The American Board of Surgery Examinations: How are the Southwestern Surgical Congress Programs Performing Compared to the Rest of the United States?

Abstract Background Our aim was to study pass rates of the American Board of Surgery (ABS) examinations for examinees from programs in the Southwestern Surgical Congress (SWSC) compared to the rest of the United States (Non-SWSC). Methods A retrospective review of pass rates of ABS Qualifying Examin...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The American journal of surgery 2016-12, Vol.212 (6), p.1243-1247
Hauptverfasser: Al Fayyadh, Mohammed J., MD, Rawlings, Jeremy A., BS, Willis, Ross E., PhD, Falcone, John L., MD MS FACS, Stewart, Ronald M., MD FACS, Dent, Daniel L., MD FACS
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1247
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1243
container_title The American journal of surgery
container_volume 212
creator Al Fayyadh, Mohammed J., MD
Rawlings, Jeremy A., BS
Willis, Ross E., PhD
Falcone, John L., MD MS FACS
Stewart, Ronald M., MD FACS
Dent, Daniel L., MD FACS
description Abstract Background Our aim was to study pass rates of the American Board of Surgery (ABS) examinations for examinees from programs in the Southwestern Surgical Congress (SWSC) compared to the rest of the United States (Non-SWSC). Methods A retrospective review of pass rates of ABS Qualifying Examination (QE), Certifying Examination (CE) and QE/CE index from 2005-2015 was conducted. Results From 2005-2010, SWSC outperformed Non-SWSC in QE (88% vs 85%, p
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2016.08.023
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1837029859</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0002961016305712</els_id><sourcerecordid>4273598331</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-8e9828cb7577200643ee15b5705cbc8abf6c2cab190cbf15a177942277723b223</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFks1u1DAUhSMEokPhEUCW2LBJ8E8SOyyoyqhQpEogpl1bjnMzdZjEUzuhnQfp-3LTGUDqhpWv5e-ca_vcJHnNaMYoK993mem7OIV1xnGbUZVRLp4kC6ZklTKlxNNkQSnlaVUyepS8iLHDLWO5eJ4ccamYVLxYJPeX10BOewjOmoF88iY0xLdkhcYQduTszvRuMKPzQ_xAzv0tMQHIiJqVn8brW4gjhOEBR4MNWfphHSBG8j34dTA9FhBaH9BkjYf9FuUNGf2DxQ9Uz83m-mpwI56sRjNCPHmZPGvNJsKrw3qcXH0-u1yepxffvnxdnl6kNs_VmCqoFFe2loWUnNIyFwCsqAtJC1tbZeq2tNyamlXU1i0rDJOyyjmXiIuac3GcvNv7boO_mfA6unfRwmZjBvBT1EwJSXmligrRt4_Qzk9hwNshlctcVEqUSBV7ygYfY4BWb4PrTdhpRvWcm-70ITc956ap0pgb6t4c3Ke6h-av6k9QCJzsAcDv-OUg6GgdDBYaF8COuvHuvy0-PnKwGzfMqf2EHcR_r9GRa6pX8_DMs8NKQQvJuPgN9L3BRw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1847439836</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The American Board of Surgery Examinations: How are the Southwestern Surgical Congress Programs Performing Compared to the Rest of the United States?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Al Fayyadh, Mohammed J., MD ; Rawlings, Jeremy A., BS ; Willis, Ross E., PhD ; Falcone, John L., MD MS FACS ; Stewart, Ronald M., MD FACS ; Dent, Daniel L., MD FACS</creator><creatorcontrib>Al Fayyadh, Mohammed J., MD ; Rawlings, Jeremy A., BS ; Willis, Ross E., PhD ; Falcone, John L., MD MS FACS ; Stewart, Ronald M., MD FACS ; Dent, Daniel L., MD FACS</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Background Our aim was to study pass rates of the American Board of Surgery (ABS) examinations for examinees from programs in the Southwestern Surgical Congress (SWSC) compared to the rest of the United States (Non-SWSC). Methods A retrospective review of pass rates of ABS Qualifying Examination (QE), Certifying Examination (CE) and QE/CE index from 2005-2015 was conducted. Results From 2005-2010, SWSC outperformed Non-SWSC in QE (88% vs 85%, p&lt;0.02), CE (86% vs 82%, p&lt;0.01) and QE/CE (77% vs 72%, p&lt;0.01). From 2010-2015, SWSC outperformed Non-SWSC in QE (91% vs 86%, p&lt;0.01) and QE/CE (77% vs 71%, p&lt;0.01), but did not achieve statistical significance in CE (83% vs 81%, p=0.09). Conclusions SWSC programs outperformed Non-SWSC across QE and CE in the early period, but only on QE in the late period. We encourage SWSC states and regional surgical societies to evaluate performance on ABS examinations and collaborate to improve surgical training.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9610</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1883</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2016.08.023</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27817825</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Accountability ; Accreditation ; American Board of Surgery ; Board certification ; Certification ; Certifying Examination ; Collaboration ; Education ; Educational Measurement ; General Surgery - education ; Humans ; Physicians ; Qualifying Examination ; Quality ; Retrospective Studies ; Software ; Specialty Boards ; Surgery ; Surgical education ; Trends ; United States</subject><ispartof>The American journal of surgery, 2016-12, Vol.212 (6), p.1243-1247</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2016 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited Dec 01, 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-8e9828cb7577200643ee15b5705cbc8abf6c2cab190cbf15a177942277723b223</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-8e9828cb7577200643ee15b5705cbc8abf6c2cab190cbf15a177942277723b223</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002961016305712$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27817825$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Al Fayyadh, Mohammed J., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rawlings, Jeremy A., BS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Willis, Ross E., PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Falcone, John L., MD MS FACS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stewart, Ronald M., MD FACS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dent, Daniel L., MD FACS</creatorcontrib><title>The American Board of Surgery Examinations: How are the Southwestern Surgical Congress Programs Performing Compared to the Rest of the United States?</title><title>The American journal of surgery</title><addtitle>Am J Surg</addtitle><description>Abstract Background Our aim was to study pass rates of the American Board of Surgery (ABS) examinations for examinees from programs in the Southwestern Surgical Congress (SWSC) compared to the rest of the United States (Non-SWSC). Methods A retrospective review of pass rates of ABS Qualifying Examination (QE), Certifying Examination (CE) and QE/CE index from 2005-2015 was conducted. Results From 2005-2010, SWSC outperformed Non-SWSC in QE (88% vs 85%, p&lt;0.02), CE (86% vs 82%, p&lt;0.01) and QE/CE (77% vs 72%, p&lt;0.01). From 2010-2015, SWSC outperformed Non-SWSC in QE (91% vs 86%, p&lt;0.01) and QE/CE (77% vs 71%, p&lt;0.01), but did not achieve statistical significance in CE (83% vs 81%, p=0.09). Conclusions SWSC programs outperformed Non-SWSC across QE and CE in the early period, but only on QE in the late period. We encourage SWSC states and regional surgical societies to evaluate performance on ABS examinations and collaborate to improve surgical training.</description><subject>Accountability</subject><subject>Accreditation</subject><subject>American Board of Surgery</subject><subject>Board certification</subject><subject>Certification</subject><subject>Certifying Examination</subject><subject>Collaboration</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Educational Measurement</subject><subject>General Surgery - education</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Physicians</subject><subject>Qualifying Examination</subject><subject>Quality</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Software</subject><subject>Specialty Boards</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surgical education</subject><subject>Trends</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>0002-9610</issn><issn>1879-1883</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFks1u1DAUhSMEokPhEUCW2LBJ8E8SOyyoyqhQpEogpl1bjnMzdZjEUzuhnQfp-3LTGUDqhpWv5e-ca_vcJHnNaMYoK993mem7OIV1xnGbUZVRLp4kC6ZklTKlxNNkQSnlaVUyepS8iLHDLWO5eJ4ccamYVLxYJPeX10BOewjOmoF88iY0xLdkhcYQduTszvRuMKPzQ_xAzv0tMQHIiJqVn8brW4gjhOEBR4MNWfphHSBG8j34dTA9FhBaH9BkjYf9FuUNGf2DxQ9Uz83m-mpwI56sRjNCPHmZPGvNJsKrw3qcXH0-u1yepxffvnxdnl6kNs_VmCqoFFe2loWUnNIyFwCsqAtJC1tbZeq2tNyamlXU1i0rDJOyyjmXiIuac3GcvNv7boO_mfA6unfRwmZjBvBT1EwJSXmligrRt4_Qzk9hwNshlctcVEqUSBV7ygYfY4BWb4PrTdhpRvWcm-70ITc956ap0pgb6t4c3Ke6h-av6k9QCJzsAcDv-OUg6GgdDBYaF8COuvHuvy0-PnKwGzfMqf2EHcR_r9GRa6pX8_DMs8NKQQvJuPgN9L3BRw</recordid><startdate>20161201</startdate><enddate>20161201</enddate><creator>Al Fayyadh, Mohammed J., MD</creator><creator>Rawlings, Jeremy A., BS</creator><creator>Willis, Ross E., PhD</creator><creator>Falcone, John L., MD MS FACS</creator><creator>Stewart, Ronald M., MD FACS</creator><creator>Dent, Daniel L., MD FACS</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20161201</creationdate><title>The American Board of Surgery Examinations: How are the Southwestern Surgical Congress Programs Performing Compared to the Rest of the United States?</title><author>Al Fayyadh, Mohammed J., MD ; Rawlings, Jeremy A., BS ; Willis, Ross E., PhD ; Falcone, John L., MD MS FACS ; Stewart, Ronald M., MD FACS ; Dent, Daniel L., MD FACS</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-8e9828cb7577200643ee15b5705cbc8abf6c2cab190cbf15a177942277723b223</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Accountability</topic><topic>Accreditation</topic><topic>American Board of Surgery</topic><topic>Board certification</topic><topic>Certification</topic><topic>Certifying Examination</topic><topic>Collaboration</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Educational Measurement</topic><topic>General Surgery - education</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Physicians</topic><topic>Qualifying Examination</topic><topic>Quality</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Software</topic><topic>Specialty Boards</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surgical education</topic><topic>Trends</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Al Fayyadh, Mohammed J., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rawlings, Jeremy A., BS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Willis, Ross E., PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Falcone, John L., MD MS FACS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stewart, Ronald M., MD FACS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dent, Daniel L., MD FACS</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The American journal of surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Al Fayyadh, Mohammed J., MD</au><au>Rawlings, Jeremy A., BS</au><au>Willis, Ross E., PhD</au><au>Falcone, John L., MD MS FACS</au><au>Stewart, Ronald M., MD FACS</au><au>Dent, Daniel L., MD FACS</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The American Board of Surgery Examinations: How are the Southwestern Surgical Congress Programs Performing Compared to the Rest of the United States?</atitle><jtitle>The American journal of surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Surg</addtitle><date>2016-12-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>212</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1243</spage><epage>1247</epage><pages>1243-1247</pages><issn>0002-9610</issn><eissn>1879-1883</eissn><abstract>Abstract Background Our aim was to study pass rates of the American Board of Surgery (ABS) examinations for examinees from programs in the Southwestern Surgical Congress (SWSC) compared to the rest of the United States (Non-SWSC). Methods A retrospective review of pass rates of ABS Qualifying Examination (QE), Certifying Examination (CE) and QE/CE index from 2005-2015 was conducted. Results From 2005-2010, SWSC outperformed Non-SWSC in QE (88% vs 85%, p&lt;0.02), CE (86% vs 82%, p&lt;0.01) and QE/CE (77% vs 72%, p&lt;0.01). From 2010-2015, SWSC outperformed Non-SWSC in QE (91% vs 86%, p&lt;0.01) and QE/CE (77% vs 71%, p&lt;0.01), but did not achieve statistical significance in CE (83% vs 81%, p=0.09). Conclusions SWSC programs outperformed Non-SWSC across QE and CE in the early period, but only on QE in the late period. We encourage SWSC states and regional surgical societies to evaluate performance on ABS examinations and collaborate to improve surgical training.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>27817825</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.amjsurg.2016.08.023</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0002-9610
ispartof The American journal of surgery, 2016-12, Vol.212 (6), p.1243-1247
issn 0002-9610
1879-1883
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1837029859
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Accountability
Accreditation
American Board of Surgery
Board certification
Certification
Certifying Examination
Collaboration
Education
Educational Measurement
General Surgery - education
Humans
Physicians
Qualifying Examination
Quality
Retrospective Studies
Software
Specialty Boards
Surgery
Surgical education
Trends
United States
title The American Board of Surgery Examinations: How are the Southwestern Surgical Congress Programs Performing Compared to the Rest of the United States?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T15%3A30%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20American%20Board%20of%20Surgery%20Examinations:%20How%20are%20the%20Southwestern%20Surgical%20Congress%20Programs%20Performing%20Compared%20to%20the%20Rest%20of%20the%20United%20States?&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20journal%20of%20surgery&rft.au=Al%20Fayyadh,%20Mohammed%20J.,%20MD&rft.date=2016-12-01&rft.volume=212&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1243&rft.epage=1247&rft.pages=1243-1247&rft.issn=0002-9610&rft.eissn=1879-1883&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2016.08.023&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4273598331%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1847439836&rft_id=info:pmid/27817825&rft_els_id=S0002961016305712&rfr_iscdi=true