Revisiting the species–area relationship in a semi-natural habitat: floral richness in agricultural buffer zones in Finland
Buffer zones in agroecosystems are maintained to prevent soil erosion, nutrient leaching and pesticide drift from arable fields. Buffer zones are also semi-natural habitats supporting wildlife in farmland. At the landscape level, buffer zones may also function as corridors in agricultural mosaics. T...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Agriculture, ecosystems & environment ecosystems & environment, 2002-04, Vol.89 (1), p.137-148 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 148 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 137 |
container_title | Agriculture, ecosystems & environment |
container_volume | 89 |
creator | Ma, Maohua Tarmi, Sanna Helenius, Juha |
description | Buffer zones in agroecosystems are maintained to prevent soil erosion, nutrient leaching and pesticide drift from arable fields. Buffer zones are also semi-natural habitats supporting wildlife in farmland. At the landscape level, buffer zones may also function as corridors in agricultural mosaics. This study aims at understanding the relationship between spatial structure of buffer zones and floral species richness. These are linear landscape elements for which the area is approximated by the product of length and width. The species–area relationship (
S=
cA
z
) was revised, accordingly, and it was found that patch width was the most effective spatial indicator for species richness in buffer zones. The modified species–area model emphasised the species–area relationship and the importance of width in buffer zone design in an agricultural landscape. It was concluded that there is no unique best-fit model of species–area for both natural and semi-natural ecosystems. Especially in agricultural landscapes, in which habitat heterogeneity is introduced by agricultural activities, the species–area model must be reconsidered accordingly. Some possible factors accounting for the results were discussed. It was suggested that the increase in species diversity with an increase in width of the buffer zone may be due to cross-sectional habitat gradients within the linear patches. The result can be used for optimising buffer zones to meet the needs of biodiversity conservation. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S0167-8809(01)00325-5 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18401594</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0167880901003255</els_id><sourcerecordid>14622062</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-95b69a38bddc8a156c1babcc4773104fb362728eaff4284c7c98e278fe20f7d23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc2KFDEQx4MoOK4-gpCLoofWfHQ6aS-yLO4qLAh-nEM6XdmJ9KTHVHpBQfAd9g19EtMzix63DlUU9asP6k_IU85ecca715-r040xrH_B-EvGpFCNukc23GjZCMnUfbL5hzwkjxC_sWpCmg359QmuI8YS0xUtW6C4Bx8B__y-cRkczTC5EueE27inMVFHEXaxSa4s2U1064ZYXHlDwzSveY5-mwDxgF7VbJmO4LCEAJn-nGt1LZ7HNLk0PiYPgpsQntzGE_L1_N2Xs_fN5ceLD2enl42XfV-aXg1d76QZxtEbx1Xn-eAG71utJWdtGGQntDDgQmiFab32vQGhTQDBgh6FPCHPj3P3ef6-ABa7i-hhqjfAvKDlpmVc9e3dYNsJwbp1ojqCPs-IGYLd57hz-YflzK6q2IMqdn25ZdweVLGq9j27XeDQuylkl3zE_81SKd21XeXeHjmob7mOkC1WXZKHMWbwxY5zvGPTX_EJpG0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>14622062</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Revisiting the species–area relationship in a semi-natural habitat: floral richness in agricultural buffer zones in Finland</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Ma, Maohua ; Tarmi, Sanna ; Helenius, Juha</creator><creatorcontrib>Ma, Maohua ; Tarmi, Sanna ; Helenius, Juha</creatorcontrib><description>Buffer zones in agroecosystems are maintained to prevent soil erosion, nutrient leaching and pesticide drift from arable fields. Buffer zones are also semi-natural habitats supporting wildlife in farmland. At the landscape level, buffer zones may also function as corridors in agricultural mosaics. This study aims at understanding the relationship between spatial structure of buffer zones and floral species richness. These are linear landscape elements for which the area is approximated by the product of length and width. The species–area relationship (
S=
cA
z
) was revised, accordingly, and it was found that patch width was the most effective spatial indicator for species richness in buffer zones. The modified species–area model emphasised the species–area relationship and the importance of width in buffer zone design in an agricultural landscape. It was concluded that there is no unique best-fit model of species–area for both natural and semi-natural ecosystems. Especially in agricultural landscapes, in which habitat heterogeneity is introduced by agricultural activities, the species–area model must be reconsidered accordingly. Some possible factors accounting for the results were discussed. It was suggested that the increase in species diversity with an increase in width of the buffer zone may be due to cross-sectional habitat gradients within the linear patches. The result can be used for optimising buffer zones to meet the needs of biodiversity conservation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0167-8809</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2305</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0167-8809(01)00325-5</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AEENDO</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Agricultural ecosystem ; Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions ; Biological and medical sciences ; Buffer zone ; Floral richness ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General agroecology ; General agroecology. Agricultural and farming systems. Agricultural development. Rural area planning. Landscaping ; General agronomy. Plant production ; Generalities. Agricultural and farming systems. Agricultural development ; Modelling ; Species–area relationship ; Width</subject><ispartof>Agriculture, ecosystems & environment, 2002-04, Vol.89 (1), p.137-148</ispartof><rights>2002 Elsevier Science B.V.</rights><rights>2002 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-95b69a38bddc8a156c1babcc4773104fb362728eaff4284c7c98e278fe20f7d23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-95b69a38bddc8a156c1babcc4773104fb362728eaff4284c7c98e278fe20f7d23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167880901003255$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,776,780,785,786,3537,23909,23910,25118,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=13557646$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ma, Maohua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tarmi, Sanna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Helenius, Juha</creatorcontrib><title>Revisiting the species–area relationship in a semi-natural habitat: floral richness in agricultural buffer zones in Finland</title><title>Agriculture, ecosystems & environment</title><description>Buffer zones in agroecosystems are maintained to prevent soil erosion, nutrient leaching and pesticide drift from arable fields. Buffer zones are also semi-natural habitats supporting wildlife in farmland. At the landscape level, buffer zones may also function as corridors in agricultural mosaics. This study aims at understanding the relationship between spatial structure of buffer zones and floral species richness. These are linear landscape elements for which the area is approximated by the product of length and width. The species–area relationship (
S=
cA
z
) was revised, accordingly, and it was found that patch width was the most effective spatial indicator for species richness in buffer zones. The modified species–area model emphasised the species–area relationship and the importance of width in buffer zone design in an agricultural landscape. It was concluded that there is no unique best-fit model of species–area for both natural and semi-natural ecosystems. Especially in agricultural landscapes, in which habitat heterogeneity is introduced by agricultural activities, the species–area model must be reconsidered accordingly. Some possible factors accounting for the results were discussed. It was suggested that the increase in species diversity with an increase in width of the buffer zone may be due to cross-sectional habitat gradients within the linear patches. The result can be used for optimising buffer zones to meet the needs of biodiversity conservation.</description><subject>Agricultural ecosystem</subject><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Buffer zone</subject><subject>Floral richness</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General agroecology</subject><subject>General agroecology. Agricultural and farming systems. Agricultural development. Rural area planning. Landscaping</subject><subject>General agronomy. Plant production</subject><subject>Generalities. Agricultural and farming systems. Agricultural development</subject><subject>Modelling</subject><subject>Species–area relationship</subject><subject>Width</subject><issn>0167-8809</issn><issn>1873-2305</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkc2KFDEQx4MoOK4-gpCLoofWfHQ6aS-yLO4qLAh-nEM6XdmJ9KTHVHpBQfAd9g19EtMzix63DlUU9asP6k_IU85ecca715-r040xrH_B-EvGpFCNukc23GjZCMnUfbL5hzwkjxC_sWpCmg359QmuI8YS0xUtW6C4Bx8B__y-cRkczTC5EueE27inMVFHEXaxSa4s2U1064ZYXHlDwzSveY5-mwDxgF7VbJmO4LCEAJn-nGt1LZ7HNLk0PiYPgpsQntzGE_L1_N2Xs_fN5ceLD2enl42XfV-aXg1d76QZxtEbx1Xn-eAG71utJWdtGGQntDDgQmiFab32vQGhTQDBgh6FPCHPj3P3ef6-ABa7i-hhqjfAvKDlpmVc9e3dYNsJwbp1ojqCPs-IGYLd57hz-YflzK6q2IMqdn25ZdweVLGq9j27XeDQuylkl3zE_81SKd21XeXeHjmob7mOkC1WXZKHMWbwxY5zvGPTX_EJpG0</recordid><startdate>20020401</startdate><enddate>20020401</enddate><creator>Ma, Maohua</creator><creator>Tarmi, Sanna</creator><creator>Helenius, Juha</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier Science</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7SN</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20020401</creationdate><title>Revisiting the species–area relationship in a semi-natural habitat: floral richness in agricultural buffer zones in Finland</title><author>Ma, Maohua ; Tarmi, Sanna ; Helenius, Juha</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c399t-95b69a38bddc8a156c1babcc4773104fb362728eaff4284c7c98e278fe20f7d23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Agricultural ecosystem</topic><topic>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Buffer zone</topic><topic>Floral richness</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General agroecology</topic><topic>General agroecology. Agricultural and farming systems. Agricultural development. Rural area planning. Landscaping</topic><topic>General agronomy. Plant production</topic><topic>Generalities. Agricultural and farming systems. Agricultural development</topic><topic>Modelling</topic><topic>Species–area relationship</topic><topic>Width</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ma, Maohua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tarmi, Sanna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Helenius, Juha</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Agriculture, ecosystems & environment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ma, Maohua</au><au>Tarmi, Sanna</au><au>Helenius, Juha</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Revisiting the species–area relationship in a semi-natural habitat: floral richness in agricultural buffer zones in Finland</atitle><jtitle>Agriculture, ecosystems & environment</jtitle><date>2002-04-01</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>89</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>137</spage><epage>148</epage><pages>137-148</pages><issn>0167-8809</issn><eissn>1873-2305</eissn><coden>AEENDO</coden><abstract>Buffer zones in agroecosystems are maintained to prevent soil erosion, nutrient leaching and pesticide drift from arable fields. Buffer zones are also semi-natural habitats supporting wildlife in farmland. At the landscape level, buffer zones may also function as corridors in agricultural mosaics. This study aims at understanding the relationship between spatial structure of buffer zones and floral species richness. These are linear landscape elements for which the area is approximated by the product of length and width. The species–area relationship (
S=
cA
z
) was revised, accordingly, and it was found that patch width was the most effective spatial indicator for species richness in buffer zones. The modified species–area model emphasised the species–area relationship and the importance of width in buffer zone design in an agricultural landscape. It was concluded that there is no unique best-fit model of species–area for both natural and semi-natural ecosystems. Especially in agricultural landscapes, in which habitat heterogeneity is introduced by agricultural activities, the species–area model must be reconsidered accordingly. Some possible factors accounting for the results were discussed. It was suggested that the increase in species diversity with an increase in width of the buffer zone may be due to cross-sectional habitat gradients within the linear patches. The result can be used for optimising buffer zones to meet the needs of biodiversity conservation.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/S0167-8809(01)00325-5</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0167-8809 |
ispartof | Agriculture, ecosystems & environment, 2002-04, Vol.89 (1), p.137-148 |
issn | 0167-8809 1873-2305 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18401594 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Agricultural ecosystem Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions Biological and medical sciences Buffer zone Floral richness Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology General agroecology General agroecology. Agricultural and farming systems. Agricultural development. Rural area planning. Landscaping General agronomy. Plant production Generalities. Agricultural and farming systems. Agricultural development Modelling Species–area relationship Width |
title | Revisiting the species–area relationship in a semi-natural habitat: floral richness in agricultural buffer zones in Finland |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T01%3A37%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Revisiting%20the%20species%E2%80%93area%20relationship%20in%20a%20semi-natural%20habitat:%20floral%20richness%20in%20agricultural%20buffer%20zones%20in%20Finland&rft.jtitle=Agriculture,%20ecosystems%20&%20environment&rft.au=Ma,%20Maohua&rft.date=2002-04-01&rft.volume=89&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=137&rft.epage=148&rft.pages=137-148&rft.issn=0167-8809&rft.eissn=1873-2305&rft.coden=AEENDO&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0167-8809(01)00325-5&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E14622062%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=14622062&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0167880901003255&rfr_iscdi=true |