The influence of dredge design on the catch of Callista chione (Linnaeus, 1758)

To evaluate a possible introduction of a new dredge in the fishery of Callista chione (Linnaeus, 1758), IPIMAR has conducted a study with the objective of comparing the efficiency of two dredges (traditional dredge and the new dredge design) and evaluating their impact on the benthic community. The...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Hydrobiologia 2001-12, Vol.465 (1-3), p.153-167
Hauptverfasser: GASPAR, M. B, DIAS, M. D, CAMPOS, A, MONTEIRO, C. C, SANTOS, M. N, CHICHARO, A, CHICHARO, L
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 167
container_issue 1-3
container_start_page 153
container_title Hydrobiologia
container_volume 465
creator GASPAR, M. B
DIAS, M. D
CAMPOS, A
MONTEIRO, C. C
SANTOS, M. N
CHICHARO, A
CHICHARO, L
description To evaluate a possible introduction of a new dredge in the fishery of Callista chione (Linnaeus, 1758), IPIMAR has conducted a study with the objective of comparing the efficiency of two dredges (traditional dredge and the new dredge design) and evaluating their impact on the benthic community. The experiments were carried out during March 1999 on the Southwest coast of Portugal, from a site off Troia. Three different tow durations of 5, 10 and 20 min were investigated. A total of 24 hauls were accomplished, 4 for each tow duration and dredge. The experiments were conducted by attaching a cover bag with a 20 mm mesh to the gear. After each haul, the catches in the bag and in the cover were sorted separately. All individuals retained were attributed scores on a scale of 1-4 in which 1 equates to good and 4 equates to dead. The results obtained showed that catches from the traditional dredge (TD) are composed of a great fraction of juveniles of C. chione, while in the new dredge (NDD) catches are composed, almost entirely, by individuals with a superior size to the minimum legal length (50 mm). This result indicates that the mesh of the bag of the TD used in the exploitation of this resource is not adequate. For the 3 different tow durations, the mean fishing yield obtained for the NDD was always superior to the TD, due to its greater efficiency in capture. The proportion of by-catch is significantly higher when the TD is used. For all 3 tow duration, the TD caused mortalities on the target species and on the macrobenthic community in the same order of magnitude as the NDD. Since the fishery of C. chione is managed by daily quotas per boat, when using the NDD the impact on the macrobenthic community is reduced by about 50% due to its greater efficiency of capture. Another advantage in the usage of the NDD relatively to the TD, is to allow the smallest individuals (independently of the species) to escape rapidly through the metallic bars on the grid, increasing their probability of survival.
doi_str_mv 10.1023/A:1014587212528
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pasca</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18373798</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>18373798</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c320t-f6fabf6e5e306e24b61ce55f339e8465d07184c2e70bfdff416d1baf08b1850d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90EtLw0AUBeBBFKyPtdtBUCoYnTvvuCvFFxS6qeswmdxpU9JJzSQL_70Ru3Lh6i7Ox4FzCbkC9gCMi8fZEzCQyhoOXHF7RCagjMgUgDkmE8bAZhaUPSVnKW0ZYybnbEKWqw3SOoZmwOiRtoFWHVZrpBWmeh1pG2k_Cu96v_lJ565p6tQ76jd1G5FOF3WMDod0T8Eoe3dBToJrEl4e7jn5eHlezd-yxfL1fT5bZF5w1mdBB1cGjQoF08hlqcGjUkGIHK3UqmIGrPQcDStDFYIEXUHpArMlWMUqcU5uf3v3Xfs5YOqLXZ08No2L2A6pACuMMLkd4fR_qLWSuZDajPT6D922QxfHGYUdnypyK8WIbg7IJe-a0Lno61Tsu3rnuq8ChDK5liC-AVEadlM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>821239843</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The influence of dredge design on the catch of Callista chione (Linnaeus, 1758)</title><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>GASPAR, M. B ; DIAS, M. D ; CAMPOS, A ; MONTEIRO, C. C ; SANTOS, M. N ; CHICHARO, A ; CHICHARO, L</creator><creatorcontrib>GASPAR, M. B ; DIAS, M. D ; CAMPOS, A ; MONTEIRO, C. C ; SANTOS, M. N ; CHICHARO, A ; CHICHARO, L</creatorcontrib><description>To evaluate a possible introduction of a new dredge in the fishery of Callista chione (Linnaeus, 1758), IPIMAR has conducted a study with the objective of comparing the efficiency of two dredges (traditional dredge and the new dredge design) and evaluating their impact on the benthic community. The experiments were carried out during March 1999 on the Southwest coast of Portugal, from a site off Troia. Three different tow durations of 5, 10 and 20 min were investigated. A total of 24 hauls were accomplished, 4 for each tow duration and dredge. The experiments were conducted by attaching a cover bag with a 20 mm mesh to the gear. After each haul, the catches in the bag and in the cover were sorted separately. All individuals retained were attributed scores on a scale of 1-4 in which 1 equates to good and 4 equates to dead. The results obtained showed that catches from the traditional dredge (TD) are composed of a great fraction of juveniles of C. chione, while in the new dredge (NDD) catches are composed, almost entirely, by individuals with a superior size to the minimum legal length (50 mm). This result indicates that the mesh of the bag of the TD used in the exploitation of this resource is not adequate. For the 3 different tow durations, the mean fishing yield obtained for the NDD was always superior to the TD, due to its greater efficiency in capture. The proportion of by-catch is significantly higher when the TD is used. For all 3 tow duration, the TD caused mortalities on the target species and on the macrobenthic community in the same order of magnitude as the NDD. Since the fishery of C. chione is managed by daily quotas per boat, when using the NDD the impact on the macrobenthic community is reduced by about 50% due to its greater efficiency of capture. Another advantage in the usage of the NDD relatively to the TD, is to allow the smallest individuals (independently of the species) to escape rapidly through the metallic bars on the grid, increasing their probability of survival.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0018-8158</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-5117</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1023/A:1014587212528</identifier><identifier>CODEN: HYDRB8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer</publisher><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Applied ecology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Bycatch ; Callista chione ; Efficiency ; Exploitation and management of natural biological resources (hunting, fishing and exploited populations survey, etc.) ; Fisheries ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Marine</subject><ispartof>Hydrobiologia, 2001-12, Vol.465 (1-3), p.153-167</ispartof><rights>2002 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Kluwer Academic Publishers 2001</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c320t-f6fabf6e5e306e24b61ce55f339e8465d07184c2e70bfdff416d1baf08b1850d3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,776,780,785,786,23910,23911,25119,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=13579641$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>GASPAR, M. B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DIAS, M. D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CAMPOS, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MONTEIRO, C. C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SANTOS, M. N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CHICHARO, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CHICHARO, L</creatorcontrib><title>The influence of dredge design on the catch of Callista chione (Linnaeus, 1758)</title><title>Hydrobiologia</title><description>To evaluate a possible introduction of a new dredge in the fishery of Callista chione (Linnaeus, 1758), IPIMAR has conducted a study with the objective of comparing the efficiency of two dredges (traditional dredge and the new dredge design) and evaluating their impact on the benthic community. The experiments were carried out during March 1999 on the Southwest coast of Portugal, from a site off Troia. Three different tow durations of 5, 10 and 20 min were investigated. A total of 24 hauls were accomplished, 4 for each tow duration and dredge. The experiments were conducted by attaching a cover bag with a 20 mm mesh to the gear. After each haul, the catches in the bag and in the cover were sorted separately. All individuals retained were attributed scores on a scale of 1-4 in which 1 equates to good and 4 equates to dead. The results obtained showed that catches from the traditional dredge (TD) are composed of a great fraction of juveniles of C. chione, while in the new dredge (NDD) catches are composed, almost entirely, by individuals with a superior size to the minimum legal length (50 mm). This result indicates that the mesh of the bag of the TD used in the exploitation of this resource is not adequate. For the 3 different tow durations, the mean fishing yield obtained for the NDD was always superior to the TD, due to its greater efficiency in capture. The proportion of by-catch is significantly higher when the TD is used. For all 3 tow duration, the TD caused mortalities on the target species and on the macrobenthic community in the same order of magnitude as the NDD. Since the fishery of C. chione is managed by daily quotas per boat, when using the NDD the impact on the macrobenthic community is reduced by about 50% due to its greater efficiency of capture. Another advantage in the usage of the NDD relatively to the TD, is to allow the smallest individuals (independently of the species) to escape rapidly through the metallic bars on the grid, increasing their probability of survival.</description><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Applied ecology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Bycatch</subject><subject>Callista chione</subject><subject>Efficiency</subject><subject>Exploitation and management of natural biological resources (hunting, fishing and exploited populations survey, etc.)</subject><subject>Fisheries</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Marine</subject><issn>0018-8158</issn><issn>1573-5117</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp90EtLw0AUBeBBFKyPtdtBUCoYnTvvuCvFFxS6qeswmdxpU9JJzSQL_70Ru3Lh6i7Ox4FzCbkC9gCMi8fZEzCQyhoOXHF7RCagjMgUgDkmE8bAZhaUPSVnKW0ZYybnbEKWqw3SOoZmwOiRtoFWHVZrpBWmeh1pG2k_Cu96v_lJ565p6tQ76jd1G5FOF3WMDod0T8Eoe3dBToJrEl4e7jn5eHlezd-yxfL1fT5bZF5w1mdBB1cGjQoF08hlqcGjUkGIHK3UqmIGrPQcDStDFYIEXUHpArMlWMUqcU5uf3v3Xfs5YOqLXZ08No2L2A6pACuMMLkd4fR_qLWSuZDajPT6D922QxfHGYUdnypyK8WIbg7IJe-a0Lno61Tsu3rnuq8ChDK5liC-AVEadlM</recordid><startdate>20011201</startdate><enddate>20011201</enddate><creator>GASPAR, M. B</creator><creator>DIAS, M. D</creator><creator>CAMPOS, A</creator><creator>MONTEIRO, C. C</creator><creator>SANTOS, M. N</creator><creator>CHICHARO, A</creator><creator>CHICHARO, L</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7TN</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20011201</creationdate><title>The influence of dredge design on the catch of Callista chione (Linnaeus, 1758)</title><author>GASPAR, M. B ; DIAS, M. D ; CAMPOS, A ; MONTEIRO, C. C ; SANTOS, M. N ; CHICHARO, A ; CHICHARO, L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c320t-f6fabf6e5e306e24b61ce55f339e8465d07184c2e70bfdff416d1baf08b1850d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Applied ecology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Bycatch</topic><topic>Callista chione</topic><topic>Efficiency</topic><topic>Exploitation and management of natural biological resources (hunting, fishing and exploited populations survey, etc.)</topic><topic>Fisheries</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Marine</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>GASPAR, M. B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DIAS, M. D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CAMPOS, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MONTEIRO, C. C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SANTOS, M. N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CHICHARO, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CHICHARO, L</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Hydrobiologia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>GASPAR, M. B</au><au>DIAS, M. D</au><au>CAMPOS, A</au><au>MONTEIRO, C. C</au><au>SANTOS, M. N</au><au>CHICHARO, A</au><au>CHICHARO, L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The influence of dredge design on the catch of Callista chione (Linnaeus, 1758)</atitle><jtitle>Hydrobiologia</jtitle><date>2001-12-01</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>465</volume><issue>1-3</issue><spage>153</spage><epage>167</epage><pages>153-167</pages><issn>0018-8158</issn><eissn>1573-5117</eissn><coden>HYDRB8</coden><abstract>To evaluate a possible introduction of a new dredge in the fishery of Callista chione (Linnaeus, 1758), IPIMAR has conducted a study with the objective of comparing the efficiency of two dredges (traditional dredge and the new dredge design) and evaluating their impact on the benthic community. The experiments were carried out during March 1999 on the Southwest coast of Portugal, from a site off Troia. Three different tow durations of 5, 10 and 20 min were investigated. A total of 24 hauls were accomplished, 4 for each tow duration and dredge. The experiments were conducted by attaching a cover bag with a 20 mm mesh to the gear. After each haul, the catches in the bag and in the cover were sorted separately. All individuals retained were attributed scores on a scale of 1-4 in which 1 equates to good and 4 equates to dead. The results obtained showed that catches from the traditional dredge (TD) are composed of a great fraction of juveniles of C. chione, while in the new dredge (NDD) catches are composed, almost entirely, by individuals with a superior size to the minimum legal length (50 mm). This result indicates that the mesh of the bag of the TD used in the exploitation of this resource is not adequate. For the 3 different tow durations, the mean fishing yield obtained for the NDD was always superior to the TD, due to its greater efficiency in capture. The proportion of by-catch is significantly higher when the TD is used. For all 3 tow duration, the TD caused mortalities on the target species and on the macrobenthic community in the same order of magnitude as the NDD. Since the fishery of C. chione is managed by daily quotas per boat, when using the NDD the impact on the macrobenthic community is reduced by about 50% due to its greater efficiency of capture. Another advantage in the usage of the NDD relatively to the TD, is to allow the smallest individuals (independently of the species) to escape rapidly through the metallic bars on the grid, increasing their probability of survival.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer</pub><doi>10.1023/A:1014587212528</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0018-8158
ispartof Hydrobiologia, 2001-12, Vol.465 (1-3), p.153-167
issn 0018-8158
1573-5117
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18373798
source SpringerLink Journals
subjects Animal, plant and microbial ecology
Applied ecology
Biological and medical sciences
Bycatch
Callista chione
Efficiency
Exploitation and management of natural biological resources (hunting, fishing and exploited populations survey, etc.)
Fisheries
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Marine
title The influence of dredge design on the catch of Callista chione (Linnaeus, 1758)
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T00%3A12%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pasca&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20influence%20of%20dredge%20design%20on%20the%20catch%20of%20Callista%20chione%20(Linnaeus,%201758)&rft.jtitle=Hydrobiologia&rft.au=GASPAR,%20M.%20B&rft.date=2001-12-01&rft.volume=465&rft.issue=1-3&rft.spage=153&rft.epage=167&rft.pages=153-167&rft.issn=0018-8158&rft.eissn=1573-5117&rft.coden=HYDRB8&rft_id=info:doi/10.1023/A:1014587212528&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pasca%3E18373798%3C/proquest_pasca%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=821239843&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true