Reliability of the radiographic variables in the International Spinal Cord Injury Spinal Column Injury Basic Data Set compared with the AO classification
Study design: Intra- and interrater reliability study for radiological variables of the International Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) Spinal Column Injury Basic Data Set. Objectives: To test reliability of the radiological variables in the International SCI Spinal Column Injury Basic Data Set and compare i...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Spinal cord 2016-10, Vol.54 (10), p.884-888 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 888 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 10 |
| container_start_page | 884 |
| container_title | Spinal cord |
| container_volume | 54 |
| creator | Lucantoni, C Krishnan, R G Gehrchen, M Hallager, D W Biering-Sørensen, F Dahl, B |
| description | Study design:
Intra- and interrater reliability study for radiological variables of the International Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) Spinal Column Injury Basic Data Set.
Objectives:
To test reliability of the radiological variables in the International SCI Spinal Column Injury Basic Data Set and compare it with the Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen (AO) classification.
Setting:
The database of Eastern Denmark Regional SCI Referral Center, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Methods:
Ratings of the International SCI Spinal Column Injury Basic Data Set radiological variables and AO classification were obtained by two international observers for all the surgically treated spine trauma patients between 1st October 2010 and 31st December 2012 at the Spine Unit, Rigshospitalet, Denmark. Statistical analyses for intra- and interrater crude agreement and Cohen’s unweighted kappa (
κ
) coefficients were performed.
Results:
For 283 spine injuries, the intra- and interrater reliability for the individual radiological variables of the International SCI Spinal Column Injury Basic Data Set was at least substantial (
κ
=0.67–0.97 for interrater,
κ
=0.79–0.89 for the intrarater agreement). For the AO classification, intrarater reliability was moderate-to-substantial (
κ
=0.57–0.75), whereas interrater reliability was substantial (
κ
=0.67–0.69). The crude intra- and interrater agreement for a combined radiographic SCI Spinal Column Injury Basic Data Set variable showed no significant difference compared with the AO classification (
P
=0.067–0.895).
Conclusions:
The reliability of International SCI Spinal Column Injury Basic Data Set radiological variables is comparable to the AO classification system. We encourage its use for spinal column injury description, thus facilitating data collection and comparison between centres and countries. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1038/sc.2016.6 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1837308719</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4206992651</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-c500894c9cd73dfc4f5dc029e1112a3fbfedd27e00a730dbb4aae22be002a4653</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkctu1DAUhq2qiJbCoi9QWeoGkDL4kjjOsgy3SpUqUVhHJ7bT8ciJU9sBzaPwtnhmWkB009Wxzv_5s-QfoVNKFpRw-S6qBSNULMQBOqZlLYpKsPIwn7lgRckbfoRexLgmhDS0kc_RERNSslLWx-jXV-MsdNbZtMG-x2llcABt_W2AaWUV_gEh585EbMddejkmE0ZI1o_g8M1kt2Ppg87Jeg6bvys3D-PD8j3ELPsACfCNSVj5YYJgNP5p02qnvbjGykGMtrdqJ3-JnvXgonl1P0_Q908fvy2_FFfXny-XF1eF4pKmQlWEyKZUjdI1170q-0orwhpDKWXA-643WrPaEAI1J7rrSgDDWJcXDEpR8RP0eu-dgr-bTUztYKMyzsFo_BxbKnm-KGvaPAFlQlSsYlv0_D907ef8bW5PVZRLQTL1Zk-p4GMMpm-nYAcIm5aSdlttG1W7rbYVmT27N87dYPQf8qHLDLzdAzFH460J_zz5yPYb8e-uIA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1826513860</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Reliability of the radiographic variables in the International Spinal Cord Injury Spinal Column Injury Basic Data Set compared with the AO classification</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Lucantoni, C ; Krishnan, R G ; Gehrchen, M ; Hallager, D W ; Biering-Sørensen, F ; Dahl, B</creator><creatorcontrib>Lucantoni, C ; Krishnan, R G ; Gehrchen, M ; Hallager, D W ; Biering-Sørensen, F ; Dahl, B</creatorcontrib><description>Study design:
Intra- and interrater reliability study for radiological variables of the International Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) Spinal Column Injury Basic Data Set.
Objectives:
To test reliability of the radiological variables in the International SCI Spinal Column Injury Basic Data Set and compare it with the Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen (AO) classification.
Setting:
The database of Eastern Denmark Regional SCI Referral Center, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Methods:
Ratings of the International SCI Spinal Column Injury Basic Data Set radiological variables and AO classification were obtained by two international observers for all the surgically treated spine trauma patients between 1st October 2010 and 31st December 2012 at the Spine Unit, Rigshospitalet, Denmark. Statistical analyses for intra- and interrater crude agreement and Cohen’s unweighted kappa (
κ
) coefficients were performed.
Results:
For 283 spine injuries, the intra- and interrater reliability for the individual radiological variables of the International SCI Spinal Column Injury Basic Data Set was at least substantial (
κ
=0.67–0.97 for interrater,
κ
=0.79–0.89 for the intrarater agreement). For the AO classification, intrarater reliability was moderate-to-substantial (
κ
=0.57–0.75), whereas interrater reliability was substantial (
κ
=0.67–0.69). The crude intra- and interrater agreement for a combined radiographic SCI Spinal Column Injury Basic Data Set variable showed no significant difference compared with the AO classification (
P
=0.067–0.895).
Conclusions:
The reliability of International SCI Spinal Column Injury Basic Data Set radiological variables is comparable to the AO classification system. We encourage its use for spinal column injury description, thus facilitating data collection and comparison between centres and countries.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1362-4393</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1476-5624</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1038/sc.2016.6</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26882487</identifier><identifier>CODEN: SPCOFM</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Nature Publishing Group UK</publisher><subject>692/699/578 ; Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Anatomy ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Biomedicine ; Child ; Databases, Factual ; Denmark ; Female ; Human Physiology ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Neurochemistry ; Neuropsychology ; Neurosciences ; original-article ; Radiography ; Reproducibility of Results ; Retrospective Studies ; Severity of Illness Index ; Spinal Cord Injuries - classification ; Spinal Cord Injuries - diagnostic imaging ; Spinal Cord Injuries - pathology ; Spine - diagnostic imaging ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Spinal cord, 2016-10, Vol.54 (10), p.884-888</ispartof><rights>International Spinal Cord Society 2016</rights><rights>Copyright Nature Publishing Group Oct 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-c500894c9cd73dfc4f5dc029e1112a3fbfedd27e00a730dbb4aae22be002a4653</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-c500894c9cd73dfc4f5dc029e1112a3fbfedd27e00a730dbb4aae22be002a4653</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1038/sc.2016.6$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1038/sc.2016.6$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26882487$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lucantoni, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krishnan, R G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gehrchen, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hallager, D W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Biering-Sørensen, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dahl, B</creatorcontrib><title>Reliability of the radiographic variables in the International Spinal Cord Injury Spinal Column Injury Basic Data Set compared with the AO classification</title><title>Spinal cord</title><addtitle>Spinal Cord</addtitle><addtitle>Spinal Cord</addtitle><description>Study design:
Intra- and interrater reliability study for radiological variables of the International Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) Spinal Column Injury Basic Data Set.
Objectives:
To test reliability of the radiological variables in the International SCI Spinal Column Injury Basic Data Set and compare it with the Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen (AO) classification.
Setting:
The database of Eastern Denmark Regional SCI Referral Center, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Methods:
Ratings of the International SCI Spinal Column Injury Basic Data Set radiological variables and AO classification were obtained by two international observers for all the surgically treated spine trauma patients between 1st October 2010 and 31st December 2012 at the Spine Unit, Rigshospitalet, Denmark. Statistical analyses for intra- and interrater crude agreement and Cohen’s unweighted kappa (
κ
) coefficients were performed.
Results:
For 283 spine injuries, the intra- and interrater reliability for the individual radiological variables of the International SCI Spinal Column Injury Basic Data Set was at least substantial (
κ
=0.67–0.97 for interrater,
κ
=0.79–0.89 for the intrarater agreement). For the AO classification, intrarater reliability was moderate-to-substantial (
κ
=0.57–0.75), whereas interrater reliability was substantial (
κ
=0.67–0.69). The crude intra- and interrater agreement for a combined radiographic SCI Spinal Column Injury Basic Data Set variable showed no significant difference compared with the AO classification (
P
=0.067–0.895).
Conclusions:
The reliability of International SCI Spinal Column Injury Basic Data Set radiological variables is comparable to the AO classification system. We encourage its use for spinal column injury description, thus facilitating data collection and comparison between centres and countries.</description><subject>692/699/578</subject><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Anatomy</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Biomedicine</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Databases, Factual</subject><subject>Denmark</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Human Physiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neurochemistry</subject><subject>Neuropsychology</subject><subject>Neurosciences</subject><subject>original-article</subject><subject>Radiography</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Severity of Illness Index</subject><subject>Spinal Cord Injuries - classification</subject><subject>Spinal Cord Injuries - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Spinal Cord Injuries - pathology</subject><subject>Spine - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1362-4393</issn><issn>1476-5624</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkctu1DAUhq2qiJbCoi9QWeoGkDL4kjjOsgy3SpUqUVhHJ7bT8ciJU9sBzaPwtnhmWkB009Wxzv_5s-QfoVNKFpRw-S6qBSNULMQBOqZlLYpKsPIwn7lgRckbfoRexLgmhDS0kc_RERNSslLWx-jXV-MsdNbZtMG-x2llcABt_W2AaWUV_gEh585EbMddejkmE0ZI1o_g8M1kt2Ppg87Jeg6bvys3D-PD8j3ELPsACfCNSVj5YYJgNP5p02qnvbjGykGMtrdqJ3-JnvXgonl1P0_Q908fvy2_FFfXny-XF1eF4pKmQlWEyKZUjdI1170q-0orwhpDKWXA-643WrPaEAI1J7rrSgDDWJcXDEpR8RP0eu-dgr-bTUztYKMyzsFo_BxbKnm-KGvaPAFlQlSsYlv0_D907ef8bW5PVZRLQTL1Zk-p4GMMpm-nYAcIm5aSdlttG1W7rbYVmT27N87dYPQf8qHLDLzdAzFH460J_zz5yPYb8e-uIA</recordid><startdate>20161001</startdate><enddate>20161001</enddate><creator>Lucantoni, C</creator><creator>Krishnan, R G</creator><creator>Gehrchen, M</creator><creator>Hallager, D W</creator><creator>Biering-Sørensen, F</creator><creator>Dahl, B</creator><general>Nature Publishing Group UK</general><general>Nature Publishing Group</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20161001</creationdate><title>Reliability of the radiographic variables in the International Spinal Cord Injury Spinal Column Injury Basic Data Set compared with the AO classification</title><author>Lucantoni, C ; Krishnan, R G ; Gehrchen, M ; Hallager, D W ; Biering-Sørensen, F ; Dahl, B</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-c500894c9cd73dfc4f5dc029e1112a3fbfedd27e00a730dbb4aae22be002a4653</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>692/699/578</topic><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Anatomy</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Biomedicine</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Databases, Factual</topic><topic>Denmark</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Human Physiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neurochemistry</topic><topic>Neuropsychology</topic><topic>Neurosciences</topic><topic>original-article</topic><topic>Radiography</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Severity of Illness Index</topic><topic>Spinal Cord Injuries - classification</topic><topic>Spinal Cord Injuries - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Spinal Cord Injuries - pathology</topic><topic>Spine - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lucantoni, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krishnan, R G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gehrchen, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hallager, D W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Biering-Sørensen, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dahl, B</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Spinal cord</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lucantoni, C</au><au>Krishnan, R G</au><au>Gehrchen, M</au><au>Hallager, D W</au><au>Biering-Sørensen, F</au><au>Dahl, B</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Reliability of the radiographic variables in the International Spinal Cord Injury Spinal Column Injury Basic Data Set compared with the AO classification</atitle><jtitle>Spinal cord</jtitle><stitle>Spinal Cord</stitle><addtitle>Spinal Cord</addtitle><date>2016-10-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>54</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>884</spage><epage>888</epage><pages>884-888</pages><issn>1362-4393</issn><eissn>1476-5624</eissn><coden>SPCOFM</coden><abstract>Study design:
Intra- and interrater reliability study for radiological variables of the International Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) Spinal Column Injury Basic Data Set.
Objectives:
To test reliability of the radiological variables in the International SCI Spinal Column Injury Basic Data Set and compare it with the Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen (AO) classification.
Setting:
The database of Eastern Denmark Regional SCI Referral Center, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Methods:
Ratings of the International SCI Spinal Column Injury Basic Data Set radiological variables and AO classification were obtained by two international observers for all the surgically treated spine trauma patients between 1st October 2010 and 31st December 2012 at the Spine Unit, Rigshospitalet, Denmark. Statistical analyses for intra- and interrater crude agreement and Cohen’s unweighted kappa (
κ
) coefficients were performed.
Results:
For 283 spine injuries, the intra- and interrater reliability for the individual radiological variables of the International SCI Spinal Column Injury Basic Data Set was at least substantial (
κ
=0.67–0.97 for interrater,
κ
=0.79–0.89 for the intrarater agreement). For the AO classification, intrarater reliability was moderate-to-substantial (
κ
=0.57–0.75), whereas interrater reliability was substantial (
κ
=0.67–0.69). The crude intra- and interrater agreement for a combined radiographic SCI Spinal Column Injury Basic Data Set variable showed no significant difference compared with the AO classification (
P
=0.067–0.895).
Conclusions:
The reliability of International SCI Spinal Column Injury Basic Data Set radiological variables is comparable to the AO classification system. We encourage its use for spinal column injury description, thus facilitating data collection and comparison between centres and countries.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Nature Publishing Group UK</pub><pmid>26882487</pmid><doi>10.1038/sc.2016.6</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1362-4393 |
| ispartof | Spinal cord, 2016-10, Vol.54 (10), p.884-888 |
| issn | 1362-4393 1476-5624 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1837308719 |
| source | MEDLINE; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals |
| subjects | 692/699/578 Adolescent Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Anatomy Biomedical and Life Sciences Biomedicine Child Databases, Factual Denmark Female Human Physiology Humans Male Middle Aged Neurochemistry Neuropsychology Neurosciences original-article Radiography Reproducibility of Results Retrospective Studies Severity of Illness Index Spinal Cord Injuries - classification Spinal Cord Injuries - diagnostic imaging Spinal Cord Injuries - pathology Spine - diagnostic imaging Young Adult |
| title | Reliability of the radiographic variables in the International Spinal Cord Injury Spinal Column Injury Basic Data Set compared with the AO classification |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T01%3A32%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Reliability%20of%20the%20radiographic%20variables%20in%20the%20International%20Spinal%20Cord%20Injury%20Spinal%20Column%20Injury%20Basic%20Data%20Set%20compared%20with%20the%20AO%20classification&rft.jtitle=Spinal%20cord&rft.au=Lucantoni,%20C&rft.date=2016-10-01&rft.volume=54&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=884&rft.epage=888&rft.pages=884-888&rft.issn=1362-4393&rft.eissn=1476-5624&rft.coden=SPCOFM&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038/sc.2016.6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4206992651%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1826513860&rft_id=info:pmid/26882487&rfr_iscdi=true |