CBCT quantitative evaluation of mandibular lingual concavities in dental implant patients
Purpose The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of mandibular lingual concavities and to measure them using CBCT (Cone-Beam Computerized Tomography). Methods In this study, CBCT scans of 200 patients requiring dental implants were assessed for lingual concavities. Reconstructed CBCT...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Surgical and radiologic anatomy (English ed.) 2015-12, Vol.37 (10), p.1209-1215 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 1215 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 10 |
| container_start_page | 1209 |
| container_title | Surgical and radiologic anatomy (English ed.) |
| container_volume | 37 |
| creator | Kamburoğlu, Kıvanç Acar, Buket Yüksel, Selcen Paksoy, Candan Semra |
| description | Purpose
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of mandibular lingual concavities and to measure them using CBCT (Cone-Beam Computerized Tomography).
Methods
In this study, CBCT scans of 200 patients requiring dental implants were assessed for lingual concavities. Reconstructed CBCT images were transferred as DICOM files to the 3D DOCTOR software program, and metric, volumetric, and surface area measurements were obtained. Two-way mixed ANOVA was used to model side (left/right, anterior), measurement type, and gender with side and type taken as within-subject variables, gender as between-subject variables, and age as a covariate. A comparison between the dentate and edentulous groups in the samples with lingual concavities was performed using an unpaired Student’s
t
test.
Results
Submandibular concavity mean depth and volume were found to be 2.4 mm and 130.7 mm
3
, whereas mean depth and volume of sublingual concavities were found to be 1.3 mm and 26.5 mm
3
. Significant inverse ratios were found between age and volume and between age and surface area (
p
0.05).
Conclusion
Mandibular lingual concavity dimensions were found to vary by age, location, and the presence/absence of teeth. Third party software can be used to generate 3-dimensional models that provide useful information about shape, size, and location of sublingual and submandibular concavities prior to implant placement. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00276-015-1493-9 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1837344259</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1837344259</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-9d6366e12777021e6137e59e699ce783c3e24e54f0a745d1e5e776bb2314f1e93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1LJDEQhsOirKO7P2AvEvDipbWqk3Q6R3fwCwQvevAUMt3VQ6Q7PXa6B_z3ZpxxEWHxlFB56k0VD2N_EM4QQJ9HgFwXGaDKUBqRmR9shrk2WalQ77EZGAEZgigP2GGMzwCgEMuf7CBXxsgCYMae5n_nD_xlcmH0oxv9mjitXTulax943_DOhdovptYNvPVhObmWV32o3NqPniL3gdcUxlT13apNKXyVWlMl_mL7jWsj_d6dR-zx6vJhfpPd3V_fzi_uskqKcsxMXYiioDS21pAjFSg0KUOFMRXpUlSCcklKNuC0VDWSIq2LxSIXKBskI47Y6TZ3NfQvE8XRdj5W1KZhqJ-ixVJoIWVa-XtUC2XAaLlBT76gz_00hLTIO4WlBgGJwi1VDX2MAzV2NfjODa8WwW4U2a0imxTZjSK7ST7eJU-Ljup_HR9OEpBvgZiewpKGT1__N_UNyY6adw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1735187030</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>CBCT quantitative evaluation of mandibular lingual concavities in dental implant patients</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Kamburoğlu, Kıvanç ; Acar, Buket ; Yüksel, Selcen ; Paksoy, Candan Semra</creator><creatorcontrib>Kamburoğlu, Kıvanç ; Acar, Buket ; Yüksel, Selcen ; Paksoy, Candan Semra</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of mandibular lingual concavities and to measure them using CBCT (Cone-Beam Computerized Tomography).
Methods
In this study, CBCT scans of 200 patients requiring dental implants were assessed for lingual concavities. Reconstructed CBCT images were transferred as DICOM files to the 3D DOCTOR software program, and metric, volumetric, and surface area measurements were obtained. Two-way mixed ANOVA was used to model side (left/right, anterior), measurement type, and gender with side and type taken as within-subject variables, gender as between-subject variables, and age as a covariate. A comparison between the dentate and edentulous groups in the samples with lingual concavities was performed using an unpaired Student’s
t
test.
Results
Submandibular concavity mean depth and volume were found to be 2.4 mm and 130.7 mm
3
, whereas mean depth and volume of sublingual concavities were found to be 1.3 mm and 26.5 mm
3
. Significant inverse ratios were found between age and volume and between age and surface area (
p
< 0.05). All measurements were higher in males than females, but the differences were not statistically significant. The differences between the presence of concavity (sublingual, right, and left submandibular) and dental status (dentate/edentulous) were statistically insignificant (
p
> 0.05).
Conclusion
Mandibular lingual concavity dimensions were found to vary by age, location, and the presence/absence of teeth. Third party software can be used to generate 3-dimensional models that provide useful information about shape, size, and location of sublingual and submandibular concavities prior to implant placement.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0930-1038</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1279-8517</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00276-015-1493-9</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25994600</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Paris: Springer Paris</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Analysis ; Anatomy ; Cone-Beam Computed Tomography ; Dental Implants ; Dentistry ; Female ; Humans ; Image Processing, Computer-Assisted ; Imaging ; Imaging, Three-Dimensional ; Male ; Mandible - diagnostic imaging ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Middle Aged ; Original Article ; Orthopedics ; Radiology ; Studies ; Surgery ; Tomography ; Transplants & implants ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Surgical and radiologic anatomy (English ed.), 2015-12, Vol.37 (10), p.1209-1215</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag France 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-9d6366e12777021e6137e59e699ce783c3e24e54f0a745d1e5e776bb2314f1e93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-9d6366e12777021e6137e59e699ce783c3e24e54f0a745d1e5e776bb2314f1e93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00276-015-1493-9$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00276-015-1493-9$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25994600$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kamburoğlu, Kıvanç</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Acar, Buket</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yüksel, Selcen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paksoy, Candan Semra</creatorcontrib><title>CBCT quantitative evaluation of mandibular lingual concavities in dental implant patients</title><title>Surgical and radiologic anatomy (English ed.)</title><addtitle>Surg Radiol Anat</addtitle><addtitle>Surg Radiol Anat</addtitle><description>Purpose
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of mandibular lingual concavities and to measure them using CBCT (Cone-Beam Computerized Tomography).
Methods
In this study, CBCT scans of 200 patients requiring dental implants were assessed for lingual concavities. Reconstructed CBCT images were transferred as DICOM files to the 3D DOCTOR software program, and metric, volumetric, and surface area measurements were obtained. Two-way mixed ANOVA was used to model side (left/right, anterior), measurement type, and gender with side and type taken as within-subject variables, gender as between-subject variables, and age as a covariate. A comparison between the dentate and edentulous groups in the samples with lingual concavities was performed using an unpaired Student’s
t
test.
Results
Submandibular concavity mean depth and volume were found to be 2.4 mm and 130.7 mm
3
, whereas mean depth and volume of sublingual concavities were found to be 1.3 mm and 26.5 mm
3
. Significant inverse ratios were found between age and volume and between age and surface area (
p
< 0.05). All measurements were higher in males than females, but the differences were not statistically significant. The differences between the presence of concavity (sublingual, right, and left submandibular) and dental status (dentate/edentulous) were statistically insignificant (
p
> 0.05).
Conclusion
Mandibular lingual concavity dimensions were found to vary by age, location, and the presence/absence of teeth. Third party software can be used to generate 3-dimensional models that provide useful information about shape, size, and location of sublingual and submandibular concavities prior to implant placement.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Anatomy</subject><subject>Cone-Beam Computed Tomography</subject><subject>Dental Implants</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted</subject><subject>Imaging</subject><subject>Imaging, Three-Dimensional</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mandible - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Orthopedics</subject><subject>Radiology</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Tomography</subject><subject>Transplants & implants</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0930-1038</issn><issn>1279-8517</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU1LJDEQhsOirKO7P2AvEvDipbWqk3Q6R3fwCwQvevAUMt3VQ6Q7PXa6B_z3ZpxxEWHxlFB56k0VD2N_EM4QQJ9HgFwXGaDKUBqRmR9shrk2WalQ77EZGAEZgigP2GGMzwCgEMuf7CBXxsgCYMae5n_nD_xlcmH0oxv9mjitXTulax943_DOhdovptYNvPVhObmWV32o3NqPniL3gdcUxlT13apNKXyVWlMl_mL7jWsj_d6dR-zx6vJhfpPd3V_fzi_uskqKcsxMXYiioDS21pAjFSg0KUOFMRXpUlSCcklKNuC0VDWSIq2LxSIXKBskI47Y6TZ3NfQvE8XRdj5W1KZhqJ-ixVJoIWVa-XtUC2XAaLlBT76gz_00hLTIO4WlBgGJwi1VDX2MAzV2NfjODa8WwW4U2a0imxTZjSK7ST7eJU-Ljup_HR9OEpBvgZiewpKGT1__N_UNyY6adw</recordid><startdate>20151201</startdate><enddate>20151201</enddate><creator>Kamburoğlu, Kıvanç</creator><creator>Acar, Buket</creator><creator>Yüksel, Selcen</creator><creator>Paksoy, Candan Semra</creator><general>Springer Paris</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20151201</creationdate><title>CBCT quantitative evaluation of mandibular lingual concavities in dental implant patients</title><author>Kamburoğlu, Kıvanç ; Acar, Buket ; Yüksel, Selcen ; Paksoy, Candan Semra</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-9d6366e12777021e6137e59e699ce783c3e24e54f0a745d1e5e776bb2314f1e93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Anatomy</topic><topic>Cone-Beam Computed Tomography</topic><topic>Dental Implants</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted</topic><topic>Imaging</topic><topic>Imaging, Three-Dimensional</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mandible - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Orthopedics</topic><topic>Radiology</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Tomography</topic><topic>Transplants & implants</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kamburoğlu, Kıvanç</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Acar, Buket</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yüksel, Selcen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paksoy, Candan Semra</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Surgical and radiologic anatomy (English ed.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kamburoğlu, Kıvanç</au><au>Acar, Buket</au><au>Yüksel, Selcen</au><au>Paksoy, Candan Semra</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>CBCT quantitative evaluation of mandibular lingual concavities in dental implant patients</atitle><jtitle>Surgical and radiologic anatomy (English ed.)</jtitle><stitle>Surg Radiol Anat</stitle><addtitle>Surg Radiol Anat</addtitle><date>2015-12-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1209</spage><epage>1215</epage><pages>1209-1215</pages><issn>0930-1038</issn><eissn>1279-8517</eissn><abstract>Purpose
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of mandibular lingual concavities and to measure them using CBCT (Cone-Beam Computerized Tomography).
Methods
In this study, CBCT scans of 200 patients requiring dental implants were assessed for lingual concavities. Reconstructed CBCT images were transferred as DICOM files to the 3D DOCTOR software program, and metric, volumetric, and surface area measurements were obtained. Two-way mixed ANOVA was used to model side (left/right, anterior), measurement type, and gender with side and type taken as within-subject variables, gender as between-subject variables, and age as a covariate. A comparison between the dentate and edentulous groups in the samples with lingual concavities was performed using an unpaired Student’s
t
test.
Results
Submandibular concavity mean depth and volume were found to be 2.4 mm and 130.7 mm
3
, whereas mean depth and volume of sublingual concavities were found to be 1.3 mm and 26.5 mm
3
. Significant inverse ratios were found between age and volume and between age and surface area (
p
< 0.05). All measurements were higher in males than females, but the differences were not statistically significant. The differences between the presence of concavity (sublingual, right, and left submandibular) and dental status (dentate/edentulous) were statistically insignificant (
p
> 0.05).
Conclusion
Mandibular lingual concavity dimensions were found to vary by age, location, and the presence/absence of teeth. Third party software can be used to generate 3-dimensional models that provide useful information about shape, size, and location of sublingual and submandibular concavities prior to implant placement.</abstract><cop>Paris</cop><pub>Springer Paris</pub><pmid>25994600</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00276-015-1493-9</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0930-1038 |
| ispartof | Surgical and radiologic anatomy (English ed.), 2015-12, Vol.37 (10), p.1209-1215 |
| issn | 0930-1038 1279-8517 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1837344259 |
| source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
| subjects | Adolescent Adult Aged Analysis Anatomy Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Dental Implants Dentistry Female Humans Image Processing, Computer-Assisted Imaging Imaging, Three-Dimensional Male Mandible - diagnostic imaging Medicine Medicine & Public Health Middle Aged Original Article Orthopedics Radiology Studies Surgery Tomography Transplants & implants Young Adult |
| title | CBCT quantitative evaluation of mandibular lingual concavities in dental implant patients |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T23%3A23%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=CBCT%20quantitative%20evaluation%20of%20mandibular%20lingual%20concavities%20in%20dental%20implant%20patients&rft.jtitle=Surgical%20and%20radiologic%20anatomy%20(English%20ed.)&rft.au=Kamburo%C4%9Flu,%20K%C4%B1van%C3%A7&rft.date=2015-12-01&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1209&rft.epage=1215&rft.pages=1209-1215&rft.issn=0930-1038&rft.eissn=1279-8517&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00276-015-1493-9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1837344259%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1735187030&rft_id=info:pmid/25994600&rfr_iscdi=true |