Rainfall interception in a forest stand estimated from grassland meteorological data

Meteorological data collected over grassland were used in the Rutter and analytical interception models to predict interception losses for a Scots pine stand in Thetford Forest during 84 weeks in 1975 and 1976. Rutter and analytical model estimates using grassland data overestimated the observed los...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam) 1980-01, Vol.46 (1), p.147-163
Hauptverfasser: Pearce, A.J., Gash, J.H.C., Stewart, J.B.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 163
container_issue 1
container_start_page 147
container_title Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam)
container_volume 46
creator Pearce, A.J.
Gash, J.H.C.
Stewart, J.B.
description Meteorological data collected over grassland were used in the Rutter and analytical interception models to predict interception losses for a Scots pine stand in Thetford Forest during 84 weeks in 1975 and 1976. Rutter and analytical model estimates using grassland data overestimated the observed losses by 37% and 25%, respectively; estimates using data collected over the forest overestimated by 8% and 5%, respectively. Systematic differences in the meteorological parameters controlling the evaporation rate from wet forest and wet grass are the cause of the overestimation of interception losses when grassland data are used in the models. Mean air temperature over the wet forest was 0.75°C cooler, mean wet-bulb depression was 0.25°C smaller, and mean vapour pressure deficit was 0.4 mbar smaller than the mean values observed over wet grass in 116 hr when ⩾ 0.5 mm of rain fell at both observation sites. No significant differences between sites were found when both the grass and the forest canopy were dry. Regression equations for forest-site parameters on grassed-site parameters were used to adjust the grassed-site data for use in the models. Analytical model estimates using adjusted data were closely comparable to both observed losses and model estimates using above-forest data. Rutter model estimates using adjusted data were significantly different from the observed losses for 1976 and for the combined 1975–1976 data, but were comparable with the observed losses and model estimates using above-forest data in 1975.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/0022-1694(80)90040-2
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18397671</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>0022169480900402</els_id><sourcerecordid>18397671</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a479t-125684add78414a9803d83538f710d75b2a7864640609b3b78b68ad352f867903</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEtLAzEQgIMoWKv_QHBPoofVyWPzuAhSfEFB0PYc0k22RLabmqSC_97UikcNA8mQbyaTD6FTDFcYML8GIKTGXLELCZcKgEFN9tAIS6FqIkDso9EvcoiOUnqDsihlIzR7MX7oTN9Xfsgutm6dfRhKUpmqC9GlXKVsBluVk1-Z7GzVxbCqltGk1G8vVi67EEMflr41fWVNNsfooLRM7uRnH6P5_d1s8lhPnx-eJrfT2jChco1JwyUz1grJMDNKArWSNlR2AoMVzYIYITnjDDioBV0IueDSWNqQTnKhgI7R-a7vOob3TZlQr3xqXV_mcmGTNJZUCS7w_yBV0CgiCsh2YBtDStF1eh3Lt-OnxqC3rvVWpN6K1BL0t2tNStnZrqwzQZtl9EnPXwlgWoLxYroQNzvCFR8f3kWdWu-G1lkfXZu1Df7vJ74AMXCNkA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>13905927</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Rainfall interception in a forest stand estimated from grassland meteorological data</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Pearce, A.J. ; Gash, J.H.C. ; Stewart, J.B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Pearce, A.J. ; Gash, J.H.C. ; Stewart, J.B.</creatorcontrib><description>Meteorological data collected over grassland were used in the Rutter and analytical interception models to predict interception losses for a Scots pine stand in Thetford Forest during 84 weeks in 1975 and 1976. Rutter and analytical model estimates using grassland data overestimated the observed losses by 37% and 25%, respectively; estimates using data collected over the forest overestimated by 8% and 5%, respectively. Systematic differences in the meteorological parameters controlling the evaporation rate from wet forest and wet grass are the cause of the overestimation of interception losses when grassland data are used in the models. Mean air temperature over the wet forest was 0.75°C cooler, mean wet-bulb depression was 0.25°C smaller, and mean vapour pressure deficit was 0.4 mbar smaller than the mean values observed over wet grass in 116 hr when ⩾ 0.5 mm of rain fell at both observation sites. No significant differences between sites were found when both the grass and the forest canopy were dry. Regression equations for forest-site parameters on grassed-site parameters were used to adjust the grassed-site data for use in the models. Analytical model estimates using adjusted data were closely comparable to both observed losses and model estimates using above-forest data. Rutter model estimates using adjusted data were significantly different from the observed losses for 1976 and for the combined 1975–1976 data, but were comparable with the observed losses and model estimates using above-forest data in 1975.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-1694</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-2707</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0022-1694(80)90040-2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier B.V</publisher><ispartof>Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam), 1980-01, Vol.46 (1), p.147-163</ispartof><rights>1980</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a479t-125684add78414a9803d83538f710d75b2a7864640609b3b78b68ad352f867903</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a479t-125684add78414a9803d83538f710d75b2a7864640609b3b78b68ad352f867903</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0022169480900402$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pearce, A.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gash, J.H.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stewart, J.B.</creatorcontrib><title>Rainfall interception in a forest stand estimated from grassland meteorological data</title><title>Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam)</title><description>Meteorological data collected over grassland were used in the Rutter and analytical interception models to predict interception losses for a Scots pine stand in Thetford Forest during 84 weeks in 1975 and 1976. Rutter and analytical model estimates using grassland data overestimated the observed losses by 37% and 25%, respectively; estimates using data collected over the forest overestimated by 8% and 5%, respectively. Systematic differences in the meteorological parameters controlling the evaporation rate from wet forest and wet grass are the cause of the overestimation of interception losses when grassland data are used in the models. Mean air temperature over the wet forest was 0.75°C cooler, mean wet-bulb depression was 0.25°C smaller, and mean vapour pressure deficit was 0.4 mbar smaller than the mean values observed over wet grass in 116 hr when ⩾ 0.5 mm of rain fell at both observation sites. No significant differences between sites were found when both the grass and the forest canopy were dry. Regression equations for forest-site parameters on grassed-site parameters were used to adjust the grassed-site data for use in the models. Analytical model estimates using adjusted data were closely comparable to both observed losses and model estimates using above-forest data. Rutter model estimates using adjusted data were significantly different from the observed losses for 1976 and for the combined 1975–1976 data, but were comparable with the observed losses and model estimates using above-forest data in 1975.</description><issn>0022-1694</issn><issn>1879-2707</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1980</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkEtLAzEQgIMoWKv_QHBPoofVyWPzuAhSfEFB0PYc0k22RLabmqSC_97UikcNA8mQbyaTD6FTDFcYML8GIKTGXLELCZcKgEFN9tAIS6FqIkDso9EvcoiOUnqDsihlIzR7MX7oTN9Xfsgutm6dfRhKUpmqC9GlXKVsBluVk1-Z7GzVxbCqltGk1G8vVi67EEMflr41fWVNNsfooLRM7uRnH6P5_d1s8lhPnx-eJrfT2jChco1JwyUz1grJMDNKArWSNlR2AoMVzYIYITnjDDioBV0IueDSWNqQTnKhgI7R-a7vOob3TZlQr3xqXV_mcmGTNJZUCS7w_yBV0CgiCsh2YBtDStF1eh3Lt-OnxqC3rvVWpN6K1BL0t2tNStnZrqwzQZtl9EnPXwlgWoLxYroQNzvCFR8f3kWdWu-G1lkfXZu1Df7vJ74AMXCNkA</recordid><startdate>19800101</startdate><enddate>19800101</enddate><creator>Pearce, A.J.</creator><creator>Gash, J.H.C.</creator><creator>Stewart, J.B.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>KL.</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19800101</creationdate><title>Rainfall interception in a forest stand estimated from grassland meteorological data</title><author>Pearce, A.J. ; Gash, J.H.C. ; Stewart, J.B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a479t-125684add78414a9803d83538f710d75b2a7864640609b3b78b68ad352f867903</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1980</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pearce, A.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gash, J.H.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stewart, J.B.</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pearce, A.J.</au><au>Gash, J.H.C.</au><au>Stewart, J.B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Rainfall interception in a forest stand estimated from grassland meteorological data</atitle><jtitle>Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam)</jtitle><date>1980-01-01</date><risdate>1980</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>147</spage><epage>163</epage><pages>147-163</pages><issn>0022-1694</issn><eissn>1879-2707</eissn><abstract>Meteorological data collected over grassland were used in the Rutter and analytical interception models to predict interception losses for a Scots pine stand in Thetford Forest during 84 weeks in 1975 and 1976. Rutter and analytical model estimates using grassland data overestimated the observed losses by 37% and 25%, respectively; estimates using data collected over the forest overestimated by 8% and 5%, respectively. Systematic differences in the meteorological parameters controlling the evaporation rate from wet forest and wet grass are the cause of the overestimation of interception losses when grassland data are used in the models. Mean air temperature over the wet forest was 0.75°C cooler, mean wet-bulb depression was 0.25°C smaller, and mean vapour pressure deficit was 0.4 mbar smaller than the mean values observed over wet grass in 116 hr when ⩾ 0.5 mm of rain fell at both observation sites. No significant differences between sites were found when both the grass and the forest canopy were dry. Regression equations for forest-site parameters on grassed-site parameters were used to adjust the grassed-site data for use in the models. Analytical model estimates using adjusted data were closely comparable to both observed losses and model estimates using above-forest data. Rutter model estimates using adjusted data were significantly different from the observed losses for 1976 and for the combined 1975–1976 data, but were comparable with the observed losses and model estimates using above-forest data in 1975.</abstract><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/0022-1694(80)90040-2</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-1694
ispartof Journal of hydrology (Amsterdam), 1980-01, Vol.46 (1), p.147-163
issn 0022-1694
1879-2707
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18397671
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
title Rainfall interception in a forest stand estimated from grassland meteorological data
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T03%3A44%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Rainfall%20interception%20in%20a%20forest%20stand%20estimated%20from%20grassland%20meteorological%20data&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20hydrology%20(Amsterdam)&rft.au=Pearce,%20A.J.&rft.date=1980-01-01&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=147&rft.epage=163&rft.pages=147-163&rft.issn=0022-1694&rft.eissn=1879-2707&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0022-1694(80)90040-2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E18397671%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=13905927&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=0022169480900402&rfr_iscdi=true