Validity of remission and recovery criteria for schizophrenia and major depression: comparison of the results of two one-year follow-up naturalistic studies
The objective of the present study was the application and comparison of common remission and recovery criteria between patients with the diagnosis of schizophrenia and major depressive disorder (MDD) under inclusion of other outcome parameters. Patients with schizophrenia and MDD who were treated a...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience 2017-06, Vol.267 (4), p.303-313 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 313 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 303 |
container_title | European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience |
container_volume | 267 |
creator | Spellmann, Ilja Schennach, Rebecca Seemüller, Florian Meyer, Sebastian Musil, Richard Jäger, Markus Schmauß, Max Laux, Gerd Pfeiffer, Herbert Naber, Dieter Schmidt, Lutz G. Gaebel, Wolfgang Klosterkötter, Joachim Heuser, Isabella Bauer, Michael Adli, Mazda Zeiler, Joachim Bender, Wolfram Kronmüller, Klaus-Thomas Ising, Marcus Brieger, Peter Maier, Wolfgang Lemke, Matthias R. Rüther, Eckart Klingberg, Stefan Gastpar, Markus Riedel, Michael Möller, Hans-Jürgen |
description | The objective of the present study was the application and comparison of common remission and recovery criteria between patients with the diagnosis of schizophrenia and major depressive disorder (MDD) under inclusion of other outcome parameters. Patients with schizophrenia and MDD who were treated as inpatients at the beginning of the study were examined within two naturalistic follow-up trials from admission to discharge of an inpatient treatment period and the one-year follow-up assessment. PANSS criteria of the Remission in Schizophrenia Working Group (RSWG) for schizophrenia and HAMD criteria of the ACNP Task Force in MDD for depressive patients as well as the Clinical Global Impression-Severity Scale (CGI-S) were applied as symptomatic outcome measures additionally to functional outcome parameters. Data of 153 schizophrenia patients and 231 patients with a MDD episode have been included in the analysis. More depressive than schizophrenia patients reached a threshold score of ≤3 on the CGI-S, indicating symptomatic remission at discharge and at the one-year follow-up. In contrast similar proportions of patients reaching symptomatic remission at discharge from inpatient treatment and at the one-year follow-up in the schizophrenia and in the MDD group were found when disease-related consensus criteria (RSWG vs. ACNP Task Force) were used. Functional remission and recovery rates were significantly lower in schizophrenia than in depressive patients at the one-year follow-up visit. Common outcome criteria for remission and recovery in schizophrenia and major depression were not directly comparable. However, our results indicated a significantly poorer outcome in schizophrenia than in depressive patients according to terms of remission and recovery. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00406-016-0741-2 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1835680516</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1835680516</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-67b379566088a8995d2beceaf6fe576d020a0c9d5d8bfbe57f0773c81c39fbcf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kcFu1DAQhi0EokvhAbggS1y4BMZxbMfcUEULUiUuLdfIccasV0kcbKfV8ix9WLzdghBSD5bl8TefR_4Jec3gPQNQHxJAA7ICVpZqWFU_IRvWcF61jWZPyQZ0AxXjvDkhL1LaAQATNTwnJ7VSrZAgNuTuuxn94POeBkcjTj4lH2Zq5qGcbLjBuKc2-ozRG-pCpMlu_a-wbCPOpXLgJrMr9QGXiPfNH6kN02KiT0VUrHmLxZXWMaf7422gYcZqjyYW4ziG22pd6GzyGsssKXtLU14Hj-kleebMmPDVw35Krs8_X519qS6_XXw9-3RZWa7qXEnVc6WFlNC2ptVaDHWPFo2TDoWSA9RgwOpBDG3v-lJyoBS3LbNcu946fkreHb1LDD9XTLkr_2BxHM2MYU0da7mQLQgmC_r2P3QX1jiX6QqltdSiYXWh2JGyMaQU0XVL9JOJ-45Bd4iuO0bXlei6Q3TdoefNg3ntJxz-dvzJqgD1EUjlav6B8Z-nH7X-BhZGp80</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1899695412</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Validity of remission and recovery criteria for schizophrenia and major depression: comparison of the results of two one-year follow-up naturalistic studies</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Spellmann, Ilja ; Schennach, Rebecca ; Seemüller, Florian ; Meyer, Sebastian ; Musil, Richard ; Jäger, Markus ; Schmauß, Max ; Laux, Gerd ; Pfeiffer, Herbert ; Naber, Dieter ; Schmidt, Lutz G. ; Gaebel, Wolfgang ; Klosterkötter, Joachim ; Heuser, Isabella ; Bauer, Michael ; Adli, Mazda ; Zeiler, Joachim ; Bender, Wolfram ; Kronmüller, Klaus-Thomas ; Ising, Marcus ; Brieger, Peter ; Maier, Wolfgang ; Lemke, Matthias R. ; Rüther, Eckart ; Klingberg, Stefan ; Gastpar, Markus ; Riedel, Michael ; Möller, Hans-Jürgen</creator><creatorcontrib>Spellmann, Ilja ; Schennach, Rebecca ; Seemüller, Florian ; Meyer, Sebastian ; Musil, Richard ; Jäger, Markus ; Schmauß, Max ; Laux, Gerd ; Pfeiffer, Herbert ; Naber, Dieter ; Schmidt, Lutz G. ; Gaebel, Wolfgang ; Klosterkötter, Joachim ; Heuser, Isabella ; Bauer, Michael ; Adli, Mazda ; Zeiler, Joachim ; Bender, Wolfram ; Kronmüller, Klaus-Thomas ; Ising, Marcus ; Brieger, Peter ; Maier, Wolfgang ; Lemke, Matthias R. ; Rüther, Eckart ; Klingberg, Stefan ; Gastpar, Markus ; Riedel, Michael ; Möller, Hans-Jürgen</creatorcontrib><description>The objective of the present study was the application and comparison of common remission and recovery criteria between patients with the diagnosis of schizophrenia and major depressive disorder (MDD) under inclusion of other outcome parameters. Patients with schizophrenia and MDD who were treated as inpatients at the beginning of the study were examined within two naturalistic follow-up trials from admission to discharge of an inpatient treatment period and the one-year follow-up assessment. PANSS criteria of the Remission in Schizophrenia Working Group (RSWG) for schizophrenia and HAMD criteria of the ACNP Task Force in MDD for depressive patients as well as the Clinical Global Impression-Severity Scale (CGI-S) were applied as symptomatic outcome measures additionally to functional outcome parameters. Data of 153 schizophrenia patients and 231 patients with a MDD episode have been included in the analysis. More depressive than schizophrenia patients reached a threshold score of ≤3 on the CGI-S, indicating symptomatic remission at discharge and at the one-year follow-up. In contrast similar proportions of patients reaching symptomatic remission at discharge from inpatient treatment and at the one-year follow-up in the schizophrenia and in the MDD group were found when disease-related consensus criteria (RSWG vs. ACNP Task Force) were used. Functional remission and recovery rates were significantly lower in schizophrenia than in depressive patients at the one-year follow-up visit. Common outcome criteria for remission and recovery in schizophrenia and major depression were not directly comparable. However, our results indicated a significantly poorer outcome in schizophrenia than in depressive patients according to terms of remission and recovery.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0940-1334</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1433-8491</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00406-016-0741-2</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27785605</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Absenteeism ; Adult ; Clinical trials ; Data processing ; Depressive Disorder, Major - diagnosis ; Depressive Disorder, Major - physiopathology ; Depressive Disorder, Major - psychology ; Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Inpatients ; Male ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Mental depression ; Mental disorders ; Middle Aged ; Neurosciences ; Original Paper ; Outcome Assessment (Health Care) ; Psychiatry ; Recovery of function ; Recovery of Function - physiology ; Remission ; Reproducibility of Results ; Schizophrenia ; Schizophrenia - diagnosis ; Schizophrenia - physiopathology ; Severity of Illness Index ; Task forces</subject><ispartof>European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience, 2017-06, Vol.267 (4), p.303-313</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016</rights><rights>European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience is a copyright of Springer, 2017.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-67b379566088a8995d2beceaf6fe576d020a0c9d5d8bfbe57f0773c81c39fbcf3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-67b379566088a8995d2beceaf6fe576d020a0c9d5d8bfbe57f0773c81c39fbcf3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3041-2386</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00406-016-0741-2$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00406-016-0741-2$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27785605$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Spellmann, Ilja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schennach, Rebecca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seemüller, Florian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meyer, Sebastian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Musil, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jäger, Markus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmauß, Max</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laux, Gerd</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pfeiffer, Herbert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Naber, Dieter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmidt, Lutz G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gaebel, Wolfgang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klosterkötter, Joachim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heuser, Isabella</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bauer, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adli, Mazda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zeiler, Joachim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bender, Wolfram</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kronmüller, Klaus-Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ising, Marcus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brieger, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maier, Wolfgang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lemke, Matthias R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rüther, Eckart</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klingberg, Stefan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gastpar, Markus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Riedel, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Möller, Hans-Jürgen</creatorcontrib><title>Validity of remission and recovery criteria for schizophrenia and major depression: comparison of the results of two one-year follow-up naturalistic studies</title><title>European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience</title><addtitle>Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci</addtitle><addtitle>Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci</addtitle><description>The objective of the present study was the application and comparison of common remission and recovery criteria between patients with the diagnosis of schizophrenia and major depressive disorder (MDD) under inclusion of other outcome parameters. Patients with schizophrenia and MDD who were treated as inpatients at the beginning of the study were examined within two naturalistic follow-up trials from admission to discharge of an inpatient treatment period and the one-year follow-up assessment. PANSS criteria of the Remission in Schizophrenia Working Group (RSWG) for schizophrenia and HAMD criteria of the ACNP Task Force in MDD for depressive patients as well as the Clinical Global Impression-Severity Scale (CGI-S) were applied as symptomatic outcome measures additionally to functional outcome parameters. Data of 153 schizophrenia patients and 231 patients with a MDD episode have been included in the analysis. More depressive than schizophrenia patients reached a threshold score of ≤3 on the CGI-S, indicating symptomatic remission at discharge and at the one-year follow-up. In contrast similar proportions of patients reaching symptomatic remission at discharge from inpatient treatment and at the one-year follow-up in the schizophrenia and in the MDD group were found when disease-related consensus criteria (RSWG vs. ACNP Task Force) were used. Functional remission and recovery rates were significantly lower in schizophrenia than in depressive patients at the one-year follow-up visit. Common outcome criteria for remission and recovery in schizophrenia and major depression were not directly comparable. However, our results indicated a significantly poorer outcome in schizophrenia than in depressive patients according to terms of remission and recovery.</description><subject>Absenteeism</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Data processing</subject><subject>Depressive Disorder, Major - diagnosis</subject><subject>Depressive Disorder, Major - physiopathology</subject><subject>Depressive Disorder, Major - psychology</subject><subject>Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Inpatients</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Mental depression</subject><subject>Mental disorders</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neurosciences</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Outcome Assessment (Health Care)</subject><subject>Psychiatry</subject><subject>Recovery of function</subject><subject>Recovery of Function - physiology</subject><subject>Remission</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Schizophrenia</subject><subject>Schizophrenia - diagnosis</subject><subject>Schizophrenia - physiopathology</subject><subject>Severity of Illness Index</subject><subject>Task forces</subject><issn>0940-1334</issn><issn>1433-8491</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kcFu1DAQhi0EokvhAbggS1y4BMZxbMfcUEULUiUuLdfIccasV0kcbKfV8ix9WLzdghBSD5bl8TefR_4Jec3gPQNQHxJAA7ICVpZqWFU_IRvWcF61jWZPyQZ0AxXjvDkhL1LaAQATNTwnJ7VSrZAgNuTuuxn94POeBkcjTj4lH2Zq5qGcbLjBuKc2-ozRG-pCpMlu_a-wbCPOpXLgJrMr9QGXiPfNH6kN02KiT0VUrHmLxZXWMaf7422gYcZqjyYW4ziG22pd6GzyGsssKXtLU14Hj-kleebMmPDVw35Krs8_X519qS6_XXw9-3RZWa7qXEnVc6WFlNC2ptVaDHWPFo2TDoWSA9RgwOpBDG3v-lJyoBS3LbNcu946fkreHb1LDD9XTLkr_2BxHM2MYU0da7mQLQgmC_r2P3QX1jiX6QqltdSiYXWh2JGyMaQU0XVL9JOJ-45Bd4iuO0bXlei6Q3TdoefNg3ntJxz-dvzJqgD1EUjlav6B8Z-nH7X-BhZGp80</recordid><startdate>20170601</startdate><enddate>20170601</enddate><creator>Spellmann, Ilja</creator><creator>Schennach, Rebecca</creator><creator>Seemüller, Florian</creator><creator>Meyer, Sebastian</creator><creator>Musil, Richard</creator><creator>Jäger, Markus</creator><creator>Schmauß, Max</creator><creator>Laux, Gerd</creator><creator>Pfeiffer, Herbert</creator><creator>Naber, Dieter</creator><creator>Schmidt, Lutz G.</creator><creator>Gaebel, Wolfgang</creator><creator>Klosterkötter, Joachim</creator><creator>Heuser, Isabella</creator><creator>Bauer, Michael</creator><creator>Adli, Mazda</creator><creator>Zeiler, Joachim</creator><creator>Bender, Wolfram</creator><creator>Kronmüller, Klaus-Thomas</creator><creator>Ising, Marcus</creator><creator>Brieger, Peter</creator><creator>Maier, Wolfgang</creator><creator>Lemke, Matthias R.</creator><creator>Rüther, Eckart</creator><creator>Klingberg, Stefan</creator><creator>Gastpar, Markus</creator><creator>Riedel, Michael</creator><creator>Möller, Hans-Jürgen</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3041-2386</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20170601</creationdate><title>Validity of remission and recovery criteria for schizophrenia and major depression: comparison of the results of two one-year follow-up naturalistic studies</title><author>Spellmann, Ilja ; Schennach, Rebecca ; Seemüller, Florian ; Meyer, Sebastian ; Musil, Richard ; Jäger, Markus ; Schmauß, Max ; Laux, Gerd ; Pfeiffer, Herbert ; Naber, Dieter ; Schmidt, Lutz G. ; Gaebel, Wolfgang ; Klosterkötter, Joachim ; Heuser, Isabella ; Bauer, Michael ; Adli, Mazda ; Zeiler, Joachim ; Bender, Wolfram ; Kronmüller, Klaus-Thomas ; Ising, Marcus ; Brieger, Peter ; Maier, Wolfgang ; Lemke, Matthias R. ; Rüther, Eckart ; Klingberg, Stefan ; Gastpar, Markus ; Riedel, Michael ; Möller, Hans-Jürgen</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-67b379566088a8995d2beceaf6fe576d020a0c9d5d8bfbe57f0773c81c39fbcf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Absenteeism</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Data processing</topic><topic>Depressive Disorder, Major - diagnosis</topic><topic>Depressive Disorder, Major - physiopathology</topic><topic>Depressive Disorder, Major - psychology</topic><topic>Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Inpatients</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Mental depression</topic><topic>Mental disorders</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neurosciences</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Outcome Assessment (Health Care)</topic><topic>Psychiatry</topic><topic>Recovery of function</topic><topic>Recovery of Function - physiology</topic><topic>Remission</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Schizophrenia</topic><topic>Schizophrenia - diagnosis</topic><topic>Schizophrenia - physiopathology</topic><topic>Severity of Illness Index</topic><topic>Task forces</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Spellmann, Ilja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schennach, Rebecca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seemüller, Florian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meyer, Sebastian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Musil, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jäger, Markus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmauß, Max</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laux, Gerd</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pfeiffer, Herbert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Naber, Dieter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmidt, Lutz G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gaebel, Wolfgang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klosterkötter, Joachim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heuser, Isabella</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bauer, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adli, Mazda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zeiler, Joachim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bender, Wolfram</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kronmüller, Klaus-Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ising, Marcus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brieger, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maier, Wolfgang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lemke, Matthias R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rüther, Eckart</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klingberg, Stefan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gastpar, Markus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Riedel, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Möller, Hans-Jürgen</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Spellmann, Ilja</au><au>Schennach, Rebecca</au><au>Seemüller, Florian</au><au>Meyer, Sebastian</au><au>Musil, Richard</au><au>Jäger, Markus</au><au>Schmauß, Max</au><au>Laux, Gerd</au><au>Pfeiffer, Herbert</au><au>Naber, Dieter</au><au>Schmidt, Lutz G.</au><au>Gaebel, Wolfgang</au><au>Klosterkötter, Joachim</au><au>Heuser, Isabella</au><au>Bauer, Michael</au><au>Adli, Mazda</au><au>Zeiler, Joachim</au><au>Bender, Wolfram</au><au>Kronmüller, Klaus-Thomas</au><au>Ising, Marcus</au><au>Brieger, Peter</au><au>Maier, Wolfgang</au><au>Lemke, Matthias R.</au><au>Rüther, Eckart</au><au>Klingberg, Stefan</au><au>Gastpar, Markus</au><au>Riedel, Michael</au><au>Möller, Hans-Jürgen</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Validity of remission and recovery criteria for schizophrenia and major depression: comparison of the results of two one-year follow-up naturalistic studies</atitle><jtitle>European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience</jtitle><stitle>Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci</stitle><addtitle>Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci</addtitle><date>2017-06-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>267</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>303</spage><epage>313</epage><pages>303-313</pages><issn>0940-1334</issn><eissn>1433-8491</eissn><abstract>The objective of the present study was the application and comparison of common remission and recovery criteria between patients with the diagnosis of schizophrenia and major depressive disorder (MDD) under inclusion of other outcome parameters. Patients with schizophrenia and MDD who were treated as inpatients at the beginning of the study were examined within two naturalistic follow-up trials from admission to discharge of an inpatient treatment period and the one-year follow-up assessment. PANSS criteria of the Remission in Schizophrenia Working Group (RSWG) for schizophrenia and HAMD criteria of the ACNP Task Force in MDD for depressive patients as well as the Clinical Global Impression-Severity Scale (CGI-S) were applied as symptomatic outcome measures additionally to functional outcome parameters. Data of 153 schizophrenia patients and 231 patients with a MDD episode have been included in the analysis. More depressive than schizophrenia patients reached a threshold score of ≤3 on the CGI-S, indicating symptomatic remission at discharge and at the one-year follow-up. In contrast similar proportions of patients reaching symptomatic remission at discharge from inpatient treatment and at the one-year follow-up in the schizophrenia and in the MDD group were found when disease-related consensus criteria (RSWG vs. ACNP Task Force) were used. Functional remission and recovery rates were significantly lower in schizophrenia than in depressive patients at the one-year follow-up visit. Common outcome criteria for remission and recovery in schizophrenia and major depression were not directly comparable. However, our results indicated a significantly poorer outcome in schizophrenia than in depressive patients according to terms of remission and recovery.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>27785605</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00406-016-0741-2</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3041-2386</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0940-1334 |
ispartof | European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience, 2017-06, Vol.267 (4), p.303-313 |
issn | 0940-1334 1433-8491 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1835680516 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Absenteeism Adult Clinical trials Data processing Depressive Disorder, Major - diagnosis Depressive Disorder, Major - physiopathology Depressive Disorder, Major - psychology Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders Female Follow-Up Studies Humans Inpatients Male Medicine Medicine & Public Health Mental depression Mental disorders Middle Aged Neurosciences Original Paper Outcome Assessment (Health Care) Psychiatry Recovery of function Recovery of Function - physiology Remission Reproducibility of Results Schizophrenia Schizophrenia - diagnosis Schizophrenia - physiopathology Severity of Illness Index Task forces |
title | Validity of remission and recovery criteria for schizophrenia and major depression: comparison of the results of two one-year follow-up naturalistic studies |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T12%3A24%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Validity%20of%20remission%20and%20recovery%20criteria%20for%20schizophrenia%20and%20major%20depression:%20comparison%20of%20the%20results%20of%20two%20one-year%20follow-up%20naturalistic%20studies&rft.jtitle=European%20archives%20of%20psychiatry%20and%20clinical%20neuroscience&rft.au=Spellmann,%20Ilja&rft.date=2017-06-01&rft.volume=267&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=303&rft.epage=313&rft.pages=303-313&rft.issn=0940-1334&rft.eissn=1433-8491&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00406-016-0741-2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1835680516%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1899695412&rft_id=info:pmid/27785605&rfr_iscdi=true |