Does Lordotic Angle of Cage Determine Lumbar Lordosis in Lumbar Interbody Fusion?

STUDY DESIGN.Retrospective, radiological analysis OBJECTIVE.To determine that 15° lordotic angle cages create higher lumbar lordosis in open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) than 4° and 8° cages. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA.Restoration of lumbar lordosis is important to obtain good outco...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976) Pa. 1976), 2017-07, Vol.42 (13), p.E775-E780
Hauptverfasser: Hong, Taek-Ho, Cho, Kyu-Jung, Kim, Young-Tae, Park, Jae-Woo, Seo, Beom-Ho, Kim, Nak-Chul
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:STUDY DESIGN.Retrospective, radiological analysis OBJECTIVE.To determine that 15° lordotic angle cages create higher lumbar lordosis in open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) than 4° and 8° cages. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA.Restoration of lumbar lordosis is important to obtain good outcome after lumbar fusion surgery. Various shapes and angles of cages in interbody fusion have been used, however, it is not proved that lordotic angle of cages determine lumbar lordosis. METHODS.Sixty-seven patients were evaluated after TLIF using 15° cages and screw instrumentation. For comparison, TLIF using 4° lordotic angle cages in 65 patients and 8° cages in 49 patients were analyzed. Lumbar lordosis angles, segmental lordosis angles, disc height, and bony union rate were measured on the radiographs. RESULTS.The lumbar lordosis was 31.1° preoperatively, improved to 42.9° postoperatively and decreased to 36.4° at the last follow-up in the 15° group. It was 35.8° before surgery, corrected to 41.5° after surgery, and changed to 33.6° at the last follow-up in the 4° group. In the 8° group, it was 32.7° preoperatively, improved to 39.1° postoperatively and decreased to 34.5° at the last follow-up. These changes showed statistical significances (p 
ISSN:0362-2436
1528-1159
DOI:10.1097/BRS.0000000000001957