Survival and Philopatry of Female Redheads Breeding in Southwestern Manitoba

Understanding the relationships between survival and philopatry of adult and juvenile waterfowl is fundamental information for developing effective management programs. We used combined recovery-resighting models to estimate band-reporting (r), fidelity (F), survival (S), and resighting (ρ) probabil...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of wildlife management 2002-01, Vol.66 (1), p.162-169
Hauptverfasser: Arnold, Todd W., Anderson, Michael G., Sorenson, Michael D., Emery, Robert B.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 169
container_issue 1
container_start_page 162
container_title The Journal of wildlife management
container_volume 66
creator Arnold, Todd W.
Anderson, Michael G.
Sorenson, Michael D.
Emery, Robert B.
description Understanding the relationships between survival and philopatry of adult and juvenile waterfowl is fundamental information for developing effective management programs. We used combined recovery-resighting models to estimate band-reporting (r), fidelity (F), survival (S), and resighting (ρ) probabilities of female redheads (Aythya americana) breeding in southwestern Manitoba, Canada, during 1983-1993. We banded and nasal-marked 194 hatch-year (HY) females during 1983-1988 and 149 after-hatch-year (AHY) females during 1984-1990 and subsequently obtained 298 resightings and 26 band recoveries during 1984-1993. Recovery data were sparse, and band-reporting rates were best modeled as a constant (r = 0.082, 95% CI: 0.055 to 0.121). Breeding-site fidelity (F = 1 - permanent emigration) averaged 0.899 (95% CI: 0.703 to 0.971) across age classes, or 0.744 (95% CI: 0.287 to 0.955) and 0.923 (95% CI: 0.665 to 0.986) for models that treated HY and AHY females as different. Annual survival rates varied by age, averaging 0.417 (95% CI: 0.311 to 0.532) for HY females and 0.722 (95% CI: 0.610 to 0.812) for AHY females in a model with constant F, or 0.487 (95% CI: 0.273 to 0.705) and 0.708 (95% CI: 0.597 to 0.799), respectively, in models with age-specific estimates of F. Resighting estimates varied by age and year, averaging 0.513 (95% CI: 0.263 to 0.764) for HY females returning as yearlings and 0.724 (95% CI: 0.604 to 0.843) for AHY females. We suspect that lower resighting rates by HY versus AHY females were the result of greater temporary emigration by HY females (i.e., lower breeding propensity), and that some among-year variation in resighting rates was also caused by temporary emigration (i.e., drought avoidance). Our data demonstrate that temporary and permanent emigration are important processes affecting local redhead populations, and that failure to model these processes can lead to biased estimates of survival, especially among HY females.
doi_str_mv 10.2307/3802882
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18405206</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>3802882</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>3802882</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-60498fe6586d724ffd3b828cfeb57e1c8ec812e34d057a37fa816851c52f21773</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10EtLAzEUhuEgCtYq_oUgXlajuUwuLrVYFSqKVXA3pJkTO2Wa1GSm0n_vlBYEwdXZPLx8HISOKblknKgrrgnTmu2gHr3mKmOaql3UI4SxTOT0Yx8dpDQjhFOqZQ-Nxm1cVktTY-NL_DKt6rAwTVzh4PAQ5qYG_ArlFEyZ8G0EKCv_iSuPx6Ftpt-QGogePxlfNWFiDtGeM3WCo-3to_fh3dvgIRs93z8ObkaZ5TlpMknya-1ACi1LxXLnSj7RTFsHE6GAWg1WUwY8L4lQhitnNJVaUCuYY1Qp3kfnm-4ihq-2G1HMq2Shro2H0KaC6pwIRmQHT_7AWWij77YVjOdUckFYhy42yMaQUgRXLGI1N3FVUFKsX1psX9rJs23OJGtqF423Vfrl65wktHOnGzdLTYj_5n4AzFp-2Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>234163502</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Survival and Philopatry of Female Redheads Breeding in Southwestern Manitoba</title><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Arnold, Todd W. ; Anderson, Michael G. ; Sorenson, Michael D. ; Emery, Robert B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Arnold, Todd W. ; Anderson, Michael G. ; Sorenson, Michael D. ; Emery, Robert B.</creatorcontrib><description>Understanding the relationships between survival and philopatry of adult and juvenile waterfowl is fundamental information for developing effective management programs. We used combined recovery-resighting models to estimate band-reporting (r), fidelity (F), survival (S), and resighting (ρ) probabilities of female redheads (Aythya americana) breeding in southwestern Manitoba, Canada, during 1983-1993. We banded and nasal-marked 194 hatch-year (HY) females during 1983-1988 and 149 after-hatch-year (AHY) females during 1984-1990 and subsequently obtained 298 resightings and 26 band recoveries during 1984-1993. Recovery data were sparse, and band-reporting rates were best modeled as a constant (r = 0.082, 95% CI: 0.055 to 0.121). Breeding-site fidelity (F = 1 - permanent emigration) averaged 0.899 (95% CI: 0.703 to 0.971) across age classes, or 0.744 (95% CI: 0.287 to 0.955) and 0.923 (95% CI: 0.665 to 0.986) for models that treated HY and AHY females as different. Annual survival rates varied by age, averaging 0.417 (95% CI: 0.311 to 0.532) for HY females and 0.722 (95% CI: 0.610 to 0.812) for AHY females in a model with constant F, or 0.487 (95% CI: 0.273 to 0.705) and 0.708 (95% CI: 0.597 to 0.799), respectively, in models with age-specific estimates of F. Resighting estimates varied by age and year, averaging 0.513 (95% CI: 0.263 to 0.764) for HY females returning as yearlings and 0.724 (95% CI: 0.604 to 0.843) for AHY females. We suspect that lower resighting rates by HY versus AHY females were the result of greater temporary emigration by HY females (i.e., lower breeding propensity), and that some among-year variation in resighting rates was also caused by temporary emigration (i.e., drought avoidance). Our data demonstrate that temporary and permanent emigration are important processes affecting local redhead populations, and that failure to model these processes can lead to biased estimates of survival, especially among HY females.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-541X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1937-2817</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2307/3802882</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JWMAA9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bethesda, MD: The Wildlife Society</publisher><subject>Animal and plant ecology ; Animal reproduction ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Animals ; Aves ; Biological and medical sciences ; Bird banding ; Breeding ; Demecology ; Ducks ; Emigration ; Female animals ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Parametric models ; Survival rates ; Vertebrata ; Waterfowl ; Wildfowl ; Wildlife ecology ; Wildlife management</subject><ispartof>The Journal of wildlife management, 2002-01, Vol.66 (1), p.162-169</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2002 The Wildlife Society</rights><rights>2002 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Wildlife Society Jan 2002</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-60498fe6586d724ffd3b828cfeb57e1c8ec812e34d057a37fa816851c52f21773</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3802882$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/3802882$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,804,4025,27928,27929,27930,58022,58255</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=13502601$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Arnold, Todd W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderson, Michael G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sorenson, Michael D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Emery, Robert B.</creatorcontrib><title>Survival and Philopatry of Female Redheads Breeding in Southwestern Manitoba</title><title>The Journal of wildlife management</title><description>Understanding the relationships between survival and philopatry of adult and juvenile waterfowl is fundamental information for developing effective management programs. We used combined recovery-resighting models to estimate band-reporting (r), fidelity (F), survival (S), and resighting (ρ) probabilities of female redheads (Aythya americana) breeding in southwestern Manitoba, Canada, during 1983-1993. We banded and nasal-marked 194 hatch-year (HY) females during 1983-1988 and 149 after-hatch-year (AHY) females during 1984-1990 and subsequently obtained 298 resightings and 26 band recoveries during 1984-1993. Recovery data were sparse, and band-reporting rates were best modeled as a constant (r = 0.082, 95% CI: 0.055 to 0.121). Breeding-site fidelity (F = 1 - permanent emigration) averaged 0.899 (95% CI: 0.703 to 0.971) across age classes, or 0.744 (95% CI: 0.287 to 0.955) and 0.923 (95% CI: 0.665 to 0.986) for models that treated HY and AHY females as different. Annual survival rates varied by age, averaging 0.417 (95% CI: 0.311 to 0.532) for HY females and 0.722 (95% CI: 0.610 to 0.812) for AHY females in a model with constant F, or 0.487 (95% CI: 0.273 to 0.705) and 0.708 (95% CI: 0.597 to 0.799), respectively, in models with age-specific estimates of F. Resighting estimates varied by age and year, averaging 0.513 (95% CI: 0.263 to 0.764) for HY females returning as yearlings and 0.724 (95% CI: 0.604 to 0.843) for AHY females. We suspect that lower resighting rates by HY versus AHY females were the result of greater temporary emigration by HY females (i.e., lower breeding propensity), and that some among-year variation in resighting rates was also caused by temporary emigration (i.e., drought avoidance). Our data demonstrate that temporary and permanent emigration are important processes affecting local redhead populations, and that failure to model these processes can lead to biased estimates of survival, especially among HY females.</description><subject>Animal and plant ecology</subject><subject>Animal reproduction</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Aves</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Bird banding</subject><subject>Breeding</subject><subject>Demecology</subject><subject>Ducks</subject><subject>Emigration</subject><subject>Female animals</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Parametric models</subject><subject>Survival rates</subject><subject>Vertebrata</subject><subject>Waterfowl</subject><subject>Wildfowl</subject><subject>Wildlife ecology</subject><subject>Wildlife management</subject><issn>0022-541X</issn><issn>1937-2817</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp10EtLAzEUhuEgCtYq_oUgXlajuUwuLrVYFSqKVXA3pJkTO2Wa1GSm0n_vlBYEwdXZPLx8HISOKblknKgrrgnTmu2gHr3mKmOaql3UI4SxTOT0Yx8dpDQjhFOqZQ-Nxm1cVktTY-NL_DKt6rAwTVzh4PAQ5qYG_ArlFEyZ8G0EKCv_iSuPx6Ftpt-QGogePxlfNWFiDtGeM3WCo-3to_fh3dvgIRs93z8ObkaZ5TlpMknya-1ACi1LxXLnSj7RTFsHE6GAWg1WUwY8L4lQhitnNJVaUCuYY1Qp3kfnm-4ihq-2G1HMq2Shro2H0KaC6pwIRmQHT_7AWWij77YVjOdUckFYhy42yMaQUgRXLGI1N3FVUFKsX1psX9rJs23OJGtqF423Vfrl65wktHOnGzdLTYj_5n4AzFp-2Q</recordid><startdate>20020101</startdate><enddate>20020101</enddate><creator>Arnold, Todd W.</creator><creator>Anderson, Michael G.</creator><creator>Sorenson, Michael D.</creator><creator>Emery, Robert B.</creator><general>The Wildlife Society</general><general>Wildlife Society</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20020101</creationdate><title>Survival and Philopatry of Female Redheads Breeding in Southwestern Manitoba</title><author>Arnold, Todd W. ; Anderson, Michael G. ; Sorenson, Michael D. ; Emery, Robert B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c340t-60498fe6586d724ffd3b828cfeb57e1c8ec812e34d057a37fa816851c52f21773</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Animal and plant ecology</topic><topic>Animal reproduction</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Aves</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Bird banding</topic><topic>Breeding</topic><topic>Demecology</topic><topic>Ducks</topic><topic>Emigration</topic><topic>Female animals</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Parametric models</topic><topic>Survival rates</topic><topic>Vertebrata</topic><topic>Waterfowl</topic><topic>Wildfowl</topic><topic>Wildlife ecology</topic><topic>Wildlife management</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Arnold, Todd W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderson, Michael G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sorenson, Michael D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Emery, Robert B.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>The Journal of wildlife management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Arnold, Todd W.</au><au>Anderson, Michael G.</au><au>Sorenson, Michael D.</au><au>Emery, Robert B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Survival and Philopatry of Female Redheads Breeding in Southwestern Manitoba</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of wildlife management</jtitle><date>2002-01-01</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>66</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>162</spage><epage>169</epage><pages>162-169</pages><issn>0022-541X</issn><eissn>1937-2817</eissn><coden>JWMAA9</coden><abstract>Understanding the relationships between survival and philopatry of adult and juvenile waterfowl is fundamental information for developing effective management programs. We used combined recovery-resighting models to estimate band-reporting (r), fidelity (F), survival (S), and resighting (ρ) probabilities of female redheads (Aythya americana) breeding in southwestern Manitoba, Canada, during 1983-1993. We banded and nasal-marked 194 hatch-year (HY) females during 1983-1988 and 149 after-hatch-year (AHY) females during 1984-1990 and subsequently obtained 298 resightings and 26 band recoveries during 1984-1993. Recovery data were sparse, and band-reporting rates were best modeled as a constant (r = 0.082, 95% CI: 0.055 to 0.121). Breeding-site fidelity (F = 1 - permanent emigration) averaged 0.899 (95% CI: 0.703 to 0.971) across age classes, or 0.744 (95% CI: 0.287 to 0.955) and 0.923 (95% CI: 0.665 to 0.986) for models that treated HY and AHY females as different. Annual survival rates varied by age, averaging 0.417 (95% CI: 0.311 to 0.532) for HY females and 0.722 (95% CI: 0.610 to 0.812) for AHY females in a model with constant F, or 0.487 (95% CI: 0.273 to 0.705) and 0.708 (95% CI: 0.597 to 0.799), respectively, in models with age-specific estimates of F. Resighting estimates varied by age and year, averaging 0.513 (95% CI: 0.263 to 0.764) for HY females returning as yearlings and 0.724 (95% CI: 0.604 to 0.843) for AHY females. We suspect that lower resighting rates by HY versus AHY females were the result of greater temporary emigration by HY females (i.e., lower breeding propensity), and that some among-year variation in resighting rates was also caused by temporary emigration (i.e., drought avoidance). Our data demonstrate that temporary and permanent emigration are important processes affecting local redhead populations, and that failure to model these processes can lead to biased estimates of survival, especially among HY females.</abstract><cop>Bethesda, MD</cop><pub>The Wildlife Society</pub><doi>10.2307/3802882</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-541X
ispartof The Journal of wildlife management, 2002-01, Vol.66 (1), p.162-169
issn 0022-541X
1937-2817
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18405206
source JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing
subjects Animal and plant ecology
Animal reproduction
Animal, plant and microbial ecology
Animals
Aves
Biological and medical sciences
Bird banding
Breeding
Demecology
Ducks
Emigration
Female animals
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Parametric models
Survival rates
Vertebrata
Waterfowl
Wildfowl
Wildlife ecology
Wildlife management
title Survival and Philopatry of Female Redheads Breeding in Southwestern Manitoba
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-15T06%3A53%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Survival%20and%20Philopatry%20of%20Female%20Redheads%20Breeding%20in%20Southwestern%20Manitoba&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20wildlife%20management&rft.au=Arnold,%20Todd%20W.&rft.date=2002-01-01&rft.volume=66&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=162&rft.epage=169&rft.pages=162-169&rft.issn=0022-541X&rft.eissn=1937-2817&rft.coden=JWMAA9&rft_id=info:doi/10.2307/3802882&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E3802882%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=234163502&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=3802882&rfr_iscdi=true