MatOrtho proximal interphalangeal joint arthroplasty: minimum 2-year follow-up

The MatOrtho proximal interphalangeal replacement is a cementless cobalt-chromium metal-on-polyethylene mobile-bearing surface replacement arthroplasty. The aim of this study is to report the outcome and complications of this implant at a minimum of 2 years follow-up from a single institution. A ret...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of hand surgery, European volume European volume, 2016-11, Vol.41 (9), p.910-916
Hauptverfasser: Flannery, O, Harley, O, Badge, R, Birch, A, Nuttall, D, Trail, I A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 916
container_issue 9
container_start_page 910
container_title The Journal of hand surgery, European volume
container_volume 41
creator Flannery, O
Harley, O
Badge, R
Birch, A
Nuttall, D
Trail, I A
description The MatOrtho proximal interphalangeal replacement is a cementless cobalt-chromium metal-on-polyethylene mobile-bearing surface replacement arthroplasty. The aim of this study is to report the outcome and complications of this implant at a minimum of 2 years follow-up from a single institution. A retrospective case review was performed on all MatOrtho proximal interphalangeal joint replacements performed with a minimum of 2 years follow-up. Patient demographics, diagnosis, implant revision and other surgical interventions were recorded. Subjective and objective outcomes were evaluated at latest follow-up, including pain scores, range of motion, function and radiographic assessment. A total of 109 implants were inserted in 56 patients. Nine implants (six patients) were lost to follow-up. Of the remaining 100 implants, 75 had been undertaken in females. The mean age at time of surgery was 64 years and the principal diagnosis was osteoarthritis in 74%. The mean follow-up was 47 months (range 24-77). Within the group there was a statistically significant diminution in pain. There was also an improvement in functional scores post-operatively. Improvement in range of motion was seen in those joints with a pre-operative range of motion greater than 20°. Radiologically there was no evidence of loosening or of implant subsidence at final follow-up. The revision rate was 13%. Nine joints were revised to the NeuFlex (silicone rubber) prosthesis, three were converted to an arthrodesis and one had exchange of the MatOrtho prosthesis. The survival of the MatOrtho proximal interphalangeal joint arthroplasty was 85% at a minimum of 2-years follow-up. Patients can be advised that the procedure achieves good pain relief, improvement in functional scores and may improve range of motion. We would, however, caution against this implant's use in joints that are either stiff or have significant deformity and/or instability pre-operatively.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/1753193415614251
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1837309448</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1826636724</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c332t-39f5dae334c882d55284c223b33040d57f2a2ac7eccd5d7111af5247017a06463</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkL1PwzAQxS0EoqWwM6GMLAGfzx8JG6r4kgpdYI5cx6GpkjrYiaD_Pa5aGJiYTnfvvdPTj5BzoFcASl2DEgg5chASOBNwQMaMckwly_JDMt7K6VYfkZMQVpSKLAd5TEZMSgTkfExennU_9_3SJZ13X3Wrm6Re99Z3S93o9buN-8rFS6Kjybuu0aHf3CRtva7boU1YurHaJ5VrGveZDt0pOap0E-zZfk7I2_3d6_Qxnc0fnqa3s9Qgsj7FvBKltojcZBkrhWAZN4zhApFyWgpVMc20UdaYUpQKAHQlGFcUlKaSS5yQy93f2PpjsKEv2joY28TO1g2hgAwV0pzz7B_WLQ2pGI9WurMa70Lwtio6H5H4TQG02AIv_gKPkYv992HR2vI38EMYvwFjCHn2</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1826636724</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>MatOrtho proximal interphalangeal joint arthroplasty: minimum 2-year follow-up</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Flannery, O ; Harley, O ; Badge, R ; Birch, A ; Nuttall, D ; Trail, I A</creator><creatorcontrib>Flannery, O ; Harley, O ; Badge, R ; Birch, A ; Nuttall, D ; Trail, I A</creatorcontrib><description>The MatOrtho proximal interphalangeal replacement is a cementless cobalt-chromium metal-on-polyethylene mobile-bearing surface replacement arthroplasty. The aim of this study is to report the outcome and complications of this implant at a minimum of 2 years follow-up from a single institution. A retrospective case review was performed on all MatOrtho proximal interphalangeal joint replacements performed with a minimum of 2 years follow-up. Patient demographics, diagnosis, implant revision and other surgical interventions were recorded. Subjective and objective outcomes were evaluated at latest follow-up, including pain scores, range of motion, function and radiographic assessment. A total of 109 implants were inserted in 56 patients. Nine implants (six patients) were lost to follow-up. Of the remaining 100 implants, 75 had been undertaken in females. The mean age at time of surgery was 64 years and the principal diagnosis was osteoarthritis in 74%. The mean follow-up was 47 months (range 24-77). Within the group there was a statistically significant diminution in pain. There was also an improvement in functional scores post-operatively. Improvement in range of motion was seen in those joints with a pre-operative range of motion greater than 20°. Radiologically there was no evidence of loosening or of implant subsidence at final follow-up. The revision rate was 13%. Nine joints were revised to the NeuFlex (silicone rubber) prosthesis, three were converted to an arthrodesis and one had exchange of the MatOrtho prosthesis. The survival of the MatOrtho proximal interphalangeal joint arthroplasty was 85% at a minimum of 2-years follow-up. Patients can be advised that the procedure achieves good pain relief, improvement in functional scores and may improve range of motion. We would, however, caution against this implant's use in joints that are either stiff or have significant deformity and/or instability pre-operatively.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1753-1934</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2043-6289</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1753193415614251</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26631344</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Arthritis - diagnosis ; Arthritis - physiopathology ; Arthritis - surgery ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Finger ; Female ; Finger Joint ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Joint Prosthesis ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Prosthesis Design ; Range of Motion, Articular ; Retrospective Studies ; Time Factors ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>The Journal of hand surgery, European volume, 2016-11, Vol.41 (9), p.910-916</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c332t-39f5dae334c882d55284c223b33040d57f2a2ac7eccd5d7111af5247017a06463</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c332t-39f5dae334c882d55284c223b33040d57f2a2ac7eccd5d7111af5247017a06463</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26631344$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Flannery, O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harley, O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Badge, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Birch, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nuttall, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trail, I A</creatorcontrib><title>MatOrtho proximal interphalangeal joint arthroplasty: minimum 2-year follow-up</title><title>The Journal of hand surgery, European volume</title><addtitle>J Hand Surg Eur Vol</addtitle><description>The MatOrtho proximal interphalangeal replacement is a cementless cobalt-chromium metal-on-polyethylene mobile-bearing surface replacement arthroplasty. The aim of this study is to report the outcome and complications of this implant at a minimum of 2 years follow-up from a single institution. A retrospective case review was performed on all MatOrtho proximal interphalangeal joint replacements performed with a minimum of 2 years follow-up. Patient demographics, diagnosis, implant revision and other surgical interventions were recorded. Subjective and objective outcomes were evaluated at latest follow-up, including pain scores, range of motion, function and radiographic assessment. A total of 109 implants were inserted in 56 patients. Nine implants (six patients) were lost to follow-up. Of the remaining 100 implants, 75 had been undertaken in females. The mean age at time of surgery was 64 years and the principal diagnosis was osteoarthritis in 74%. The mean follow-up was 47 months (range 24-77). Within the group there was a statistically significant diminution in pain. There was also an improvement in functional scores post-operatively. Improvement in range of motion was seen in those joints with a pre-operative range of motion greater than 20°. Radiologically there was no evidence of loosening or of implant subsidence at final follow-up. The revision rate was 13%. Nine joints were revised to the NeuFlex (silicone rubber) prosthesis, three were converted to an arthrodesis and one had exchange of the MatOrtho prosthesis. The survival of the MatOrtho proximal interphalangeal joint arthroplasty was 85% at a minimum of 2-years follow-up. Patients can be advised that the procedure achieves good pain relief, improvement in functional scores and may improve range of motion. We would, however, caution against this implant's use in joints that are either stiff or have significant deformity and/or instability pre-operatively.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Arthritis - diagnosis</subject><subject>Arthritis - physiopathology</subject><subject>Arthritis - surgery</subject><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Finger</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Finger Joint</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Joint Prosthesis</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Prosthesis Design</subject><subject>Range of Motion, Articular</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>1753-1934</issn><issn>2043-6289</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkL1PwzAQxS0EoqWwM6GMLAGfzx8JG6r4kgpdYI5cx6GpkjrYiaD_Pa5aGJiYTnfvvdPTj5BzoFcASl2DEgg5chASOBNwQMaMckwly_JDMt7K6VYfkZMQVpSKLAd5TEZMSgTkfExennU_9_3SJZ13X3Wrm6Re99Z3S93o9buN-8rFS6Kjybuu0aHf3CRtva7boU1YurHaJ5VrGveZDt0pOap0E-zZfk7I2_3d6_Qxnc0fnqa3s9Qgsj7FvBKltojcZBkrhWAZN4zhApFyWgpVMc20UdaYUpQKAHQlGFcUlKaSS5yQy93f2PpjsKEv2joY28TO1g2hgAwV0pzz7B_WLQ2pGI9WurMa70Lwtio6H5H4TQG02AIv_gKPkYv992HR2vI38EMYvwFjCHn2</recordid><startdate>201611</startdate><enddate>201611</enddate><creator>Flannery, O</creator><creator>Harley, O</creator><creator>Badge, R</creator><creator>Birch, A</creator><creator>Nuttall, D</creator><creator>Trail, I A</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201611</creationdate><title>MatOrtho proximal interphalangeal joint arthroplasty: minimum 2-year follow-up</title><author>Flannery, O ; Harley, O ; Badge, R ; Birch, A ; Nuttall, D ; Trail, I A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c332t-39f5dae334c882d55284c223b33040d57f2a2ac7eccd5d7111af5247017a06463</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Arthritis - diagnosis</topic><topic>Arthritis - physiopathology</topic><topic>Arthritis - surgery</topic><topic>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Finger</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Finger Joint</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Joint Prosthesis</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Prosthesis Design</topic><topic>Range of Motion, Articular</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Flannery, O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harley, O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Badge, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Birch, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nuttall, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trail, I A</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>The Journal of hand surgery, European volume</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Flannery, O</au><au>Harley, O</au><au>Badge, R</au><au>Birch, A</au><au>Nuttall, D</au><au>Trail, I A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>MatOrtho proximal interphalangeal joint arthroplasty: minimum 2-year follow-up</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of hand surgery, European volume</jtitle><addtitle>J Hand Surg Eur Vol</addtitle><date>2016-11</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>910</spage><epage>916</epage><pages>910-916</pages><issn>1753-1934</issn><eissn>2043-6289</eissn><abstract>The MatOrtho proximal interphalangeal replacement is a cementless cobalt-chromium metal-on-polyethylene mobile-bearing surface replacement arthroplasty. The aim of this study is to report the outcome and complications of this implant at a minimum of 2 years follow-up from a single institution. A retrospective case review was performed on all MatOrtho proximal interphalangeal joint replacements performed with a minimum of 2 years follow-up. Patient demographics, diagnosis, implant revision and other surgical interventions were recorded. Subjective and objective outcomes were evaluated at latest follow-up, including pain scores, range of motion, function and radiographic assessment. A total of 109 implants were inserted in 56 patients. Nine implants (six patients) were lost to follow-up. Of the remaining 100 implants, 75 had been undertaken in females. The mean age at time of surgery was 64 years and the principal diagnosis was osteoarthritis in 74%. The mean follow-up was 47 months (range 24-77). Within the group there was a statistically significant diminution in pain. There was also an improvement in functional scores post-operatively. Improvement in range of motion was seen in those joints with a pre-operative range of motion greater than 20°. Radiologically there was no evidence of loosening or of implant subsidence at final follow-up. The revision rate was 13%. Nine joints were revised to the NeuFlex (silicone rubber) prosthesis, three were converted to an arthrodesis and one had exchange of the MatOrtho prosthesis. The survival of the MatOrtho proximal interphalangeal joint arthroplasty was 85% at a minimum of 2-years follow-up. Patients can be advised that the procedure achieves good pain relief, improvement in functional scores and may improve range of motion. We would, however, caution against this implant's use in joints that are either stiff or have significant deformity and/or instability pre-operatively.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pmid>26631344</pmid><doi>10.1177/1753193415614251</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1753-1934
ispartof The Journal of hand surgery, European volume, 2016-11, Vol.41 (9), p.910-916
issn 1753-1934
2043-6289
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1837309448
source MEDLINE; SAGE Complete A-Z List; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Adult
Aged
Arthritis - diagnosis
Arthritis - physiopathology
Arthritis - surgery
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Finger
Female
Finger Joint
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Joint Prosthesis
Male
Middle Aged
Prosthesis Design
Range of Motion, Articular
Retrospective Studies
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
title MatOrtho proximal interphalangeal joint arthroplasty: minimum 2-year follow-up
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T13%3A42%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=MatOrtho%20proximal%20interphalangeal%20joint%20arthroplasty:%20minimum%202-year%20follow-up&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20hand%20surgery,%20European%20volume&rft.au=Flannery,%20O&rft.date=2016-11&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=910&rft.epage=916&rft.pages=910-916&rft.issn=1753-1934&rft.eissn=2043-6289&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1753193415614251&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1826636724%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1826636724&rft_id=info:pmid/26631344&rfr_iscdi=true