</subject><subject>Evictions</subject><subject>Housing developments</subject><subject>Inner city</subject><subject>Johannesburg</subject><subject>Johannesburg South Africa</subject><subject>migration</subject><subject>stigma</subject><subject>urban regeneration</subject><subject>Urban renewal</subject><issn>0129-7619</issn><issn>1467-9493</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp90E1LwzAYB_AgCg714icoeFCEapO0efEmc5tOnYiK3kKSpjNa05m0vnx7s009ePC5JITf_yH8AdiG2QGMcxie2ukBRJAUK6AHc0JTnnO8CnoZRDylBPJ1sBWCVRnKeBEn74GHE6Ob0rppUtowa0IwETTuKBm8Wd3GWyJdmXReSZd4MzXOeLl4ti4ZN4_SORNU56e7ISmlf05UZ-v5urAJ1ipZB7P1fW6Au-Hgtn-aXlyNzvrHF6nGFBWp4bKQSmFFJVOSIKWV0jzTpMC5whWmCnIFFdMy47BCpqwIzZFk0TCmKok3wN5y78w3r50JrXixQZu6ls40XRCQ5RlBmNE80p0_9KnpvIu_iwqxvGAFI1HtL5X2sQ5vKjHz9kX6TwEzMe9ZzHsWi54jhkv8bmvz-Y8UN-Pb0U8mXWZsaM3Hbya2JwjFtBD3k1EMDeE5up6IS_wFpwGQQA</recordid><startdate>201609</startdate><enddate>201609</enddate><creator>Wilhelm-Solomon, Matthew</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201609</creationdate><title>Decoding dispossession: Eviction and urban regeneration in Johannesburg's dark buildings</title><author>Wilhelm-Solomon, Matthew</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3725-e9a5abb3b7a8ba62bcbbc90c6534b3f37b19b1b8ca091f2edf6742a8c9088bfa3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>blindness</topic><topic>dispossession</topic><topic>Evictions</topic><topic>Housing developments</topic><topic>Inner city</topic><topic>Johannesburg</topic><topic>Johannesburg South Africa</topic><topic>migration</topic><topic>stigma</topic><topic>urban regeneration</topic><topic>Urban renewal</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wilhelm-Solomon, Matthew</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Singapore journal of tropical geography</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wilhelm-Solomon, Matthew</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Decoding dispossession: Eviction and urban regeneration in Johannesburg's dark buildings</atitle><jtitle>Singapore journal of tropical geography</jtitle><addtitle>Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography</addtitle><date>2016-09</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>378</spage><epage>395</epage><pages>378-395</pages><issn>0129-7619</issn><eissn>1467-9493</eissn><abstract>In January 2012 the residents of an inner‐city tenement building in Doornfontein, Johannesburg, were evicted on a court order. The building was situated in a post‐industrial neighbourhood in which thousands of South Africans and foreign nationals, many blind or disabled, live in unlawfully occupied buildings without access to water, basic sanitation, electricity and waste management services. Such buildings are known in policy discourse as ‘bad buildings’, and informally as ‘dark buildings’, invoking both a sense of developmental failure and spiritual insecurity. In this paper I analyse how urban renewal policies created social divisions and alliances not only among the residents of Chambers, which were channelled along nationalist lines, but also between the able‐bodied and disabled, and produced new social alliances. In particular, I document how a group of blind Zimbabweans experienced threats of violence and accusations of betrayal, as they were offered alternate accommodation by the evicting company because of their disability. I argue here that the pressures of private‐sector housing developments intersected with the insecurities and divisions of inner‐city social spaces and also fostered new alliances. Following the work of Deleuze and Guattari, I invoke the concept of ‘decoding dispossession’, proposing that ongoing evictions and dispossessions are characterized by simultaneous movements of ‘decoding and deterritorialization’ and ‘overcoding‐reterritorialization’.</abstract><cop>Singapore</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/sjtg.12165</doi><tpages>18</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0129-7619 |
ispartof | Singapore journal of tropical geography, 2016-09, Vol.37 (3), p.378-395 |
issn | 0129-7619 1467-9493 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1840623874 |
source | Wiley Journals |
subjects | blindness dispossession Evictions Housing developments Inner city Johannesburg Johannesburg South Africa migration stigma urban regeneration Urban renewal |
title | Decoding dispossession: Eviction and urban regeneration in Johannesburg's dark buildings |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T11%3A45%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Decoding%20dispossession:%20Eviction%20and%20urban%20regeneration%20in%20Johannesburg's%20dark%20buildings&rft.jtitle=Singapore%20journal%20of%20tropical%20geography&rft.au=Wilhelm-Solomon,%20Matthew&rft.date=2016-09&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=378&rft.epage=395&rft.pages=378-395&rft.issn=0129-7619&rft.eissn=1467-9493&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/sjtg.12165&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4214063941%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1828458586&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |