EFFECT OF DIFFERENT ECOSYSTEMS AND MANAGEMENT PRACTICES ON TOXOPLASMA GONDII AND NEOSPORA CANINUM INFECTIONS IN WILD RUMINANTS IN SPAIN

Toxoplasma gondii and Neospora caninum are two major abortifacient protozoans in domestic small ruminants and cattle, respectively, and they also parasitize a wide range of wildlife. Numerous serosurveys have been conducted in wild ruminants worldwide. However, the potential effect of different ecos...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of wildlife diseases 2016-04, Vol.52 (2), p.293-300
Hauptverfasser: San Miguel, José M., Gutiérrez-Expósito, Daniel, Aguado-Martínez, Adriana, González-Zotes, Elena, Pereira-Bueno, Juana, Gómez-Bautista, Mercedes, Rubio, Pedro, Ortega-Mora, Luis M., Collantes-Fernández, Esther, Álvarez-García, Gema
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 300
container_issue 2
container_start_page 293
container_title Journal of wildlife diseases
container_volume 52
creator San Miguel, José M.
Gutiérrez-Expósito, Daniel
Aguado-Martínez, Adriana
González-Zotes, Elena
Pereira-Bueno, Juana
Gómez-Bautista, Mercedes
Rubio, Pedro
Ortega-Mora, Luis M.
Collantes-Fernández, Esther
Álvarez-García, Gema
description Toxoplasma gondii and Neospora caninum are two major abortifacient protozoans in domestic small ruminants and cattle, respectively, and they also parasitize a wide range of wildlife. Numerous serosurveys have been conducted in wild ruminants worldwide. However, the potential effect of different ecosystems and management practices on these infections has not been investigated. We studied the prevalence of antibodies to T. gondii and N. caninum in wild ruminants between 2007 and 2012 from four national wildlife reserves: three open space reserves in northwest Spain (Ancares, Mampodre, and Riaño) and a fenced reserve in central Spain (Quintos de Mora). Sera from roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) and chamois (Rupicapra rupicapra) were collected in Ancares (roe deer), Mampodre (both species), and Riaño (both species), whereas red deer (Cervus elaphus) sera were collected only in Quintos de Mora. The results of immunofluorescence antibody tests showed a T. gondii antibody prevalence significantly higher in red deer (13%; 17/131) than in roe deer (2%; 5/228) and chamois (4%; 6/149) (P
doi_str_mv 10.7589/2015-07-176
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1837311805</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1837311805</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b380t-549fde5b115895c278a712d2baf2968b2815913b6f8413ffca9e2b5c4ebbd0593</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0U1v0zAYB3ALgVgZnLiDj5umgF_q2D5aqdtZauyqSQWcrDh1UFG7bMl64BPwtXHXwRFOfmz__H9kPQC8x-gTZ0J-JgizDPEM8_wFmGA5pRnlCL0EE4Qkyihj4gK8GccfCBGWNq_BBcllzjFlE_BLz-e6qKGbw5lJ5VrbGurCVd-qWpcVVHYGS2XVQpenm9VaFbUpdAWdhbX76lZLVZUKLpydGfOkrXbVyq0VLJQ1dlNCY08djLNVKuEXs5zB9aY0Vtn66aRaKWPfglddsx_ju-f1Emzmui5us6VbmEIts0AFeszYVHbbyALG6eesJVw0HJMtCU1HZC4CEZhJTEPeiSmmXdc2MpLA2mkMYYuYpJfg6px7P_QPxzg--sNubON-39zF_jh6LCinGAvE_k-5YJxhJEWiN2faDv04DrHz98Pu0Aw_PUb-NCR_GpJHPD3Kk_7wHHwMh7j9a_9MJYGPZ9A1vW--D7vRb6qUkKOUQggmSVyfRdj1_V38Z7vfamCVtw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1785751098</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>EFFECT OF DIFFERENT ECOSYSTEMS AND MANAGEMENT PRACTICES ON TOXOPLASMA GONDII AND NEOSPORA CANINUM INFECTIONS IN WILD RUMINANTS IN SPAIN</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Allen Press Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>San Miguel, José M. ; Gutiérrez-Expósito, Daniel ; Aguado-Martínez, Adriana ; González-Zotes, Elena ; Pereira-Bueno, Juana ; Gómez-Bautista, Mercedes ; Rubio, Pedro ; Ortega-Mora, Luis M. ; Collantes-Fernández, Esther ; Álvarez-García, Gema</creator><creatorcontrib>San Miguel, José M. ; Gutiérrez-Expósito, Daniel ; Aguado-Martínez, Adriana ; González-Zotes, Elena ; Pereira-Bueno, Juana ; Gómez-Bautista, Mercedes ; Rubio, Pedro ; Ortega-Mora, Luis M. ; Collantes-Fernández, Esther ; Álvarez-García, Gema</creatorcontrib><description>Toxoplasma gondii and Neospora caninum are two major abortifacient protozoans in domestic small ruminants and cattle, respectively, and they also parasitize a wide range of wildlife. Numerous serosurveys have been conducted in wild ruminants worldwide. However, the potential effect of different ecosystems and management practices on these infections has not been investigated. We studied the prevalence of antibodies to T. gondii and N. caninum in wild ruminants between 2007 and 2012 from four national wildlife reserves: three open space reserves in northwest Spain (Ancares, Mampodre, and Riaño) and a fenced reserve in central Spain (Quintos de Mora). Sera from roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) and chamois (Rupicapra rupicapra) were collected in Ancares (roe deer), Mampodre (both species), and Riaño (both species), whereas red deer (Cervus elaphus) sera were collected only in Quintos de Mora. The results of immunofluorescence antibody tests showed a T. gondii antibody prevalence significantly higher in red deer (13%; 17/131) than in roe deer (2%; 5/228) and chamois (4%; 6/149) (P&lt;0.05, Fisher's exact test). Moreover, N. caninum–specific antibodies were only detected in 1% of animals (2/131 red deer, 2/228 roe deer, and 2/149 chamois). Management measures were implemented in the Quintos de Mora reserve and T. gondii antibody prevalence in red deer decreased from 13% to 2% after 5 yr. In contrast, N. caninum antibody prevalences were very low (&lt;2%) over the years. The results suggest a low frequency of sylvatic life cycles in the hunting reservations studied, so interconnection between sylvatic and domestic life cycles is unlikely. Regardless, a sustainable exploitation of natural resources in wildlife reserves may help to reduce the prevalence of T. gondii infection.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0090-3558</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1943-3700</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.7589/2015-07-176</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26967135</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wildife Disease Association</publisher><subject>Animals ; Animals, Wild ; Capreolus capreolus ; Cervus elaphus ; Chamois ; Coccidiosis - epidemiology ; Coccidiosis - parasitology ; Coccidiosis - veterinary ; Conservation of Natural Resources ; Deer - parasitology ; Ecosystem ; Female ; Male ; management measures ; Mora ; Neospora ; Neospora caninum ; PARASITOLOGY ; red deer ; roe deer ; Ruminantia ; Ruminants - parasitology ; Rupicapra - parasitology ; Rupicapra rupicapra ; seroprevalence ; Spain - epidemiology ; Spanish wildlife reserves ; Toxoplasma ; Toxoplasma gondii ; Toxoplasmosis, Animal - epidemiology ; Toxoplasmosis, Animal - parasitology</subject><ispartof>Journal of wildlife diseases, 2016-04, Vol.52 (2), p.293-300</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b380t-549fde5b115895c278a712d2baf2968b2815913b6f8413ffca9e2b5c4ebbd0593</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b380t-549fde5b115895c278a712d2baf2968b2815913b6f8413ffca9e2b5c4ebbd0593</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26967135$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>San Miguel, José M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gutiérrez-Expósito, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aguado-Martínez, Adriana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>González-Zotes, Elena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pereira-Bueno, Juana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gómez-Bautista, Mercedes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rubio, Pedro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ortega-Mora, Luis M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Collantes-Fernández, Esther</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Álvarez-García, Gema</creatorcontrib><title>EFFECT OF DIFFERENT ECOSYSTEMS AND MANAGEMENT PRACTICES ON TOXOPLASMA GONDII AND NEOSPORA CANINUM INFECTIONS IN WILD RUMINANTS IN SPAIN</title><title>Journal of wildlife diseases</title><addtitle>J Wildl Dis</addtitle><description>Toxoplasma gondii and Neospora caninum are two major abortifacient protozoans in domestic small ruminants and cattle, respectively, and they also parasitize a wide range of wildlife. Numerous serosurveys have been conducted in wild ruminants worldwide. However, the potential effect of different ecosystems and management practices on these infections has not been investigated. We studied the prevalence of antibodies to T. gondii and N. caninum in wild ruminants between 2007 and 2012 from four national wildlife reserves: three open space reserves in northwest Spain (Ancares, Mampodre, and Riaño) and a fenced reserve in central Spain (Quintos de Mora). Sera from roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) and chamois (Rupicapra rupicapra) were collected in Ancares (roe deer), Mampodre (both species), and Riaño (both species), whereas red deer (Cervus elaphus) sera were collected only in Quintos de Mora. The results of immunofluorescence antibody tests showed a T. gondii antibody prevalence significantly higher in red deer (13%; 17/131) than in roe deer (2%; 5/228) and chamois (4%; 6/149) (P&lt;0.05, Fisher's exact test). Moreover, N. caninum–specific antibodies were only detected in 1% of animals (2/131 red deer, 2/228 roe deer, and 2/149 chamois). Management measures were implemented in the Quintos de Mora reserve and T. gondii antibody prevalence in red deer decreased from 13% to 2% after 5 yr. In contrast, N. caninum antibody prevalences were very low (&lt;2%) over the years. The results suggest a low frequency of sylvatic life cycles in the hunting reservations studied, so interconnection between sylvatic and domestic life cycles is unlikely. Regardless, a sustainable exploitation of natural resources in wildlife reserves may help to reduce the prevalence of T. gondii infection.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Animals, Wild</subject><subject>Capreolus capreolus</subject><subject>Cervus elaphus</subject><subject>Chamois</subject><subject>Coccidiosis - epidemiology</subject><subject>Coccidiosis - parasitology</subject><subject>Coccidiosis - veterinary</subject><subject>Conservation of Natural Resources</subject><subject>Deer - parasitology</subject><subject>Ecosystem</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>management measures</subject><subject>Mora</subject><subject>Neospora</subject><subject>Neospora caninum</subject><subject>PARASITOLOGY</subject><subject>red deer</subject><subject>roe deer</subject><subject>Ruminantia</subject><subject>Ruminants - parasitology</subject><subject>Rupicapra - parasitology</subject><subject>Rupicapra rupicapra</subject><subject>seroprevalence</subject><subject>Spain - epidemiology</subject><subject>Spanish wildlife reserves</subject><subject>Toxoplasma</subject><subject>Toxoplasma gondii</subject><subject>Toxoplasmosis, Animal - epidemiology</subject><subject>Toxoplasmosis, Animal - parasitology</subject><issn>0090-3558</issn><issn>1943-3700</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0U1v0zAYB3ALgVgZnLiDj5umgF_q2D5aqdtZauyqSQWcrDh1UFG7bMl64BPwtXHXwRFOfmz__H9kPQC8x-gTZ0J-JgizDPEM8_wFmGA5pRnlCL0EE4Qkyihj4gK8GccfCBGWNq_BBcllzjFlE_BLz-e6qKGbw5lJ5VrbGurCVd-qWpcVVHYGS2XVQpenm9VaFbUpdAWdhbX76lZLVZUKLpydGfOkrXbVyq0VLJQ1dlNCY08djLNVKuEXs5zB9aY0Vtn66aRaKWPfglddsx_ju-f1Emzmui5us6VbmEIts0AFeszYVHbbyALG6eesJVw0HJMtCU1HZC4CEZhJTEPeiSmmXdc2MpLA2mkMYYuYpJfg6px7P_QPxzg--sNubON-39zF_jh6LCinGAvE_k-5YJxhJEWiN2faDv04DrHz98Pu0Aw_PUb-NCR_GpJHPD3Kk_7wHHwMh7j9a_9MJYGPZ9A1vW--D7vRb6qUkKOUQggmSVyfRdj1_V38Z7vfamCVtw</recordid><startdate>20160401</startdate><enddate>20160401</enddate><creator>San Miguel, José M.</creator><creator>Gutiérrez-Expósito, Daniel</creator><creator>Aguado-Martínez, Adriana</creator><creator>González-Zotes, Elena</creator><creator>Pereira-Bueno, Juana</creator><creator>Gómez-Bautista, Mercedes</creator><creator>Rubio, Pedro</creator><creator>Ortega-Mora, Luis M.</creator><creator>Collantes-Fernández, Esther</creator><creator>Álvarez-García, Gema</creator><general>Wildife Disease Association</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>M7N</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160401</creationdate><title>EFFECT OF DIFFERENT ECOSYSTEMS AND MANAGEMENT PRACTICES ON TOXOPLASMA GONDII AND NEOSPORA CANINUM INFECTIONS IN WILD RUMINANTS IN SPAIN</title><author>San Miguel, José M. ; Gutiérrez-Expósito, Daniel ; Aguado-Martínez, Adriana ; González-Zotes, Elena ; Pereira-Bueno, Juana ; Gómez-Bautista, Mercedes ; Rubio, Pedro ; Ortega-Mora, Luis M. ; Collantes-Fernández, Esther ; Álvarez-García, Gema</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b380t-549fde5b115895c278a712d2baf2968b2815913b6f8413ffca9e2b5c4ebbd0593</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Animals, Wild</topic><topic>Capreolus capreolus</topic><topic>Cervus elaphus</topic><topic>Chamois</topic><topic>Coccidiosis - epidemiology</topic><topic>Coccidiosis - parasitology</topic><topic>Coccidiosis - veterinary</topic><topic>Conservation of Natural Resources</topic><topic>Deer - parasitology</topic><topic>Ecosystem</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>management measures</topic><topic>Mora</topic><topic>Neospora</topic><topic>Neospora caninum</topic><topic>PARASITOLOGY</topic><topic>red deer</topic><topic>roe deer</topic><topic>Ruminantia</topic><topic>Ruminants - parasitology</topic><topic>Rupicapra - parasitology</topic><topic>Rupicapra rupicapra</topic><topic>seroprevalence</topic><topic>Spain - epidemiology</topic><topic>Spanish wildlife reserves</topic><topic>Toxoplasma</topic><topic>Toxoplasma gondii</topic><topic>Toxoplasmosis, Animal - epidemiology</topic><topic>Toxoplasmosis, Animal - parasitology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>San Miguel, José M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gutiérrez-Expósito, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aguado-Martínez, Adriana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>González-Zotes, Elena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pereira-Bueno, Juana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gómez-Bautista, Mercedes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rubio, Pedro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ortega-Mora, Luis M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Collantes-Fernández, Esther</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Álvarez-García, Gema</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><jtitle>Journal of wildlife diseases</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>San Miguel, José M.</au><au>Gutiérrez-Expósito, Daniel</au><au>Aguado-Martínez, Adriana</au><au>González-Zotes, Elena</au><au>Pereira-Bueno, Juana</au><au>Gómez-Bautista, Mercedes</au><au>Rubio, Pedro</au><au>Ortega-Mora, Luis M.</au><au>Collantes-Fernández, Esther</au><au>Álvarez-García, Gema</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>EFFECT OF DIFFERENT ECOSYSTEMS AND MANAGEMENT PRACTICES ON TOXOPLASMA GONDII AND NEOSPORA CANINUM INFECTIONS IN WILD RUMINANTS IN SPAIN</atitle><jtitle>Journal of wildlife diseases</jtitle><addtitle>J Wildl Dis</addtitle><date>2016-04-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>52</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>293</spage><epage>300</epage><pages>293-300</pages><issn>0090-3558</issn><eissn>1943-3700</eissn><abstract>Toxoplasma gondii and Neospora caninum are two major abortifacient protozoans in domestic small ruminants and cattle, respectively, and they also parasitize a wide range of wildlife. Numerous serosurveys have been conducted in wild ruminants worldwide. However, the potential effect of different ecosystems and management practices on these infections has not been investigated. We studied the prevalence of antibodies to T. gondii and N. caninum in wild ruminants between 2007 and 2012 from four national wildlife reserves: three open space reserves in northwest Spain (Ancares, Mampodre, and Riaño) and a fenced reserve in central Spain (Quintos de Mora). Sera from roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) and chamois (Rupicapra rupicapra) were collected in Ancares (roe deer), Mampodre (both species), and Riaño (both species), whereas red deer (Cervus elaphus) sera were collected only in Quintos de Mora. The results of immunofluorescence antibody tests showed a T. gondii antibody prevalence significantly higher in red deer (13%; 17/131) than in roe deer (2%; 5/228) and chamois (4%; 6/149) (P&lt;0.05, Fisher's exact test). Moreover, N. caninum–specific antibodies were only detected in 1% of animals (2/131 red deer, 2/228 roe deer, and 2/149 chamois). Management measures were implemented in the Quintos de Mora reserve and T. gondii antibody prevalence in red deer decreased from 13% to 2% after 5 yr. In contrast, N. caninum antibody prevalences were very low (&lt;2%) over the years. The results suggest a low frequency of sylvatic life cycles in the hunting reservations studied, so interconnection between sylvatic and domestic life cycles is unlikely. Regardless, a sustainable exploitation of natural resources in wildlife reserves may help to reduce the prevalence of T. gondii infection.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wildife Disease Association</pub><pmid>26967135</pmid><doi>10.7589/2015-07-176</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0090-3558
ispartof Journal of wildlife diseases, 2016-04, Vol.52 (2), p.293-300
issn 0090-3558
1943-3700
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1837311805
source MEDLINE; Allen Press Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Animals
Animals, Wild
Capreolus capreolus
Cervus elaphus
Chamois
Coccidiosis - epidemiology
Coccidiosis - parasitology
Coccidiosis - veterinary
Conservation of Natural Resources
Deer - parasitology
Ecosystem
Female
Male
management measures
Mora
Neospora
Neospora caninum
PARASITOLOGY
red deer
roe deer
Ruminantia
Ruminants - parasitology
Rupicapra - parasitology
Rupicapra rupicapra
seroprevalence
Spain - epidemiology
Spanish wildlife reserves
Toxoplasma
Toxoplasma gondii
Toxoplasmosis, Animal - epidemiology
Toxoplasmosis, Animal - parasitology
title EFFECT OF DIFFERENT ECOSYSTEMS AND MANAGEMENT PRACTICES ON TOXOPLASMA GONDII AND NEOSPORA CANINUM INFECTIONS IN WILD RUMINANTS IN SPAIN
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T13%3A53%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=EFFECT%20OF%20DIFFERENT%20ECOSYSTEMS%20AND%20MANAGEMENT%20PRACTICES%20ON%20TOXOPLASMA%20GONDII%20AND%20NEOSPORA%20CANINUM%20INFECTIONS%20IN%20WILD%20RUMINANTS%20IN%20SPAIN&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20wildlife%20diseases&rft.au=San%20Miguel,%20Jos%C3%A9%20M.&rft.date=2016-04-01&rft.volume=52&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=293&rft.epage=300&rft.pages=293-300&rft.issn=0090-3558&rft.eissn=1943-3700&rft_id=info:doi/10.7589/2015-07-176&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1837311805%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1785751098&rft_id=info:pmid/26967135&rfr_iscdi=true