Evaluation of the Cyclic Fatigue and Torsional Resistance of Novel Nickel-Titanium Rotary Files with Various Alloy Properties
Abstract Introduction The purpose of this study was to evaluate the cyclic fatigue and torsional resistance of Hyflex EDM, ProTaper Gold (PTG), and ProTaper Universal (PTU) instruments. Methods For the cyclic fatigue test, 10 instruments from each group were tested by using a stainless steel block w...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of endodontics 2016-12, Vol.42 (12), p.1840-1843 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Abstract Introduction The purpose of this study was to evaluate the cyclic fatigue and torsional resistance of Hyflex EDM, ProTaper Gold (PTG), and ProTaper Universal (PTU) instruments. Methods For the cyclic fatigue test, 10 instruments from each group were tested by using a stainless steel block with 1.5-mm diameter and 3-mm radius of 60° angle of curvature. The instruments were allowed to rotate by using a low-torque motor, and number of cycles from the beginning to the fracture was recorded. Torsional resistance of the instruments (n = 10) was evaluated according to ISO 3630-1. The rotational speed of the instruments was set in the clockwise direction at 2 rpm. The maximum torque and angular deflection until fracture of the instrument were recorded. The data were analyzed by using one-way analysis of variance followed by post hoc Tukey test ( P = .05). Results HyFlex EDM instruments exhibited the highest cyclic fatigue resistance and were followed by PTG and PTU groups, respectively. The mean fragment length for PTU instruments was significantly shorter than that for Hyflex EDM and PTG instruments. PTG instruments demonstrated significantly higher torsional resistance than HyFlex EDM files ( P = .025), and the distortion angle of the instruments ranged as follows: PTU |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0099-2399 1878-3554 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.joen.2016.07.015 |