In vivo skin dose measurement using MOSkin detectors in tangential breast radiotherapy
•Patients’ skin dose during tangential breast radiotherapy have been determined.•EBT2 film and PBC overestimated the skin dose.•The skin dose is approached and exceeded the dose toxicity level for skin erythema.•The use of suitable metrological device is necessary to determine actual skin dose. The...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Physica medica 2016-11, Vol.32 (11), p.1466-1474 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1474 |
---|---|
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | 1466 |
container_title | Physica medica |
container_volume | 32 |
creator | Jong, W.L. Ung, N.M. Wong, J.H.D. Ng, K.H. Wan Ishak, W.Z. Abdul Malik, R. Phua, V.C.E. Cutajar, D.L. Metcalfe, P.E. Rosenfeld, A.B. Ho, G.F. |
description | •Patients’ skin dose during tangential breast radiotherapy have been determined.•EBT2 film and PBC overestimated the skin dose.•The skin dose is approached and exceeded the dose toxicity level for skin erythema.•The use of suitable metrological device is necessary to determine actual skin dose.
The purpose of this study is to measure patient skin dose in tangential breast radiotherapy. Treatment planning dose calculation algorithm such as Pencil Beam Convolution (PBC) and in vivo dosimetry techniques such as radiochromic film can be used to accurately monitor radiation doses at tissue depths, but they are inaccurate for skin dose measurement. A MOSFET-based (MOSkin) detector was used to measure skin dose in this study. Tangential breast radiotherapies (“bolus” and “no bolus”) were simulated on an anthropomorphic phantom and the skin doses were measured. Skin doses were also measured in 13 patients undergoing each of the techniques. In the patient study, the EBT2 measurements and PBC calculation tended to over-estimate the skin dose compared with the MOSkin detector (p0.05). The results from patients were similar to that of the phantom study. This shows that the EBT2 measurement and PBC calculation, while able to predict accurate doses at tissue depths, are inaccurate in predicting doses at build-up regions. The clinical application of the MOSkin detectors showed that the average total skin doses received by patients were 1662±129cGy (medial) and 1893±199cGy (lateral) during “no bolus radiotherapy”. The average total skin doses were 4030±72cGy (medial) and 4004±91cGy (lateral) for “bolus radiotherapy”. In some cases, patient skin doses were shown to exceed the dose toxicity level for skin erythema. Hence, a suitable device for in vivo dosimetry is necessary to accurately determine skin dose. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.ejmp.2016.10.022 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1839740031</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1120179716309693</els_id><sourcerecordid>1839740031</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-db8b16bca305c7145aa5e691a0809cbea03089908076013e726142bfa46be2e23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kDtPwzAUhS0EolD4AwzII0uC7bwlFlTxqFTUgYfYLNu5LQ5JHOykUv89Di2MTPd1zpHuh9AFJSElNL2uQqiaLmS-94uQMHaATmjG4oAW9P3Q95SRgGZFNkGnzlWERIwlyTGasCyPWZGzE_Q2b_FGbwx2n7rFpXGAGxBusNBA2-PB6XaNn5bPP1foQfXGOuyHXrRrr9CixtJ6R4-tKLXpP8CKbnuGjlaidnC-r1P0en_3MnsMFsuH-ex2EagoSfuglLmkqVQiIonKaJwIkUBaUEFyUigJgkQkLwo_ZSmhEWQspTGTKxGnEhiwaIqudrmdNV8DuJ432imoa9GCGRyneVRksX-ceinbSZU1zllY8c7qRtgtp4SPPHnFR5585DnuPE9vutznD7KB8s_yC9ALbnYC8F9uNFjulIZWQamth8VLo__L_wZnkIbo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1839740031</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>In vivo skin dose measurement using MOSkin detectors in tangential breast radiotherapy</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Jong, W.L. ; Ung, N.M. ; Wong, J.H.D. ; Ng, K.H. ; Wan Ishak, W.Z. ; Abdul Malik, R. ; Phua, V.C.E. ; Cutajar, D.L. ; Metcalfe, P.E. ; Rosenfeld, A.B. ; Ho, G.F.</creator><creatorcontrib>Jong, W.L. ; Ung, N.M. ; Wong, J.H.D. ; Ng, K.H. ; Wan Ishak, W.Z. ; Abdul Malik, R. ; Phua, V.C.E. ; Cutajar, D.L. ; Metcalfe, P.E. ; Rosenfeld, A.B. ; Ho, G.F.</creatorcontrib><description>•Patients’ skin dose during tangential breast radiotherapy have been determined.•EBT2 film and PBC overestimated the skin dose.•The skin dose is approached and exceeded the dose toxicity level for skin erythema.•The use of suitable metrological device is necessary to determine actual skin dose.
The purpose of this study is to measure patient skin dose in tangential breast radiotherapy. Treatment planning dose calculation algorithm such as Pencil Beam Convolution (PBC) and in vivo dosimetry techniques such as radiochromic film can be used to accurately monitor radiation doses at tissue depths, but they are inaccurate for skin dose measurement. A MOSFET-based (MOSkin) detector was used to measure skin dose in this study. Tangential breast radiotherapies (“bolus” and “no bolus”) were simulated on an anthropomorphic phantom and the skin doses were measured. Skin doses were also measured in 13 patients undergoing each of the techniques. In the patient study, the EBT2 measurements and PBC calculation tended to over-estimate the skin dose compared with the MOSkin detector (p<0.05) in the “no bolus radiotherapy”. No significant differences were observed in the “bolus radiotherapy” (p>0.05). The results from patients were similar to that of the phantom study. This shows that the EBT2 measurement and PBC calculation, while able to predict accurate doses at tissue depths, are inaccurate in predicting doses at build-up regions. The clinical application of the MOSkin detectors showed that the average total skin doses received by patients were 1662±129cGy (medial) and 1893±199cGy (lateral) during “no bolus radiotherapy”. The average total skin doses were 4030±72cGy (medial) and 4004±91cGy (lateral) for “bolus radiotherapy”. In some cases, patient skin doses were shown to exceed the dose toxicity level for skin erythema. Hence, a suitable device for in vivo dosimetry is necessary to accurately determine skin dose.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1120-1797</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1724-191X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2016.10.022</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27842982</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Italy: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Breast conserving radiotherapy ; Breast Neoplasms - radiotherapy ; Chest wall irradiation ; Humans ; In vivo dosimetry ; MOSFET ; Organs at Risk - radiation effects ; Phantoms, Imaging ; Radiometry - instrumentation ; Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted ; Rotation ; Skin - radiation effects ; Superficial dose ; Surface dose</subject><ispartof>Physica medica, 2016-11, Vol.32 (11), p.1466-1474</ispartof><rights>2016 Associazione Italiana di Fisica Medica</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 Associazione Italiana di Fisica Medica. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-db8b16bca305c7145aa5e691a0809cbea03089908076013e726142bfa46be2e23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-db8b16bca305c7145aa5e691a0809cbea03089908076013e726142bfa46be2e23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2016.10.022$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27842982$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jong, W.L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ung, N.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wong, J.H.D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ng, K.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wan Ishak, W.Z.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abdul Malik, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Phua, V.C.E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cutajar, D.L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Metcalfe, P.E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosenfeld, A.B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ho, G.F.</creatorcontrib><title>In vivo skin dose measurement using MOSkin detectors in tangential breast radiotherapy</title><title>Physica medica</title><addtitle>Phys Med</addtitle><description>•Patients’ skin dose during tangential breast radiotherapy have been determined.•EBT2 film and PBC overestimated the skin dose.•The skin dose is approached and exceeded the dose toxicity level for skin erythema.•The use of suitable metrological device is necessary to determine actual skin dose.
The purpose of this study is to measure patient skin dose in tangential breast radiotherapy. Treatment planning dose calculation algorithm such as Pencil Beam Convolution (PBC) and in vivo dosimetry techniques such as radiochromic film can be used to accurately monitor radiation doses at tissue depths, but they are inaccurate for skin dose measurement. A MOSFET-based (MOSkin) detector was used to measure skin dose in this study. Tangential breast radiotherapies (“bolus” and “no bolus”) were simulated on an anthropomorphic phantom and the skin doses were measured. Skin doses were also measured in 13 patients undergoing each of the techniques. In the patient study, the EBT2 measurements and PBC calculation tended to over-estimate the skin dose compared with the MOSkin detector (p<0.05) in the “no bolus radiotherapy”. No significant differences were observed in the “bolus radiotherapy” (p>0.05). The results from patients were similar to that of the phantom study. This shows that the EBT2 measurement and PBC calculation, while able to predict accurate doses at tissue depths, are inaccurate in predicting doses at build-up regions. The clinical application of the MOSkin detectors showed that the average total skin doses received by patients were 1662±129cGy (medial) and 1893±199cGy (lateral) during “no bolus radiotherapy”. The average total skin doses were 4030±72cGy (medial) and 4004±91cGy (lateral) for “bolus radiotherapy”. In some cases, patient skin doses were shown to exceed the dose toxicity level for skin erythema. Hence, a suitable device for in vivo dosimetry is necessary to accurately determine skin dose.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Breast conserving radiotherapy</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - radiotherapy</subject><subject>Chest wall irradiation</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>In vivo dosimetry</subject><subject>MOSFET</subject><subject>Organs at Risk - radiation effects</subject><subject>Phantoms, Imaging</subject><subject>Radiometry - instrumentation</subject><subject>Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted</subject><subject>Rotation</subject><subject>Skin - radiation effects</subject><subject>Superficial dose</subject><subject>Surface dose</subject><issn>1120-1797</issn><issn>1724-191X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kDtPwzAUhS0EolD4AwzII0uC7bwlFlTxqFTUgYfYLNu5LQ5JHOykUv89Di2MTPd1zpHuh9AFJSElNL2uQqiaLmS-94uQMHaATmjG4oAW9P3Q95SRgGZFNkGnzlWERIwlyTGasCyPWZGzE_Q2b_FGbwx2n7rFpXGAGxBusNBA2-PB6XaNn5bPP1foQfXGOuyHXrRrr9CixtJ6R4-tKLXpP8CKbnuGjlaidnC-r1P0en_3MnsMFsuH-ex2EagoSfuglLmkqVQiIonKaJwIkUBaUEFyUigJgkQkLwo_ZSmhEWQspTGTKxGnEhiwaIqudrmdNV8DuJ432imoa9GCGRyneVRksX-ceinbSZU1zllY8c7qRtgtp4SPPHnFR5585DnuPE9vutznD7KB8s_yC9ALbnYC8F9uNFjulIZWQamth8VLo__L_wZnkIbo</recordid><startdate>201611</startdate><enddate>201611</enddate><creator>Jong, W.L.</creator><creator>Ung, N.M.</creator><creator>Wong, J.H.D.</creator><creator>Ng, K.H.</creator><creator>Wan Ishak, W.Z.</creator><creator>Abdul Malik, R.</creator><creator>Phua, V.C.E.</creator><creator>Cutajar, D.L.</creator><creator>Metcalfe, P.E.</creator><creator>Rosenfeld, A.B.</creator><creator>Ho, G.F.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201611</creationdate><title>In vivo skin dose measurement using MOSkin detectors in tangential breast radiotherapy</title><author>Jong, W.L. ; Ung, N.M. ; Wong, J.H.D. ; Ng, K.H. ; Wan Ishak, W.Z. ; Abdul Malik, R. ; Phua, V.C.E. ; Cutajar, D.L. ; Metcalfe, P.E. ; Rosenfeld, A.B. ; Ho, G.F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-db8b16bca305c7145aa5e691a0809cbea03089908076013e726142bfa46be2e23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Breast conserving radiotherapy</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - radiotherapy</topic><topic>Chest wall irradiation</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>In vivo dosimetry</topic><topic>MOSFET</topic><topic>Organs at Risk - radiation effects</topic><topic>Phantoms, Imaging</topic><topic>Radiometry - instrumentation</topic><topic>Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted</topic><topic>Rotation</topic><topic>Skin - radiation effects</topic><topic>Superficial dose</topic><topic>Surface dose</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jong, W.L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ung, N.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wong, J.H.D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ng, K.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wan Ishak, W.Z.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abdul Malik, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Phua, V.C.E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cutajar, D.L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Metcalfe, P.E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosenfeld, A.B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ho, G.F.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Physica medica</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jong, W.L.</au><au>Ung, N.M.</au><au>Wong, J.H.D.</au><au>Ng, K.H.</au><au>Wan Ishak, W.Z.</au><au>Abdul Malik, R.</au><au>Phua, V.C.E.</au><au>Cutajar, D.L.</au><au>Metcalfe, P.E.</au><au>Rosenfeld, A.B.</au><au>Ho, G.F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>In vivo skin dose measurement using MOSkin detectors in tangential breast radiotherapy</atitle><jtitle>Physica medica</jtitle><addtitle>Phys Med</addtitle><date>2016-11</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>1466</spage><epage>1474</epage><pages>1466-1474</pages><issn>1120-1797</issn><eissn>1724-191X</eissn><abstract>•Patients’ skin dose during tangential breast radiotherapy have been determined.•EBT2 film and PBC overestimated the skin dose.•The skin dose is approached and exceeded the dose toxicity level for skin erythema.•The use of suitable metrological device is necessary to determine actual skin dose.
The purpose of this study is to measure patient skin dose in tangential breast radiotherapy. Treatment planning dose calculation algorithm such as Pencil Beam Convolution (PBC) and in vivo dosimetry techniques such as radiochromic film can be used to accurately monitor radiation doses at tissue depths, but they are inaccurate for skin dose measurement. A MOSFET-based (MOSkin) detector was used to measure skin dose in this study. Tangential breast radiotherapies (“bolus” and “no bolus”) were simulated on an anthropomorphic phantom and the skin doses were measured. Skin doses were also measured in 13 patients undergoing each of the techniques. In the patient study, the EBT2 measurements and PBC calculation tended to over-estimate the skin dose compared with the MOSkin detector (p<0.05) in the “no bolus radiotherapy”. No significant differences were observed in the “bolus radiotherapy” (p>0.05). The results from patients were similar to that of the phantom study. This shows that the EBT2 measurement and PBC calculation, while able to predict accurate doses at tissue depths, are inaccurate in predicting doses at build-up regions. The clinical application of the MOSkin detectors showed that the average total skin doses received by patients were 1662±129cGy (medial) and 1893±199cGy (lateral) during “no bolus radiotherapy”. The average total skin doses were 4030±72cGy (medial) and 4004±91cGy (lateral) for “bolus radiotherapy”. In some cases, patient skin doses were shown to exceed the dose toxicity level for skin erythema. Hence, a suitable device for in vivo dosimetry is necessary to accurately determine skin dose.</abstract><cop>Italy</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>27842982</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ejmp.2016.10.022</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1120-1797 |
ispartof | Physica medica, 2016-11, Vol.32 (11), p.1466-1474 |
issn | 1120-1797 1724-191X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1839740031 |
source | MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | Algorithms Breast conserving radiotherapy Breast Neoplasms - radiotherapy Chest wall irradiation Humans In vivo dosimetry MOSFET Organs at Risk - radiation effects Phantoms, Imaging Radiometry - instrumentation Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted Rotation Skin - radiation effects Superficial dose Surface dose |
title | In vivo skin dose measurement using MOSkin detectors in tangential breast radiotherapy |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T16%3A26%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=In%20vivo%20skin%20dose%20measurement%20using%20MOSkin%20detectors%20in%20tangential%20breast%20radiotherapy&rft.jtitle=Physica%20medica&rft.au=Jong,%20W.L.&rft.date=2016-11&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=1466&rft.epage=1474&rft.pages=1466-1474&rft.issn=1120-1797&rft.eissn=1724-191X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ejmp.2016.10.022&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1839740031%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1839740031&rft_id=info:pmid/27842982&rft_els_id=S1120179716309693&rfr_iscdi=true |