Vaccines without thiomersal : Why so necessary, why so long coming?

The inorganic mercurial thiomersal (merthiolate) has been used as an effective preservative in numerous medical and non-medical products since the early 1930s. Both the potential toxicity of thiomersal and sensitisation to thiomersal in relation to the application of thiomersal-containing vaccines a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Drugs (New York, N.Y.) N.Y.), 2001, Vol.61 (5), p.565-572
1. Verfasser: VAN'T VEEN, Albert-Jan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 572
container_issue 5
container_start_page 565
container_title Drugs (New York, N.Y.)
container_volume 61
creator VAN'T VEEN, Albert-Jan
description The inorganic mercurial thiomersal (merthiolate) has been used as an effective preservative in numerous medical and non-medical products since the early 1930s. Both the potential toxicity of thiomersal and sensitisation to thiomersal in relation to the application of thiomersal-containing vaccines and immunoglobulins, especially in children, have been debated in the literature. The very low thiomersal concentrations in pharmacological and biological products are relatively non-toxic, but probably not in utero and during the first 6 months of life. The developing brain of the fetus is most susceptible to thiomersal and, therefore, women of childbearing age, in particular, should not receive thiomersal-containing products. Definitive data of doses at which developmental effects occur are not available. Moreover, revelation of subtle effects of toxicity needs long term observation of children. The ethylmercury radical of the thiomersal molecule appears to be the prominent sensitiser. The prevalence of thiomersal hypersensitivity in mostly selected populations varies up to 18%, but higher figures have been reported. The overall exposure to thiomersal differs considerably between countries. In many cases a positive routine patch test to thiomersal should be considered an accidental finding without or, probably more accurately, with low clinical relevance. In practice, some preventive measures can be taken with respect to thiomersal hypersensitivity. However, with regard to the debate on primary sensitisation during childhood and renewed attention for a reduction of children's exposure to mercury from all sources, the use of thiomersal should preferably be eliminated or at least be reduced. In 1999 the manufacturers of vaccines and immunoglobulins in the US and Europe were approached with this in mind. The potential toxicity in children seems to be of much more concern to them than the hidden sensitising properties of thiomersal. In The Netherlands, unlike many other countries, the exposure to thiomersal from pharmaceutical sources has already been reduced. Replacement of thiomersal in all products should have a high priority in all countries.
doi_str_mv 10.2165/00003495-200161050-00002
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18389956</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>18389956</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-89767daedbf7bbba24877a34179803edd58ffcad8af58a649bba82bc7ac53bc43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkMlOwzAQhi0EoqXwCsgHxImAl3jjglDFJlXiwnKMHMdpg5K4ZBJVfXtcWpa5jOafbxb9CGFKLhmV4orE4KkRCSOESkoESTYS20NjSpVJqBFkH41jkyVSSjVCRwAfm9IIc4hGlHKpmWZjNH2zzlWtB7yq-kUYetwvqtD4DmyNr_H7Yo0h4NY7D2C79QVebZU6tHPsQlO185tjdFDaGvzJLk_Q6_3dy_QxmT0_PE1vZ4njVPaJNkqqwvoiL1We55alWinL0_iwJtwXhdBl6WyhbSm0lamJjGa5U9YJnruUT9D5du-yC5-Dhz5rKnC-rm3rwwAZ1VwbI2QE9RZ0XQDofJktu6qJ72eUZBsDsx8Ds18DvyUWR093N4a88cXf4M6xCJztAAvO1mVnW1fBvwOE0TTlXxVNeEc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>18389956</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Vaccines without thiomersal : Why so necessary, why so long coming?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>VAN'T VEEN, Albert-Jan</creator><creatorcontrib>VAN'T VEEN, Albert-Jan</creatorcontrib><description>The inorganic mercurial thiomersal (merthiolate) has been used as an effective preservative in numerous medical and non-medical products since the early 1930s. Both the potential toxicity of thiomersal and sensitisation to thiomersal in relation to the application of thiomersal-containing vaccines and immunoglobulins, especially in children, have been debated in the literature. The very low thiomersal concentrations in pharmacological and biological products are relatively non-toxic, but probably not in utero and during the first 6 months of life. The developing brain of the fetus is most susceptible to thiomersal and, therefore, women of childbearing age, in particular, should not receive thiomersal-containing products. Definitive data of doses at which developmental effects occur are not available. Moreover, revelation of subtle effects of toxicity needs long term observation of children. The ethylmercury radical of the thiomersal molecule appears to be the prominent sensitiser. The prevalence of thiomersal hypersensitivity in mostly selected populations varies up to 18%, but higher figures have been reported. The overall exposure to thiomersal differs considerably between countries. In many cases a positive routine patch test to thiomersal should be considered an accidental finding without or, probably more accurately, with low clinical relevance. In practice, some preventive measures can be taken with respect to thiomersal hypersensitivity. However, with regard to the debate on primary sensitisation during childhood and renewed attention for a reduction of children's exposure to mercury from all sources, the use of thiomersal should preferably be eliminated or at least be reduced. In 1999 the manufacturers of vaccines and immunoglobulins in the US and Europe were approached with this in mind. The potential toxicity in children seems to be of much more concern to them than the hidden sensitising properties of thiomersal. In The Netherlands, unlike many other countries, the exposure to thiomersal from pharmaceutical sources has already been reduced. Replacement of thiomersal in all products should have a high priority in all countries.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0012-6667</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1179-1950</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2165/00003495-200161050-00002</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11368282</identifier><identifier>CODEN: DRUGAY</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Auckland: Adis International</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Child ; Drug Hypersensitivity - epidemiology ; Drug toxicity and drugs side effects treatment ; Female ; Fetus - drug effects ; Humans ; Medical sciences ; Miscellaneous (drug allergy, mutagens, teratogens...) ; Pharmacology. Drug treatments ; Pregnancy ; Preservatives, Pharmaceutical - adverse effects ; Preservatives, Pharmaceutical - chemistry ; Preservatives, Pharmaceutical - pharmacology ; Prevalence ; Technology, Pharmaceutical ; Thimerosal - adverse effects ; Thimerosal - chemistry ; Thimerosal - pharmacology ; Vaccines</subject><ispartof>Drugs (New York, N.Y.), 2001, Vol.61 (5), p.565-572</ispartof><rights>2001 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-89767daedbf7bbba24877a34179803edd58ffcad8af58a649bba82bc7ac53bc43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,4010,27900,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=1002144$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11368282$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>VAN'T VEEN, Albert-Jan</creatorcontrib><title>Vaccines without thiomersal : Why so necessary, why so long coming?</title><title>Drugs (New York, N.Y.)</title><addtitle>Drugs</addtitle><description>The inorganic mercurial thiomersal (merthiolate) has been used as an effective preservative in numerous medical and non-medical products since the early 1930s. Both the potential toxicity of thiomersal and sensitisation to thiomersal in relation to the application of thiomersal-containing vaccines and immunoglobulins, especially in children, have been debated in the literature. The very low thiomersal concentrations in pharmacological and biological products are relatively non-toxic, but probably not in utero and during the first 6 months of life. The developing brain of the fetus is most susceptible to thiomersal and, therefore, women of childbearing age, in particular, should not receive thiomersal-containing products. Definitive data of doses at which developmental effects occur are not available. Moreover, revelation of subtle effects of toxicity needs long term observation of children. The ethylmercury radical of the thiomersal molecule appears to be the prominent sensitiser. The prevalence of thiomersal hypersensitivity in mostly selected populations varies up to 18%, but higher figures have been reported. The overall exposure to thiomersal differs considerably between countries. In many cases a positive routine patch test to thiomersal should be considered an accidental finding without or, probably more accurately, with low clinical relevance. In practice, some preventive measures can be taken with respect to thiomersal hypersensitivity. However, with regard to the debate on primary sensitisation during childhood and renewed attention for a reduction of children's exposure to mercury from all sources, the use of thiomersal should preferably be eliminated or at least be reduced. In 1999 the manufacturers of vaccines and immunoglobulins in the US and Europe were approached with this in mind. The potential toxicity in children seems to be of much more concern to them than the hidden sensitising properties of thiomersal. In The Netherlands, unlike many other countries, the exposure to thiomersal from pharmaceutical sources has already been reduced. Replacement of thiomersal in all products should have a high priority in all countries.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Drug Hypersensitivity - epidemiology</subject><subject>Drug toxicity and drugs side effects treatment</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fetus - drug effects</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Miscellaneous (drug allergy, mutagens, teratogens...)</subject><subject>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Preservatives, Pharmaceutical - adverse effects</subject><subject>Preservatives, Pharmaceutical - chemistry</subject><subject>Preservatives, Pharmaceutical - pharmacology</subject><subject>Prevalence</subject><subject>Technology, Pharmaceutical</subject><subject>Thimerosal - adverse effects</subject><subject>Thimerosal - chemistry</subject><subject>Thimerosal - pharmacology</subject><subject>Vaccines</subject><issn>0012-6667</issn><issn>1179-1950</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkMlOwzAQhi0EoqXwCsgHxImAl3jjglDFJlXiwnKMHMdpg5K4ZBJVfXtcWpa5jOafbxb9CGFKLhmV4orE4KkRCSOESkoESTYS20NjSpVJqBFkH41jkyVSSjVCRwAfm9IIc4hGlHKpmWZjNH2zzlWtB7yq-kUYetwvqtD4DmyNr_H7Yo0h4NY7D2C79QVebZU6tHPsQlO185tjdFDaGvzJLk_Q6_3dy_QxmT0_PE1vZ4njVPaJNkqqwvoiL1We55alWinL0_iwJtwXhdBl6WyhbSm0lamJjGa5U9YJnruUT9D5du-yC5-Dhz5rKnC-rm3rwwAZ1VwbI2QE9RZ0XQDofJktu6qJ72eUZBsDsx8Ds18DvyUWR093N4a88cXf4M6xCJztAAvO1mVnW1fBvwOE0TTlXxVNeEc</recordid><startdate>2001</startdate><enddate>2001</enddate><creator>VAN'T VEEN, Albert-Jan</creator><general>Adis International</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2001</creationdate><title>Vaccines without thiomersal : Why so necessary, why so long coming?</title><author>VAN'T VEEN, Albert-Jan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-89767daedbf7bbba24877a34179803edd58ffcad8af58a649bba82bc7ac53bc43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Drug Hypersensitivity - epidemiology</topic><topic>Drug toxicity and drugs side effects treatment</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fetus - drug effects</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Miscellaneous (drug allergy, mutagens, teratogens...)</topic><topic>Pharmacology. Drug treatments</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Preservatives, Pharmaceutical - adverse effects</topic><topic>Preservatives, Pharmaceutical - chemistry</topic><topic>Preservatives, Pharmaceutical - pharmacology</topic><topic>Prevalence</topic><topic>Technology, Pharmaceutical</topic><topic>Thimerosal - adverse effects</topic><topic>Thimerosal - chemistry</topic><topic>Thimerosal - pharmacology</topic><topic>Vaccines</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>VAN'T VEEN, Albert-Jan</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Drugs (New York, N.Y.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>VAN'T VEEN, Albert-Jan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Vaccines without thiomersal : Why so necessary, why so long coming?</atitle><jtitle>Drugs (New York, N.Y.)</jtitle><addtitle>Drugs</addtitle><date>2001</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>61</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>565</spage><epage>572</epage><pages>565-572</pages><issn>0012-6667</issn><eissn>1179-1950</eissn><coden>DRUGAY</coden><abstract>The inorganic mercurial thiomersal (merthiolate) has been used as an effective preservative in numerous medical and non-medical products since the early 1930s. Both the potential toxicity of thiomersal and sensitisation to thiomersal in relation to the application of thiomersal-containing vaccines and immunoglobulins, especially in children, have been debated in the literature. The very low thiomersal concentrations in pharmacological and biological products are relatively non-toxic, but probably not in utero and during the first 6 months of life. The developing brain of the fetus is most susceptible to thiomersal and, therefore, women of childbearing age, in particular, should not receive thiomersal-containing products. Definitive data of doses at which developmental effects occur are not available. Moreover, revelation of subtle effects of toxicity needs long term observation of children. The ethylmercury radical of the thiomersal molecule appears to be the prominent sensitiser. The prevalence of thiomersal hypersensitivity in mostly selected populations varies up to 18%, but higher figures have been reported. The overall exposure to thiomersal differs considerably between countries. In many cases a positive routine patch test to thiomersal should be considered an accidental finding without or, probably more accurately, with low clinical relevance. In practice, some preventive measures can be taken with respect to thiomersal hypersensitivity. However, with regard to the debate on primary sensitisation during childhood and renewed attention for a reduction of children's exposure to mercury from all sources, the use of thiomersal should preferably be eliminated or at least be reduced. In 1999 the manufacturers of vaccines and immunoglobulins in the US and Europe were approached with this in mind. The potential toxicity in children seems to be of much more concern to them than the hidden sensitising properties of thiomersal. In The Netherlands, unlike many other countries, the exposure to thiomersal from pharmaceutical sources has already been reduced. Replacement of thiomersal in all products should have a high priority in all countries.</abstract><cop>Auckland</cop><pub>Adis International</pub><pmid>11368282</pmid><doi>10.2165/00003495-200161050-00002</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0012-6667
ispartof Drugs (New York, N.Y.), 2001, Vol.61 (5), p.565-572
issn 0012-6667
1179-1950
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18389956
source MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Biological and medical sciences
Child
Drug Hypersensitivity - epidemiology
Drug toxicity and drugs side effects treatment
Female
Fetus - drug effects
Humans
Medical sciences
Miscellaneous (drug allergy, mutagens, teratogens...)
Pharmacology. Drug treatments
Pregnancy
Preservatives, Pharmaceutical - adverse effects
Preservatives, Pharmaceutical - chemistry
Preservatives, Pharmaceutical - pharmacology
Prevalence
Technology, Pharmaceutical
Thimerosal - adverse effects
Thimerosal - chemistry
Thimerosal - pharmacology
Vaccines
title Vaccines without thiomersal : Why so necessary, why so long coming?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T09%3A25%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Vaccines%20without%20thiomersal%20:%20Why%20so%20necessary,%20why%20so%20long%20coming?&rft.jtitle=Drugs%20(New%20York,%20N.Y.)&rft.au=VAN'T%20VEEN,%20Albert-Jan&rft.date=2001&rft.volume=61&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=565&rft.epage=572&rft.pages=565-572&rft.issn=0012-6667&rft.eissn=1179-1950&rft.coden=DRUGAY&rft_id=info:doi/10.2165/00003495-200161050-00002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E18389956%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=18389956&rft_id=info:pmid/11368282&rfr_iscdi=true