Use of preoperative factors including urodynamic evaluations and nerve-sparing status for predicting urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: Nerve-sparing technique contributes to the reduction of postprostatectomy incontinence

Aims To examine which preoperative factors, including urodynamic evaluations, and operative procedures could predict continence status after robot‐assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) in this study. Materials and Methods Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses of preoperative facto...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Neurourology and urodynamics 2016-11, Vol.35 (8), p.1034-1039
Hauptverfasser: Kadono, Yoshifumi, Ueno, Satoru, Kadomoto, Suguru, Iwamoto, Hiroaki, Takezawa, Yuta, Nakashima, Kazufumi, Nohara, Takahiro, Izumi, Kouji, Mizokami, Atsushi, Gabata, Toshifumi, Namiki, Mikio
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1039
container_issue 8
container_start_page 1034
container_title Neurourology and urodynamics
container_volume 35
creator Kadono, Yoshifumi
Ueno, Satoru
Kadomoto, Suguru
Iwamoto, Hiroaki
Takezawa, Yuta
Nakashima, Kazufumi
Nohara, Takahiro
Izumi, Kouji
Mizokami, Atsushi
Gabata, Toshifumi
Namiki, Mikio
description Aims To examine which preoperative factors, including urodynamic evaluations, and operative procedures could predict continence status after robot‐assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) in this study. Materials and Methods Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses of preoperative factors such as age, body mass index, prostate‐specific antigen level before biopsy, prostate size before surgery, membranous urethral length measured using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), bladder compliance and maximum urethral closure pressure (MUCP) measured by urodynamic study (UDS), and nerve‐sparing (NS) status predicting 24‐hr pad test >2 g/day at 1 year after RARP were examined in 111 patients enrolled in this study. Results The number of patients with incontinence at 1 year after RARP was 39 (35.1%). The only predictive factor for urinary continence was NS grades. To investigate the contribution of NS to urinary continence, 84 patients underwent UDS three times; before, immediately after, and 1 year after RARP. Chronological UDS revealed that recovery patterns of storage and voiding functions were the same among non‐NS, unilateral‐NS, and bilateral‐NS groups, and that higher degrees of NS contributed to lesser decreases in MUCP and longer functional urethral length (FUL) after RARP. Conclusion Preoperative factors, including the results of UDS, could not predict continence 1 year after RARP. The NS procedure contributed to continence status. NS favorably affected MUCP and FUL; however, it did not affect bladder function after RARP. Neurourol. Urodynam. 35:1034–1039, 2016. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/nau.22877
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1837319103</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1837319103</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6397-4999f8d962bb67bbbcc4a961fc53fb230c7e921a250dad623253b2b9bed653003</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkktv1DAURsNLdCgs-APIEhtYpPUjsRN2paJToBoWMEJiY9nODXXJ2IPtDMy_x5lpKxUJiZVl69zj79q3KJ4TfEQwpsdOjUeUNkLcL2akprjkQoiHxQwLxkpacXFQPInxCmPcsKp9XBxQzmpK6mp278EyAvI9Wgfwawgq2Q2gXpnkQ0TWmWHsrPuOxuC7rVMraxBs1DBmzruIlOuQg7CBMq5VmMCYVBoj6n2YlJ01aV9unQpbZLzLe3AGUADjN5DPVJ8goOC1T6WK0cYEHQoql6ohO_xkhJxntX2DFnfuyseXzv4cYecNVo8JIkoepcvJ341mSrnrLlvuqKbWbrM8LR71aojw7Ho9LJZn776cnpcXn-bvT08uSsNZK8qqbdu-6VpOteZCa21MpVpOelOzXlOGjYCWEkVr3KmOU0ZrpqluNXS8Zhizw-LV3puj5NQxyZWNBoZBOfBjlKRhgpGWYPYfKOWcEdKIjL78C73yY3C5kYlqmpZhUWXq9Z4y-RligF6ug13lP5EEy2mIZB4iuRuizL64No56Bd0teTM1GTjeA7_sANt_m-TiZHmjLPcV0_f-vq1Q4Yfkgolafl3M5dn5_O23j5_n8gP7A-_h6QU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1828893074</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Use of preoperative factors including urodynamic evaluations and nerve-sparing status for predicting urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: Nerve-sparing technique contributes to the reduction of postprostatectomy incontinence</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Kadono, Yoshifumi ; Ueno, Satoru ; Kadomoto, Suguru ; Iwamoto, Hiroaki ; Takezawa, Yuta ; Nakashima, Kazufumi ; Nohara, Takahiro ; Izumi, Kouji ; Mizokami, Atsushi ; Gabata, Toshifumi ; Namiki, Mikio</creator><creatorcontrib>Kadono, Yoshifumi ; Ueno, Satoru ; Kadomoto, Suguru ; Iwamoto, Hiroaki ; Takezawa, Yuta ; Nakashima, Kazufumi ; Nohara, Takahiro ; Izumi, Kouji ; Mizokami, Atsushi ; Gabata, Toshifumi ; Namiki, Mikio</creatorcontrib><description>Aims To examine which preoperative factors, including urodynamic evaluations, and operative procedures could predict continence status after robot‐assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) in this study. Materials and Methods Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses of preoperative factors such as age, body mass index, prostate‐specific antigen level before biopsy, prostate size before surgery, membranous urethral length measured using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), bladder compliance and maximum urethral closure pressure (MUCP) measured by urodynamic study (UDS), and nerve‐sparing (NS) status predicting 24‐hr pad test &gt;2 g/day at 1 year after RARP were examined in 111 patients enrolled in this study. Results The number of patients with incontinence at 1 year after RARP was 39 (35.1%). The only predictive factor for urinary continence was NS grades. To investigate the contribution of NS to urinary continence, 84 patients underwent UDS three times; before, immediately after, and 1 year after RARP. Chronological UDS revealed that recovery patterns of storage and voiding functions were the same among non‐NS, unilateral‐NS, and bilateral‐NS groups, and that higher degrees of NS contributed to lesser decreases in MUCP and longer functional urethral length (FUL) after RARP. Conclusion Preoperative factors, including the results of UDS, could not predict continence 1 year after RARP. The NS procedure contributed to continence status. NS favorably affected MUCP and FUL; however, it did not affect bladder function after RARP. Neurourol. Urodynam. 35:1034–1039, 2016. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0733-2467</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-6777</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/nau.22877</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26352154</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Age Factors ; Aged ; Body Mass Index ; Humans ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasm Grading ; nerve sparing ; Postoperative Complications - prevention &amp; control ; Prostate-Specific Antigen - analysis ; prostatectomy ; Prostatectomy - adverse effects ; Prostatectomy - methods ; Prostatic Neoplasms - complications ; Prostatic Neoplasms - surgery ; Robotic Surgical Procedures - adverse effects ; Robotic Surgical Procedures - methods ; Urinary Bladder - physiopathology ; urinary incontinence ; Urinary Incontinence - etiology ; Urinary Incontinence - prevention &amp; control ; urodynamic ; Urodynamics</subject><ispartof>Neurourology and urodynamics, 2016-11, Vol.35 (8), p.1034-1039</ispartof><rights>2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><rights>2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6397-4999f8d962bb67bbbcc4a961fc53fb230c7e921a250dad623253b2b9bed653003</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6397-4999f8d962bb67bbbcc4a961fc53fb230c7e921a250dad623253b2b9bed653003</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fnau.22877$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fnau.22877$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,1418,27929,27930,45579,45580</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26352154$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kadono, Yoshifumi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ueno, Satoru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kadomoto, Suguru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iwamoto, Hiroaki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takezawa, Yuta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nakashima, Kazufumi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nohara, Takahiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Izumi, Kouji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mizokami, Atsushi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gabata, Toshifumi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Namiki, Mikio</creatorcontrib><title>Use of preoperative factors including urodynamic evaluations and nerve-sparing status for predicting urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: Nerve-sparing technique contributes to the reduction of postprostatectomy incontinence</title><title>Neurourology and urodynamics</title><addtitle>Neurourol. Urodynam</addtitle><description>Aims To examine which preoperative factors, including urodynamic evaluations, and operative procedures could predict continence status after robot‐assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) in this study. Materials and Methods Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses of preoperative factors such as age, body mass index, prostate‐specific antigen level before biopsy, prostate size before surgery, membranous urethral length measured using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), bladder compliance and maximum urethral closure pressure (MUCP) measured by urodynamic study (UDS), and nerve‐sparing (NS) status predicting 24‐hr pad test &gt;2 g/day at 1 year after RARP were examined in 111 patients enrolled in this study. Results The number of patients with incontinence at 1 year after RARP was 39 (35.1%). The only predictive factor for urinary continence was NS grades. To investigate the contribution of NS to urinary continence, 84 patients underwent UDS three times; before, immediately after, and 1 year after RARP. Chronological UDS revealed that recovery patterns of storage and voiding functions were the same among non‐NS, unilateral‐NS, and bilateral‐NS groups, and that higher degrees of NS contributed to lesser decreases in MUCP and longer functional urethral length (FUL) after RARP. Conclusion Preoperative factors, including the results of UDS, could not predict continence 1 year after RARP. The NS procedure contributed to continence status. NS favorably affected MUCP and FUL; however, it did not affect bladder function after RARP. Neurourol. Urodynam. 35:1034–1039, 2016. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</description><subject>Age Factors</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Body Mass Index</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neoplasm Grading</subject><subject>nerve sparing</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Prostate-Specific Antigen - analysis</subject><subject>prostatectomy</subject><subject>Prostatectomy - adverse effects</subject><subject>Prostatectomy - methods</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - complications</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Robotic Surgical Procedures - adverse effects</subject><subject>Robotic Surgical Procedures - methods</subject><subject>Urinary Bladder - physiopathology</subject><subject>urinary incontinence</subject><subject>Urinary Incontinence - etiology</subject><subject>Urinary Incontinence - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>urodynamic</subject><subject>Urodynamics</subject><issn>0733-2467</issn><issn>1520-6777</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkktv1DAURsNLdCgs-APIEhtYpPUjsRN2paJToBoWMEJiY9nODXXJ2IPtDMy_x5lpKxUJiZVl69zj79q3KJ4TfEQwpsdOjUeUNkLcL2akprjkQoiHxQwLxkpacXFQPInxCmPcsKp9XBxQzmpK6mp278EyAvI9Wgfwawgq2Q2gXpnkQ0TWmWHsrPuOxuC7rVMraxBs1DBmzruIlOuQg7CBMq5VmMCYVBoj6n2YlJ01aV9unQpbZLzLe3AGUADjN5DPVJ8goOC1T6WK0cYEHQoql6ohO_xkhJxntX2DFnfuyseXzv4cYecNVo8JIkoepcvJ341mSrnrLlvuqKbWbrM8LR71aojw7Ho9LJZn776cnpcXn-bvT08uSsNZK8qqbdu-6VpOteZCa21MpVpOelOzXlOGjYCWEkVr3KmOU0ZrpqluNXS8Zhizw-LV3puj5NQxyZWNBoZBOfBjlKRhgpGWYPYfKOWcEdKIjL78C73yY3C5kYlqmpZhUWXq9Z4y-RligF6ug13lP5EEy2mIZB4iuRuizL64No56Bd0teTM1GTjeA7_sANt_m-TiZHmjLPcV0_f-vq1Q4Yfkgolafl3M5dn5_O23j5_n8gP7A-_h6QU</recordid><startdate>201611</startdate><enddate>201611</enddate><creator>Kadono, Yoshifumi</creator><creator>Ueno, Satoru</creator><creator>Kadomoto, Suguru</creator><creator>Iwamoto, Hiroaki</creator><creator>Takezawa, Yuta</creator><creator>Nakashima, Kazufumi</creator><creator>Nohara, Takahiro</creator><creator>Izumi, Kouji</creator><creator>Mizokami, Atsushi</creator><creator>Gabata, Toshifumi</creator><creator>Namiki, Mikio</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201611</creationdate><title>Use of preoperative factors including urodynamic evaluations and nerve-sparing status for predicting urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: Nerve-sparing technique contributes to the reduction of postprostatectomy incontinence</title><author>Kadono, Yoshifumi ; Ueno, Satoru ; Kadomoto, Suguru ; Iwamoto, Hiroaki ; Takezawa, Yuta ; Nakashima, Kazufumi ; Nohara, Takahiro ; Izumi, Kouji ; Mizokami, Atsushi ; Gabata, Toshifumi ; Namiki, Mikio</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c6397-4999f8d962bb67bbbcc4a961fc53fb230c7e921a250dad623253b2b9bed653003</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Age Factors</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Body Mass Index</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neoplasm Grading</topic><topic>nerve sparing</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Prostate-Specific Antigen - analysis</topic><topic>prostatectomy</topic><topic>Prostatectomy - adverse effects</topic><topic>Prostatectomy - methods</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - complications</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Robotic Surgical Procedures - adverse effects</topic><topic>Robotic Surgical Procedures - methods</topic><topic>Urinary Bladder - physiopathology</topic><topic>urinary incontinence</topic><topic>Urinary Incontinence - etiology</topic><topic>Urinary Incontinence - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>urodynamic</topic><topic>Urodynamics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kadono, Yoshifumi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ueno, Satoru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kadomoto, Suguru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iwamoto, Hiroaki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takezawa, Yuta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nakashima, Kazufumi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nohara, Takahiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Izumi, Kouji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mizokami, Atsushi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gabata, Toshifumi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Namiki, Mikio</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Neurourology and urodynamics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kadono, Yoshifumi</au><au>Ueno, Satoru</au><au>Kadomoto, Suguru</au><au>Iwamoto, Hiroaki</au><au>Takezawa, Yuta</au><au>Nakashima, Kazufumi</au><au>Nohara, Takahiro</au><au>Izumi, Kouji</au><au>Mizokami, Atsushi</au><au>Gabata, Toshifumi</au><au>Namiki, Mikio</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Use of preoperative factors including urodynamic evaluations and nerve-sparing status for predicting urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: Nerve-sparing technique contributes to the reduction of postprostatectomy incontinence</atitle><jtitle>Neurourology and urodynamics</jtitle><addtitle>Neurourol. Urodynam</addtitle><date>2016-11</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1034</spage><epage>1039</epage><pages>1034-1039</pages><issn>0733-2467</issn><eissn>1520-6777</eissn><abstract>Aims To examine which preoperative factors, including urodynamic evaluations, and operative procedures could predict continence status after robot‐assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) in this study. Materials and Methods Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses of preoperative factors such as age, body mass index, prostate‐specific antigen level before biopsy, prostate size before surgery, membranous urethral length measured using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), bladder compliance and maximum urethral closure pressure (MUCP) measured by urodynamic study (UDS), and nerve‐sparing (NS) status predicting 24‐hr pad test &gt;2 g/day at 1 year after RARP were examined in 111 patients enrolled in this study. Results The number of patients with incontinence at 1 year after RARP was 39 (35.1%). The only predictive factor for urinary continence was NS grades. To investigate the contribution of NS to urinary continence, 84 patients underwent UDS three times; before, immediately after, and 1 year after RARP. Chronological UDS revealed that recovery patterns of storage and voiding functions were the same among non‐NS, unilateral‐NS, and bilateral‐NS groups, and that higher degrees of NS contributed to lesser decreases in MUCP and longer functional urethral length (FUL) after RARP. Conclusion Preoperative factors, including the results of UDS, could not predict continence 1 year after RARP. The NS procedure contributed to continence status. NS favorably affected MUCP and FUL; however, it did not affect bladder function after RARP. Neurourol. Urodynam. 35:1034–1039, 2016. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>26352154</pmid><doi>10.1002/nau.22877</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0733-2467
ispartof Neurourology and urodynamics, 2016-11, Vol.35 (8), p.1034-1039
issn 0733-2467
1520-6777
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1837319103
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library All Journals
subjects Age Factors
Aged
Body Mass Index
Humans
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Male
Middle Aged
Neoplasm Grading
nerve sparing
Postoperative Complications - prevention & control
Prostate-Specific Antigen - analysis
prostatectomy
Prostatectomy - adverse effects
Prostatectomy - methods
Prostatic Neoplasms - complications
Prostatic Neoplasms - surgery
Robotic Surgical Procedures - adverse effects
Robotic Surgical Procedures - methods
Urinary Bladder - physiopathology
urinary incontinence
Urinary Incontinence - etiology
Urinary Incontinence - prevention & control
urodynamic
Urodynamics
title Use of preoperative factors including urodynamic evaluations and nerve-sparing status for predicting urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: Nerve-sparing technique contributes to the reduction of postprostatectomy incontinence
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-15T05%3A35%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Use%20of%20preoperative%20factors%20including%20urodynamic%20evaluations%20and%20nerve-sparing%20status%20for%20predicting%20urinary%20continence%20recovery%20after%20robot-assisted%20radical%20prostatectomy:%20Nerve-sparing%20technique%20contributes%20to%20the%20reduction%20of%20postprostatectomy%20incontinence&rft.jtitle=Neurourology%20and%20urodynamics&rft.au=Kadono,%20Yoshifumi&rft.date=2016-11&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1034&rft.epage=1039&rft.pages=1034-1039&rft.issn=0733-2467&rft.eissn=1520-6777&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/nau.22877&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1837319103%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1828893074&rft_id=info:pmid/26352154&rfr_iscdi=true