Intercomparisons of upper air and surface winds in an urban region

During the Regional Air Pollution Study (RAPS), winds in the St. Louis region were recorded by surface stations (hourly averages) and by multiple upper air releases (on the hour). This study analyzes differences 1) between upper air and surface resultant winds, 2) among upper air winds at four sites...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Boundary-layer meteorology 1982-11, Vol.24 (3), p.345-356
1. Verfasser: Shreffler, Jack H.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 356
container_issue 3
container_start_page 345
container_title Boundary-layer meteorology
container_volume 24
creator Shreffler, Jack H.
description During the Regional Air Pollution Study (RAPS), winds in the St. Louis region were recorded by surface stations (hourly averages) and by multiple upper air releases (on the hour). This study analyzes differences 1) between upper air and surface resultant winds, 2) among upper air winds at four sites, and 3) among surface winds at 25 sites. The extensive data set provides a statistical basis for indicating the representativeness of individual observations, and the results show considerable variation between simultaneously measured winds determined by alternate means. Based on gaussian plume dispersion, the spatial variations in wind direction are translated into expected departures between predictions and observations of pollutant concentrations. Inaccurate specification of winds in air quality simulation models is likely to be a substantial contributor to differences between short-term predictions and observations on an urban scale.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/BF00121599
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18359585</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>18359585</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c260t-ad48cf93b35e9496e1634157e3c76839ffd86126f57c0954d15d79ed25549e013</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkE9LAzEQxYMoWKsXP0FOHoTVzObf5miL1ULBi56XNJlIpE3WpIv47V2p4GFmeMPj8fgRcg3sDhjT94sVY9CCNOaEzEBq3oDQ7SmZMcZU03EQ5-Si1o9JapBsRhbrdMDi8n6wJdacKs2BjsOAhdo4TfK0jiVYh_QrJl9pTNOTjmU77YLvMadLchbsruLV352Tt9Xj6_K52bw8rZcPm8a1ih0a60XnguFbLtEIoxAUF1NF5E6rjpsQfKegVUFqx4wUHqTXBn0rpTDIgM_JzTF3KPlzxHro97E63O1swjzWHjoujezkZLw9Gl3JtRYM_VDi3pbvHlj_i6n_x8R_AHlVWJI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>18359585</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Intercomparisons of upper air and surface winds in an urban region</title><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Shreffler, Jack H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Shreffler, Jack H.</creatorcontrib><description>During the Regional Air Pollution Study (RAPS), winds in the St. Louis region were recorded by surface stations (hourly averages) and by multiple upper air releases (on the hour). This study analyzes differences 1) between upper air and surface resultant winds, 2) among upper air winds at four sites, and 3) among surface winds at 25 sites. The extensive data set provides a statistical basis for indicating the representativeness of individual observations, and the results show considerable variation between simultaneously measured winds determined by alternate means. Based on gaussian plume dispersion, the spatial variations in wind direction are translated into expected departures between predictions and observations of pollutant concentrations. Inaccurate specification of winds in air quality simulation models is likely to be a substantial contributor to differences between short-term predictions and observations on an urban scale.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0006-8314</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-1472</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/BF00121599</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Boundary-layer meteorology, 1982-11, Vol.24 (3), p.345-356</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c260t-ad48cf93b35e9496e1634157e3c76839ffd86126f57c0954d15d79ed25549e013</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c260t-ad48cf93b35e9496e1634157e3c76839ffd86126f57c0954d15d79ed25549e013</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Shreffler, Jack H.</creatorcontrib><title>Intercomparisons of upper air and surface winds in an urban region</title><title>Boundary-layer meteorology</title><description>During the Regional Air Pollution Study (RAPS), winds in the St. Louis region were recorded by surface stations (hourly averages) and by multiple upper air releases (on the hour). This study analyzes differences 1) between upper air and surface resultant winds, 2) among upper air winds at four sites, and 3) among surface winds at 25 sites. The extensive data set provides a statistical basis for indicating the representativeness of individual observations, and the results show considerable variation between simultaneously measured winds determined by alternate means. Based on gaussian plume dispersion, the spatial variations in wind direction are translated into expected departures between predictions and observations of pollutant concentrations. Inaccurate specification of winds in air quality simulation models is likely to be a substantial contributor to differences between short-term predictions and observations on an urban scale.</description><issn>0006-8314</issn><issn>1573-1472</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1982</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpFkE9LAzEQxYMoWKsXP0FOHoTVzObf5miL1ULBi56XNJlIpE3WpIv47V2p4GFmeMPj8fgRcg3sDhjT94sVY9CCNOaEzEBq3oDQ7SmZMcZU03EQ5-Si1o9JapBsRhbrdMDi8n6wJdacKs2BjsOAhdo4TfK0jiVYh_QrJl9pTNOTjmU77YLvMadLchbsruLV352Tt9Xj6_K52bw8rZcPm8a1ih0a60XnguFbLtEIoxAUF1NF5E6rjpsQfKegVUFqx4wUHqTXBn0rpTDIgM_JzTF3KPlzxHro97E63O1swjzWHjoujezkZLw9Gl3JtRYM_VDi3pbvHlj_i6n_x8R_AHlVWJI</recordid><startdate>198211</startdate><enddate>198211</enddate><creator>Shreffler, Jack H.</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>KL.</scope></search><sort><creationdate>198211</creationdate><title>Intercomparisons of upper air and surface winds in an urban region</title><author>Shreffler, Jack H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c260t-ad48cf93b35e9496e1634157e3c76839ffd86126f57c0954d15d79ed25549e013</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1982</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shreffler, Jack H.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><jtitle>Boundary-layer meteorology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shreffler, Jack H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Intercomparisons of upper air and surface winds in an urban region</atitle><jtitle>Boundary-layer meteorology</jtitle><date>1982-11</date><risdate>1982</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>345</spage><epage>356</epage><pages>345-356</pages><issn>0006-8314</issn><eissn>1573-1472</eissn><abstract>During the Regional Air Pollution Study (RAPS), winds in the St. Louis region were recorded by surface stations (hourly averages) and by multiple upper air releases (on the hour). This study analyzes differences 1) between upper air and surface resultant winds, 2) among upper air winds at four sites, and 3) among surface winds at 25 sites. The extensive data set provides a statistical basis for indicating the representativeness of individual observations, and the results show considerable variation between simultaneously measured winds determined by alternate means. Based on gaussian plume dispersion, the spatial variations in wind direction are translated into expected departures between predictions and observations of pollutant concentrations. Inaccurate specification of winds in air quality simulation models is likely to be a substantial contributor to differences between short-term predictions and observations on an urban scale.</abstract><doi>10.1007/BF00121599</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0006-8314
ispartof Boundary-layer meteorology, 1982-11, Vol.24 (3), p.345-356
issn 0006-8314
1573-1472
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18359585
source SpringerLink Journals
title Intercomparisons of upper air and surface winds in an urban region
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T09%3A23%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Intercomparisons%20of%20upper%20air%20and%20surface%20winds%20in%20an%20urban%20region&rft.jtitle=Boundary-layer%20meteorology&rft.au=Shreffler,%20Jack%20H.&rft.date=1982-11&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=345&rft.epage=356&rft.pages=345-356&rft.issn=0006-8314&rft.eissn=1573-1472&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/BF00121599&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E18359585%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=18359585&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true