Predictions of sediment toxicity using consensus-based freshwater sediment quality guidelines
The objectives of this study were to compare approaches for evaluating the combined effects of chemical mixtures on the toxicity in field-collected sediments and to evaluate the ability of consensus-based probable effect concentrations (PECs) to predict toxicity in a freshwater database on both a na...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Archives of environmental contamination and toxicology 2001-05, Vol.41 (1), p.8-21 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 21 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 8 |
container_title | Archives of environmental contamination and toxicology |
container_volume | 41 |
creator | INGERSOLL, C. G MACDONALD, D. D WANG, N CRANE, J. L FIELD, L. J HAVERLAND, P. S KEMBLE, N. E LINDSKOOG, R. A SEVERN, C SMORONG, D. E |
description | The objectives of this study were to compare approaches for evaluating the combined effects of chemical mixtures on the toxicity in field-collected sediments and to evaluate the ability of consensus-based probable effect concentrations (PECs) to predict toxicity in a freshwater database on both a national and regional geographic basis. A database was developed from 92 published reports, which included a total of 1,657 samples with high-quality matching sediment toxicity and chemistry data from across North America. The database was comprised primarily of 10- to 14-day or 28- to 42-day toxicity tests with the amphipod Hyalella azteca (designated as the HA10 or HA28 tests) and 10- to 14-day toxicity tests with the midges Chironomus tentans or C. riparius (designated as the CS10 test). Mean PEC quotients were calculated to provide an overall measure of chemical contamination and to support an evaluation of the combined effects of multiple contaminants in sediments. There was an overall increase in the incidence of toxicity with an increase in the mean quotients in all three tests. A consistent increase in the toxicity in all three tests occurred at a mean quotient > 0.5, however, the overall incidence of toxicity was greater in the HA28 test compared to the short-term tests. The longer-term tests, in which survival and growth are measured, tend to be more sensitive than the shorter-term tests, with acute to chronic ratios on the order of six indicated for H. azteca. Different patterns were observed among the various procedures used to calculate mean quotients. For example, in the HA28 test, a relatively abrupt increase in toxicity was associated with elevated polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) alone or with elevated polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) alone, compared to the pattern of a gradual increase in toxicity observed with quotients calculated using a combination of metals, PAHs, and PCBs. These analyses indicate that the different patterns in toxicity may be the result of unique chemical signals associated with individual contaminants in samples. Though mean quotients can be used to classify samples as toxic or nontoxic, individual quotients might be useful in helping identify substances that may be causing or substantially contributing to the observed toxicity. An increase in the incidence of toxicity was observed with increasing mean quotients within most of the regions, basins, and areas in North America for all three toxicity tests. The results o |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s002440010216 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18364941</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>309867333</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a563t-6dd01cd27b1af01ebdea6e6f258ae85b939930225db3df0ad21c845f829da3b93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0U1rFTEUBuAgir1Wl25lQCluRs_J1yTLUqwKBbvQpQyZfNSUuTNtzgzaf2_aXqh2UV2FcJ7zBvIy9hLhHQJ07wmASwmAwFE_YhuUgrfQgXjMNgAWWikk7rFnROcVcWPkU7aHKIxSRm_Y99MSQ_ZLnidq5tRQvW3jtDTL_Cv7vFw1K-XprPF1HidaqR1cNU0qkX78dEssdyuXqxuvN87WHOKYp0jP2ZPkRoovduc--3b84evRp_bky8fPR4cnrVNaLK0OAdAH3g3oEmAcQnQ66sSVcdGowQprBXCuwiBCAhc4eiNVMtwGJ-p4nx3c5l6U-XKNtPTbTD6Oo5vivFKPRmhpJVb49mHYWTRGo5X_ztRotDX_8bhUBkB1Fb6-B8_ntUz1Y3pU2EkF-ka1t8qXmajE1F-UvHXlqkforyvv_6q8-le71HXYxnCndx1X8GYHHHk3puImn-mPVG0V1-I3j8GzOw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1517450657</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Predictions of sediment toxicity using consensus-based freshwater sediment quality guidelines</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>INGERSOLL, C. G ; MACDONALD, D. D ; WANG, N ; CRANE, J. L ; FIELD, L. J ; HAVERLAND, P. S ; KEMBLE, N. E ; LINDSKOOG, R. A ; SEVERN, C ; SMORONG, D. E</creator><creatorcontrib>INGERSOLL, C. G ; MACDONALD, D. D ; WANG, N ; CRANE, J. L ; FIELD, L. J ; HAVERLAND, P. S ; KEMBLE, N. E ; LINDSKOOG, R. A ; SEVERN, C ; SMORONG, D. E</creatorcontrib><description>The objectives of this study were to compare approaches for evaluating the combined effects of chemical mixtures on the toxicity in field-collected sediments and to evaluate the ability of consensus-based probable effect concentrations (PECs) to predict toxicity in a freshwater database on both a national and regional geographic basis. A database was developed from 92 published reports, which included a total of 1,657 samples with high-quality matching sediment toxicity and chemistry data from across North America. The database was comprised primarily of 10- to 14-day or 28- to 42-day toxicity tests with the amphipod Hyalella azteca (designated as the HA10 or HA28 tests) and 10- to 14-day toxicity tests with the midges Chironomus tentans or C. riparius (designated as the CS10 test). Mean PEC quotients were calculated to provide an overall measure of chemical contamination and to support an evaluation of the combined effects of multiple contaminants in sediments. There was an overall increase in the incidence of toxicity with an increase in the mean quotients in all three tests. A consistent increase in the toxicity in all three tests occurred at a mean quotient > 0.5, however, the overall incidence of toxicity was greater in the HA28 test compared to the short-term tests. The longer-term tests, in which survival and growth are measured, tend to be more sensitive than the shorter-term tests, with acute to chronic ratios on the order of six indicated for H. azteca. Different patterns were observed among the various procedures used to calculate mean quotients. For example, in the HA28 test, a relatively abrupt increase in toxicity was associated with elevated polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) alone or with elevated polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) alone, compared to the pattern of a gradual increase in toxicity observed with quotients calculated using a combination of metals, PAHs, and PCBs. These analyses indicate that the different patterns in toxicity may be the result of unique chemical signals associated with individual contaminants in samples. Though mean quotients can be used to classify samples as toxic or nontoxic, individual quotients might be useful in helping identify substances that may be causing or substantially contributing to the observed toxicity. An increase in the incidence of toxicity was observed with increasing mean quotients within most of the regions, basins, and areas in North America for all three toxicity tests. The results of these analyses indicate that the consensus-based PECs can be used to reliably predict toxicity of sediments on both a regional and national basis.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0090-4341</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-0703</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s002440010216</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11385586</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AECTCV</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Animals ; Applied ecology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Chemical contaminants ; Chemical contamination ; Chemical pollution ; Chironomidae ; Chironomus riparius ; Chironomus tentans ; Contaminants ; Crustacea ; Databases, Factual ; Ecotoxicology, biological effects of pollution ; Effects of pollution and side effects of pesticides on protozoa and invertebrates ; Forecasting ; Freshwater ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Geologic Sediments ; Guidelines as Topic ; Hyalella azteca ; North America ; PCB ; Polychlorinated biphenyls ; Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons ; Public Policy ; Quality Control ; Sediments ; Toxicity ; Toxicity Tests ; Water Pollutants - toxicity ; Water Supply</subject><ispartof>Archives of environmental contamination and toxicology, 2001-05, Vol.41 (1), p.8-21</ispartof><rights>2001 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 2001</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a563t-6dd01cd27b1af01ebdea6e6f258ae85b939930225db3df0ad21c845f829da3b93</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=1069526$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11385586$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>INGERSOLL, C. G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MACDONALD, D. D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WANG, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CRANE, J. L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FIELD, L. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HAVERLAND, P. S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KEMBLE, N. E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LINDSKOOG, R. A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SEVERN, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SMORONG, D. E</creatorcontrib><title>Predictions of sediment toxicity using consensus-based freshwater sediment quality guidelines</title><title>Archives of environmental contamination and toxicology</title><addtitle>Arch Environ Contam Toxicol</addtitle><description>The objectives of this study were to compare approaches for evaluating the combined effects of chemical mixtures on the toxicity in field-collected sediments and to evaluate the ability of consensus-based probable effect concentrations (PECs) to predict toxicity in a freshwater database on both a national and regional geographic basis. A database was developed from 92 published reports, which included a total of 1,657 samples with high-quality matching sediment toxicity and chemistry data from across North America. The database was comprised primarily of 10- to 14-day or 28- to 42-day toxicity tests with the amphipod Hyalella azteca (designated as the HA10 or HA28 tests) and 10- to 14-day toxicity tests with the midges Chironomus tentans or C. riparius (designated as the CS10 test). Mean PEC quotients were calculated to provide an overall measure of chemical contamination and to support an evaluation of the combined effects of multiple contaminants in sediments. There was an overall increase in the incidence of toxicity with an increase in the mean quotients in all three tests. A consistent increase in the toxicity in all three tests occurred at a mean quotient > 0.5, however, the overall incidence of toxicity was greater in the HA28 test compared to the short-term tests. The longer-term tests, in which survival and growth are measured, tend to be more sensitive than the shorter-term tests, with acute to chronic ratios on the order of six indicated for H. azteca. Different patterns were observed among the various procedures used to calculate mean quotients. For example, in the HA28 test, a relatively abrupt increase in toxicity was associated with elevated polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) alone or with elevated polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) alone, compared to the pattern of a gradual increase in toxicity observed with quotients calculated using a combination of metals, PAHs, and PCBs. These analyses indicate that the different patterns in toxicity may be the result of unique chemical signals associated with individual contaminants in samples. Though mean quotients can be used to classify samples as toxic or nontoxic, individual quotients might be useful in helping identify substances that may be causing or substantially contributing to the observed toxicity. An increase in the incidence of toxicity was observed with increasing mean quotients within most of the regions, basins, and areas in North America for all three toxicity tests. The results of these analyses indicate that the consensus-based PECs can be used to reliably predict toxicity of sediments on both a regional and national basis.</description><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Applied ecology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Chemical contaminants</subject><subject>Chemical contamination</subject><subject>Chemical pollution</subject><subject>Chironomidae</subject><subject>Chironomus riparius</subject><subject>Chironomus tentans</subject><subject>Contaminants</subject><subject>Crustacea</subject><subject>Databases, Factual</subject><subject>Ecotoxicology, biological effects of pollution</subject><subject>Effects of pollution and side effects of pesticides on protozoa and invertebrates</subject><subject>Forecasting</subject><subject>Freshwater</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Geologic Sediments</subject><subject>Guidelines as Topic</subject><subject>Hyalella azteca</subject><subject>North America</subject><subject>PCB</subject><subject>Polychlorinated biphenyls</subject><subject>Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons</subject><subject>Public Policy</subject><subject>Quality Control</subject><subject>Sediments</subject><subject>Toxicity</subject><subject>Toxicity Tests</subject><subject>Water Pollutants - toxicity</subject><subject>Water Supply</subject><issn>0090-4341</issn><issn>1432-0703</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqN0U1rFTEUBuAgir1Wl25lQCluRs_J1yTLUqwKBbvQpQyZfNSUuTNtzgzaf2_aXqh2UV2FcJ7zBvIy9hLhHQJ07wmASwmAwFE_YhuUgrfQgXjMNgAWWikk7rFnROcVcWPkU7aHKIxSRm_Y99MSQ_ZLnidq5tRQvW3jtDTL_Cv7vFw1K-XprPF1HidaqR1cNU0qkX78dEssdyuXqxuvN87WHOKYp0jP2ZPkRoovduc--3b84evRp_bky8fPR4cnrVNaLK0OAdAH3g3oEmAcQnQ66sSVcdGowQprBXCuwiBCAhc4eiNVMtwGJ-p4nx3c5l6U-XKNtPTbTD6Oo5vivFKPRmhpJVb49mHYWTRGo5X_ztRotDX_8bhUBkB1Fb6-B8_ntUz1Y3pU2EkF-ka1t8qXmajE1F-UvHXlqkforyvv_6q8-le71HXYxnCndx1X8GYHHHk3puImn-mPVG0V1-I3j8GzOw</recordid><startdate>20010501</startdate><enddate>20010501</enddate><creator>INGERSOLL, C. G</creator><creator>MACDONALD, D. D</creator><creator>WANG, N</creator><creator>CRANE, J. L</creator><creator>FIELD, L. J</creator><creator>HAVERLAND, P. S</creator><creator>KEMBLE, N. E</creator><creator>LINDSKOOG, R. A</creator><creator>SEVERN, C</creator><creator>SMORONG, D. E</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>7SS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20010501</creationdate><title>Predictions of sediment toxicity using consensus-based freshwater sediment quality guidelines</title><author>INGERSOLL, C. G ; MACDONALD, D. D ; WANG, N ; CRANE, J. L ; FIELD, L. J ; HAVERLAND, P. S ; KEMBLE, N. E ; LINDSKOOG, R. A ; SEVERN, C ; SMORONG, D. E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a563t-6dd01cd27b1af01ebdea6e6f258ae85b939930225db3df0ad21c845f829da3b93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Applied ecology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Chemical contaminants</topic><topic>Chemical contamination</topic><topic>Chemical pollution</topic><topic>Chironomidae</topic><topic>Chironomus riparius</topic><topic>Chironomus tentans</topic><topic>Contaminants</topic><topic>Crustacea</topic><topic>Databases, Factual</topic><topic>Ecotoxicology, biological effects of pollution</topic><topic>Effects of pollution and side effects of pesticides on protozoa and invertebrates</topic><topic>Forecasting</topic><topic>Freshwater</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Geologic Sediments</topic><topic>Guidelines as Topic</topic><topic>Hyalella azteca</topic><topic>North America</topic><topic>PCB</topic><topic>Polychlorinated biphenyls</topic><topic>Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons</topic><topic>Public Policy</topic><topic>Quality Control</topic><topic>Sediments</topic><topic>Toxicity</topic><topic>Toxicity Tests</topic><topic>Water Pollutants - toxicity</topic><topic>Water Supply</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>INGERSOLL, C. G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MACDONALD, D. D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WANG, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CRANE, J. L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FIELD, L. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HAVERLAND, P. S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KEMBLE, N. E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LINDSKOOG, R. A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SEVERN, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SMORONG, D. E</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><jtitle>Archives of environmental contamination and toxicology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>INGERSOLL, C. G</au><au>MACDONALD, D. D</au><au>WANG, N</au><au>CRANE, J. L</au><au>FIELD, L. J</au><au>HAVERLAND, P. S</au><au>KEMBLE, N. E</au><au>LINDSKOOG, R. A</au><au>SEVERN, C</au><au>SMORONG, D. E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Predictions of sediment toxicity using consensus-based freshwater sediment quality guidelines</atitle><jtitle>Archives of environmental contamination and toxicology</jtitle><addtitle>Arch Environ Contam Toxicol</addtitle><date>2001-05-01</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>8</spage><epage>21</epage><pages>8-21</pages><issn>0090-4341</issn><eissn>1432-0703</eissn><coden>AECTCV</coden><abstract>The objectives of this study were to compare approaches for evaluating the combined effects of chemical mixtures on the toxicity in field-collected sediments and to evaluate the ability of consensus-based probable effect concentrations (PECs) to predict toxicity in a freshwater database on both a national and regional geographic basis. A database was developed from 92 published reports, which included a total of 1,657 samples with high-quality matching sediment toxicity and chemistry data from across North America. The database was comprised primarily of 10- to 14-day or 28- to 42-day toxicity tests with the amphipod Hyalella azteca (designated as the HA10 or HA28 tests) and 10- to 14-day toxicity tests with the midges Chironomus tentans or C. riparius (designated as the CS10 test). Mean PEC quotients were calculated to provide an overall measure of chemical contamination and to support an evaluation of the combined effects of multiple contaminants in sediments. There was an overall increase in the incidence of toxicity with an increase in the mean quotients in all three tests. A consistent increase in the toxicity in all three tests occurred at a mean quotient > 0.5, however, the overall incidence of toxicity was greater in the HA28 test compared to the short-term tests. The longer-term tests, in which survival and growth are measured, tend to be more sensitive than the shorter-term tests, with acute to chronic ratios on the order of six indicated for H. azteca. Different patterns were observed among the various procedures used to calculate mean quotients. For example, in the HA28 test, a relatively abrupt increase in toxicity was associated with elevated polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) alone or with elevated polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) alone, compared to the pattern of a gradual increase in toxicity observed with quotients calculated using a combination of metals, PAHs, and PCBs. These analyses indicate that the different patterns in toxicity may be the result of unique chemical signals associated with individual contaminants in samples. Though mean quotients can be used to classify samples as toxic or nontoxic, individual quotients might be useful in helping identify substances that may be causing or substantially contributing to the observed toxicity. An increase in the incidence of toxicity was observed with increasing mean quotients within most of the regions, basins, and areas in North America for all three toxicity tests. The results of these analyses indicate that the consensus-based PECs can be used to reliably predict toxicity of sediments on both a regional and national basis.</abstract><cop>Heidelberg</cop><cop>Berlin</cop><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><pmid>11385586</pmid><doi>10.1007/s002440010216</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0090-4341 |
ispartof | Archives of environmental contamination and toxicology, 2001-05, Vol.41 (1), p.8-21 |
issn | 0090-4341 1432-0703 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18364941 |
source | MEDLINE; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals |
subjects | Animal, plant and microbial ecology Animals Applied ecology Biological and medical sciences Chemical contaminants Chemical contamination Chemical pollution Chironomidae Chironomus riparius Chironomus tentans Contaminants Crustacea Databases, Factual Ecotoxicology, biological effects of pollution Effects of pollution and side effects of pesticides on protozoa and invertebrates Forecasting Freshwater Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Geologic Sediments Guidelines as Topic Hyalella azteca North America PCB Polychlorinated biphenyls Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons Public Policy Quality Control Sediments Toxicity Toxicity Tests Water Pollutants - toxicity Water Supply |
title | Predictions of sediment toxicity using consensus-based freshwater sediment quality guidelines |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T20%3A01%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Predictions%20of%20sediment%20toxicity%20using%20consensus-based%20freshwater%20sediment%20quality%20guidelines&rft.jtitle=Archives%20of%20environmental%20contamination%20and%20toxicology&rft.au=INGERSOLL,%20C.%20G&rft.date=2001-05-01&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=8&rft.epage=21&rft.pages=8-21&rft.issn=0090-4341&rft.eissn=1432-0703&rft.coden=AECTCV&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s002440010216&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E309867333%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1517450657&rft_id=info:pmid/11385586&rfr_iscdi=true |