Staging Rectal Cancer: The Utility of Chest Radiograph and Chest Computed Tomography

The National Comprehensive Cancer Network recommends that patients who are newly diagnosed with rectal cancer undergo staging CT scan of the chest. It is unclear whether posteroanterior and lateral chest radiography (X-ray) alone would provide adequate staging for most of these patients. A retrospec...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The American surgeon 2016-10, Vol.82 (10), p.1005-1008
Hauptverfasser: O'Leary, Michael P., Parrish, Aaron B., Tom, Cynthia M., Maclaughlin, Brian W., Petrie, Beverley A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1008
container_issue 10
container_start_page 1005
container_title The American surgeon
container_volume 82
creator O'Leary, Michael P.
Parrish, Aaron B.
Tom, Cynthia M.
Maclaughlin, Brian W.
Petrie, Beverley A.
description The National Comprehensive Cancer Network recommends that patients who are newly diagnosed with rectal cancer undergo staging CT scan of the chest. It is unclear whether posteroanterior and lateral chest radiography (X-ray) alone would provide adequate staging for most of these patients. A retrospective review was performed on all patients who had a two-view chest X-ray along with a chest CT for rectal cancer staging from 2007 to 2015. A total of 74 patients had both modalities. Sixty-three (85%) had a normal chest X-ray and 11 (15%) had an abnormal chest X-ray. Of the 63 patients with a normal chest X-ray, 40 (63%) had a corresponding normal chest CT and 23 (37%) had a lesion only noted on chest CT. Four patients (17%) in the latter group had metastatic cancer to the lung at the time of workup and four out of five of the tumors found to metastasize were within 5 cm from the anal verge. Our data suggest that a staging chest X-ray is unlikely to diagnose metastatic lungs lesions from a primary rectal cancer. Conversely, staging chest CT will accurately stage metastatic disease but will also reveal benign lung lesions in this patient population.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/000313481608201033
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1837338856</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_000313481608201033</sage_id><sourcerecordid>4230897561</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-8a42de836b1387637a2f37b39a3b9156b4e2d45e3584489d0a55a6794223b3df3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0U1LwzAYB_AgipvTL-BBAl681CV5kibxJsU3GAhzO5e0TbuOvtm0h317WzZFFMFTSPJ7_k_Cg9AlJbeUSjknhAAFrqhPFCOUAByhKRVCeFoxOEbTEXijmKAz57bDlvuCnqIJk1JqrfkUrd46k-VVhpc27kyBA1PFtr3Dq43F6y4v8m6H6xQHG-s6vDRJXmetaTbYVMnhMKjLpu9sgld1ub_cnaOT1BTOXhzWGVo_PqyCZ2_x-vQS3C-8mHPVecpwllgFfkRBSR-kYSnICLSBSFPhR9yyhAsLQg1eJ8QIYXypOWMQQZLCDN3sc5u2fu-Hx4Rl7mJbFKayde9CqkACKCX8_1DhS8alHuj1D7qt-7YaPjIqIBrIEDtDbK_itnautWnYtHlp2l1ISTiOJ_w9nqHo6hDdR6VNvko-5zGA-R44k9lvff-O_ABGk5Qt</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1833093037</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Staging Rectal Cancer: The Utility of Chest Radiograph and Chest Computed Tomography</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>O'Leary, Michael P. ; Parrish, Aaron B. ; Tom, Cynthia M. ; Maclaughlin, Brian W. ; Petrie, Beverley A.</creator><creatorcontrib>O'Leary, Michael P. ; Parrish, Aaron B. ; Tom, Cynthia M. ; Maclaughlin, Brian W. ; Petrie, Beverley A.</creatorcontrib><description>The National Comprehensive Cancer Network recommends that patients who are newly diagnosed with rectal cancer undergo staging CT scan of the chest. It is unclear whether posteroanterior and lateral chest radiography (X-ray) alone would provide adequate staging for most of these patients. A retrospective review was performed on all patients who had a two-view chest X-ray along with a chest CT for rectal cancer staging from 2007 to 2015. A total of 74 patients had both modalities. Sixty-three (85%) had a normal chest X-ray and 11 (15%) had an abnormal chest X-ray. Of the 63 patients with a normal chest X-ray, 40 (63%) had a corresponding normal chest CT and 23 (37%) had a lesion only noted on chest CT. Four patients (17%) in the latter group had metastatic cancer to the lung at the time of workup and four out of five of the tumors found to metastasize were within 5 cm from the anal verge. Our data suggest that a staging chest X-ray is unlikely to diagnose metastatic lungs lesions from a primary rectal cancer. Conversely, staging chest CT will accurately stage metastatic disease but will also reveal benign lung lesions in this patient population.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-1348</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1555-9823</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/000313481608201033</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27779994</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Antigens ; Cancer therapies ; Cohort Studies ; Colorectal cancer ; Female ; Humans ; Lung diseases ; Lung Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Lung Neoplasms - secondary ; Male ; Medical imaging ; Metastasis ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasm Invasiveness - pathology ; Neoplasm Metastasis ; Neoplasm Staging ; Patients ; Radiography, Thoracic - utilization ; Rectal Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Rectal Neoplasms - pathology ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk factors ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed - utilization</subject><ispartof>The American surgeon, 2016-10, Vol.82 (10), p.1005-1008</ispartof><rights>2016 Southeastern Surgical Congress</rights><rights>Copyright Southeastern Surgical Congress Oct 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-8a42de836b1387637a2f37b39a3b9156b4e2d45e3584489d0a55a6794223b3df3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-8a42de836b1387637a2f37b39a3b9156b4e2d45e3584489d0a55a6794223b3df3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/000313481608201033$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/000313481608201033$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,21824,27929,27930,43626,43627</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27779994$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>O'Leary, Michael P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parrish, Aaron B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tom, Cynthia M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maclaughlin, Brian W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petrie, Beverley A.</creatorcontrib><title>Staging Rectal Cancer: The Utility of Chest Radiograph and Chest Computed Tomography</title><title>The American surgeon</title><addtitle>Am Surg</addtitle><description>The National Comprehensive Cancer Network recommends that patients who are newly diagnosed with rectal cancer undergo staging CT scan of the chest. It is unclear whether posteroanterior and lateral chest radiography (X-ray) alone would provide adequate staging for most of these patients. A retrospective review was performed on all patients who had a two-view chest X-ray along with a chest CT for rectal cancer staging from 2007 to 2015. A total of 74 patients had both modalities. Sixty-three (85%) had a normal chest X-ray and 11 (15%) had an abnormal chest X-ray. Of the 63 patients with a normal chest X-ray, 40 (63%) had a corresponding normal chest CT and 23 (37%) had a lesion only noted on chest CT. Four patients (17%) in the latter group had metastatic cancer to the lung at the time of workup and four out of five of the tumors found to metastasize were within 5 cm from the anal verge. Our data suggest that a staging chest X-ray is unlikely to diagnose metastatic lungs lesions from a primary rectal cancer. Conversely, staging chest CT will accurately stage metastatic disease but will also reveal benign lung lesions in this patient population.</description><subject>Antigens</subject><subject>Cancer therapies</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Colorectal cancer</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lung diseases</subject><subject>Lung Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Lung Neoplasms - secondary</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical imaging</subject><subject>Metastasis</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neoplasm Invasiveness - pathology</subject><subject>Neoplasm Metastasis</subject><subject>Neoplasm Staging</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Radiography, Thoracic - utilization</subject><subject>Rectal Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Rectal Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk factors</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - utilization</subject><issn>0003-1348</issn><issn>1555-9823</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqN0U1LwzAYB_AgipvTL-BBAl681CV5kibxJsU3GAhzO5e0TbuOvtm0h317WzZFFMFTSPJ7_k_Cg9AlJbeUSjknhAAFrqhPFCOUAByhKRVCeFoxOEbTEXijmKAz57bDlvuCnqIJk1JqrfkUrd46k-VVhpc27kyBA1PFtr3Dq43F6y4v8m6H6xQHG-s6vDRJXmetaTbYVMnhMKjLpu9sgld1ub_cnaOT1BTOXhzWGVo_PqyCZ2_x-vQS3C-8mHPVecpwllgFfkRBSR-kYSnICLSBSFPhR9yyhAsLQg1eJ8QIYXypOWMQQZLCDN3sc5u2fu-Hx4Rl7mJbFKayde9CqkACKCX8_1DhS8alHuj1D7qt-7YaPjIqIBrIEDtDbK_itnautWnYtHlp2l1ISTiOJ_w9nqHo6hDdR6VNvko-5zGA-R44k9lvff-O_ABGk5Qt</recordid><startdate>201610</startdate><enddate>201610</enddate><creator>O'Leary, Michael P.</creator><creator>Parrish, Aaron B.</creator><creator>Tom, Cynthia M.</creator><creator>Maclaughlin, Brian W.</creator><creator>Petrie, Beverley A.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QO</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201610</creationdate><title>Staging Rectal Cancer: The Utility of Chest Radiograph and Chest Computed Tomography</title><author>O'Leary, Michael P. ; Parrish, Aaron B. ; Tom, Cynthia M. ; Maclaughlin, Brian W. ; Petrie, Beverley A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-8a42de836b1387637a2f37b39a3b9156b4e2d45e3584489d0a55a6794223b3df3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Antigens</topic><topic>Cancer therapies</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Colorectal cancer</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lung diseases</topic><topic>Lung Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Lung Neoplasms - secondary</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical imaging</topic><topic>Metastasis</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neoplasm Invasiveness - pathology</topic><topic>Neoplasm Metastasis</topic><topic>Neoplasm Staging</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Radiography, Thoracic - utilization</topic><topic>Rectal Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Rectal Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk factors</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - utilization</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>O'Leary, Michael P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parrish, Aaron B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tom, Cynthia M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maclaughlin, Brian W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petrie, Beverley A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><jtitle>The American surgeon</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>O'Leary, Michael P.</au><au>Parrish, Aaron B.</au><au>Tom, Cynthia M.</au><au>Maclaughlin, Brian W.</au><au>Petrie, Beverley A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Staging Rectal Cancer: The Utility of Chest Radiograph and Chest Computed Tomography</atitle><jtitle>The American surgeon</jtitle><addtitle>Am Surg</addtitle><date>2016-10</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>82</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1005</spage><epage>1008</epage><pages>1005-1008</pages><issn>0003-1348</issn><eissn>1555-9823</eissn><abstract>The National Comprehensive Cancer Network recommends that patients who are newly diagnosed with rectal cancer undergo staging CT scan of the chest. It is unclear whether posteroanterior and lateral chest radiography (X-ray) alone would provide adequate staging for most of these patients. A retrospective review was performed on all patients who had a two-view chest X-ray along with a chest CT for rectal cancer staging from 2007 to 2015. A total of 74 patients had both modalities. Sixty-three (85%) had a normal chest X-ray and 11 (15%) had an abnormal chest X-ray. Of the 63 patients with a normal chest X-ray, 40 (63%) had a corresponding normal chest CT and 23 (37%) had a lesion only noted on chest CT. Four patients (17%) in the latter group had metastatic cancer to the lung at the time of workup and four out of five of the tumors found to metastasize were within 5 cm from the anal verge. Our data suggest that a staging chest X-ray is unlikely to diagnose metastatic lungs lesions from a primary rectal cancer. Conversely, staging chest CT will accurately stage metastatic disease but will also reveal benign lung lesions in this patient population.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>27779994</pmid><doi>10.1177/000313481608201033</doi><tpages>4</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0003-1348
ispartof The American surgeon, 2016-10, Vol.82 (10), p.1005-1008
issn 0003-1348
1555-9823
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1837338856
source Access via SAGE; MEDLINE
subjects Antigens
Cancer therapies
Cohort Studies
Colorectal cancer
Female
Humans
Lung diseases
Lung Neoplasms - diagnosis
Lung Neoplasms - secondary
Male
Medical imaging
Metastasis
Middle Aged
Neoplasm Invasiveness - pathology
Neoplasm Metastasis
Neoplasm Staging
Patients
Radiography, Thoracic - utilization
Rectal Neoplasms - diagnosis
Rectal Neoplasms - pathology
Retrospective Studies
Risk factors
Sensitivity and Specificity
Tomography, X-Ray Computed - utilization
title Staging Rectal Cancer: The Utility of Chest Radiograph and Chest Computed Tomography
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-14T13%3A22%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Staging%20Rectal%20Cancer:%20The%20Utility%20of%20Chest%20Radiograph%20and%20Chest%20Computed%20Tomography&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20surgeon&rft.au=O'Leary,%20Michael%20P.&rft.date=2016-10&rft.volume=82&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1005&rft.epage=1008&rft.pages=1005-1008&rft.issn=0003-1348&rft.eissn=1555-9823&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/000313481608201033&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4230897561%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1833093037&rft_id=info:pmid/27779994&rft_sage_id=10.1177_000313481608201033&rfr_iscdi=true