Matched unrelated donor transplants—state of the art in the 21st century
Abstract Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is the therapy of choice in many hematological malignant and non-malignant diseases by using human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-matched siblings as stem cell source but only one third of the patients will have HLA-matched siblings. Hence, physicians...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Seminars in hematology 2016-10, Vol.53 (4), p.221-229 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 229 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 221 |
container_title | Seminars in hematology |
container_volume | 53 |
creator | Altaf, Syed Y Apperley, Jane F Olavarria, Eduardo |
description | Abstract Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is the therapy of choice in many hematological malignant and non-malignant diseases by using human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-matched siblings as stem cell source but only one third of the patients will have HLA-matched siblings. Hence, physicians rely on the availability of matched unrelated donors (URD). The possibility of finding a matched URD is now more than 70% due to continuous expansion of URD registries around the world. The use of URD in adult patients is steadily increasing and in the last 8 years has superseded the numbers of matched sibling donor transplants and has become the most commonly used stem cell source. There is also an increasing trend to use peripheral blood (PB) stem cells rather than bone marrow (BM) stem cells. Outcomes following URD transplants depend mainly upon the indication and urgency of transplant, age and comorbidities of recipients, cytomegalovirus (CMV) matching/mismatching between donor and the recipient, and degree of HLA matching. In some studies outcome of unrelated stem cell transplants in terms of treatment-related mortality (TRM), disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) is comparable to sibling donors. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1053/j.seminhematol.2016.07.002 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1835686766</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0037196316300701</els_id><sourcerecordid>1835686766</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c487t-ed62f3648aefd5a325fa522a527f064d4f01ed1cc07879b63d0c1e7e94446a3a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc1u1DAQgK0K1C6FV0ARJy5Jx3ZiZzkgofJTqlY9AGfLtSdaL4m92E6lvfUh-oQ8Sb1sqRCnHiyP5G9mPN8Q8oZCQ6HjJ-sm4eT8Ciedw9gwoKIB2QCwA7KgHWd1L3rxjCwAuKzpUvAj8iKldQGopOKQHDEp-152ywU5v9TZrNBWs4846lwiG3yIVY7ap82ofU6_b-9SLk9VGKq8wkrHXDn_J2Q05cqgz3PcviTPBz0mfPVwH5Mfnz99Pz2rL66-fD39cFGbtpe5RivYwEXbaxxspznrBt0xVo4cQLS2HYCipcaA7OXyWnALhqLEZdu2QnPNj8nbfd1NDL9mTFlNLhkcy18xzEnRnndlfilEQd_tURNDShEHtYlu0nGrKKidS7VW_7pUO5cKpCqqSvLrhz7z9YT2MfWvvAJ83ANYpr1xGFUyDr1B6yKarGxwT-vz_r8yZnTeGT3-xC2mdZijLz4VVYkpUN92W90tlQoOIIHyeyq9olc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1835686766</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Matched unrelated donor transplants—state of the art in the 21st century</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Altaf, Syed Y ; Apperley, Jane F ; Olavarria, Eduardo</creator><creatorcontrib>Altaf, Syed Y ; Apperley, Jane F ; Olavarria, Eduardo</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is the therapy of choice in many hematological malignant and non-malignant diseases by using human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-matched siblings as stem cell source but only one third of the patients will have HLA-matched siblings. Hence, physicians rely on the availability of matched unrelated donors (URD). The possibility of finding a matched URD is now more than 70% due to continuous expansion of URD registries around the world. The use of URD in adult patients is steadily increasing and in the last 8 years has superseded the numbers of matched sibling donor transplants and has become the most commonly used stem cell source. There is also an increasing trend to use peripheral blood (PB) stem cells rather than bone marrow (BM) stem cells. Outcomes following URD transplants depend mainly upon the indication and urgency of transplant, age and comorbidities of recipients, cytomegalovirus (CMV) matching/mismatching between donor and the recipient, and degree of HLA matching. In some studies outcome of unrelated stem cell transplants in terms of treatment-related mortality (TRM), disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) is comparable to sibling donors.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0037-1963</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-8686</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1053/j.seminhematol.2016.07.002</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27788759</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Hematologic Neoplasms - immunology ; Hematologic Neoplasms - therapy ; Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine ; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation ; Hematopoietic Stem Cells ; HLA Antigens - immunology ; Humans ; State of the art ; Stem cell transplantation ; Treatment Outcome ; Unrelated donor ; Unrelated Donors</subject><ispartof>Seminars in hematology, 2016-10, Vol.53 (4), p.221-229</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2016 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c487t-ed62f3648aefd5a325fa522a527f064d4f01ed1cc07879b63d0c1e7e94446a3a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c487t-ed62f3648aefd5a325fa522a527f064d4f01ed1cc07879b63d0c1e7e94446a3a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1053/j.seminhematol.2016.07.002$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27788759$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Altaf, Syed Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Apperley, Jane F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olavarria, Eduardo</creatorcontrib><title>Matched unrelated donor transplants—state of the art in the 21st century</title><title>Seminars in hematology</title><addtitle>Semin Hematol</addtitle><description>Abstract Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is the therapy of choice in many hematological malignant and non-malignant diseases by using human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-matched siblings as stem cell source but only one third of the patients will have HLA-matched siblings. Hence, physicians rely on the availability of matched unrelated donors (URD). The possibility of finding a matched URD is now more than 70% due to continuous expansion of URD registries around the world. The use of URD in adult patients is steadily increasing and in the last 8 years has superseded the numbers of matched sibling donor transplants and has become the most commonly used stem cell source. There is also an increasing trend to use peripheral blood (PB) stem cells rather than bone marrow (BM) stem cells. Outcomes following URD transplants depend mainly upon the indication and urgency of transplant, age and comorbidities of recipients, cytomegalovirus (CMV) matching/mismatching between donor and the recipient, and degree of HLA matching. In some studies outcome of unrelated stem cell transplants in terms of treatment-related mortality (TRM), disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) is comparable to sibling donors.</description><subject>Hematologic Neoplasms - immunology</subject><subject>Hematologic Neoplasms - therapy</subject><subject>Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine</subject><subject>Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation</subject><subject>Hematopoietic Stem Cells</subject><subject>HLA Antigens - immunology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>State of the art</subject><subject>Stem cell transplantation</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Unrelated donor</subject><subject>Unrelated Donors</subject><issn>0037-1963</issn><issn>1532-8686</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkc1u1DAQgK0K1C6FV0ARJy5Jx3ZiZzkgofJTqlY9AGfLtSdaL4m92E6lvfUh-oQ8Sb1sqRCnHiyP5G9mPN8Q8oZCQ6HjJ-sm4eT8Ciedw9gwoKIB2QCwA7KgHWd1L3rxjCwAuKzpUvAj8iKldQGopOKQHDEp-152ywU5v9TZrNBWs4846lwiG3yIVY7ap82ofU6_b-9SLk9VGKq8wkrHXDn_J2Q05cqgz3PcviTPBz0mfPVwH5Mfnz99Pz2rL66-fD39cFGbtpe5RivYwEXbaxxspznrBt0xVo4cQLS2HYCipcaA7OXyWnALhqLEZdu2QnPNj8nbfd1NDL9mTFlNLhkcy18xzEnRnndlfilEQd_tURNDShEHtYlu0nGrKKidS7VW_7pUO5cKpCqqSvLrhz7z9YT2MfWvvAJ83ANYpr1xGFUyDr1B6yKarGxwT-vz_r8yZnTeGT3-xC2mdZijLz4VVYkpUN92W90tlQoOIIHyeyq9olc</recordid><startdate>20161001</startdate><enddate>20161001</enddate><creator>Altaf, Syed Y</creator><creator>Apperley, Jane F</creator><creator>Olavarria, Eduardo</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20161001</creationdate><title>Matched unrelated donor transplants—state of the art in the 21st century</title><author>Altaf, Syed Y ; Apperley, Jane F ; Olavarria, Eduardo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c487t-ed62f3648aefd5a325fa522a527f064d4f01ed1cc07879b63d0c1e7e94446a3a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Hematologic Neoplasms - immunology</topic><topic>Hematologic Neoplasms - therapy</topic><topic>Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine</topic><topic>Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation</topic><topic>Hematopoietic Stem Cells</topic><topic>HLA Antigens - immunology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>State of the art</topic><topic>Stem cell transplantation</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Unrelated donor</topic><topic>Unrelated Donors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Altaf, Syed Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Apperley, Jane F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olavarria, Eduardo</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Seminars in hematology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Altaf, Syed Y</au><au>Apperley, Jane F</au><au>Olavarria, Eduardo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Matched unrelated donor transplants—state of the art in the 21st century</atitle><jtitle>Seminars in hematology</jtitle><addtitle>Semin Hematol</addtitle><date>2016-10-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>53</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>221</spage><epage>229</epage><pages>221-229</pages><issn>0037-1963</issn><eissn>1532-8686</eissn><abstract>Abstract Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is the therapy of choice in many hematological malignant and non-malignant diseases by using human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-matched siblings as stem cell source but only one third of the patients will have HLA-matched siblings. Hence, physicians rely on the availability of matched unrelated donors (URD). The possibility of finding a matched URD is now more than 70% due to continuous expansion of URD registries around the world. The use of URD in adult patients is steadily increasing and in the last 8 years has superseded the numbers of matched sibling donor transplants and has become the most commonly used stem cell source. There is also an increasing trend to use peripheral blood (PB) stem cells rather than bone marrow (BM) stem cells. Outcomes following URD transplants depend mainly upon the indication and urgency of transplant, age and comorbidities of recipients, cytomegalovirus (CMV) matching/mismatching between donor and the recipient, and degree of HLA matching. In some studies outcome of unrelated stem cell transplants in terms of treatment-related mortality (TRM), disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) is comparable to sibling donors.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>27788759</pmid><doi>10.1053/j.seminhematol.2016.07.002</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0037-1963 |
ispartof | Seminars in hematology, 2016-10, Vol.53 (4), p.221-229 |
issn | 0037-1963 1532-8686 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1835686766 |
source | MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | Hematologic Neoplasms - immunology Hematologic Neoplasms - therapy Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Hematopoietic Stem Cells HLA Antigens - immunology Humans State of the art Stem cell transplantation Treatment Outcome Unrelated donor Unrelated Donors |
title | Matched unrelated donor transplants—state of the art in the 21st century |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T18%3A15%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Matched%20unrelated%20donor%20transplants%E2%80%94state%20of%20the%20art%20in%20the%2021st%20century&rft.jtitle=Seminars%20in%20hematology&rft.au=Altaf,%20Syed%20Y&rft.date=2016-10-01&rft.volume=53&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=221&rft.epage=229&rft.pages=221-229&rft.issn=0037-1963&rft.eissn=1532-8686&rft_id=info:doi/10.1053/j.seminhematol.2016.07.002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1835686766%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1835686766&rft_id=info:pmid/27788759&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0037196316300701&rfr_iscdi=true |