Interdecadal Variations in Northern Hemisphere Winter Storm Track Intensity
In this paper, the interannual variations in the Northern Hemisphere winter storm tracks have been examined based on 51 winters (December–January–February) of NCEP–NCAR reanalysis data. The leading empirical orthogonal function (EOF) corresponds to the simultaneous strengthening/weakening of both th...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of climate 2002-03, Vol.15 (6), p.642-658 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 658 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 642 |
container_title | Journal of climate |
container_volume | 15 |
creator | Chang, Edmund K. M. Fu, Yunfei |
description | In this paper, the interannual variations in the Northern Hemisphere winter storm tracks have been examined based on 51 winters (December–January–February) of NCEP–NCAR reanalysis data. The leading empirical orthogonal function (EOF) corresponds to the simultaneous strengthening/weakening of both the Pacific and Atlantic storm tracks. Interannual and month-to-month variations in the Pacific and Atlantic storm tracks are found to be significantly correlated. The principal component associated with the leading hemispheric EOF exhibits pronounced interdecadal variability. There appears to be a transition during the early 1970s from a weak storm track state prior to 1972/73 to a strong storm track state subsequently. Decadal mean storm track intensity during the 1990s is about 30% stronger than that during the late 1960s and early 1970s.
The relationship between variations in storm track intensity and low-frequency (seasonal mean) flow anomalies has also been examined. It is shown that storm track variations and their associated seasonal mean flow anomalies are highly correlated. Relations to several other modes of interdecadal variability have also been explored. It is shown that part of the storm track variations may be related to the Arctic oscillation and part to the interdecadal ENSO-like variability. However, even when storm track variations that are linearly dependent on these other modes have been removed, substantial interdecadal variations still remain.
In order to ascertain that the interdecadal variations have not been introduced into the reanalysis data by changes in the observation network, radiosonde observations along the storm track have been examined. Preliminary analyses suggest that the radiosonde observations are largely consistent with the reanalysis data, except for the possibility that biases in the reanalysis data may have led to an overestimation of the interdecadal variability. Unfortunately, since the peaks of the storm tracks lie over the oceans where no radiosonde stations with continuous record can be found, the variations over the storm track peaks cannot be verified. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1175/1520-0442(2002)015<0642:ivinhw>2.0.co;2 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18383227</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26249192</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26249192</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c491t-ec115060286baec873ba6e1de81eaecd15ae0b35240e38650107e22d5b207b133</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kV9rFDEUxYMouFY_gjAISvsw25ubP5NREcqi3cXSPljbx5DJZGnW2cyazCr99iZsqeCDT0lufpx77zmEnFKYU9qIUyoQauAcjxEAT4CKjyA5vve_fLj7_QnnMLfjB3xCZo_kUzID1fJaNUI8Jy9S2gBQlAAz8nUVJhd7Z01vhurGRG8mP4ZU-VBdjnG6czFUS7f1aZevrrr1ha--TWPcVtfR2B9VUQjJT_cvybO1GZJ79XAeke9fPl8vlvXF1flqcXZRW97SqXaWUgESUMnOOKsa1hnpaO8UdfndU2EcdEwgB8eUFEChcYi96BCajjJ2RN4ddHdx_Ll3adJ5POuGwQQ37pOmiimG2GTw-P-glIK3yNqi-eYfdDPuY8hraERUjeRt0Ts_QDaOKUW31rvotybeawq6hKOL5bpYrks4OoejSzh6dbO6XN7qXNGLK41Z6e1DO5OsGdbRBOvTXzkmWF6bZ-71gduk7PjjP0rMVubJ_wDZAZvd</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>222876497</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Interdecadal Variations in Northern Hemisphere Winter Storm Track Intensity</title><source>American Meteorological Society</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Chang, Edmund K. M. ; Fu, Yunfei</creator><creatorcontrib>Chang, Edmund K. M. ; Fu, Yunfei</creatorcontrib><description>In this paper, the interannual variations in the Northern Hemisphere winter storm tracks have been examined based on 51 winters (December–January–February) of NCEP–NCAR reanalysis data. The leading empirical orthogonal function (EOF) corresponds to the simultaneous strengthening/weakening of both the Pacific and Atlantic storm tracks. Interannual and month-to-month variations in the Pacific and Atlantic storm tracks are found to be significantly correlated. The principal component associated with the leading hemispheric EOF exhibits pronounced interdecadal variability. There appears to be a transition during the early 1970s from a weak storm track state prior to 1972/73 to a strong storm track state subsequently. Decadal mean storm track intensity during the 1990s is about 30% stronger than that during the late 1960s and early 1970s.
The relationship between variations in storm track intensity and low-frequency (seasonal mean) flow anomalies has also been examined. It is shown that storm track variations and their associated seasonal mean flow anomalies are highly correlated. Relations to several other modes of interdecadal variability have also been explored. It is shown that part of the storm track variations may be related to the Arctic oscillation and part to the interdecadal ENSO-like variability. However, even when storm track variations that are linearly dependent on these other modes have been removed, substantial interdecadal variations still remain.
In order to ascertain that the interdecadal variations have not been introduced into the reanalysis data by changes in the observation network, radiosonde observations along the storm track have been examined. Preliminary analyses suggest that the radiosonde observations are largely consistent with the reanalysis data, except for the possibility that biases in the reanalysis data may have led to an overestimation of the interdecadal variability. Unfortunately, since the peaks of the storm tracks lie over the oceans where no radiosonde stations with continuous record can be found, the variations over the storm track peaks cannot be verified.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0894-8755</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-0442</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1175/1520-0442(2002)015<0642:ivinhw>2.0.co;2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boston, MA: American Meteorological Society</publisher><subject>Aircraft ; Brackish ; Climate ; Correlations ; Earth, ocean, space ; Exact sciences and technology ; External geophysics ; Freshwater ; Marine ; Meteorology ; Northern hemisphere ; Oceans ; Radiosondes ; Statistical discrepancies ; Statistical variance ; Storms ; Temperate regions ; Time series ; Winds and their effects ; Winter</subject><ispartof>Journal of climate, 2002-03, Vol.15 (6), p.642-658</ispartof><rights>2002 American Meteorological Society</rights><rights>2002 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Meteorological Society Mar 15, 2002</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c491t-ec115060286baec873ba6e1de81eaecd15ae0b35240e38650107e22d5b207b133</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26249192$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26249192$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,3681,27924,27925,58017,58250</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=13530104$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chang, Edmund K. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fu, Yunfei</creatorcontrib><title>Interdecadal Variations in Northern Hemisphere Winter Storm Track Intensity</title><title>Journal of climate</title><description>In this paper, the interannual variations in the Northern Hemisphere winter storm tracks have been examined based on 51 winters (December–January–February) of NCEP–NCAR reanalysis data. The leading empirical orthogonal function (EOF) corresponds to the simultaneous strengthening/weakening of both the Pacific and Atlantic storm tracks. Interannual and month-to-month variations in the Pacific and Atlantic storm tracks are found to be significantly correlated. The principal component associated with the leading hemispheric EOF exhibits pronounced interdecadal variability. There appears to be a transition during the early 1970s from a weak storm track state prior to 1972/73 to a strong storm track state subsequently. Decadal mean storm track intensity during the 1990s is about 30% stronger than that during the late 1960s and early 1970s.
The relationship between variations in storm track intensity and low-frequency (seasonal mean) flow anomalies has also been examined. It is shown that storm track variations and their associated seasonal mean flow anomalies are highly correlated. Relations to several other modes of interdecadal variability have also been explored. It is shown that part of the storm track variations may be related to the Arctic oscillation and part to the interdecadal ENSO-like variability. However, even when storm track variations that are linearly dependent on these other modes have been removed, substantial interdecadal variations still remain.
In order to ascertain that the interdecadal variations have not been introduced into the reanalysis data by changes in the observation network, radiosonde observations along the storm track have been examined. Preliminary analyses suggest that the radiosonde observations are largely consistent with the reanalysis data, except for the possibility that biases in the reanalysis data may have led to an overestimation of the interdecadal variability. Unfortunately, since the peaks of the storm tracks lie over the oceans where no radiosonde stations with continuous record can be found, the variations over the storm track peaks cannot be verified.</description><subject>Aircraft</subject><subject>Brackish</subject><subject>Climate</subject><subject>Correlations</subject><subject>Earth, ocean, space</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>External geophysics</subject><subject>Freshwater</subject><subject>Marine</subject><subject>Meteorology</subject><subject>Northern hemisphere</subject><subject>Oceans</subject><subject>Radiosondes</subject><subject>Statistical discrepancies</subject><subject>Statistical variance</subject><subject>Storms</subject><subject>Temperate regions</subject><subject>Time series</subject><subject>Winds and their effects</subject><subject>Winter</subject><issn>0894-8755</issn><issn>1520-0442</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kV9rFDEUxYMouFY_gjAISvsw25ubP5NREcqi3cXSPljbx5DJZGnW2cyazCr99iZsqeCDT0lufpx77zmEnFKYU9qIUyoQauAcjxEAT4CKjyA5vve_fLj7_QnnMLfjB3xCZo_kUzID1fJaNUI8Jy9S2gBQlAAz8nUVJhd7Z01vhurGRG8mP4ZU-VBdjnG6czFUS7f1aZevrrr1ha--TWPcVtfR2B9VUQjJT_cvybO1GZJ79XAeke9fPl8vlvXF1flqcXZRW97SqXaWUgESUMnOOKsa1hnpaO8UdfndU2EcdEwgB8eUFEChcYi96BCajjJ2RN4ddHdx_Ll3adJ5POuGwQQ37pOmiimG2GTw-P-glIK3yNqi-eYfdDPuY8hraERUjeRt0Ts_QDaOKUW31rvotybeawq6hKOL5bpYrks4OoejSzh6dbO6XN7qXNGLK41Z6e1DO5OsGdbRBOvTXzkmWF6bZ-71gduk7PjjP0rMVubJ_wDZAZvd</recordid><startdate>20020315</startdate><enddate>20020315</enddate><creator>Chang, Edmund K. M.</creator><creator>Fu, Yunfei</creator><general>American Meteorological Society</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88F</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M1Q</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7TN</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20020315</creationdate><title>Interdecadal Variations in Northern Hemisphere Winter Storm Track Intensity</title><author>Chang, Edmund K. M. ; Fu, Yunfei</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c491t-ec115060286baec873ba6e1de81eaecd15ae0b35240e38650107e22d5b207b133</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Aircraft</topic><topic>Brackish</topic><topic>Climate</topic><topic>Correlations</topic><topic>Earth, ocean, space</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>External geophysics</topic><topic>Freshwater</topic><topic>Marine</topic><topic>Meteorology</topic><topic>Northern hemisphere</topic><topic>Oceans</topic><topic>Radiosondes</topic><topic>Statistical discrepancies</topic><topic>Statistical variance</topic><topic>Storms</topic><topic>Temperate regions</topic><topic>Time series</topic><topic>Winds and their effects</topic><topic>Winter</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chang, Edmund K. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fu, Yunfei</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Military Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Military Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of climate</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chang, Edmund K. M.</au><au>Fu, Yunfei</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Interdecadal Variations in Northern Hemisphere Winter Storm Track Intensity</atitle><jtitle>Journal of climate</jtitle><date>2002-03-15</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>642</spage><epage>658</epage><pages>642-658</pages><issn>0894-8755</issn><eissn>1520-0442</eissn><abstract>In this paper, the interannual variations in the Northern Hemisphere winter storm tracks have been examined based on 51 winters (December–January–February) of NCEP–NCAR reanalysis data. The leading empirical orthogonal function (EOF) corresponds to the simultaneous strengthening/weakening of both the Pacific and Atlantic storm tracks. Interannual and month-to-month variations in the Pacific and Atlantic storm tracks are found to be significantly correlated. The principal component associated with the leading hemispheric EOF exhibits pronounced interdecadal variability. There appears to be a transition during the early 1970s from a weak storm track state prior to 1972/73 to a strong storm track state subsequently. Decadal mean storm track intensity during the 1990s is about 30% stronger than that during the late 1960s and early 1970s.
The relationship between variations in storm track intensity and low-frequency (seasonal mean) flow anomalies has also been examined. It is shown that storm track variations and their associated seasonal mean flow anomalies are highly correlated. Relations to several other modes of interdecadal variability have also been explored. It is shown that part of the storm track variations may be related to the Arctic oscillation and part to the interdecadal ENSO-like variability. However, even when storm track variations that are linearly dependent on these other modes have been removed, substantial interdecadal variations still remain.
In order to ascertain that the interdecadal variations have not been introduced into the reanalysis data by changes in the observation network, radiosonde observations along the storm track have been examined. Preliminary analyses suggest that the radiosonde observations are largely consistent with the reanalysis data, except for the possibility that biases in the reanalysis data may have led to an overestimation of the interdecadal variability. Unfortunately, since the peaks of the storm tracks lie over the oceans where no radiosonde stations with continuous record can be found, the variations over the storm track peaks cannot be verified.</abstract><cop>Boston, MA</cop><pub>American Meteorological Society</pub><doi>10.1175/1520-0442(2002)015<0642:ivinhw>2.0.co;2</doi><tpages>17</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0894-8755 |
ispartof | Journal of climate, 2002-03, Vol.15 (6), p.642-658 |
issn | 0894-8755 1520-0442 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18383227 |
source | American Meteorological Society; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Aircraft Brackish Climate Correlations Earth, ocean, space Exact sciences and technology External geophysics Freshwater Marine Meteorology Northern hemisphere Oceans Radiosondes Statistical discrepancies Statistical variance Storms Temperate regions Time series Winds and their effects Winter |
title | Interdecadal Variations in Northern Hemisphere Winter Storm Track Intensity |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T22%3A17%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Interdecadal%20Variations%20in%20Northern%20Hemisphere%20Winter%20Storm%20Track%20Intensity&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20climate&rft.au=Chang,%20Edmund%20K.%20M.&rft.date=2002-03-15&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=642&rft.epage=658&rft.pages=642-658&rft.issn=0894-8755&rft.eissn=1520-0442&rft_id=info:doi/10.1175/1520-0442(2002)015%3C0642:ivinhw%3E2.0.co;2&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E26249192%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=222876497&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=26249192&rfr_iscdi=true |