Revisiting the species–area relationship in a semi-natural habitat: floral richness in agricultural buffer zones in Finland

Buffer zones in agroecosystems are maintained to prevent soil erosion, nutrient leaching and pesticide drift from arable fields. Buffer zones are also semi-natural habitats supporting wildlife in farmland. At the landscape level, buffer zones may also function as corridors in agricultural mosaics. T...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Agriculture, ecosystems & environment ecosystems & environment, 2002-04, Vol.89 (1), p.137-148
Hauptverfasser: Ma, Maohua, Tarmi, Sanna, Helenius, Juha
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 148
container_issue 1
container_start_page 137
container_title Agriculture, ecosystems & environment
container_volume 89
creator Ma, Maohua
Tarmi, Sanna
Helenius, Juha
description Buffer zones in agroecosystems are maintained to prevent soil erosion, nutrient leaching and pesticide drift from arable fields. Buffer zones are also semi-natural habitats supporting wildlife in farmland. At the landscape level, buffer zones may also function as corridors in agricultural mosaics. This study aims at understanding the relationship between spatial structure of buffer zones and floral species richness. These are linear landscape elements for which the area is approximated by the product of length and width. The species–area relationship ( S= cA z ) was revised, accordingly, and it was found that patch width was the most effective spatial indicator for species richness in buffer zones. The modified species–area model emphasised the species–area relationship and the importance of width in buffer zone design in an agricultural landscape. It was concluded that there is no unique best-fit model of species–area for both natural and semi-natural ecosystems. Especially in agricultural landscapes, in which habitat heterogeneity is introduced by agricultural activities, the species–area model must be reconsidered accordingly. Some possible factors accounting for the results were discussed. It was suggested that the increase in species diversity with an increase in width of the buffer zone may be due to cross-sectional habitat gradients within the linear patches. The result can be used for optimising buffer zones to meet the needs of biodiversity conservation.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0167-8809(01)00325-5
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18401594</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0167880901003255</els_id><sourcerecordid>14622062</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-95b69a38bddc8a156c1babcc4773104fb362728eaff4284c7c98e278fe20f7d23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc2KFDEQx4MoOK4-gpCLoofWfHQ6aS-yLO4qLAh-nEM6XdmJ9KTHVHpBQfAd9g19EtMzix63DlUU9asP6k_IU85ecca715-r040xrH_B-EvGpFCNukc23GjZCMnUfbL5hzwkjxC_sWpCmg359QmuI8YS0xUtW6C4Bx8B__y-cRkczTC5EueE27inMVFHEXaxSa4s2U1064ZYXHlDwzSveY5-mwDxgF7VbJmO4LCEAJn-nGt1LZ7HNLk0PiYPgpsQntzGE_L1_N2Xs_fN5ceLD2enl42XfV-aXg1d76QZxtEbx1Xn-eAG71utJWdtGGQntDDgQmiFab32vQGhTQDBgh6FPCHPj3P3ef6-ABa7i-hhqjfAvKDlpmVc9e3dYNsJwbp1ojqCPs-IGYLd57hz-YflzK6q2IMqdn25ZdweVLGq9j27XeDQuylkl3zE_81SKd21XeXeHjmob7mOkC1WXZKHMWbwxY5zvGPTX_EJpG0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>14622062</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Revisiting the species–area relationship in a semi-natural habitat: floral richness in agricultural buffer zones in Finland</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Ma, Maohua ; Tarmi, Sanna ; Helenius, Juha</creator><creatorcontrib>Ma, Maohua ; Tarmi, Sanna ; Helenius, Juha</creatorcontrib><description>Buffer zones in agroecosystems are maintained to prevent soil erosion, nutrient leaching and pesticide drift from arable fields. Buffer zones are also semi-natural habitats supporting wildlife in farmland. At the landscape level, buffer zones may also function as corridors in agricultural mosaics. This study aims at understanding the relationship between spatial structure of buffer zones and floral species richness. These are linear landscape elements for which the area is approximated by the product of length and width. The species–area relationship ( S= cA z ) was revised, accordingly, and it was found that patch width was the most effective spatial indicator for species richness in buffer zones. The modified species–area model emphasised the species–area relationship and the importance of width in buffer zone design in an agricultural landscape. It was concluded that there is no unique best-fit model of species–area for both natural and semi-natural ecosystems. Especially in agricultural landscapes, in which habitat heterogeneity is introduced by agricultural activities, the species–area model must be reconsidered accordingly. Some possible factors accounting for the results were discussed. It was suggested that the increase in species diversity with an increase in width of the buffer zone may be due to cross-sectional habitat gradients within the linear patches. The result can be used for optimising buffer zones to meet the needs of biodiversity conservation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0167-8809</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2305</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0167-8809(01)00325-5</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AEENDO</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Agricultural ecosystem ; Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions ; Biological and medical sciences ; Buffer zone ; Floral richness ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General agroecology ; General agroecology. Agricultural and farming systems. Agricultural development. Rural area planning. Landscaping ; General agronomy. Plant production ; Generalities. Agricultural and farming systems. Agricultural development ; Modelling ; Species–area relationship ; Width</subject><ispartof>Agriculture, ecosystems &amp; environment, 2002-04, Vol.89 (1), p.137-148</ispartof><rights>2002 Elsevier Science B.V.</rights><rights>2002 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-95b69a38bddc8a156c1babcc4773104fb362728eaff4284c7c98e278fe20f7d23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-95b69a38bddc8a156c1babcc4773104fb362728eaff4284c7c98e278fe20f7d23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167880901003255$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,776,780,785,786,3537,23909,23910,25118,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=13557646$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ma, Maohua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tarmi, Sanna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Helenius, Juha</creatorcontrib><title>Revisiting the species–area relationship in a semi-natural habitat: floral richness in agricultural buffer zones in Finland</title><title>Agriculture, ecosystems &amp; environment</title><description>Buffer zones in agroecosystems are maintained to prevent soil erosion, nutrient leaching and pesticide drift from arable fields. Buffer zones are also semi-natural habitats supporting wildlife in farmland. At the landscape level, buffer zones may also function as corridors in agricultural mosaics. This study aims at understanding the relationship between spatial structure of buffer zones and floral species richness. These are linear landscape elements for which the area is approximated by the product of length and width. The species–area relationship ( S= cA z ) was revised, accordingly, and it was found that patch width was the most effective spatial indicator for species richness in buffer zones. The modified species–area model emphasised the species–area relationship and the importance of width in buffer zone design in an agricultural landscape. It was concluded that there is no unique best-fit model of species–area for both natural and semi-natural ecosystems. Especially in agricultural landscapes, in which habitat heterogeneity is introduced by agricultural activities, the species–area model must be reconsidered accordingly. Some possible factors accounting for the results were discussed. It was suggested that the increase in species diversity with an increase in width of the buffer zone may be due to cross-sectional habitat gradients within the linear patches. The result can be used for optimising buffer zones to meet the needs of biodiversity conservation.</description><subject>Agricultural ecosystem</subject><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Buffer zone</subject><subject>Floral richness</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General agroecology</subject><subject>General agroecology. Agricultural and farming systems. Agricultural development. Rural area planning. Landscaping</subject><subject>General agronomy. Plant production</subject><subject>Generalities. Agricultural and farming systems. Agricultural development</subject><subject>Modelling</subject><subject>Species–area relationship</subject><subject>Width</subject><issn>0167-8809</issn><issn>1873-2305</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkc2KFDEQx4MoOK4-gpCLoofWfHQ6aS-yLO4qLAh-nEM6XdmJ9KTHVHpBQfAd9g19EtMzix63DlUU9asP6k_IU85ecca715-r040xrH_B-EvGpFCNukc23GjZCMnUfbL5hzwkjxC_sWpCmg359QmuI8YS0xUtW6C4Bx8B__y-cRkczTC5EueE27inMVFHEXaxSa4s2U1064ZYXHlDwzSveY5-mwDxgF7VbJmO4LCEAJn-nGt1LZ7HNLk0PiYPgpsQntzGE_L1_N2Xs_fN5ceLD2enl42XfV-aXg1d76QZxtEbx1Xn-eAG71utJWdtGGQntDDgQmiFab32vQGhTQDBgh6FPCHPj3P3ef6-ABa7i-hhqjfAvKDlpmVc9e3dYNsJwbp1ojqCPs-IGYLd57hz-YflzK6q2IMqdn25ZdweVLGq9j27XeDQuylkl3zE_81SKd21XeXeHjmob7mOkC1WXZKHMWbwxY5zvGPTX_EJpG0</recordid><startdate>20020401</startdate><enddate>20020401</enddate><creator>Ma, Maohua</creator><creator>Tarmi, Sanna</creator><creator>Helenius, Juha</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier Science</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7SN</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20020401</creationdate><title>Revisiting the species–area relationship in a semi-natural habitat: floral richness in agricultural buffer zones in Finland</title><author>Ma, Maohua ; Tarmi, Sanna ; Helenius, Juha</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-95b69a38bddc8a156c1babcc4773104fb362728eaff4284c7c98e278fe20f7d23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Agricultural ecosystem</topic><topic>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Buffer zone</topic><topic>Floral richness</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General agroecology</topic><topic>General agroecology. Agricultural and farming systems. Agricultural development. Rural area planning. Landscaping</topic><topic>General agronomy. Plant production</topic><topic>Generalities. Agricultural and farming systems. Agricultural development</topic><topic>Modelling</topic><topic>Species–area relationship</topic><topic>Width</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ma, Maohua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tarmi, Sanna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Helenius, Juha</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Agriculture, ecosystems &amp; environment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ma, Maohua</au><au>Tarmi, Sanna</au><au>Helenius, Juha</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Revisiting the species–area relationship in a semi-natural habitat: floral richness in agricultural buffer zones in Finland</atitle><jtitle>Agriculture, ecosystems &amp; environment</jtitle><date>2002-04-01</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>89</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>137</spage><epage>148</epage><pages>137-148</pages><issn>0167-8809</issn><eissn>1873-2305</eissn><coden>AEENDO</coden><abstract>Buffer zones in agroecosystems are maintained to prevent soil erosion, nutrient leaching and pesticide drift from arable fields. Buffer zones are also semi-natural habitats supporting wildlife in farmland. At the landscape level, buffer zones may also function as corridors in agricultural mosaics. This study aims at understanding the relationship between spatial structure of buffer zones and floral species richness. These are linear landscape elements for which the area is approximated by the product of length and width. The species–area relationship ( S= cA z ) was revised, accordingly, and it was found that patch width was the most effective spatial indicator for species richness in buffer zones. The modified species–area model emphasised the species–area relationship and the importance of width in buffer zone design in an agricultural landscape. It was concluded that there is no unique best-fit model of species–area for both natural and semi-natural ecosystems. Especially in agricultural landscapes, in which habitat heterogeneity is introduced by agricultural activities, the species–area model must be reconsidered accordingly. Some possible factors accounting for the results were discussed. It was suggested that the increase in species diversity with an increase in width of the buffer zone may be due to cross-sectional habitat gradients within the linear patches. The result can be used for optimising buffer zones to meet the needs of biodiversity conservation.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/S0167-8809(01)00325-5</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0167-8809
ispartof Agriculture, ecosystems & environment, 2002-04, Vol.89 (1), p.137-148
issn 0167-8809
1873-2305
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18401594
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Agricultural ecosystem
Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions
Biological and medical sciences
Buffer zone
Floral richness
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
General agroecology
General agroecology. Agricultural and farming systems. Agricultural development. Rural area planning. Landscaping
General agronomy. Plant production
Generalities. Agricultural and farming systems. Agricultural development
Modelling
Species–area relationship
Width
title Revisiting the species–area relationship in a semi-natural habitat: floral richness in agricultural buffer zones in Finland
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T01%3A37%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Revisiting%20the%20species%E2%80%93area%20relationship%20in%20a%20semi-natural%20habitat:%20floral%20richness%20in%20agricultural%20buffer%20zones%20in%20Finland&rft.jtitle=Agriculture,%20ecosystems%20&%20environment&rft.au=Ma,%20Maohua&rft.date=2002-04-01&rft.volume=89&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=137&rft.epage=148&rft.pages=137-148&rft.issn=0167-8809&rft.eissn=1873-2305&rft.coden=AEENDO&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0167-8809(01)00325-5&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E14622062%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=14622062&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0167880901003255&rfr_iscdi=true