Biological pollution in the Mediterranean Sea: invasive versus introduced macrophytes
The authors have listed 85 species of macrophytes that have probably been introduced to the Mediterranean. Among them, nine species can be considered as invasive, i.e., playing a conspicuous role in the recipient ecosystems, taking the place of keystone species and/or being economically harmful: Acr...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Marine pollution bulletin 2002, Vol.44 (1), p.32-38 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 38 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 32 |
| container_title | Marine pollution bulletin |
| container_volume | 44 |
| creator | Boudouresque, Charles François Verlaque, Marc |
| description | The authors have listed 85 species of macrophytes that have probably been introduced to the Mediterranean. Among them, nine species can be considered as invasive, i.e., playing a conspicuous role in the recipient ecosystems, taking the place of keystone species and/or being economically harmful:
Acrothamnion preissii,
Asparagopsis armata,
Lophocladia lallemandii,
Womersleyella setacea (Rhodophyta),
Sargassum muticum,
Stypopodium schimperi (Fucophyceae),
Caulerpa racemosa,
Caulerpa taxifolia and
Halophila stipulacea (Plantae). These data fit well the Williamson and Fitter's “tens rule”, which states that, on average, 1 out of 10 introduced species becomes invasive. Though some features (e.g. life traits, geographical origin) can increase the likelihood of a successful invasion, the success of invaders is far from being predictable. Since the beginning of the 20th century, the number of introduced species to the Mediterranean has nearly doubled every 20 years. Should these kinetics continue, and according to the tens rule, it can be expected that 5–10 newly introduced macrophytes shall become invasive in the next 20 years. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S0025-326X(01)00150-3 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18390464</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0025326X01001503</els_id><sourcerecordid>14613072</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c604t-3cd7dd69d6a6f152b1e9d0d91a32818925d5faabef2c239b0b28d8997d13c91d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkcFu1DAQhi1ERZfCI4ByAZVDYMZOHJsLggpapCIOpRI3y7En1Cgbb-1kpb49bnfV3ujJsvzNeOb_GHuF8B4B5YcLAN7Wgsvfx4DvALCFWjxhK1SdroWQ4ilb3SOH7HnOfwGg4x0-Y4eISgmpcMUuv4Q4xj_B2bHaxHFc5hCnKkzVfEXVD_JhppTsRHaqLsh-LC9bm8OWqi2lvORyn1P0iyNfra1LcXN1M1N-wQ4GO2Z6uT-P2OW3r79Ozurzn6ffTz6f105CM9fC-c57qb20csCW90jag9doBVeoNG99O1jb08AdF7qHniuvtO48CqfRiyP2dtd3k-L1Qnk265AdjWOZOC7ZoBIaGtkU8Pj_oJRto0F1zeM9G4miBFnAdgeWtXNONJhNCmubbgyCuXVk7hyZWwEG0Nw5MqLUvd5_sPRr8g9VeykFeLMHbC5ehpK_C_mBE02rO1CF-7TjqES8DZRMdoGm4iIkcrPxMTwyyj-hQK5v</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>14613072</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Biological pollution in the Mediterranean Sea: invasive versus introduced macrophytes</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Boudouresque, Charles François ; Verlaque, Marc</creator><creatorcontrib>Boudouresque, Charles François ; Verlaque, Marc</creatorcontrib><description>The authors have listed 85 species of macrophytes that have probably been introduced to the Mediterranean. Among them, nine species can be considered as invasive, i.e., playing a conspicuous role in the recipient ecosystems, taking the place of keystone species and/or being economically harmful:
Acrothamnion preissii,
Asparagopsis armata,
Lophocladia lallemandii,
Womersleyella setacea (Rhodophyta),
Sargassum muticum,
Stypopodium schimperi (Fucophyceae),
Caulerpa racemosa,
Caulerpa taxifolia and
Halophila stipulacea (Plantae). These data fit well the Williamson and Fitter's “tens rule”, which states that, on average, 1 out of 10 introduced species becomes invasive. Though some features (e.g. life traits, geographical origin) can increase the likelihood of a successful invasion, the success of invaders is far from being predictable. Since the beginning of the 20th century, the number of introduced species to the Mediterranean has nearly doubled every 20 years. Should these kinetics continue, and according to the tens rule, it can be expected that 5–10 newly introduced macrophytes shall become invasive in the next 20 years.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0025-326X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-3363</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0025-326X(01)00150-3</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11883681</identifier><identifier>CODEN: MPNBAZ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Acrothamnion preissii ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Applied ecology ; Asparagopsis armata ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biological pollution ; Caulerpa racemosa ; Caulerpa taxifolia ; Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife ; Ecosystem ; Environmental degradation: ecosystems survey and restoration ; Eutrophication ; Exotic species ; Fucophyceae ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Halophila stipulacea ; Invasive species ; Lophocladia lallemandii ; Macrophyte ; Mediterranean ; Mediterranean Sea ; Plant Development ; Plantae ; Population Dynamics ; Rhodophyta ; Sargassum muticum ; Species Specificity ; Stypopodium schimperi ; Water Pollution ; Womersleyella setacea</subject><ispartof>Marine pollution bulletin, 2002, Vol.44 (1), p.32-38</ispartof><rights>2002 Elsevier Science Ltd</rights><rights>2002 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c604t-3cd7dd69d6a6f152b1e9d0d91a32818925d5faabef2c239b0b28d8997d13c91d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c604t-3cd7dd69d6a6f152b1e9d0d91a32818925d5faabef2c239b0b28d8997d13c91d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0025-326X(01)00150-3$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3549,4023,27922,27923,27924,45994</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=13459708$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11883681$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Boudouresque, Charles François</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verlaque, Marc</creatorcontrib><title>Biological pollution in the Mediterranean Sea: invasive versus introduced macrophytes</title><title>Marine pollution bulletin</title><addtitle>Mar Pollut Bull</addtitle><description>The authors have listed 85 species of macrophytes that have probably been introduced to the Mediterranean. Among them, nine species can be considered as invasive, i.e., playing a conspicuous role in the recipient ecosystems, taking the place of keystone species and/or being economically harmful:
Acrothamnion preissii,
Asparagopsis armata,
Lophocladia lallemandii,
Womersleyella setacea (Rhodophyta),
Sargassum muticum,
Stypopodium schimperi (Fucophyceae),
Caulerpa racemosa,
Caulerpa taxifolia and
Halophila stipulacea (Plantae). These data fit well the Williamson and Fitter's “tens rule”, which states that, on average, 1 out of 10 introduced species becomes invasive. Though some features (e.g. life traits, geographical origin) can increase the likelihood of a successful invasion, the success of invaders is far from being predictable. Since the beginning of the 20th century, the number of introduced species to the Mediterranean has nearly doubled every 20 years. Should these kinetics continue, and according to the tens rule, it can be expected that 5–10 newly introduced macrophytes shall become invasive in the next 20 years.</description><subject>Acrothamnion preissii</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Applied ecology</subject><subject>Asparagopsis armata</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biological pollution</subject><subject>Caulerpa racemosa</subject><subject>Caulerpa taxifolia</subject><subject>Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife</subject><subject>Ecosystem</subject><subject>Environmental degradation: ecosystems survey and restoration</subject><subject>Eutrophication</subject><subject>Exotic species</subject><subject>Fucophyceae</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Halophila stipulacea</subject><subject>Invasive species</subject><subject>Lophocladia lallemandii</subject><subject>Macrophyte</subject><subject>Mediterranean</subject><subject>Mediterranean Sea</subject><subject>Plant Development</subject><subject>Plantae</subject><subject>Population Dynamics</subject><subject>Rhodophyta</subject><subject>Sargassum muticum</subject><subject>Species Specificity</subject><subject>Stypopodium schimperi</subject><subject>Water Pollution</subject><subject>Womersleyella setacea</subject><issn>0025-326X</issn><issn>1879-3363</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkcFu1DAQhi1ERZfCI4ByAZVDYMZOHJsLggpapCIOpRI3y7En1Cgbb-1kpb49bnfV3ujJsvzNeOb_GHuF8B4B5YcLAN7Wgsvfx4DvALCFWjxhK1SdroWQ4ilb3SOH7HnOfwGg4x0-Y4eISgmpcMUuv4Q4xj_B2bHaxHFc5hCnKkzVfEXVD_JhppTsRHaqLsh-LC9bm8OWqi2lvORyn1P0iyNfra1LcXN1M1N-wQ4GO2Z6uT-P2OW3r79Ozurzn6ffTz6f105CM9fC-c57qb20csCW90jag9doBVeoNG99O1jb08AdF7qHniuvtO48CqfRiyP2dtd3k-L1Qnk265AdjWOZOC7ZoBIaGtkU8Pj_oJRto0F1zeM9G4miBFnAdgeWtXNONJhNCmubbgyCuXVk7hyZWwEG0Nw5MqLUvd5_sPRr8g9VeykFeLMHbC5ehpK_C_mBE02rO1CF-7TjqES8DZRMdoGm4iIkcrPxMTwyyj-hQK5v</recordid><startdate>2002</startdate><enddate>2002</enddate><creator>Boudouresque, Charles François</creator><creator>Verlaque, Marc</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2002</creationdate><title>Biological pollution in the Mediterranean Sea: invasive versus introduced macrophytes</title><author>Boudouresque, Charles François ; Verlaque, Marc</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c604t-3cd7dd69d6a6f152b1e9d0d91a32818925d5faabef2c239b0b28d8997d13c91d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Acrothamnion preissii</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Applied ecology</topic><topic>Asparagopsis armata</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biological pollution</topic><topic>Caulerpa racemosa</topic><topic>Caulerpa taxifolia</topic><topic>Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife</topic><topic>Ecosystem</topic><topic>Environmental degradation: ecosystems survey and restoration</topic><topic>Eutrophication</topic><topic>Exotic species</topic><topic>Fucophyceae</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Halophila stipulacea</topic><topic>Invasive species</topic><topic>Lophocladia lallemandii</topic><topic>Macrophyte</topic><topic>Mediterranean</topic><topic>Mediterranean Sea</topic><topic>Plant Development</topic><topic>Plantae</topic><topic>Population Dynamics</topic><topic>Rhodophyta</topic><topic>Sargassum muticum</topic><topic>Species Specificity</topic><topic>Stypopodium schimperi</topic><topic>Water Pollution</topic><topic>Womersleyella setacea</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Boudouresque, Charles François</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verlaque, Marc</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Marine pollution bulletin</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Boudouresque, Charles François</au><au>Verlaque, Marc</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Biological pollution in the Mediterranean Sea: invasive versus introduced macrophytes</atitle><jtitle>Marine pollution bulletin</jtitle><addtitle>Mar Pollut Bull</addtitle><date>2002</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>44</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>32</spage><epage>38</epage><pages>32-38</pages><issn>0025-326X</issn><eissn>1879-3363</eissn><coden>MPNBAZ</coden><abstract>The authors have listed 85 species of macrophytes that have probably been introduced to the Mediterranean. Among them, nine species can be considered as invasive, i.e., playing a conspicuous role in the recipient ecosystems, taking the place of keystone species and/or being economically harmful:
Acrothamnion preissii,
Asparagopsis armata,
Lophocladia lallemandii,
Womersleyella setacea (Rhodophyta),
Sargassum muticum,
Stypopodium schimperi (Fucophyceae),
Caulerpa racemosa,
Caulerpa taxifolia and
Halophila stipulacea (Plantae). These data fit well the Williamson and Fitter's “tens rule”, which states that, on average, 1 out of 10 introduced species becomes invasive. Though some features (e.g. life traits, geographical origin) can increase the likelihood of a successful invasion, the success of invaders is far from being predictable. Since the beginning of the 20th century, the number of introduced species to the Mediterranean has nearly doubled every 20 years. Should these kinetics continue, and according to the tens rule, it can be expected that 5–10 newly introduced macrophytes shall become invasive in the next 20 years.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>11883681</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0025-326X(01)00150-3</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0025-326X |
| ispartof | Marine pollution bulletin, 2002, Vol.44 (1), p.32-38 |
| issn | 0025-326X 1879-3363 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18390464 |
| source | MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present) |
| subjects | Acrothamnion preissii Animal, plant and microbial ecology Applied ecology Asparagopsis armata Biological and medical sciences Biological pollution Caulerpa racemosa Caulerpa taxifolia Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife Ecosystem Environmental degradation: ecosystems survey and restoration Eutrophication Exotic species Fucophyceae Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Halophila stipulacea Invasive species Lophocladia lallemandii Macrophyte Mediterranean Mediterranean Sea Plant Development Plantae Population Dynamics Rhodophyta Sargassum muticum Species Specificity Stypopodium schimperi Water Pollution Womersleyella setacea |
| title | Biological pollution in the Mediterranean Sea: invasive versus introduced macrophytes |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T20%3A00%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Biological%20pollution%20in%20the%20Mediterranean%20Sea:%20invasive%20versus%20introduced%20macrophytes&rft.jtitle=Marine%20pollution%20bulletin&rft.au=Boudouresque,%20Charles%20Fran%C3%A7ois&rft.date=2002&rft.volume=44&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=32&rft.epage=38&rft.pages=32-38&rft.issn=0025-326X&rft.eissn=1879-3363&rft.coden=MPNBAZ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0025-326X(01)00150-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E14613072%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=14613072&rft_id=info:pmid/11883681&rft_els_id=S0025326X01001503&rfr_iscdi=true |