Shaping an international agreement on marine biodiversity beyond areas of national jurisdiction: Lessons from high seas fisheries

A decade of international discussion on marine biological diversity beyond areas of national jurisdiction (BBNJ) culminated in 2015 with a United Nations General Assembly Resolution to establish an international legally-binding instrument on the conservation and sustainable use of BBNJ. Proponents o...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Marine policy 2016-09, Vol.71, p.210-216
Hauptverfasser: Blasiak, Robert, Yagi, Nobuyuki
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 216
container_issue
container_start_page 210
container_title Marine policy
container_volume 71
creator Blasiak, Robert
Yagi, Nobuyuki
description A decade of international discussion on marine biological diversity beyond areas of national jurisdiction (BBNJ) culminated in 2015 with a United Nations General Assembly Resolution to establish an international legally-binding instrument on the conservation and sustainable use of BBNJ. Proponents of the new instrument therefore consider it as an opportunity to eliminate gaps in the current legal regime and promote better coordination. As the next step in the negotiations begins, substantial lessons can be drawn from the 1995 UN Fish Stocks Agreement (UNFSA), which has faced many of the same challenges related to gaps in scientific knowledge, uneven governance and regulatory capacities, and inherent unpredictability, both ecologically and in terms of anthropogenic drivers of change. For BBNJ, however, such challenges are far more complex due to the diversity of stakeholder communities and the diversity of resources involved, including fish and mineral resources with tangible economic values, marine genetic resources of unknown value, and the culturally-specific values attached to charismatic species and conservation in general. Drawing on lessons from UNFSA, it is argued that the establishment of marine protected areas (MPAs) under the BBNJ instrument would be particularly well served by a similar regional approach aligned with existing international agreements. In this regard, it is recommended that the capacity building under the new international instrument on BBNJ should focus inter alia on the secretariats of the regional fishery management organizations in order to enhance intra-regional and inter-regional cooperation and sharing of best practices. •Lessons from the UNFSA are crucial for shaping an effective instrument on BBNJ.•The BBNJ instrument should make maximum use of regional approach.•Self-interest among stakeholders in monitoring and compliance will be crucial.•A major challenge for BBNJ instrument is range of tangibility of resource values.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.marpol.2016.06.004
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1835630266</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0308597X16300021</els_id><sourcerecordid>1835630266</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-cc2796d95c65be760aa8a8540e6b068acab2cd0fba120ee9e45642cf9ef26c783</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU9r20AQxZeSQJ0036CHPfYid1ZarVY9FELoPzDkkAZyW1arkT1G3nV25ICP-eaRcemxFAaGB-_3YOYJ8VHBUoEyn7fLnc_7NC7LWS1hHtDvxELZpixabeBCLKACW9Rt8_ReXDFvAaCpdbsQrw8bv6e4lj5KihPm6CdK0Y_SrzPiDuMkU5RzPkWUHaWeXjAzTUfZ4THFXvqMnmUa5F9ye8jEPYWT_CJXyJwiyyGnndzQeiP5BAzEG8yE_EFcDn5kvPmzr8Xj92-_734Wq_sfv-5uV0XQlZ2KEMqmNX1bB1N32Bjw3npba0DTgbE--K4MPQydVyUgtqhro8swtDiUJjS2uhafzrn7nJ4PyJPbEQccRx8xHdgpW9WmgtKY_7AqZa0CC7NVn60hJ-aMg9tnmr91dArcqRy3dedy3KkcB_OAnrGvZwzni18Is-NAGAP2lDFMrk_074A3gMGdpw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1811881080</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Shaping an international agreement on marine biodiversity beyond areas of national jurisdiction: Lessons from high seas fisheries</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Blasiak, Robert ; Yagi, Nobuyuki</creator><creatorcontrib>Blasiak, Robert ; Yagi, Nobuyuki</creatorcontrib><description>A decade of international discussion on marine biological diversity beyond areas of national jurisdiction (BBNJ) culminated in 2015 with a United Nations General Assembly Resolution to establish an international legally-binding instrument on the conservation and sustainable use of BBNJ. Proponents of the new instrument therefore consider it as an opportunity to eliminate gaps in the current legal regime and promote better coordination. As the next step in the negotiations begins, substantial lessons can be drawn from the 1995 UN Fish Stocks Agreement (UNFSA), which has faced many of the same challenges related to gaps in scientific knowledge, uneven governance and regulatory capacities, and inherent unpredictability, both ecologically and in terms of anthropogenic drivers of change. For BBNJ, however, such challenges are far more complex due to the diversity of stakeholder communities and the diversity of resources involved, including fish and mineral resources with tangible economic values, marine genetic resources of unknown value, and the culturally-specific values attached to charismatic species and conservation in general. Drawing on lessons from UNFSA, it is argued that the establishment of marine protected areas (MPAs) under the BBNJ instrument would be particularly well served by a similar regional approach aligned with existing international agreements. In this regard, it is recommended that the capacity building under the new international instrument on BBNJ should focus inter alia on the secretariats of the regional fishery management organizations in order to enhance intra-regional and inter-regional cooperation and sharing of best practices. •Lessons from the UNFSA are crucial for shaping an effective instrument on BBNJ.•The BBNJ instrument should make maximum use of regional approach.•Self-interest among stakeholders in monitoring and compliance will be crucial.•A major challenge for BBNJ instrument is range of tangibility of resource values.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0308-597X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-9460</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.marpol.2016.06.004</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>BBNJ ; Biological diversity ; Brackish ; Conservation ; Economics ; Fish ; Fisheries ; Information asymmetries ; Jurisdiction ; Marine ; Marine genetic resources ; Marine protected areas ; Multi-stakeholder engagement ; Policies ; Sustainability ; UN Fish Stocks Agreement</subject><ispartof>Marine policy, 2016-09, Vol.71, p.210-216</ispartof><rights>2016 Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-cc2796d95c65be760aa8a8540e6b068acab2cd0fba120ee9e45642cf9ef26c783</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-cc2796d95c65be760aa8a8540e6b068acab2cd0fba120ee9e45642cf9ef26c783</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2016.06.004$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,3551,27929,27930,46000</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Blasiak, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yagi, Nobuyuki</creatorcontrib><title>Shaping an international agreement on marine biodiversity beyond areas of national jurisdiction: Lessons from high seas fisheries</title><title>Marine policy</title><description>A decade of international discussion on marine biological diversity beyond areas of national jurisdiction (BBNJ) culminated in 2015 with a United Nations General Assembly Resolution to establish an international legally-binding instrument on the conservation and sustainable use of BBNJ. Proponents of the new instrument therefore consider it as an opportunity to eliminate gaps in the current legal regime and promote better coordination. As the next step in the negotiations begins, substantial lessons can be drawn from the 1995 UN Fish Stocks Agreement (UNFSA), which has faced many of the same challenges related to gaps in scientific knowledge, uneven governance and regulatory capacities, and inherent unpredictability, both ecologically and in terms of anthropogenic drivers of change. For BBNJ, however, such challenges are far more complex due to the diversity of stakeholder communities and the diversity of resources involved, including fish and mineral resources with tangible economic values, marine genetic resources of unknown value, and the culturally-specific values attached to charismatic species and conservation in general. Drawing on lessons from UNFSA, it is argued that the establishment of marine protected areas (MPAs) under the BBNJ instrument would be particularly well served by a similar regional approach aligned with existing international agreements. In this regard, it is recommended that the capacity building under the new international instrument on BBNJ should focus inter alia on the secretariats of the regional fishery management organizations in order to enhance intra-regional and inter-regional cooperation and sharing of best practices. •Lessons from the UNFSA are crucial for shaping an effective instrument on BBNJ.•The BBNJ instrument should make maximum use of regional approach.•Self-interest among stakeholders in monitoring and compliance will be crucial.•A major challenge for BBNJ instrument is range of tangibility of resource values.</description><subject>BBNJ</subject><subject>Biological diversity</subject><subject>Brackish</subject><subject>Conservation</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Fish</subject><subject>Fisheries</subject><subject>Information asymmetries</subject><subject>Jurisdiction</subject><subject>Marine</subject><subject>Marine genetic resources</subject><subject>Marine protected areas</subject><subject>Multi-stakeholder engagement</subject><subject>Policies</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><subject>UN Fish Stocks Agreement</subject><issn>0308-597X</issn><issn>1872-9460</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkU9r20AQxZeSQJ0036CHPfYid1ZarVY9FELoPzDkkAZyW1arkT1G3nV25ICP-eaRcemxFAaGB-_3YOYJ8VHBUoEyn7fLnc_7NC7LWS1hHtDvxELZpixabeBCLKACW9Rt8_ReXDFvAaCpdbsQrw8bv6e4lj5KihPm6CdK0Y_SrzPiDuMkU5RzPkWUHaWeXjAzTUfZ4THFXvqMnmUa5F9ye8jEPYWT_CJXyJwiyyGnndzQeiP5BAzEG8yE_EFcDn5kvPmzr8Xj92-_734Wq_sfv-5uV0XQlZ2KEMqmNX1bB1N32Bjw3npba0DTgbE--K4MPQydVyUgtqhro8swtDiUJjS2uhafzrn7nJ4PyJPbEQccRx8xHdgpW9WmgtKY_7AqZa0CC7NVn60hJ-aMg9tnmr91dArcqRy3dedy3KkcB_OAnrGvZwzni18Is-NAGAP2lDFMrk_074A3gMGdpw</recordid><startdate>201609</startdate><enddate>201609</enddate><creator>Blasiak, Robert</creator><creator>Yagi, Nobuyuki</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201609</creationdate><title>Shaping an international agreement on marine biodiversity beyond areas of national jurisdiction: Lessons from high seas fisheries</title><author>Blasiak, Robert ; Yagi, Nobuyuki</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-cc2796d95c65be760aa8a8540e6b068acab2cd0fba120ee9e45642cf9ef26c783</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>BBNJ</topic><topic>Biological diversity</topic><topic>Brackish</topic><topic>Conservation</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Fish</topic><topic>Fisheries</topic><topic>Information asymmetries</topic><topic>Jurisdiction</topic><topic>Marine</topic><topic>Marine genetic resources</topic><topic>Marine protected areas</topic><topic>Multi-stakeholder engagement</topic><topic>Policies</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><topic>UN Fish Stocks Agreement</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Blasiak, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yagi, Nobuyuki</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Marine policy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Blasiak, Robert</au><au>Yagi, Nobuyuki</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Shaping an international agreement on marine biodiversity beyond areas of national jurisdiction: Lessons from high seas fisheries</atitle><jtitle>Marine policy</jtitle><date>2016-09</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>71</volume><spage>210</spage><epage>216</epage><pages>210-216</pages><issn>0308-597X</issn><eissn>1872-9460</eissn><abstract>A decade of international discussion on marine biological diversity beyond areas of national jurisdiction (BBNJ) culminated in 2015 with a United Nations General Assembly Resolution to establish an international legally-binding instrument on the conservation and sustainable use of BBNJ. Proponents of the new instrument therefore consider it as an opportunity to eliminate gaps in the current legal regime and promote better coordination. As the next step in the negotiations begins, substantial lessons can be drawn from the 1995 UN Fish Stocks Agreement (UNFSA), which has faced many of the same challenges related to gaps in scientific knowledge, uneven governance and regulatory capacities, and inherent unpredictability, both ecologically and in terms of anthropogenic drivers of change. For BBNJ, however, such challenges are far more complex due to the diversity of stakeholder communities and the diversity of resources involved, including fish and mineral resources with tangible economic values, marine genetic resources of unknown value, and the culturally-specific values attached to charismatic species and conservation in general. Drawing on lessons from UNFSA, it is argued that the establishment of marine protected areas (MPAs) under the BBNJ instrument would be particularly well served by a similar regional approach aligned with existing international agreements. In this regard, it is recommended that the capacity building under the new international instrument on BBNJ should focus inter alia on the secretariats of the regional fishery management organizations in order to enhance intra-regional and inter-regional cooperation and sharing of best practices. •Lessons from the UNFSA are crucial for shaping an effective instrument on BBNJ.•The BBNJ instrument should make maximum use of regional approach.•Self-interest among stakeholders in monitoring and compliance will be crucial.•A major challenge for BBNJ instrument is range of tangibility of resource values.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.marpol.2016.06.004</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0308-597X
ispartof Marine policy, 2016-09, Vol.71, p.210-216
issn 0308-597X
1872-9460
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1835630266
source Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects BBNJ
Biological diversity
Brackish
Conservation
Economics
Fish
Fisheries
Information asymmetries
Jurisdiction
Marine
Marine genetic resources
Marine protected areas
Multi-stakeholder engagement
Policies
Sustainability
UN Fish Stocks Agreement
title Shaping an international agreement on marine biodiversity beyond areas of national jurisdiction: Lessons from high seas fisheries
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-14T21%3A49%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Shaping%20an%20international%20agreement%20on%20marine%20biodiversity%20beyond%20areas%20of%20national%20jurisdiction:%20Lessons%20from%20high%20seas%20fisheries&rft.jtitle=Marine%20policy&rft.au=Blasiak,%20Robert&rft.date=2016-09&rft.volume=71&rft.spage=210&rft.epage=216&rft.pages=210-216&rft.issn=0308-597X&rft.eissn=1872-9460&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.marpol.2016.06.004&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1835630266%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1811881080&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0308597X16300021&rfr_iscdi=true