Marked differences in cardiovascular risk profiles in middle-aged and older Chinese residents: Evidence from a large Australian cohort

Abstract Background Although Chinese form the largest non-English speaking group in Australia, cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk profiles among Chinese Australians have not been comprehensively examined, nor has the effect of mixed-Chinese ethnicity been adequately explored. This study is to investi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of cardiology 2017-01, Vol.227, p.347-354
Hauptverfasser: Jin, Kai, Neubeck, Lis, Gullick, Janice, Koo, Fung, Ding, Ding
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 354
container_issue
container_start_page 347
container_title International journal of cardiology
container_volume 227
creator Jin, Kai
Neubeck, Lis
Gullick, Janice
Koo, Fung
Ding, Ding
description Abstract Background Although Chinese form the largest non-English speaking group in Australia, cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk profiles among Chinese Australians have not been comprehensively examined, nor has the effect of mixed-Chinese ethnicity been adequately explored. This study is to investigate cardiovascular risk among Chinese, mixed-Chinese and non-Chinese Australians. Methods Using data from 266,696 Australian participants from the 45 and Up Study (2006–2009), this study investigated cardiovascular risk among Chinese (n = 3454), mixed-Chinese (n = 1062) and non-Chinese (n = 262,180) participants. Poisson regression models with a robust error variance were used to estimate prevalence ratio (PR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for CVD (coronary heart disease (CHD) and stroke) and six major risk factors (hypertension, diabetes, high cholesterol, smoking, overweight/obesity, physical inactivity) by ethnicity using non-Chinese participants as the reference group. Each outcome was adjusted for sociodemographic characteristics. Results Compared with non-Chinese Australians, Chinese had lower prevalence of CHD (PR = 0.67; 95% CI 0.59–0.75) and stroke (PR = 0.67; 0.51–0.88). Of the risk factors, Chinese had higher prevalence of diabetes (PR = 1.25; 1.12–1.39), smoking (PR = 1.22; 1.04–1.43) and physical inactivity (PR = 1.48; 1.41–1.55) but lower prevalence of hypertension (PR = 0.90; 0.86–0.95), high cholesterol (PR = 0.87; 0.79–0.95) and overweight/obesity (PR = 0.46; 0.43–0.48). Mixed-Chinese had higher prevalence of CVD and worse CVD risk profiles compared with Chinese. Conclusions There are marked differences in the prevalence of CVD and risk factors among three groups. The noticeable variations in CVD risk between Chinese and mixed-Chinese indicate that conventional classification of treating all Chinese as homogeneous could be misleading. More investigation into the health outcomes of mixed ancestry is warranted.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.11.062
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1839113750</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0167527316335082</els_id><sourcerecordid>1839113750</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-6f3b8fbfc0579897a93af3e42faf24b2d5c4acfd254c2688524d20c3b843e0ca3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUk1v1TAQtBCIPgr_ACEfuST4K3HCAal6ammlIg7A2fKz163znLjYyZP6B_jdOErhwIWT19qZWe3MIvSWkpoS2n4Yaj8YnWzNyq-mtCYte4Z2tJOiorIRz9GuNGTVMMnP0KucB0KI6PvuJTpjsuN9R-UO_fqi0xEstt45SDAZyNhPeBX28aSzWYJOOPl8xA8pOh-2_uitDVDpu0LVk8UxWEh4f-8nyIATZG9hmvNHfHlaKwPYpThijYvaHeCLJc9JB6_LpHgf0_wavXA6ZHjz9J6jH1eX3_fX1e3Xzzf7i9vKiJbPVev4oXMHZ0gj-66XuufacRDMacfEgdnGCG2cZY0wrO26hgnLiCkkwYEYzc_R-023LPNzgTyr0WcDIegJ4pIVLb5QymVDClRsUJNizgmcekh-1OlRUaLWBNSgtgTUmoCiVJUECu3d04TlMIL9S_pjeQF82gBQ9jx5SCobv1pkfQIzKxv9_yb8K2CCn7zR4QiPkIe4pKl4qKjKTBH1bb2C9Qhoy3lDOsZ_A1CVsE8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1839113750</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Marked differences in cardiovascular risk profiles in middle-aged and older Chinese residents: Evidence from a large Australian cohort</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Jin, Kai ; Neubeck, Lis ; Gullick, Janice ; Koo, Fung ; Ding, Ding</creator><creatorcontrib>Jin, Kai ; Neubeck, Lis ; Gullick, Janice ; Koo, Fung ; Ding, Ding</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Background Although Chinese form the largest non-English speaking group in Australia, cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk profiles among Chinese Australians have not been comprehensively examined, nor has the effect of mixed-Chinese ethnicity been adequately explored. This study is to investigate cardiovascular risk among Chinese, mixed-Chinese and non-Chinese Australians. Methods Using data from 266,696 Australian participants from the 45 and Up Study (2006–2009), this study investigated cardiovascular risk among Chinese (n = 3454), mixed-Chinese (n = 1062) and non-Chinese (n = 262,180) participants. Poisson regression models with a robust error variance were used to estimate prevalence ratio (PR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for CVD (coronary heart disease (CHD) and stroke) and six major risk factors (hypertension, diabetes, high cholesterol, smoking, overweight/obesity, physical inactivity) by ethnicity using non-Chinese participants as the reference group. Each outcome was adjusted for sociodemographic characteristics. Results Compared with non-Chinese Australians, Chinese had lower prevalence of CHD (PR = 0.67; 95% CI 0.59–0.75) and stroke (PR = 0.67; 0.51–0.88). Of the risk factors, Chinese had higher prevalence of diabetes (PR = 1.25; 1.12–1.39), smoking (PR = 1.22; 1.04–1.43) and physical inactivity (PR = 1.48; 1.41–1.55) but lower prevalence of hypertension (PR = 0.90; 0.86–0.95), high cholesterol (PR = 0.87; 0.79–0.95) and overweight/obesity (PR = 0.46; 0.43–0.48). Mixed-Chinese had higher prevalence of CVD and worse CVD risk profiles compared with Chinese. Conclusions There are marked differences in the prevalence of CVD and risk factors among three groups. The noticeable variations in CVD risk between Chinese and mixed-Chinese indicate that conventional classification of treating all Chinese as homogeneous could be misleading. More investigation into the health outcomes of mixed ancestry is warranted.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0167-5273</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1874-1754</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.11.062</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27839817</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Age Factors ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Asian Continental Ancestry Group - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Australia ; Cardiovascular ; Cardiovascular disease (CVD) ; Cardiovascular Diseases - ethnology ; Cardiovascular risk factors ; China - ethnology ; Chinese immigrants ; Cohort Studies ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Prevalence ; Risk Factors ; Secondary prevention ; Socioeconomic Factors</subject><ispartof>International journal of cardiology, 2017-01, Vol.227, p.347-354</ispartof><rights>2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-6f3b8fbfc0579897a93af3e42faf24b2d5c4acfd254c2688524d20c3b843e0ca3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-6f3b8fbfc0579897a93af3e42faf24b2d5c4acfd254c2688524d20c3b843e0ca3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4071-7415</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167527316335082$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27839817$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jin, Kai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neubeck, Lis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gullick, Janice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koo, Fung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ding, Ding</creatorcontrib><title>Marked differences in cardiovascular risk profiles in middle-aged and older Chinese residents: Evidence from a large Australian cohort</title><title>International journal of cardiology</title><addtitle>Int J Cardiol</addtitle><description>Abstract Background Although Chinese form the largest non-English speaking group in Australia, cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk profiles among Chinese Australians have not been comprehensively examined, nor has the effect of mixed-Chinese ethnicity been adequately explored. This study is to investigate cardiovascular risk among Chinese, mixed-Chinese and non-Chinese Australians. Methods Using data from 266,696 Australian participants from the 45 and Up Study (2006–2009), this study investigated cardiovascular risk among Chinese (n = 3454), mixed-Chinese (n = 1062) and non-Chinese (n = 262,180) participants. Poisson regression models with a robust error variance were used to estimate prevalence ratio (PR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for CVD (coronary heart disease (CHD) and stroke) and six major risk factors (hypertension, diabetes, high cholesterol, smoking, overweight/obesity, physical inactivity) by ethnicity using non-Chinese participants as the reference group. Each outcome was adjusted for sociodemographic characteristics. Results Compared with non-Chinese Australians, Chinese had lower prevalence of CHD (PR = 0.67; 95% CI 0.59–0.75) and stroke (PR = 0.67; 0.51–0.88). Of the risk factors, Chinese had higher prevalence of diabetes (PR = 1.25; 1.12–1.39), smoking (PR = 1.22; 1.04–1.43) and physical inactivity (PR = 1.48; 1.41–1.55) but lower prevalence of hypertension (PR = 0.90; 0.86–0.95), high cholesterol (PR = 0.87; 0.79–0.95) and overweight/obesity (PR = 0.46; 0.43–0.48). Mixed-Chinese had higher prevalence of CVD and worse CVD risk profiles compared with Chinese. Conclusions There are marked differences in the prevalence of CVD and risk factors among three groups. The noticeable variations in CVD risk between Chinese and mixed-Chinese indicate that conventional classification of treating all Chinese as homogeneous could be misleading. More investigation into the health outcomes of mixed ancestry is warranted.</description><subject>Age Factors</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Asian Continental Ancestry Group - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Australia</subject><subject>Cardiovascular</subject><subject>Cardiovascular disease (CVD)</subject><subject>Cardiovascular Diseases - ethnology</subject><subject>Cardiovascular risk factors</subject><subject>China - ethnology</subject><subject>Chinese immigrants</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Prevalence</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Secondary prevention</subject><subject>Socioeconomic Factors</subject><issn>0167-5273</issn><issn>1874-1754</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFUk1v1TAQtBCIPgr_ACEfuST4K3HCAal6ammlIg7A2fKz163znLjYyZP6B_jdOErhwIWT19qZWe3MIvSWkpoS2n4Yaj8YnWzNyq-mtCYte4Z2tJOiorIRz9GuNGTVMMnP0KucB0KI6PvuJTpjsuN9R-UO_fqi0xEstt45SDAZyNhPeBX28aSzWYJOOPl8xA8pOh-2_uitDVDpu0LVk8UxWEh4f-8nyIATZG9hmvNHfHlaKwPYpThijYvaHeCLJc9JB6_LpHgf0_wavXA6ZHjz9J6jH1eX3_fX1e3Xzzf7i9vKiJbPVev4oXMHZ0gj-66XuufacRDMacfEgdnGCG2cZY0wrO26hgnLiCkkwYEYzc_R-023LPNzgTyr0WcDIegJ4pIVLb5QymVDClRsUJNizgmcekh-1OlRUaLWBNSgtgTUmoCiVJUECu3d04TlMIL9S_pjeQF82gBQ9jx5SCobv1pkfQIzKxv9_yb8K2CCn7zR4QiPkIe4pKl4qKjKTBH1bb2C9Qhoy3lDOsZ_A1CVsE8</recordid><startdate>20170115</startdate><enddate>20170115</enddate><creator>Jin, Kai</creator><creator>Neubeck, Lis</creator><creator>Gullick, Janice</creator><creator>Koo, Fung</creator><creator>Ding, Ding</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4071-7415</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20170115</creationdate><title>Marked differences in cardiovascular risk profiles in middle-aged and older Chinese residents: Evidence from a large Australian cohort</title><author>Jin, Kai ; Neubeck, Lis ; Gullick, Janice ; Koo, Fung ; Ding, Ding</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-6f3b8fbfc0579897a93af3e42faf24b2d5c4acfd254c2688524d20c3b843e0ca3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Age Factors</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Asian Continental Ancestry Group - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Australia</topic><topic>Cardiovascular</topic><topic>Cardiovascular disease (CVD)</topic><topic>Cardiovascular Diseases - ethnology</topic><topic>Cardiovascular risk factors</topic><topic>China - ethnology</topic><topic>Chinese immigrants</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Prevalence</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Secondary prevention</topic><topic>Socioeconomic Factors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jin, Kai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neubeck, Lis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gullick, Janice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koo, Fung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ding, Ding</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of cardiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jin, Kai</au><au>Neubeck, Lis</au><au>Gullick, Janice</au><au>Koo, Fung</au><au>Ding, Ding</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Marked differences in cardiovascular risk profiles in middle-aged and older Chinese residents: Evidence from a large Australian cohort</atitle><jtitle>International journal of cardiology</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Cardiol</addtitle><date>2017-01-15</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>227</volume><spage>347</spage><epage>354</epage><pages>347-354</pages><issn>0167-5273</issn><eissn>1874-1754</eissn><abstract>Abstract Background Although Chinese form the largest non-English speaking group in Australia, cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk profiles among Chinese Australians have not been comprehensively examined, nor has the effect of mixed-Chinese ethnicity been adequately explored. This study is to investigate cardiovascular risk among Chinese, mixed-Chinese and non-Chinese Australians. Methods Using data from 266,696 Australian participants from the 45 and Up Study (2006–2009), this study investigated cardiovascular risk among Chinese (n = 3454), mixed-Chinese (n = 1062) and non-Chinese (n = 262,180) participants. Poisson regression models with a robust error variance were used to estimate prevalence ratio (PR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for CVD (coronary heart disease (CHD) and stroke) and six major risk factors (hypertension, diabetes, high cholesterol, smoking, overweight/obesity, physical inactivity) by ethnicity using non-Chinese participants as the reference group. Each outcome was adjusted for sociodemographic characteristics. Results Compared with non-Chinese Australians, Chinese had lower prevalence of CHD (PR = 0.67; 95% CI 0.59–0.75) and stroke (PR = 0.67; 0.51–0.88). Of the risk factors, Chinese had higher prevalence of diabetes (PR = 1.25; 1.12–1.39), smoking (PR = 1.22; 1.04–1.43) and physical inactivity (PR = 1.48; 1.41–1.55) but lower prevalence of hypertension (PR = 0.90; 0.86–0.95), high cholesterol (PR = 0.87; 0.79–0.95) and overweight/obesity (PR = 0.46; 0.43–0.48). Mixed-Chinese had higher prevalence of CVD and worse CVD risk profiles compared with Chinese. Conclusions There are marked differences in the prevalence of CVD and risk factors among three groups. The noticeable variations in CVD risk between Chinese and mixed-Chinese indicate that conventional classification of treating all Chinese as homogeneous could be misleading. More investigation into the health outcomes of mixed ancestry is warranted.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>27839817</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.11.062</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4071-7415</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0167-5273
ispartof International journal of cardiology, 2017-01, Vol.227, p.347-354
issn 0167-5273
1874-1754
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1839113750
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Age Factors
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Asian Continental Ancestry Group - statistics & numerical data
Australia
Cardiovascular
Cardiovascular disease (CVD)
Cardiovascular Diseases - ethnology
Cardiovascular risk factors
China - ethnology
Chinese immigrants
Cohort Studies
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Prevalence
Risk Factors
Secondary prevention
Socioeconomic Factors
title Marked differences in cardiovascular risk profiles in middle-aged and older Chinese residents: Evidence from a large Australian cohort
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T15%3A28%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Marked%20differences%20in%20cardiovascular%20risk%20profiles%20in%20middle-aged%20and%20older%20Chinese%20residents:%20Evidence%20from%20a%20large%20Australian%20cohort&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20cardiology&rft.au=Jin,%20Kai&rft.date=2017-01-15&rft.volume=227&rft.spage=347&rft.epage=354&rft.pages=347-354&rft.issn=0167-5273&rft.eissn=1874-1754&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.11.062&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1839113750%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1839113750&rft_id=info:pmid/27839817&rft_els_id=S0167527316335082&rfr_iscdi=true