Birch pollen immunotherapy inhibits anaphylaxis to the cross-reactive apple allergen Mal d 1 in mice
Summary Background Cross‐reactive apple allergy is a common co‐morbidity of birch pollen allergy, caused by the presence of a Bet v 1 homologue allergen in apple, Mal d 1. Treatment of tree pollen hay fever by immunotherapy is well established, but its effect on the accompanying apple allergy is deb...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Clinical and experimental allergy 2016-11, Vol.46 (11), p.1474-1483 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1483 |
---|---|
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | 1474 |
container_title | Clinical and experimental allergy |
container_volume | 46 |
creator | Utsch, L. Logiantara, A. Wallner, M. Hofer, H. van Ree, R. van Rijt, L. S. |
description | Summary
Background
Cross‐reactive apple allergy is a common co‐morbidity of birch pollen allergy, caused by the presence of a Bet v 1 homologue allergen in apple, Mal d 1. Treatment of tree pollen hay fever by immunotherapy is well established, but its effect on the accompanying apple allergy is debated.
Objective
To establish a mouse model of birch pollen induced cross‐reactivity to Mal d 1 and investigate the effect of birch pollen immunotherapy on the cross‐reactivity to Mal d 1.
Methods
Respiratory allergy was induced in Balb/c mice by intraperitoneal exposure to alum‐adsorbed birch pollen extract (BPE) in combination with short or prolonged intranasal exposure to BPE. To evaluate the response to Mal d 1, mice were exposed intraperitoneally to Mal d 1. Immunoglobulin responses and cytokine production by splenocytes were measured by ELISA. Allergic symptoms were evaluated by measuring airway hyper‐reactivity and hypothermia as a surrogate marker for anaphylaxis. Immunotherapy was performed subcutaneously with alum‐adsorbed BPE.
Results
Mice exposed to BPE develop cross‐reactive IgE to Mal d 1. Early after exposure to BPE, this response is still weak and does not yet translate into anaphylaxis. Interestingly, later re‐challenge with BPE increased cross‐reactivity to a level where Mal d 1 exposure induced anaphylaxis. Cross‐sensitization can also be induced by systemic Mal d 1 exposure. Birch pollen immunotherapy significantly reduced the anaphylactic response of mice to Mal d 1.
Conclusion & Clinical Relevance
A mouse model mimicking birch pollen induced cross‐reactivity to Mal d 1 was successfully established. In this model, birch pollen immunotherapy significantly ameliorated the anaphylaxis induced by Mal d 1. Our experimental data suggest that boosting of Mal d 1 recognizing immunoglobulins by BP SCIT is important for the amelioration of apple allergy in human. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/cea.12775 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1837325379</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1826716186</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5605-32136997151871722445d6fe9a8beb8e1d8ea187fd85c56b774f78f52c5117353</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkctP3DAQh62qVdnSHvoPVJZ6KYeAH3HGOcKKR6Vle-njaDnJpGvqPGonwP73NSxwQELqHOzDfPNp7B8hHzk75KmOarSHXACoV2TBZaEykeo1WbBS5RnoMt8j72K8YoxJVeq3ZE-AhAJKtiDNiQv1ho6D99hT13VzP0wbDHbcUtdvXOWmSG1vx83W21sX6TTQ1Kd1GGLMAtp6ctdI7Tj6dCZJ-J08l9bThvJkoJ2r8T1501of8cPDvU9-nJ1-X15kq2_nX5fHq6xWBVOZFGn5sgSuuAYOQuS5aooWS6srrDTyRqNNrbbRKk1UAHkLulWiVpyDVHKffNl5xzD8nTFOpnOxRu9tj8McDdcSpFASyv9ARQG84LpI6Odn6NUwhz495E4oGQMoeKIOdtT9zwRszRhcZ8PWcGbuUjIpJXOfUmI_PRjnqsPmiXyMJQFHO-DGedy-bDLL0-NHZbabcHHC26cJG_6YIlmV-bU-NxdrfnK5UmvzU_4DWVWoaQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1833007761</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Birch pollen immunotherapy inhibits anaphylaxis to the cross-reactive apple allergen Mal d 1 in mice</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Utsch, L. ; Logiantara, A. ; Wallner, M. ; Hofer, H. ; van Ree, R. ; van Rijt, L. S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Utsch, L. ; Logiantara, A. ; Wallner, M. ; Hofer, H. ; van Ree, R. ; van Rijt, L. S.</creatorcontrib><description>Summary
Background
Cross‐reactive apple allergy is a common co‐morbidity of birch pollen allergy, caused by the presence of a Bet v 1 homologue allergen in apple, Mal d 1. Treatment of tree pollen hay fever by immunotherapy is well established, but its effect on the accompanying apple allergy is debated.
Objective
To establish a mouse model of birch pollen induced cross‐reactivity to Mal d 1 and investigate the effect of birch pollen immunotherapy on the cross‐reactivity to Mal d 1.
Methods
Respiratory allergy was induced in Balb/c mice by intraperitoneal exposure to alum‐adsorbed birch pollen extract (BPE) in combination with short or prolonged intranasal exposure to BPE. To evaluate the response to Mal d 1, mice were exposed intraperitoneally to Mal d 1. Immunoglobulin responses and cytokine production by splenocytes were measured by ELISA. Allergic symptoms were evaluated by measuring airway hyper‐reactivity and hypothermia as a surrogate marker for anaphylaxis. Immunotherapy was performed subcutaneously with alum‐adsorbed BPE.
Results
Mice exposed to BPE develop cross‐reactive IgE to Mal d 1. Early after exposure to BPE, this response is still weak and does not yet translate into anaphylaxis. Interestingly, later re‐challenge with BPE increased cross‐reactivity to a level where Mal d 1 exposure induced anaphylaxis. Cross‐sensitization can also be induced by systemic Mal d 1 exposure. Birch pollen immunotherapy significantly reduced the anaphylactic response of mice to Mal d 1.
Conclusion & Clinical Relevance
A mouse model mimicking birch pollen induced cross‐reactivity to Mal d 1 was successfully established. In this model, birch pollen immunotherapy significantly ameliorated the anaphylaxis induced by Mal d 1. Our experimental data suggest that boosting of Mal d 1 recognizing immunoglobulins by BP SCIT is important for the amelioration of apple allergy in human.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0954-7894</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2222</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/cea.12775</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27376790</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Allergens - immunology ; Allergies ; Anaphylaxis - blood ; Anaphylaxis - immunology ; Animals ; Antigens, Plant - immunology ; apple allergy ; Bet v 1 ; Betula - adverse effects ; Biomarkers ; Cross Reactions - immunology ; cross-reactivity ; Desensitization, Immunologic ; Disease Models, Animal ; Female ; Immunization ; Immunoglobulin E - blood ; Immunoglobulin E - immunology ; Immunosuppression ; Immunotherapy ; Mal d 1 ; Malus ; Malus - adverse effects ; Mice ; Plant Proteins - immunology ; Pollen ; Pollen - immunology ; Spleen - immunology ; T-Lymphocytes - immunology ; T-Lymphocytes - metabolism</subject><ispartof>Clinical and experimental allergy, 2016-11, Vol.46 (11), p.1474-1483</ispartof><rights>2016 John Wiley & Sons Ltd</rights><rights>2016 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5605-32136997151871722445d6fe9a8beb8e1d8ea187fd85c56b774f78f52c5117353</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5605-32136997151871722445d6fe9a8beb8e1d8ea187fd85c56b774f78f52c5117353</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fcea.12775$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fcea.12775$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27376790$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Utsch, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Logiantara, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wallner, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hofer, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Ree, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Rijt, L. S.</creatorcontrib><title>Birch pollen immunotherapy inhibits anaphylaxis to the cross-reactive apple allergen Mal d 1 in mice</title><title>Clinical and experimental allergy</title><addtitle>Clin Exp Allergy</addtitle><description>Summary
Background
Cross‐reactive apple allergy is a common co‐morbidity of birch pollen allergy, caused by the presence of a Bet v 1 homologue allergen in apple, Mal d 1. Treatment of tree pollen hay fever by immunotherapy is well established, but its effect on the accompanying apple allergy is debated.
Objective
To establish a mouse model of birch pollen induced cross‐reactivity to Mal d 1 and investigate the effect of birch pollen immunotherapy on the cross‐reactivity to Mal d 1.
Methods
Respiratory allergy was induced in Balb/c mice by intraperitoneal exposure to alum‐adsorbed birch pollen extract (BPE) in combination with short or prolonged intranasal exposure to BPE. To evaluate the response to Mal d 1, mice were exposed intraperitoneally to Mal d 1. Immunoglobulin responses and cytokine production by splenocytes were measured by ELISA. Allergic symptoms were evaluated by measuring airway hyper‐reactivity and hypothermia as a surrogate marker for anaphylaxis. Immunotherapy was performed subcutaneously with alum‐adsorbed BPE.
Results
Mice exposed to BPE develop cross‐reactive IgE to Mal d 1. Early after exposure to BPE, this response is still weak and does not yet translate into anaphylaxis. Interestingly, later re‐challenge with BPE increased cross‐reactivity to a level where Mal d 1 exposure induced anaphylaxis. Cross‐sensitization can also be induced by systemic Mal d 1 exposure. Birch pollen immunotherapy significantly reduced the anaphylactic response of mice to Mal d 1.
Conclusion & Clinical Relevance
A mouse model mimicking birch pollen induced cross‐reactivity to Mal d 1 was successfully established. In this model, birch pollen immunotherapy significantly ameliorated the anaphylaxis induced by Mal d 1. Our experimental data suggest that boosting of Mal d 1 recognizing immunoglobulins by BP SCIT is important for the amelioration of apple allergy in human.</description><subject>Allergens - immunology</subject><subject>Allergies</subject><subject>Anaphylaxis - blood</subject><subject>Anaphylaxis - immunology</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Antigens, Plant - immunology</subject><subject>apple allergy</subject><subject>Bet v 1</subject><subject>Betula - adverse effects</subject><subject>Biomarkers</subject><subject>Cross Reactions - immunology</subject><subject>cross-reactivity</subject><subject>Desensitization, Immunologic</subject><subject>Disease Models, Animal</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Immunization</subject><subject>Immunoglobulin E - blood</subject><subject>Immunoglobulin E - immunology</subject><subject>Immunosuppression</subject><subject>Immunotherapy</subject><subject>Mal d 1</subject><subject>Malus</subject><subject>Malus - adverse effects</subject><subject>Mice</subject><subject>Plant Proteins - immunology</subject><subject>Pollen</subject><subject>Pollen - immunology</subject><subject>Spleen - immunology</subject><subject>T-Lymphocytes - immunology</subject><subject>T-Lymphocytes - metabolism</subject><issn>0954-7894</issn><issn>1365-2222</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkctP3DAQh62qVdnSHvoPVJZ6KYeAH3HGOcKKR6Vle-njaDnJpGvqPGonwP73NSxwQELqHOzDfPNp7B8hHzk75KmOarSHXACoV2TBZaEykeo1WbBS5RnoMt8j72K8YoxJVeq3ZE-AhAJKtiDNiQv1ho6D99hT13VzP0wbDHbcUtdvXOWmSG1vx83W21sX6TTQ1Kd1GGLMAtp6ctdI7Tj6dCZJ-J08l9bThvJkoJ2r8T1501of8cPDvU9-nJ1-X15kq2_nX5fHq6xWBVOZFGn5sgSuuAYOQuS5aooWS6srrDTyRqNNrbbRKk1UAHkLulWiVpyDVHKffNl5xzD8nTFOpnOxRu9tj8McDdcSpFASyv9ARQG84LpI6Odn6NUwhz495E4oGQMoeKIOdtT9zwRszRhcZ8PWcGbuUjIpJXOfUmI_PRjnqsPmiXyMJQFHO-DGedy-bDLL0-NHZbabcHHC26cJG_6YIlmV-bU-NxdrfnK5UmvzU_4DWVWoaQ</recordid><startdate>201611</startdate><enddate>201611</enddate><creator>Utsch, L.</creator><creator>Logiantara, A.</creator><creator>Wallner, M.</creator><creator>Hofer, H.</creator><creator>van Ree, R.</creator><creator>van Rijt, L. S.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201611</creationdate><title>Birch pollen immunotherapy inhibits anaphylaxis to the cross-reactive apple allergen Mal d 1 in mice</title><author>Utsch, L. ; Logiantara, A. ; Wallner, M. ; Hofer, H. ; van Ree, R. ; van Rijt, L. S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5605-32136997151871722445d6fe9a8beb8e1d8ea187fd85c56b774f78f52c5117353</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Allergens - immunology</topic><topic>Allergies</topic><topic>Anaphylaxis - blood</topic><topic>Anaphylaxis - immunology</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Antigens, Plant - immunology</topic><topic>apple allergy</topic><topic>Bet v 1</topic><topic>Betula - adverse effects</topic><topic>Biomarkers</topic><topic>Cross Reactions - immunology</topic><topic>cross-reactivity</topic><topic>Desensitization, Immunologic</topic><topic>Disease Models, Animal</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Immunization</topic><topic>Immunoglobulin E - blood</topic><topic>Immunoglobulin E - immunology</topic><topic>Immunosuppression</topic><topic>Immunotherapy</topic><topic>Mal d 1</topic><topic>Malus</topic><topic>Malus - adverse effects</topic><topic>Mice</topic><topic>Plant Proteins - immunology</topic><topic>Pollen</topic><topic>Pollen - immunology</topic><topic>Spleen - immunology</topic><topic>T-Lymphocytes - immunology</topic><topic>T-Lymphocytes - metabolism</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Utsch, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Logiantara, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wallner, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hofer, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Ree, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Rijt, L. S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical and experimental allergy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Utsch, L.</au><au>Logiantara, A.</au><au>Wallner, M.</au><au>Hofer, H.</au><au>van Ree, R.</au><au>van Rijt, L. S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Birch pollen immunotherapy inhibits anaphylaxis to the cross-reactive apple allergen Mal d 1 in mice</atitle><jtitle>Clinical and experimental allergy</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Exp Allergy</addtitle><date>2016-11</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>1474</spage><epage>1483</epage><pages>1474-1483</pages><issn>0954-7894</issn><eissn>1365-2222</eissn><abstract>Summary
Background
Cross‐reactive apple allergy is a common co‐morbidity of birch pollen allergy, caused by the presence of a Bet v 1 homologue allergen in apple, Mal d 1. Treatment of tree pollen hay fever by immunotherapy is well established, but its effect on the accompanying apple allergy is debated.
Objective
To establish a mouse model of birch pollen induced cross‐reactivity to Mal d 1 and investigate the effect of birch pollen immunotherapy on the cross‐reactivity to Mal d 1.
Methods
Respiratory allergy was induced in Balb/c mice by intraperitoneal exposure to alum‐adsorbed birch pollen extract (BPE) in combination with short or prolonged intranasal exposure to BPE. To evaluate the response to Mal d 1, mice were exposed intraperitoneally to Mal d 1. Immunoglobulin responses and cytokine production by splenocytes were measured by ELISA. Allergic symptoms were evaluated by measuring airway hyper‐reactivity and hypothermia as a surrogate marker for anaphylaxis. Immunotherapy was performed subcutaneously with alum‐adsorbed BPE.
Results
Mice exposed to BPE develop cross‐reactive IgE to Mal d 1. Early after exposure to BPE, this response is still weak and does not yet translate into anaphylaxis. Interestingly, later re‐challenge with BPE increased cross‐reactivity to a level where Mal d 1 exposure induced anaphylaxis. Cross‐sensitization can also be induced by systemic Mal d 1 exposure. Birch pollen immunotherapy significantly reduced the anaphylactic response of mice to Mal d 1.
Conclusion & Clinical Relevance
A mouse model mimicking birch pollen induced cross‐reactivity to Mal d 1 was successfully established. In this model, birch pollen immunotherapy significantly ameliorated the anaphylaxis induced by Mal d 1. Our experimental data suggest that boosting of Mal d 1 recognizing immunoglobulins by BP SCIT is important for the amelioration of apple allergy in human.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>27376790</pmid><doi>10.1111/cea.12775</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0954-7894 |
ispartof | Clinical and experimental allergy, 2016-11, Vol.46 (11), p.1474-1483 |
issn | 0954-7894 1365-2222 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1837325379 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Allergens - immunology Allergies Anaphylaxis - blood Anaphylaxis - immunology Animals Antigens, Plant - immunology apple allergy Bet v 1 Betula - adverse effects Biomarkers Cross Reactions - immunology cross-reactivity Desensitization, Immunologic Disease Models, Animal Female Immunization Immunoglobulin E - blood Immunoglobulin E - immunology Immunosuppression Immunotherapy Mal d 1 Malus Malus - adverse effects Mice Plant Proteins - immunology Pollen Pollen - immunology Spleen - immunology T-Lymphocytes - immunology T-Lymphocytes - metabolism |
title | Birch pollen immunotherapy inhibits anaphylaxis to the cross-reactive apple allergen Mal d 1 in mice |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T22%3A01%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Birch%20pollen%20immunotherapy%20inhibits%20anaphylaxis%20to%20the%20cross-reactive%20apple%20allergen%20Mal%20d%201%20in%20mice&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20and%20experimental%20allergy&rft.au=Utsch,%20L.&rft.date=2016-11&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=1474&rft.epage=1483&rft.pages=1474-1483&rft.issn=0954-7894&rft.eissn=1365-2222&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/cea.12775&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1826716186%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1833007761&rft_id=info:pmid/27376790&rfr_iscdi=true |