Quantitative evaluation of apple (Malus × domestica Borkh.) fruit shape by principal component analysis of Fourier descriptors

Apples from 1253 genotypes representing 82 open pollinated families planted at three sites were cut along the stem-calyx axis at the widest point to analyse fruit shape. An image analysis program was used to extract calliper measurements of the fruit outline and calculated Fourier descriptors for ea...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Euphytica 2000-02, Vol.111 (3), p.221-227
Hauptverfasser: Currie, A J, Ganeshanandam, S, Noiton DA, Garrick, D, Shelbourne CJA, Oraguzie, N
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 227
container_issue 3
container_start_page 221
container_title Euphytica
container_volume 111
creator Currie, A J
Ganeshanandam, S
Noiton DA
Garrick, D
Shelbourne CJA
Oraguzie, N
description Apples from 1253 genotypes representing 82 open pollinated families planted at three sites were cut along the stem-calyx axis at the widest point to analyse fruit shape. An image analysis program was used to extract calliper measurements of the fruit outline and calculated Fourier descriptors for each fruit outline. Five independent shape traits were identified from a principal component analysis of the Fourier descriptors. The shape traits and the proportion of the total phenotypic variation they accounted for were: fruit aspect (76.8%), asymmetric-crown (7.8%), fruit conicity (6.0%), asymmetric-sides (4.3%), and fruit squareness (2.0%). Genetic and residual variance components were estimated with data from two sites using restricted maximum-likelihood techniques to select genetically-inherited apple shape traits. Combined sites heritability was estimated to be 0.79 for aspect, 0.38 for conicity and 0.35 for squareness. Multiple regression between calliper measurements and aspect, conicity, and squareness traits showed firstly that aspect was best predicted by fruit length/width ratio (R2 = 0.97), secondly conicity could be described by both the distance of the maximum width from the base of the fruit/fruit length ratio and the calyx basin width/fruit width ratio (R2 =0.44), and finally squareness was best described by ratio of the product of calyx basin width and distance of the maximum width from the calyx end of the fruit by the product of fruit length and fruit width(R2 = 0.19). A chart based on the aspect, conicity and squareness principal component values was drawn to allow visual assessment of shape.
doi_str_mv 10.1023/A:1003862525814
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18376509</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2106336271</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c240t-a250ecf9a12f922fbdb5e6e20bad1c20d395ebf341b0050204d63020c45fccb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdj81KAzEcxIMoWKtnr8GD6GHrP8lmP7zVYlWoiNB7yWYTmppuYpIt9ORj-EC-mCt68jTD8GOYQeicwIQAZTfTWwLAqoJyyiuSH6AR4SXLOBRwiEYAJM8oY8UxOolxAwB1yWGEPl570SWTRDI7hdVO2H6wrsNOY-G9Vfjqecgi_vrErduqmIwU-M6Ft_XkGuvQm4TjWniFmz32wXTSeGGxdFvvOtUlLDph99HEn8K564NRAbcqymB8ciGeoiMtbFRnfzpGy_n9cvaYLV4enmbTRSZpDikTlIOSuhaE6ppS3bQNV4Wi0IiWSAotq7lqNMtJA8CBQt4WbBCZcy1lw8bo8rfWB_feDy9WWxOlslZ0yvVxRSpWFhzqAbz4B26G0cOHuCpzwoDwomLfWhBwWQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>741301568</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Quantitative evaluation of apple (Malus × domestica Borkh.) fruit shape by principal component analysis of Fourier descriptors</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Currie, A J ; Ganeshanandam, S ; Noiton DA ; Garrick, D ; Shelbourne CJA ; Oraguzie, N</creator><creatorcontrib>Currie, A J ; Ganeshanandam, S ; Noiton DA ; Garrick, D ; Shelbourne CJA ; Oraguzie, N</creatorcontrib><description>Apples from 1253 genotypes representing 82 open pollinated families planted at three sites were cut along the stem-calyx axis at the widest point to analyse fruit shape. An image analysis program was used to extract calliper measurements of the fruit outline and calculated Fourier descriptors for each fruit outline. Five independent shape traits were identified from a principal component analysis of the Fourier descriptors. The shape traits and the proportion of the total phenotypic variation they accounted for were: fruit aspect (76.8%), asymmetric-crown (7.8%), fruit conicity (6.0%), asymmetric-sides (4.3%), and fruit squareness (2.0%). Genetic and residual variance components were estimated with data from two sites using restricted maximum-likelihood techniques to select genetically-inherited apple shape traits. Combined sites heritability was estimated to be 0.79 for aspect, 0.38 for conicity and 0.35 for squareness. Multiple regression between calliper measurements and aspect, conicity, and squareness traits showed firstly that aspect was best predicted by fruit length/width ratio (R2 = 0.97), secondly conicity could be described by both the distance of the maximum width from the base of the fruit/fruit length ratio and the calyx basin width/fruit width ratio (R2 =0.44), and finally squareness was best described by ratio of the product of calyx basin width and distance of the maximum width from the calyx end of the fruit by the product of fruit length and fruit width(R2 = 0.19). A chart based on the aspect, conicity and squareness principal component values was drawn to allow visual assessment of shape.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0014-2336</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-5060</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1023/A:1003862525814</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Nature B.V</publisher><subject>Apples ; Asymmetry ; Callipers ; Fruits ; Genotypes ; Heritability ; Image analysis ; Image processing ; Phenotypic variations ; Principal components analysis</subject><ispartof>Euphytica, 2000-02, Vol.111 (3), p.221-227</ispartof><rights>Kluwer Academic Publishers 2000.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c240t-a250ecf9a12f922fbdb5e6e20bad1c20d395ebf341b0050204d63020c45fccb3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Currie, A J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ganeshanandam, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Noiton DA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garrick, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shelbourne CJA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oraguzie, N</creatorcontrib><title>Quantitative evaluation of apple (Malus × domestica Borkh.) fruit shape by principal component analysis of Fourier descriptors</title><title>Euphytica</title><description>Apples from 1253 genotypes representing 82 open pollinated families planted at three sites were cut along the stem-calyx axis at the widest point to analyse fruit shape. An image analysis program was used to extract calliper measurements of the fruit outline and calculated Fourier descriptors for each fruit outline. Five independent shape traits were identified from a principal component analysis of the Fourier descriptors. The shape traits and the proportion of the total phenotypic variation they accounted for were: fruit aspect (76.8%), asymmetric-crown (7.8%), fruit conicity (6.0%), asymmetric-sides (4.3%), and fruit squareness (2.0%). Genetic and residual variance components were estimated with data from two sites using restricted maximum-likelihood techniques to select genetically-inherited apple shape traits. Combined sites heritability was estimated to be 0.79 for aspect, 0.38 for conicity and 0.35 for squareness. Multiple regression between calliper measurements and aspect, conicity, and squareness traits showed firstly that aspect was best predicted by fruit length/width ratio (R2 = 0.97), secondly conicity could be described by both the distance of the maximum width from the base of the fruit/fruit length ratio and the calyx basin width/fruit width ratio (R2 =0.44), and finally squareness was best described by ratio of the product of calyx basin width and distance of the maximum width from the calyx end of the fruit by the product of fruit length and fruit width(R2 = 0.19). A chart based on the aspect, conicity and squareness principal component values was drawn to allow visual assessment of shape.</description><subject>Apples</subject><subject>Asymmetry</subject><subject>Callipers</subject><subject>Fruits</subject><subject>Genotypes</subject><subject>Heritability</subject><subject>Image analysis</subject><subject>Image processing</subject><subject>Phenotypic variations</subject><subject>Principal components analysis</subject><issn>0014-2336</issn><issn>1573-5060</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNpdj81KAzEcxIMoWKtnr8GD6GHrP8lmP7zVYlWoiNB7yWYTmppuYpIt9ORj-EC-mCt68jTD8GOYQeicwIQAZTfTWwLAqoJyyiuSH6AR4SXLOBRwiEYAJM8oY8UxOolxAwB1yWGEPl570SWTRDI7hdVO2H6wrsNOY-G9Vfjqecgi_vrErduqmIwU-M6Ft_XkGuvQm4TjWniFmz32wXTSeGGxdFvvOtUlLDph99HEn8K564NRAbcqymB8ciGeoiMtbFRnfzpGy_n9cvaYLV4enmbTRSZpDikTlIOSuhaE6ppS3bQNV4Wi0IiWSAotq7lqNMtJA8CBQt4WbBCZcy1lw8bo8rfWB_feDy9WWxOlslZ0yvVxRSpWFhzqAbz4B26G0cOHuCpzwoDwomLfWhBwWQ</recordid><startdate>20000201</startdate><enddate>20000201</enddate><creator>Currie, A J</creator><creator>Ganeshanandam, S</creator><creator>Noiton DA</creator><creator>Garrick, D</creator><creator>Shelbourne CJA</creator><creator>Oraguzie, N</creator><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20000201</creationdate><title>Quantitative evaluation of apple (Malus × domestica Borkh.) fruit shape by principal component analysis of Fourier descriptors</title><author>Currie, A J ; Ganeshanandam, S ; Noiton DA ; Garrick, D ; Shelbourne CJA ; Oraguzie, N</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c240t-a250ecf9a12f922fbdb5e6e20bad1c20d395ebf341b0050204d63020c45fccb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Apples</topic><topic>Asymmetry</topic><topic>Callipers</topic><topic>Fruits</topic><topic>Genotypes</topic><topic>Heritability</topic><topic>Image analysis</topic><topic>Image processing</topic><topic>Phenotypic variations</topic><topic>Principal components analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Currie, A J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ganeshanandam, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Noiton DA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garrick, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shelbourne CJA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oraguzie, N</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Euphytica</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Currie, A J</au><au>Ganeshanandam, S</au><au>Noiton DA</au><au>Garrick, D</au><au>Shelbourne CJA</au><au>Oraguzie, N</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Quantitative evaluation of apple (Malus × domestica Borkh.) fruit shape by principal component analysis of Fourier descriptors</atitle><jtitle>Euphytica</jtitle><date>2000-02-01</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>111</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>221</spage><epage>227</epage><pages>221-227</pages><issn>0014-2336</issn><eissn>1573-5060</eissn><abstract>Apples from 1253 genotypes representing 82 open pollinated families planted at three sites were cut along the stem-calyx axis at the widest point to analyse fruit shape. An image analysis program was used to extract calliper measurements of the fruit outline and calculated Fourier descriptors for each fruit outline. Five independent shape traits were identified from a principal component analysis of the Fourier descriptors. The shape traits and the proportion of the total phenotypic variation they accounted for were: fruit aspect (76.8%), asymmetric-crown (7.8%), fruit conicity (6.0%), asymmetric-sides (4.3%), and fruit squareness (2.0%). Genetic and residual variance components were estimated with data from two sites using restricted maximum-likelihood techniques to select genetically-inherited apple shape traits. Combined sites heritability was estimated to be 0.79 for aspect, 0.38 for conicity and 0.35 for squareness. Multiple regression between calliper measurements and aspect, conicity, and squareness traits showed firstly that aspect was best predicted by fruit length/width ratio (R2 = 0.97), secondly conicity could be described by both the distance of the maximum width from the base of the fruit/fruit length ratio and the calyx basin width/fruit width ratio (R2 =0.44), and finally squareness was best described by ratio of the product of calyx basin width and distance of the maximum width from the calyx end of the fruit by the product of fruit length and fruit width(R2 = 0.19). A chart based on the aspect, conicity and squareness principal component values was drawn to allow visual assessment of shape.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Nature B.V</pub><doi>10.1023/A:1003862525814</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0014-2336
ispartof Euphytica, 2000-02, Vol.111 (3), p.221-227
issn 0014-2336
1573-5060
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18376509
source SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Apples
Asymmetry
Callipers
Fruits
Genotypes
Heritability
Image analysis
Image processing
Phenotypic variations
Principal components analysis
title Quantitative evaluation of apple (Malus × domestica Borkh.) fruit shape by principal component analysis of Fourier descriptors
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T19%3A20%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Quantitative%20evaluation%20of%20apple%20(Malus%20%C3%97%20domestica%20Borkh.)%20fruit%20shape%20by%20principal%20component%20analysis%20of%20Fourier%20descriptors&rft.jtitle=Euphytica&rft.au=Currie,%20A%20J&rft.date=2000-02-01&rft.volume=111&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=221&rft.epage=227&rft.pages=221-227&rft.issn=0014-2336&rft.eissn=1573-5060&rft_id=info:doi/10.1023/A:1003862525814&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2106336271%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=741301568&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true