Light absorption properties of brown carbon in the high Himalayas

The light‐absorbing properties of water‐soluble brown carbon (WS‐BrC) and methanol‐soluble brown carbon (MeS‐BrC) were studied in PM10 aerosols collected at the “Nepal Climate Observatory‐Pyramid” (NCO‐P) station (5079 m above sea level) during the period 2013–2014. The light absorption coefficients...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres 2016-08, Vol.121 (16), p.9621-9639
Hauptverfasser: Kirillova, Elena N., Marinoni, Angela, Bonasoni, Paolo, Vuillermoz, Elisa, Facchini, Maria Cristina, Fuzzi, Sandro, Decesari, Stefano
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 9639
container_issue 16
container_start_page 9621
container_title Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres
container_volume 121
creator Kirillova, Elena N.
Marinoni, Angela
Bonasoni, Paolo
Vuillermoz, Elisa
Facchini, Maria Cristina
Fuzzi, Sandro
Decesari, Stefano
description The light‐absorbing properties of water‐soluble brown carbon (WS‐BrC) and methanol‐soluble brown carbon (MeS‐BrC) were studied in PM10 aerosols collected at the “Nepal Climate Observatory‐Pyramid” (NCO‐P) station (5079 m above sea level) during the period 2013–2014. The light absorption coefficients of WS‐BrC and MeS‐BrC were the highest during the premonsoon season and the lowest during monsoon. MeS‐BrC absorbs about 2 times higher at 365 nm and about 3 times more at 550 nm compared to WS‐BrC. The mass absorption cross section (MAC) of WS‐BrC measured at 365 nm is similar to that observed previously at South Asian low‐altitude sites. Fractional solar radiation absorption by BrC compared to BC considering the full solar spectrum showed that WS‐BrC absorbs 4 ± 1% and MeS‐BrC absorbs 9 ± 2% compared to BC at NCO‐P. Such ratios become 8 ± 1% (for WS‐BrC respect to BC) and 17 ± 5% (for MeS‐BrC respect to BC) when accounting for correction factors proposed by previous studies to convert absorption coefficients in bulk solutions into light absorption by accumulation mode aerosol particles. These results confirm the importance of BrC in contributing to light‐absorbing aerosols in this region of the world. However, the BrC absorption at 550 nm appears small compared to that of BC (1–5%, or 3–9% with conversion factors), and it is lower compared to global model estimates constrained by Aerosol Robotic Network observations. Finally, our study provides no clear evidence of a change in the fractional contribution of BrC with respect to BC to light absorption in the middle troposphere respect to the Indo‐Gangetic plain boundary layer. Key Points Light absorption coefficient of BrC in the high Himalayas has a strong seasonal variability BrC absorbs on average 4 +/‐ 1% (WS‐BrC) and 9 +/‐ 2% (MeS‐BrC) of solar radiation compared to BC BrC light absorption properties in the high Himalayas are similar to those at low altitudes
doi_str_mv 10.1002/2016JD025030
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1835666725</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1999226935</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4679-17df9e9aabd08c6bb46a8f0eb74cdff20112a98c4cb2c053504e346b2894f6563</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU1LAzEQhoMoWLQ3f0DAiwdX873JsbTaWgqCKHgLSZq1W7abmmwp_femVEQ8FOcyA_PM8M68AFxhdIcRIvcEYTEdIcIRRSegR7BQhVRKnP7U5fs56Ke0RDkkooyzHhjM6o9FB41NIa67OrRwHcPax672CYYK2hi2LXQm2tyqW9gtPFzkETipV6YxO5MuwVllmuT73_kCvD0-vA4nxex5_DQczArHRKkKXM4r5ZUxdo6kE9YyYWSFvC2Zm1dVVo-JUdIxZ4lDnHLEPGXCEqlYJbigF-DmsDcL_Nz41OlVnZxvGtP6sEkaS8qFECXh_0BJKRVXVGX0-g-6DJvY5kM0VkoRIhTlRymJFUecs_2u2wPlYkgp-kqvY_5S3GmM9N4j_dujjNMDvq0bvzvK6un4ZcQpzpK_ACWXj2k</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1819505549</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Light absorption properties of brown carbon in the high Himalayas</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Wiley Online Library Free Content</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Kirillova, Elena N. ; Marinoni, Angela ; Bonasoni, Paolo ; Vuillermoz, Elisa ; Facchini, Maria Cristina ; Fuzzi, Sandro ; Decesari, Stefano</creator><creatorcontrib>Kirillova, Elena N. ; Marinoni, Angela ; Bonasoni, Paolo ; Vuillermoz, Elisa ; Facchini, Maria Cristina ; Fuzzi, Sandro ; Decesari, Stefano</creatorcontrib><description>The light‐absorbing properties of water‐soluble brown carbon (WS‐BrC) and methanol‐soluble brown carbon (MeS‐BrC) were studied in PM10 aerosols collected at the “Nepal Climate Observatory‐Pyramid” (NCO‐P) station (5079 m above sea level) during the period 2013–2014. The light absorption coefficients of WS‐BrC and MeS‐BrC were the highest during the premonsoon season and the lowest during monsoon. MeS‐BrC absorbs about 2 times higher at 365 nm and about 3 times more at 550 nm compared to WS‐BrC. The mass absorption cross section (MAC) of WS‐BrC measured at 365 nm is similar to that observed previously at South Asian low‐altitude sites. Fractional solar radiation absorption by BrC compared to BC considering the full solar spectrum showed that WS‐BrC absorbs 4 ± 1% and MeS‐BrC absorbs 9 ± 2% compared to BC at NCO‐P. Such ratios become 8 ± 1% (for WS‐BrC respect to BC) and 17 ± 5% (for MeS‐BrC respect to BC) when accounting for correction factors proposed by previous studies to convert absorption coefficients in bulk solutions into light absorption by accumulation mode aerosol particles. These results confirm the importance of BrC in contributing to light‐absorbing aerosols in this region of the world. However, the BrC absorption at 550 nm appears small compared to that of BC (1–5%, or 3–9% with conversion factors), and it is lower compared to global model estimates constrained by Aerosol Robotic Network observations. Finally, our study provides no clear evidence of a change in the fractional contribution of BrC with respect to BC to light absorption in the middle troposphere respect to the Indo‐Gangetic plain boundary layer. Key Points Light absorption coefficient of BrC in the high Himalayas has a strong seasonal variability BrC absorbs on average 4 +/‐ 1% (WS‐BrC) and 9 +/‐ 2% (MeS‐BrC) of solar radiation compared to BC BrC light absorption properties in the high Himalayas are similar to those at low altitudes</description><identifier>ISSN: 2169-897X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2169-8996</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/2016JD025030</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Absorption ; Absorption coefficient ; Absorption cross sections ; Absorptivity ; Aerosol particles ; Aerosol Robotic Network ; Aerosols ; ambient organic aerosols ; Atmospheric chemistry ; Boundary layers ; brown carbon ; Carbon ; Coefficients ; Conversion factors ; Electromagnetic absorption ; Geophysics ; Himalayas ; Light ; Light absorption ; Low altitude ; Marine ; Mathematical models ; Middle troposphere ; Monsoons ; Particulate matter ; Properties ; Properties (attributes) ; Radiation absorption ; Ratios ; Sea level ; Seasonal variability ; Seasonal variation ; Seasonal variations ; Solar radiation ; Solar radiation absorption ; Solar spectrum ; Solutions ; Troposphere</subject><ispartof>Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres, 2016-08, Vol.121 (16), p.9621-9639</ispartof><rights>2016. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4679-17df9e9aabd08c6bb46a8f0eb74cdff20112a98c4cb2c053504e346b2894f6563</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4679-17df9e9aabd08c6bb46a8f0eb74cdff20112a98c4cb2c053504e346b2894f6563</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2F2016JD025030$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2F2016JD025030$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,1427,27901,27902,45550,45551,46384,46808</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kirillova, Elena N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marinoni, Angela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bonasoni, Paolo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vuillermoz, Elisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Facchini, Maria Cristina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fuzzi, Sandro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Decesari, Stefano</creatorcontrib><title>Light absorption properties of brown carbon in the high Himalayas</title><title>Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres</title><description>The light‐absorbing properties of water‐soluble brown carbon (WS‐BrC) and methanol‐soluble brown carbon (MeS‐BrC) were studied in PM10 aerosols collected at the “Nepal Climate Observatory‐Pyramid” (NCO‐P) station (5079 m above sea level) during the period 2013–2014. The light absorption coefficients of WS‐BrC and MeS‐BrC were the highest during the premonsoon season and the lowest during monsoon. MeS‐BrC absorbs about 2 times higher at 365 nm and about 3 times more at 550 nm compared to WS‐BrC. The mass absorption cross section (MAC) of WS‐BrC measured at 365 nm is similar to that observed previously at South Asian low‐altitude sites. Fractional solar radiation absorption by BrC compared to BC considering the full solar spectrum showed that WS‐BrC absorbs 4 ± 1% and MeS‐BrC absorbs 9 ± 2% compared to BC at NCO‐P. Such ratios become 8 ± 1% (for WS‐BrC respect to BC) and 17 ± 5% (for MeS‐BrC respect to BC) when accounting for correction factors proposed by previous studies to convert absorption coefficients in bulk solutions into light absorption by accumulation mode aerosol particles. These results confirm the importance of BrC in contributing to light‐absorbing aerosols in this region of the world. However, the BrC absorption at 550 nm appears small compared to that of BC (1–5%, or 3–9% with conversion factors), and it is lower compared to global model estimates constrained by Aerosol Robotic Network observations. Finally, our study provides no clear evidence of a change in the fractional contribution of BrC with respect to BC to light absorption in the middle troposphere respect to the Indo‐Gangetic plain boundary layer. Key Points Light absorption coefficient of BrC in the high Himalayas has a strong seasonal variability BrC absorbs on average 4 +/‐ 1% (WS‐BrC) and 9 +/‐ 2% (MeS‐BrC) of solar radiation compared to BC BrC light absorption properties in the high Himalayas are similar to those at low altitudes</description><subject>Absorption</subject><subject>Absorption coefficient</subject><subject>Absorption cross sections</subject><subject>Absorptivity</subject><subject>Aerosol particles</subject><subject>Aerosol Robotic Network</subject><subject>Aerosols</subject><subject>ambient organic aerosols</subject><subject>Atmospheric chemistry</subject><subject>Boundary layers</subject><subject>brown carbon</subject><subject>Carbon</subject><subject>Coefficients</subject><subject>Conversion factors</subject><subject>Electromagnetic absorption</subject><subject>Geophysics</subject><subject>Himalayas</subject><subject>Light</subject><subject>Light absorption</subject><subject>Low altitude</subject><subject>Marine</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Middle troposphere</subject><subject>Monsoons</subject><subject>Particulate matter</subject><subject>Properties</subject><subject>Properties (attributes)</subject><subject>Radiation absorption</subject><subject>Ratios</subject><subject>Sea level</subject><subject>Seasonal variability</subject><subject>Seasonal variation</subject><subject>Seasonal variations</subject><subject>Solar radiation</subject><subject>Solar radiation absorption</subject><subject>Solar spectrum</subject><subject>Solutions</subject><subject>Troposphere</subject><issn>2169-897X</issn><issn>2169-8996</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkU1LAzEQhoMoWLQ3f0DAiwdX873JsbTaWgqCKHgLSZq1W7abmmwp_femVEQ8FOcyA_PM8M68AFxhdIcRIvcEYTEdIcIRRSegR7BQhVRKnP7U5fs56Ke0RDkkooyzHhjM6o9FB41NIa67OrRwHcPax672CYYK2hi2LXQm2tyqW9gtPFzkETipV6YxO5MuwVllmuT73_kCvD0-vA4nxex5_DQczArHRKkKXM4r5ZUxdo6kE9YyYWSFvC2Zm1dVVo-JUdIxZ4lDnHLEPGXCEqlYJbigF-DmsDcL_Nz41OlVnZxvGtP6sEkaS8qFECXh_0BJKRVXVGX0-g-6DJvY5kM0VkoRIhTlRymJFUecs_2u2wPlYkgp-kqvY_5S3GmM9N4j_dujjNMDvq0bvzvK6un4ZcQpzpK_ACWXj2k</recordid><startdate>20160827</startdate><enddate>20160827</enddate><creator>Kirillova, Elena N.</creator><creator>Marinoni, Angela</creator><creator>Bonasoni, Paolo</creator><creator>Vuillermoz, Elisa</creator><creator>Facchini, Maria Cristina</creator><creator>Fuzzi, Sandro</creator><creator>Decesari, Stefano</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160827</creationdate><title>Light absorption properties of brown carbon in the high Himalayas</title><author>Kirillova, Elena N. ; Marinoni, Angela ; Bonasoni, Paolo ; Vuillermoz, Elisa ; Facchini, Maria Cristina ; Fuzzi, Sandro ; Decesari, Stefano</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4679-17df9e9aabd08c6bb46a8f0eb74cdff20112a98c4cb2c053504e346b2894f6563</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Absorption</topic><topic>Absorption coefficient</topic><topic>Absorption cross sections</topic><topic>Absorptivity</topic><topic>Aerosol particles</topic><topic>Aerosol Robotic Network</topic><topic>Aerosols</topic><topic>ambient organic aerosols</topic><topic>Atmospheric chemistry</topic><topic>Boundary layers</topic><topic>brown carbon</topic><topic>Carbon</topic><topic>Coefficients</topic><topic>Conversion factors</topic><topic>Electromagnetic absorption</topic><topic>Geophysics</topic><topic>Himalayas</topic><topic>Light</topic><topic>Light absorption</topic><topic>Low altitude</topic><topic>Marine</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Middle troposphere</topic><topic>Monsoons</topic><topic>Particulate matter</topic><topic>Properties</topic><topic>Properties (attributes)</topic><topic>Radiation absorption</topic><topic>Ratios</topic><topic>Sea level</topic><topic>Seasonal variability</topic><topic>Seasonal variation</topic><topic>Seasonal variations</topic><topic>Solar radiation</topic><topic>Solar radiation absorption</topic><topic>Solar spectrum</topic><topic>Solutions</topic><topic>Troposphere</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kirillova, Elena N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marinoni, Angela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bonasoni, Paolo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vuillermoz, Elisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Facchini, Maria Cristina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fuzzi, Sandro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Decesari, Stefano</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kirillova, Elena N.</au><au>Marinoni, Angela</au><au>Bonasoni, Paolo</au><au>Vuillermoz, Elisa</au><au>Facchini, Maria Cristina</au><au>Fuzzi, Sandro</au><au>Decesari, Stefano</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Light absorption properties of brown carbon in the high Himalayas</atitle><jtitle>Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres</jtitle><date>2016-08-27</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>121</volume><issue>16</issue><spage>9621</spage><epage>9639</epage><pages>9621-9639</pages><issn>2169-897X</issn><eissn>2169-8996</eissn><abstract>The light‐absorbing properties of water‐soluble brown carbon (WS‐BrC) and methanol‐soluble brown carbon (MeS‐BrC) were studied in PM10 aerosols collected at the “Nepal Climate Observatory‐Pyramid” (NCO‐P) station (5079 m above sea level) during the period 2013–2014. The light absorption coefficients of WS‐BrC and MeS‐BrC were the highest during the premonsoon season and the lowest during monsoon. MeS‐BrC absorbs about 2 times higher at 365 nm and about 3 times more at 550 nm compared to WS‐BrC. The mass absorption cross section (MAC) of WS‐BrC measured at 365 nm is similar to that observed previously at South Asian low‐altitude sites. Fractional solar radiation absorption by BrC compared to BC considering the full solar spectrum showed that WS‐BrC absorbs 4 ± 1% and MeS‐BrC absorbs 9 ± 2% compared to BC at NCO‐P. Such ratios become 8 ± 1% (for WS‐BrC respect to BC) and 17 ± 5% (for MeS‐BrC respect to BC) when accounting for correction factors proposed by previous studies to convert absorption coefficients in bulk solutions into light absorption by accumulation mode aerosol particles. These results confirm the importance of BrC in contributing to light‐absorbing aerosols in this region of the world. However, the BrC absorption at 550 nm appears small compared to that of BC (1–5%, or 3–9% with conversion factors), and it is lower compared to global model estimates constrained by Aerosol Robotic Network observations. Finally, our study provides no clear evidence of a change in the fractional contribution of BrC with respect to BC to light absorption in the middle troposphere respect to the Indo‐Gangetic plain boundary layer. Key Points Light absorption coefficient of BrC in the high Himalayas has a strong seasonal variability BrC absorbs on average 4 +/‐ 1% (WS‐BrC) and 9 +/‐ 2% (MeS‐BrC) of solar radiation compared to BC BrC light absorption properties in the high Himalayas are similar to those at low altitudes</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/2016JD025030</doi><tpages>19</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2169-897X
ispartof Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres, 2016-08, Vol.121 (16), p.9621-9639
issn 2169-897X
2169-8996
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1835666725
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Wiley Online Library Free Content; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Absorption
Absorption coefficient
Absorption cross sections
Absorptivity
Aerosol particles
Aerosol Robotic Network
Aerosols
ambient organic aerosols
Atmospheric chemistry
Boundary layers
brown carbon
Carbon
Coefficients
Conversion factors
Electromagnetic absorption
Geophysics
Himalayas
Light
Light absorption
Low altitude
Marine
Mathematical models
Middle troposphere
Monsoons
Particulate matter
Properties
Properties (attributes)
Radiation absorption
Ratios
Sea level
Seasonal variability
Seasonal variation
Seasonal variations
Solar radiation
Solar radiation absorption
Solar spectrum
Solutions
Troposphere
title Light absorption properties of brown carbon in the high Himalayas
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T17%3A06%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Light%20absorption%20properties%20of%20brown%20carbon%20in%20the%20high%20Himalayas&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20geophysical%20research.%20Atmospheres&rft.au=Kirillova,%20Elena%20N.&rft.date=2016-08-27&rft.volume=121&rft.issue=16&rft.spage=9621&rft.epage=9639&rft.pages=9621-9639&rft.issn=2169-897X&rft.eissn=2169-8996&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/2016JD025030&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1999226935%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1819505549&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true