Clinical features and treatment outcomes of dental implant-related paranasal sinusitis: A 2-year prospective observational study

Objectives As dental implant‐related paranasal sinusitis has different pathophysiology and clinical features from primarily rhinogenic paranasal sinusitis, the standard treatment protocol for dental implant‐related paranasal sinusitis has not yet been established. The aim of this study was to analyz...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical oral implants research 2016-11, Vol.27 (11), p.e100-e104
Hauptverfasser: Kim, So Jeong, Park, Jee Soo, Kim, Hee Tae, Lee, Cha Hee, Park, Yun Hwi, Bae, Jung Ho
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e104
container_issue 11
container_start_page e100
container_title Clinical oral implants research
container_volume 27
creator Kim, So Jeong
Park, Jee Soo
Kim, Hee Tae
Lee, Cha Hee
Park, Yun Hwi
Bae, Jung Ho
description Objectives As dental implant‐related paranasal sinusitis has different pathophysiology and clinical features from primarily rhinogenic paranasal sinusitis, the standard treatment protocol for dental implant‐related paranasal sinusitis has not yet been established. The aim of this study was to analyze the clinical characteristics and treatment results of dental implant‐related paranasal sinusitis. Material and methods We conducted a prospective single‐center study of 19 patients who were treated for odontogenic sinusitis developing in relation to dental implant from September 2008 through May 2012. The age of the patients ranged from 33 to 78 years, with the mean age of 54.5 years. Foul odor and postnasal dripping were the two most common complaints. All patients underwent nasal endoscopic examination and paranasal sinus CT before treatment, and initial conservative treatment for 1 week. Patients unresponsive to medical treatment underwent endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS). All patients were classified into the conservative and surgical groups for analysis and followed up for 2 years after initial diagnosis. Results Four patients (21%) were successfully treated conservatively, while 15 patients (79%) underwent surgical treatment. One of these 15 patients required revision surgery. After 2 years, all patients were successfully treated, so there were no more clinical signs of recurrent sinusitis in any patients. The survival rate of implants was 100%. Compared to those of the conservative group, symptom duration, the Lund–MacKay CT score, status of the ostiomeatal unit (OMU), and the condition of the maxillary sinus floor were significantly more severe in the surgical group. Conclusion In our study, the majority of patients who once developed paranasal sinusitis associated with dental implants required surgical treatment. Findings of paranasal sinus CT may be important in determining treatment option.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/clr.12570
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1837314832</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1826612736</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4240-7c21b96d75d1ed68bb4c9f9213bec31f54b6d2caf6d6214d867219d00e6309a93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU1rFTEUhoMo9lpd-Ack4EYX0-Zrkom7crFX5aJQlC5DJjkDqfNlkqneXX960962C6HQbEJOnvOQkxeht5Qc0bKOXR-PKKsVeYZWVBJSkZrQ52hFNKkrRSU9QK9SuiCESN3ol-iA1VLVWqoVulr3YQzO9rgDm5cICdvR4xzLaYAx42nJbhpKeeqwL4VChmHu7ZirCL3N4PFsox1tKjcpjEsKOaRP-ASzagc24jlOaQaXwyXgqU0QL20O03hD58XvXqMXne0TvLnbD9Gv088_11-q7Y_N1_XJtnKCCVIpx2irpVe1p-Bl07bC6U4zyltwnHa1aKVnznbSS0aFb6RiVHtCQHKireaH6MPeW97zZ4GUzRCSg75MAtOSDG244lQ0nD0BZVJSprgs6Pv_0ItpiWW4ZBjhovi0poX6uKdc-YsUoTNzDIONO0OJuUnQlATNbYKFfXdnXNoB_AN5H1kBjvfA39DD7nGTWW_P7pXVviOkDP8eOmz8bYpP1eb8-8aIs2-NOG82puHXLAq1Bg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2034148991</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Clinical features and treatment outcomes of dental implant-related paranasal sinusitis: A 2-year prospective observational study</title><source>Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Kim, So Jeong ; Park, Jee Soo ; Kim, Hee Tae ; Lee, Cha Hee ; Park, Yun Hwi ; Bae, Jung Ho</creator><creatorcontrib>Kim, So Jeong ; Park, Jee Soo ; Kim, Hee Tae ; Lee, Cha Hee ; Park, Yun Hwi ; Bae, Jung Ho</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives As dental implant‐related paranasal sinusitis has different pathophysiology and clinical features from primarily rhinogenic paranasal sinusitis, the standard treatment protocol for dental implant‐related paranasal sinusitis has not yet been established. The aim of this study was to analyze the clinical characteristics and treatment results of dental implant‐related paranasal sinusitis. Material and methods We conducted a prospective single‐center study of 19 patients who were treated for odontogenic sinusitis developing in relation to dental implant from September 2008 through May 2012. The age of the patients ranged from 33 to 78 years, with the mean age of 54.5 years. Foul odor and postnasal dripping were the two most common complaints. All patients underwent nasal endoscopic examination and paranasal sinus CT before treatment, and initial conservative treatment for 1 week. Patients unresponsive to medical treatment underwent endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS). All patients were classified into the conservative and surgical groups for analysis and followed up for 2 years after initial diagnosis. Results Four patients (21%) were successfully treated conservatively, while 15 patients (79%) underwent surgical treatment. One of these 15 patients required revision surgery. After 2 years, all patients were successfully treated, so there were no more clinical signs of recurrent sinusitis in any patients. The survival rate of implants was 100%. Compared to those of the conservative group, symptom duration, the Lund–MacKay CT score, status of the ostiomeatal unit (OMU), and the condition of the maxillary sinus floor were significantly more severe in the surgical group. Conclusion In our study, the majority of patients who once developed paranasal sinusitis associated with dental implants required surgical treatment. Findings of paranasal sinus CT may be important in determining treatment option.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0905-7161</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1600-0501</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/clr.12570</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25675967</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Denmark: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; dental implant ; Dental implants ; Dental Implants - adverse effects ; Dental materials ; Dental prosthetics ; Dental restorative materials ; Dentistry ; endoscopic sinus surgery ; Endoscopy ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Maxillary sinus ; Maxillary Sinusitis - drug therapy ; Maxillary Sinusitis - etiology ; Maxillary Sinusitis - surgery ; Medical treatment ; Middle Aged ; Nose ; Observational studies ; odontogenic sinusitis ; Odor ; Odors ; ostiomeatal unit ; Paranasal sinus ; Patients ; Prospective Studies ; Reoperation ; Sinus ; Sinuses ; Sinusitis ; Surgery ; Surgical implants ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed ; Transplants &amp; implants ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Clinical oral implants research, 2016-11, Vol.27 (11), p.e100-e104</ispartof><rights>2015 John Wiley &amp; Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><rights>2015 John Wiley &amp; Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 John Wiley &amp; Sons A/S</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4240-7c21b96d75d1ed68bb4c9f9213bec31f54b6d2caf6d6214d867219d00e6309a93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4240-7c21b96d75d1ed68bb4c9f9213bec31f54b6d2caf6d6214d867219d00e6309a93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fclr.12570$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fclr.12570$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25675967$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kim, So Jeong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Jee Soo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Hee Tae</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Cha Hee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Yun Hwi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bae, Jung Ho</creatorcontrib><title>Clinical features and treatment outcomes of dental implant-related paranasal sinusitis: A 2-year prospective observational study</title><title>Clinical oral implants research</title><addtitle>Clin. Oral Impl. Res</addtitle><description>Objectives As dental implant‐related paranasal sinusitis has different pathophysiology and clinical features from primarily rhinogenic paranasal sinusitis, the standard treatment protocol for dental implant‐related paranasal sinusitis has not yet been established. The aim of this study was to analyze the clinical characteristics and treatment results of dental implant‐related paranasal sinusitis. Material and methods We conducted a prospective single‐center study of 19 patients who were treated for odontogenic sinusitis developing in relation to dental implant from September 2008 through May 2012. The age of the patients ranged from 33 to 78 years, with the mean age of 54.5 years. Foul odor and postnasal dripping were the two most common complaints. All patients underwent nasal endoscopic examination and paranasal sinus CT before treatment, and initial conservative treatment for 1 week. Patients unresponsive to medical treatment underwent endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS). All patients were classified into the conservative and surgical groups for analysis and followed up for 2 years after initial diagnosis. Results Four patients (21%) were successfully treated conservatively, while 15 patients (79%) underwent surgical treatment. One of these 15 patients required revision surgery. After 2 years, all patients were successfully treated, so there were no more clinical signs of recurrent sinusitis in any patients. The survival rate of implants was 100%. Compared to those of the conservative group, symptom duration, the Lund–MacKay CT score, status of the ostiomeatal unit (OMU), and the condition of the maxillary sinus floor were significantly more severe in the surgical group. Conclusion In our study, the majority of patients who once developed paranasal sinusitis associated with dental implants required surgical treatment. Findings of paranasal sinus CT may be important in determining treatment option.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>dental implant</subject><subject>Dental implants</subject><subject>Dental Implants - adverse effects</subject><subject>Dental materials</subject><subject>Dental prosthetics</subject><subject>Dental restorative materials</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>endoscopic sinus surgery</subject><subject>Endoscopy</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Maxillary sinus</subject><subject>Maxillary Sinusitis - drug therapy</subject><subject>Maxillary Sinusitis - etiology</subject><subject>Maxillary Sinusitis - surgery</subject><subject>Medical treatment</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Nose</subject><subject>Observational studies</subject><subject>odontogenic sinusitis</subject><subject>Odor</subject><subject>Odors</subject><subject>ostiomeatal unit</subject><subject>Paranasal sinus</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Reoperation</subject><subject>Sinus</subject><subject>Sinuses</subject><subject>Sinusitis</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surgical implants</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</subject><subject>Transplants &amp; implants</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0905-7161</issn><issn>1600-0501</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkU1rFTEUhoMo9lpd-Ack4EYX0-Zrkom7crFX5aJQlC5DJjkDqfNlkqneXX960962C6HQbEJOnvOQkxeht5Qc0bKOXR-PKKsVeYZWVBJSkZrQ52hFNKkrRSU9QK9SuiCESN3ol-iA1VLVWqoVulr3YQzO9rgDm5cICdvR4xzLaYAx42nJbhpKeeqwL4VChmHu7ZirCL3N4PFsox1tKjcpjEsKOaRP-ASzagc24jlOaQaXwyXgqU0QL20O03hD58XvXqMXne0TvLnbD9Gv088_11-q7Y_N1_XJtnKCCVIpx2irpVe1p-Bl07bC6U4zyltwnHa1aKVnznbSS0aFb6RiVHtCQHKireaH6MPeW97zZ4GUzRCSg75MAtOSDG244lQ0nD0BZVJSprgs6Pv_0ItpiWW4ZBjhovi0poX6uKdc-YsUoTNzDIONO0OJuUnQlATNbYKFfXdnXNoB_AN5H1kBjvfA39DD7nGTWW_P7pXVviOkDP8eOmz8bYpP1eb8-8aIs2-NOG82puHXLAq1Bg</recordid><startdate>201611</startdate><enddate>201611</enddate><creator>Kim, So Jeong</creator><creator>Park, Jee Soo</creator><creator>Kim, Hee Tae</creator><creator>Lee, Cha Hee</creator><creator>Park, Yun Hwi</creator><creator>Bae, Jung Ho</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201611</creationdate><title>Clinical features and treatment outcomes of dental implant-related paranasal sinusitis: A 2-year prospective observational study</title><author>Kim, So Jeong ; Park, Jee Soo ; Kim, Hee Tae ; Lee, Cha Hee ; Park, Yun Hwi ; Bae, Jung Ho</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4240-7c21b96d75d1ed68bb4c9f9213bec31f54b6d2caf6d6214d867219d00e6309a93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>dental implant</topic><topic>Dental implants</topic><topic>Dental Implants - adverse effects</topic><topic>Dental materials</topic><topic>Dental prosthetics</topic><topic>Dental restorative materials</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>endoscopic sinus surgery</topic><topic>Endoscopy</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Maxillary sinus</topic><topic>Maxillary Sinusitis - drug therapy</topic><topic>Maxillary Sinusitis - etiology</topic><topic>Maxillary Sinusitis - surgery</topic><topic>Medical treatment</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Nose</topic><topic>Observational studies</topic><topic>odontogenic sinusitis</topic><topic>Odor</topic><topic>Odors</topic><topic>ostiomeatal unit</topic><topic>Paranasal sinus</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Reoperation</topic><topic>Sinus</topic><topic>Sinuses</topic><topic>Sinusitis</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surgical implants</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</topic><topic>Transplants &amp; implants</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kim, So Jeong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Jee Soo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Hee Tae</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Cha Hee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Yun Hwi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bae, Jung Ho</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical oral implants research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kim, So Jeong</au><au>Park, Jee Soo</au><au>Kim, Hee Tae</au><au>Lee, Cha Hee</au><au>Park, Yun Hwi</au><au>Bae, Jung Ho</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Clinical features and treatment outcomes of dental implant-related paranasal sinusitis: A 2-year prospective observational study</atitle><jtitle>Clinical oral implants research</jtitle><addtitle>Clin. Oral Impl. Res</addtitle><date>2016-11</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>e100</spage><epage>e104</epage><pages>e100-e104</pages><issn>0905-7161</issn><eissn>1600-0501</eissn><abstract>Objectives As dental implant‐related paranasal sinusitis has different pathophysiology and clinical features from primarily rhinogenic paranasal sinusitis, the standard treatment protocol for dental implant‐related paranasal sinusitis has not yet been established. The aim of this study was to analyze the clinical characteristics and treatment results of dental implant‐related paranasal sinusitis. Material and methods We conducted a prospective single‐center study of 19 patients who were treated for odontogenic sinusitis developing in relation to dental implant from September 2008 through May 2012. The age of the patients ranged from 33 to 78 years, with the mean age of 54.5 years. Foul odor and postnasal dripping were the two most common complaints. All patients underwent nasal endoscopic examination and paranasal sinus CT before treatment, and initial conservative treatment for 1 week. Patients unresponsive to medical treatment underwent endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS). All patients were classified into the conservative and surgical groups for analysis and followed up for 2 years after initial diagnosis. Results Four patients (21%) were successfully treated conservatively, while 15 patients (79%) underwent surgical treatment. One of these 15 patients required revision surgery. After 2 years, all patients were successfully treated, so there were no more clinical signs of recurrent sinusitis in any patients. The survival rate of implants was 100%. Compared to those of the conservative group, symptom duration, the Lund–MacKay CT score, status of the ostiomeatal unit (OMU), and the condition of the maxillary sinus floor were significantly more severe in the surgical group. Conclusion In our study, the majority of patients who once developed paranasal sinusitis associated with dental implants required surgical treatment. Findings of paranasal sinus CT may be important in determining treatment option.</abstract><cop>Denmark</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>25675967</pmid><doi>10.1111/clr.12570</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0905-7161
ispartof Clinical oral implants research, 2016-11, Vol.27 (11), p.e100-e104
issn 0905-7161
1600-0501
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1837314832
source Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals; MEDLINE
subjects Adult
Aged
dental implant
Dental implants
Dental Implants - adverse effects
Dental materials
Dental prosthetics
Dental restorative materials
Dentistry
endoscopic sinus surgery
Endoscopy
Female
Humans
Male
Maxillary sinus
Maxillary Sinusitis - drug therapy
Maxillary Sinusitis - etiology
Maxillary Sinusitis - surgery
Medical treatment
Middle Aged
Nose
Observational studies
odontogenic sinusitis
Odor
Odors
ostiomeatal unit
Paranasal sinus
Patients
Prospective Studies
Reoperation
Sinus
Sinuses
Sinusitis
Surgery
Surgical implants
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
Transplants & implants
Treatment Outcome
title Clinical features and treatment outcomes of dental implant-related paranasal sinusitis: A 2-year prospective observational study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-11T20%3A57%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Clinical%20features%20and%20treatment%20outcomes%20of%20dental%20implant-related%20paranasal%20sinusitis:%20A%202-year%20prospective%20observational%20study&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20oral%20implants%20research&rft.au=Kim,%20So%20Jeong&rft.date=2016-11&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=e100&rft.epage=e104&rft.pages=e100-e104&rft.issn=0905-7161&rft.eissn=1600-0501&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/clr.12570&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1826612736%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2034148991&rft_id=info:pmid/25675967&rfr_iscdi=true