SOLITAIRE-IV: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Multicenter Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Intravenous-to-Oral Solithromycin to Intravenous-to-Oral Moxifloxacin for Treatment of Community-Acquired Bacterial Pneumonia

Background. Solithromycin, a novel macrolide antibiotic with both intravenous and oral formulations dosed once daily, has completed 2 global phase 3 trials for treatment of community-acquired bacterial pneumonia. Methods. A total of 863 adults with community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (Pneumonia O...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical infectious diseases 2016-10, Vol.63 (8), p.1007-1016
Hauptverfasser: File, Thomas M., Rewerska, Barbara, Vucinić-Mihailović, Violeta, Gonong, Joven Roque V., Das, Anita F., Keedy, Kara, Taylor, David, Sheets, Amanda, Fernandes, Prabhavathi, Oldach, David, Jamieson, Brian D.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1016
container_issue 8
container_start_page 1007
container_title Clinical infectious diseases
container_volume 63
creator File, Thomas M.
Rewerska, Barbara
Vucinić-Mihailović, Violeta
Gonong, Joven Roque V.
Das, Anita F.
Keedy, Kara
Taylor, David
Sheets, Amanda
Fernandes, Prabhavathi
Oldach, David
Jamieson, Brian D.
description Background. Solithromycin, a novel macrolide antibiotic with both intravenous and oral formulations dosed once daily, has completed 2 global phase 3 trials for treatment of community-acquired bacterial pneumonia. Methods. A total of 863 adults with community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (Pneumonia Outcomes Research Team [PORT] class II-IV) were randomized 1:1 to receive either intravenous-to-oral solithromycin or moxifloxacin for 7 once-daily doses. All patients received 400 mg intravenously on day 1 and were permitted to switch to oral dosing when clinically indicated. The primary objective was to demonstrate noninferiority (10% margin) of solithromycin to moxifloxacin in achievement of early clinical response (ECR) assessed 3 days after first dose in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Secondary endpoints included demonstrating noninferiority in ECR in the microbiological ITT population (micro-ITT) and determination of investigator-assessed success rates at the short-term follow-up (SFU) visit 5-10 days posttherapy. Results. In the ITT population, 79.3% of solithromycin patients and 79.7% of moxifloxacin patients achieved ECR (treatment difference, –0.46; 95% confidence interval [CI], –6.1 to 5.2). In the micro-ITT population, 80.3% of solithromycin patients and 79.1% of moxifloxacin patients achieved ECR (treatment difference, 1.26; 95% CI, –8.1 to 10.6). In the ITT population, 84.6% of solithromycin patients and 88.6% of moxifloxacin patients achieved clinical success at SFU based on investigator assessment. Mostly mild/moderate infusion events led to higher incidence of adverse events overall in the solithromycin group. Other adverse events were comparable between treatment groups. Conclusions. Intravenous-to-oral solithromycin was noninferior to intravenous-to-oral moxifloxacin. Solithromycin has potential to provide an intravenous and oral option for monotherapy for community-acquired bacterial pneumonia. Clinical Trials Registration. NCT01968733.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/cid/ciw490
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1837314893</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26373229</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26373229</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c480t-33322b8aaeb05be35d236238cf9416a72f8f3faa6b73f3f335be3681fa8721133</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0t2K1DAUB_Aiiruu3vgAEhBBxGg-2jT1bnYctTDLyM7obUnTxM3QJrNpolsf1mcxZVYR8cKLkAR--eccOFn2GKNXGFX0tTRdWt_yCt3JTnFBS8iKCt9NZ1RwmHPKT7IH47hHCGOOivvZCSnznLOyOs1-bDfrereoL1ew_vwGLMClsJ0bzHfVvQRvXWx7Bc97Y9PtIvbBSGWD8mAbYjeBpRsOwhv7BYQrBVZaGynkBFIC2AqtwgScBrUNXnxV1sURBgc3XvRg63oTrrwbJmksCO6f6MLdGN27GzEb7TzYeSXCkAqYY9PfQ7QmTHAhr6PxqgPnQqbaTHr60ao4OGvEw-yeFv2oHt3uZ9mnd6vd8gNcb97Xy8UaypyjACmlhLRcCNWiolW06AhlhHKpqxwzURLNNdVCsLak6UDpjBjHWvCSYEzpWfb8mHvw7jqqMTSDGaXqe2FV6qnBnJYU57z6H0pyQhhmLNGnf9G9i96mRmZVoQKXRZ7Ui6OS3o2jV7o5eDMIPzUYNfOANGlAmuOAJPzkNjK2g-p-018TkcCzI9iPwfk_owhFZUNYaoSQiv4EYMrFVQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1829051754</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>SOLITAIRE-IV: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Multicenter Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Intravenous-to-Oral Solithromycin to Intravenous-to-Oral Moxifloxacin for Treatment of Community-Acquired Bacterial Pneumonia</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>File, Thomas M. ; Rewerska, Barbara ; Vucinić-Mihailović, Violeta ; Gonong, Joven Roque V. ; Das, Anita F. ; Keedy, Kara ; Taylor, David ; Sheets, Amanda ; Fernandes, Prabhavathi ; Oldach, David ; Jamieson, Brian D.</creator><creatorcontrib>File, Thomas M. ; Rewerska, Barbara ; Vucinić-Mihailović, Violeta ; Gonong, Joven Roque V. ; Das, Anita F. ; Keedy, Kara ; Taylor, David ; Sheets, Amanda ; Fernandes, Prabhavathi ; Oldach, David ; Jamieson, Brian D. ; SOLITAIRE-IV Pneumonia Team</creatorcontrib><description>Background. Solithromycin, a novel macrolide antibiotic with both intravenous and oral formulations dosed once daily, has completed 2 global phase 3 trials for treatment of community-acquired bacterial pneumonia. Methods. A total of 863 adults with community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (Pneumonia Outcomes Research Team [PORT] class II-IV) were randomized 1:1 to receive either intravenous-to-oral solithromycin or moxifloxacin for 7 once-daily doses. All patients received 400 mg intravenously on day 1 and were permitted to switch to oral dosing when clinically indicated. The primary objective was to demonstrate noninferiority (10% margin) of solithromycin to moxifloxacin in achievement of early clinical response (ECR) assessed 3 days after first dose in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Secondary endpoints included demonstrating noninferiority in ECR in the microbiological ITT population (micro-ITT) and determination of investigator-assessed success rates at the short-term follow-up (SFU) visit 5-10 days posttherapy. Results. In the ITT population, 79.3% of solithromycin patients and 79.7% of moxifloxacin patients achieved ECR (treatment difference, –0.46; 95% confidence interval [CI], –6.1 to 5.2). In the micro-ITT population, 80.3% of solithromycin patients and 79.1% of moxifloxacin patients achieved ECR (treatment difference, 1.26; 95% CI, –8.1 to 10.6). In the ITT population, 84.6% of solithromycin patients and 88.6% of moxifloxacin patients achieved clinical success at SFU based on investigator assessment. Mostly mild/moderate infusion events led to higher incidence of adverse events overall in the solithromycin group. Other adverse events were comparable between treatment groups. Conclusions. Intravenous-to-oral solithromycin was noninferior to intravenous-to-oral moxifloxacin. Solithromycin has potential to provide an intravenous and oral option for monotherapy for community-acquired bacterial pneumonia. Clinical Trials Registration. NCT01968733.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1058-4838</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-6591</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciw490</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27448679</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Administration, Intravenous ; Administration, Oral ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Anti-Bacterial Agents - administration &amp; dosage ; Anti-Bacterial Agents - adverse effects ; Antibiotics ; ARTICLES AND COMMENTARIES ; Bacteria ; Community-Acquired Infections - diagnosis ; Community-Acquired Infections - drug therapy ; Community-Acquired Infections - microbiology ; Comorbidity ; Comparative analysis ; Drug Resistance, Bacterial ; Female ; Fluoroquinolones - administration &amp; dosage ; Fluoroquinolones - adverse effects ; Humans ; Macrolides - administration &amp; dosage ; Macrolides - adverse effects ; Male ; Medical treatment ; Microbial Sensitivity Tests ; Middle Aged ; Pneumonia ; Pneumonia, Bacterial - diagnosis ; Pneumonia, Bacterial - drug therapy ; Pneumonia, Bacterial - microbiology ; Treatment Outcome ; Triazoles - administration &amp; dosage ; Triazoles - adverse effects</subject><ispartof>Clinical infectious diseases, 2016-10, Vol.63 (8), p.1007-1016</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2016 Oxford University Press on behalf of the Infectious Diseases Society of America</rights><rights>The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press for the Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, e-mail journals.permissions@oup.com.</rights><rights>Copyright Oxford University Press, UK Oct 15, 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c480t-33322b8aaeb05be35d236238cf9416a72f8f3faa6b73f3f335be3681fa8721133</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c480t-33322b8aaeb05be35d236238cf9416a72f8f3faa6b73f3f335be3681fa8721133</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26373229$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26373229$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27901,27902,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27448679$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>File, Thomas M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rewerska, Barbara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vucinić-Mihailović, Violeta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gonong, Joven Roque V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Das, Anita F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keedy, Kara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taylor, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sheets, Amanda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernandes, Prabhavathi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oldach, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jamieson, Brian D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SOLITAIRE-IV Pneumonia Team</creatorcontrib><title>SOLITAIRE-IV: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Multicenter Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Intravenous-to-Oral Solithromycin to Intravenous-to-Oral Moxifloxacin for Treatment of Community-Acquired Bacterial Pneumonia</title><title>Clinical infectious diseases</title><addtitle>Clin Infect Dis</addtitle><description>Background. Solithromycin, a novel macrolide antibiotic with both intravenous and oral formulations dosed once daily, has completed 2 global phase 3 trials for treatment of community-acquired bacterial pneumonia. Methods. A total of 863 adults with community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (Pneumonia Outcomes Research Team [PORT] class II-IV) were randomized 1:1 to receive either intravenous-to-oral solithromycin or moxifloxacin for 7 once-daily doses. All patients received 400 mg intravenously on day 1 and were permitted to switch to oral dosing when clinically indicated. The primary objective was to demonstrate noninferiority (10% margin) of solithromycin to moxifloxacin in achievement of early clinical response (ECR) assessed 3 days after first dose in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Secondary endpoints included demonstrating noninferiority in ECR in the microbiological ITT population (micro-ITT) and determination of investigator-assessed success rates at the short-term follow-up (SFU) visit 5-10 days posttherapy. Results. In the ITT population, 79.3% of solithromycin patients and 79.7% of moxifloxacin patients achieved ECR (treatment difference, –0.46; 95% confidence interval [CI], –6.1 to 5.2). In the micro-ITT population, 80.3% of solithromycin patients and 79.1% of moxifloxacin patients achieved ECR (treatment difference, 1.26; 95% CI, –8.1 to 10.6). In the ITT population, 84.6% of solithromycin patients and 88.6% of moxifloxacin patients achieved clinical success at SFU based on investigator assessment. Mostly mild/moderate infusion events led to higher incidence of adverse events overall in the solithromycin group. Other adverse events were comparable between treatment groups. Conclusions. Intravenous-to-oral solithromycin was noninferior to intravenous-to-oral moxifloxacin. Solithromycin has potential to provide an intravenous and oral option for monotherapy for community-acquired bacterial pneumonia. Clinical Trials Registration. NCT01968733.</description><subject>Administration, Intravenous</subject><subject>Administration, Oral</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Anti-Bacterial Agents - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Anti-Bacterial Agents - adverse effects</subject><subject>Antibiotics</subject><subject>ARTICLES AND COMMENTARIES</subject><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>Community-Acquired Infections - diagnosis</subject><subject>Community-Acquired Infections - drug therapy</subject><subject>Community-Acquired Infections - microbiology</subject><subject>Comorbidity</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Drug Resistance, Bacterial</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fluoroquinolones - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Fluoroquinolones - adverse effects</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Macrolides - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Macrolides - adverse effects</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical treatment</subject><subject>Microbial Sensitivity Tests</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Pneumonia</subject><subject>Pneumonia, Bacterial - diagnosis</subject><subject>Pneumonia, Bacterial - drug therapy</subject><subject>Pneumonia, Bacterial - microbiology</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Triazoles - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Triazoles - adverse effects</subject><issn>1058-4838</issn><issn>1537-6591</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqN0t2K1DAUB_Aiiruu3vgAEhBBxGg-2jT1bnYctTDLyM7obUnTxM3QJrNpolsf1mcxZVYR8cKLkAR--eccOFn2GKNXGFX0tTRdWt_yCt3JTnFBS8iKCt9NZ1RwmHPKT7IH47hHCGOOivvZCSnznLOyOs1-bDfrereoL1ew_vwGLMClsJ0bzHfVvQRvXWx7Bc97Y9PtIvbBSGWD8mAbYjeBpRsOwhv7BYQrBVZaGynkBFIC2AqtwgScBrUNXnxV1sURBgc3XvRg63oTrrwbJmksCO6f6MLdGN27GzEb7TzYeSXCkAqYY9PfQ7QmTHAhr6PxqgPnQqbaTHr60ao4OGvEw-yeFv2oHt3uZ9mnd6vd8gNcb97Xy8UaypyjACmlhLRcCNWiolW06AhlhHKpqxwzURLNNdVCsLak6UDpjBjHWvCSYEzpWfb8mHvw7jqqMTSDGaXqe2FV6qnBnJYU57z6H0pyQhhmLNGnf9G9i96mRmZVoQKXRZ7Ui6OS3o2jV7o5eDMIPzUYNfOANGlAmuOAJPzkNjK2g-p-018TkcCzI9iPwfk_owhFZUNYaoSQiv4EYMrFVQ</recordid><startdate>20161015</startdate><enddate>20161015</enddate><creator>File, Thomas M.</creator><creator>Rewerska, Barbara</creator><creator>Vucinić-Mihailović, Violeta</creator><creator>Gonong, Joven Roque V.</creator><creator>Das, Anita F.</creator><creator>Keedy, Kara</creator><creator>Taylor, David</creator><creator>Sheets, Amanda</creator><creator>Fernandes, Prabhavathi</creator><creator>Oldach, David</creator><creator>Jamieson, Brian D.</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7U2</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20161015</creationdate><title>SOLITAIRE-IV: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Multicenter Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Intravenous-to-Oral Solithromycin to Intravenous-to-Oral Moxifloxacin for Treatment of Community-Acquired Bacterial Pneumonia</title><author>File, Thomas M. ; Rewerska, Barbara ; Vucinić-Mihailović, Violeta ; Gonong, Joven Roque V. ; Das, Anita F. ; Keedy, Kara ; Taylor, David ; Sheets, Amanda ; Fernandes, Prabhavathi ; Oldach, David ; Jamieson, Brian D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c480t-33322b8aaeb05be35d236238cf9416a72f8f3faa6b73f3f335be3681fa8721133</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Administration, Intravenous</topic><topic>Administration, Oral</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Anti-Bacterial Agents - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Anti-Bacterial Agents - adverse effects</topic><topic>Antibiotics</topic><topic>ARTICLES AND COMMENTARIES</topic><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>Community-Acquired Infections - diagnosis</topic><topic>Community-Acquired Infections - drug therapy</topic><topic>Community-Acquired Infections - microbiology</topic><topic>Comorbidity</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Drug Resistance, Bacterial</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fluoroquinolones - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Fluoroquinolones - adverse effects</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Macrolides - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Macrolides - adverse effects</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical treatment</topic><topic>Microbial Sensitivity Tests</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Pneumonia</topic><topic>Pneumonia, Bacterial - diagnosis</topic><topic>Pneumonia, Bacterial - drug therapy</topic><topic>Pneumonia, Bacterial - microbiology</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Triazoles - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Triazoles - adverse effects</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>File, Thomas M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rewerska, Barbara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vucinić-Mihailović, Violeta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gonong, Joven Roque V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Das, Anita F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keedy, Kara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taylor, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sheets, Amanda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernandes, Prabhavathi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oldach, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jamieson, Brian D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SOLITAIRE-IV Pneumonia Team</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><jtitle>Clinical infectious diseases</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>File, Thomas M.</au><au>Rewerska, Barbara</au><au>Vucinić-Mihailović, Violeta</au><au>Gonong, Joven Roque V.</au><au>Das, Anita F.</au><au>Keedy, Kara</au><au>Taylor, David</au><au>Sheets, Amanda</au><au>Fernandes, Prabhavathi</au><au>Oldach, David</au><au>Jamieson, Brian D.</au><aucorp>SOLITAIRE-IV Pneumonia Team</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>SOLITAIRE-IV: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Multicenter Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Intravenous-to-Oral Solithromycin to Intravenous-to-Oral Moxifloxacin for Treatment of Community-Acquired Bacterial Pneumonia</atitle><jtitle>Clinical infectious diseases</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Infect Dis</addtitle><date>2016-10-15</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>63</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1007</spage><epage>1016</epage><pages>1007-1016</pages><issn>1058-4838</issn><eissn>1537-6591</eissn><abstract>Background. Solithromycin, a novel macrolide antibiotic with both intravenous and oral formulations dosed once daily, has completed 2 global phase 3 trials for treatment of community-acquired bacterial pneumonia. Methods. A total of 863 adults with community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (Pneumonia Outcomes Research Team [PORT] class II-IV) were randomized 1:1 to receive either intravenous-to-oral solithromycin or moxifloxacin for 7 once-daily doses. All patients received 400 mg intravenously on day 1 and were permitted to switch to oral dosing when clinically indicated. The primary objective was to demonstrate noninferiority (10% margin) of solithromycin to moxifloxacin in achievement of early clinical response (ECR) assessed 3 days after first dose in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population. Secondary endpoints included demonstrating noninferiority in ECR in the microbiological ITT population (micro-ITT) and determination of investigator-assessed success rates at the short-term follow-up (SFU) visit 5-10 days posttherapy. Results. In the ITT population, 79.3% of solithromycin patients and 79.7% of moxifloxacin patients achieved ECR (treatment difference, –0.46; 95% confidence interval [CI], –6.1 to 5.2). In the micro-ITT population, 80.3% of solithromycin patients and 79.1% of moxifloxacin patients achieved ECR (treatment difference, 1.26; 95% CI, –8.1 to 10.6). In the ITT population, 84.6% of solithromycin patients and 88.6% of moxifloxacin patients achieved clinical success at SFU based on investigator assessment. Mostly mild/moderate infusion events led to higher incidence of adverse events overall in the solithromycin group. Other adverse events were comparable between treatment groups. Conclusions. Intravenous-to-oral solithromycin was noninferior to intravenous-to-oral moxifloxacin. Solithromycin has potential to provide an intravenous and oral option for monotherapy for community-acquired bacterial pneumonia. Clinical Trials Registration. NCT01968733.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>27448679</pmid><doi>10.1093/cid/ciw490</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1058-4838
ispartof Clinical infectious diseases, 2016-10, Vol.63 (8), p.1007-1016
issn 1058-4838
1537-6591
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1837314893
source Jstor Complete Legacy; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Administration, Intravenous
Administration, Oral
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Anti-Bacterial Agents - administration & dosage
Anti-Bacterial Agents - adverse effects
Antibiotics
ARTICLES AND COMMENTARIES
Bacteria
Community-Acquired Infections - diagnosis
Community-Acquired Infections - drug therapy
Community-Acquired Infections - microbiology
Comorbidity
Comparative analysis
Drug Resistance, Bacterial
Female
Fluoroquinolones - administration & dosage
Fluoroquinolones - adverse effects
Humans
Macrolides - administration & dosage
Macrolides - adverse effects
Male
Medical treatment
Microbial Sensitivity Tests
Middle Aged
Pneumonia
Pneumonia, Bacterial - diagnosis
Pneumonia, Bacterial - drug therapy
Pneumonia, Bacterial - microbiology
Treatment Outcome
Triazoles - administration & dosage
Triazoles - adverse effects
title SOLITAIRE-IV: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Multicenter Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Intravenous-to-Oral Solithromycin to Intravenous-to-Oral Moxifloxacin for Treatment of Community-Acquired Bacterial Pneumonia
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T14%3A44%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=SOLITAIRE-IV:%20A%20Randomized,%20Double-Blind,%20Multicenter%20Study%20Comparing%20the%20Efficacy%20and%20Safety%20of%20Intravenous-to-Oral%20Solithromycin%20to%20Intravenous-to-Oral%20Moxifloxacin%20for%20Treatment%20of%20Community-Acquired%20Bacterial%20Pneumonia&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20infectious%20diseases&rft.au=File,%20Thomas%20M.&rft.aucorp=SOLITAIRE-IV%20Pneumonia%20Team&rft.date=2016-10-15&rft.volume=63&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1007&rft.epage=1016&rft.pages=1007-1016&rft.issn=1058-4838&rft.eissn=1537-6591&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/cid/ciw490&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E26373229%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1829051754&rft_id=info:pmid/27448679&rft_jstor_id=26373229&rfr_iscdi=true