Microbial Diversity of Type I Sourdoughs Prepared and Back-Slopped with Wholemeal and Refined Soft (Triticum aestivum) Wheat Flours

The fermentation of type I sourdough was studied for 20 d with daily back‐slopping under laboratory and artisan bakery conditions using 1 wholemeal and 2 refined soft wheat (Triticum aestivum) flours. The sourdough bacterial and yeast diversity and dynamics were investigated by plate counting and a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of food science 2016-08, Vol.81 (8), p.M1996-M2005
Hauptverfasser: Taccari, Manuela, Aquilanti, Lucia, Polverigiani, Serena, Osimani, Andrea, Garofalo, Cristiana, Milanović, Vesna, Clementi, Francesca
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page M2005
container_issue 8
container_start_page M1996
container_title Journal of food science
container_volume 81
creator Taccari, Manuela
Aquilanti, Lucia
Polverigiani, Serena
Osimani, Andrea
Garofalo, Cristiana
Milanović, Vesna
Clementi, Francesca
description The fermentation of type I sourdough was studied for 20 d with daily back‐slopping under laboratory and artisan bakery conditions using 1 wholemeal and 2 refined soft wheat (Triticum aestivum) flours. The sourdough bacterial and yeast diversity and dynamics were investigated by plate counting and a combination of culture‐dependent and culture‐independent PCR‐DGGE approach. The pH, total titrable acidity, and concentration of key organic acids (phytic, lactic, and acetic) were measured. Three flours differed for both chemical and rheological properties. A microbial succession was observed, with the atypical sourdough species detected at day 0 (i.e. Lactococcus lactis and Leuconostoc holzapfelii/citreum group for bacteria and Candida silvae and Wickerhamomyces anomalus for yeasts) being progressively replaced by taxa more adapted to the sourdough ecosystem (Lactobacillus brevis, Lactobacillus alimentarius/paralimentarius, Saccharomyces cerevisiae). In mature sourdoughs, a notably different species composition was observed. As sourdoughs propagated with the same flour at laboratory and artisan bakery level were compared, the influence of both the substrate and the propagation environment on microbial diversity was assumed. Practical Applications Bakery foods made from wholemeal flours have many health benefits, mainly due to their high content of bran fiber. However, wholemeal flours are poorly utilized in breadmaking due to their low leavening ability and richness in antinutrients (phytates). The use of wholemeal sourdoughs might represent an alternative to baker's yeast for future development of more nutritious cereal‐based foods.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/1750-3841.13372
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1835607496</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1980997960</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5452-a011b8244d97efd807f162fe8b58bc7bb2cab4aef361efeba90bfd8af203ef043</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkr9v1DAUxyMEokdhZkOWWMqQ1j8S2xlpy5VW14K4Q5VYLDt55twml9ROWm7mH8fptTcwQL1Yfv68j_zkb5K8JXifxHVARI5TJjOyTxgT9Fky2VaeJxOMKU0JycRO8iqEKzyeGX-Z7FDBGBWSTZLf5670rXG6RsfuFnxw_Rq1Fi3WHaBTNG8HX7XDz2VAXz102kOF9KpCh7q8Tud123WxcOf6JbpctjU0ED3j_TewbhWv5q3t0d7Cu96VQ4M0hN7dDs2HiIPu0bSO_vA6eWF1HeDNw76bfJ9-Whx9TmdfTk6PPs7SMs9ymmpMiJE0y6pCgK0kFpZwakGaXJpSGENLbTINlnECFowusImYthQzsDhju8nextv59maIT1GNCyXUtV5BOwRFJMs5FlnBn4CSnBeUEPoUFEueywxH9P1f6FWcfxVnVqSQuChEwf9NRVdOZX7vOthQ8ftC8GBV512j_VoRrMZsqDEJakyCus9G7Hj34B1MA9WWfwxDBPgGuHM1rP_nU2fT4_mjOd00utDDr22j9teKCyZydXlxog7PL2ZE_DhTGfsDKQnRYw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1810528540</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Microbial Diversity of Type I Sourdoughs Prepared and Back-Slopped with Wholemeal and Refined Soft (Triticum aestivum) Wheat Flours</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Taccari, Manuela ; Aquilanti, Lucia ; Polverigiani, Serena ; Osimani, Andrea ; Garofalo, Cristiana ; Milanović, Vesna ; Clementi, Francesca</creator><creatorcontrib>Taccari, Manuela ; Aquilanti, Lucia ; Polverigiani, Serena ; Osimani, Andrea ; Garofalo, Cristiana ; Milanović, Vesna ; Clementi, Francesca</creatorcontrib><description>The fermentation of type I sourdough was studied for 20 d with daily back‐slopping under laboratory and artisan bakery conditions using 1 wholemeal and 2 refined soft wheat (Triticum aestivum) flours. The sourdough bacterial and yeast diversity and dynamics were investigated by plate counting and a combination of culture‐dependent and culture‐independent PCR‐DGGE approach. The pH, total titrable acidity, and concentration of key organic acids (phytic, lactic, and acetic) were measured. Three flours differed for both chemical and rheological properties. A microbial succession was observed, with the atypical sourdough species detected at day 0 (i.e. Lactococcus lactis and Leuconostoc holzapfelii/citreum group for bacteria and Candida silvae and Wickerhamomyces anomalus for yeasts) being progressively replaced by taxa more adapted to the sourdough ecosystem (Lactobacillus brevis, Lactobacillus alimentarius/paralimentarius, Saccharomyces cerevisiae). In mature sourdoughs, a notably different species composition was observed. As sourdoughs propagated with the same flour at laboratory and artisan bakery level were compared, the influence of both the substrate and the propagation environment on microbial diversity was assumed. Practical Applications Bakery foods made from wholemeal flours have many health benefits, mainly due to their high content of bran fiber. However, wholemeal flours are poorly utilized in breadmaking due to their low leavening ability and richness in antinutrients (phytates). The use of wholemeal sourdoughs might represent an alternative to baker's yeast for future development of more nutritious cereal‐based foods.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-1147</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1750-3841</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/1750-3841.13372</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27332783</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JFDSAZ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Acidity ; Bacteria ; Bacteria - growth &amp; development ; Bakery products ; Baking yeast ; Bread ; Bread - microbiology ; Candida ; Fermentation ; Flour ; Flour - analysis ; Flour - microbiology ; Food ; Food Handling - methods ; Food Microbiology ; Food science ; high extraction rate flour ; high-fiber breadmaking ; high-fiber sourdough ; Humans ; Laboratories ; Lactobacillus - growth &amp; development ; Lactobacillus alimentarius ; Lactobacillus brevis ; Lactococcus lactis ; Leuconostoc ; Microbiology ; Microorganisms ; Organic acids ; PCR-DGGE ; pH effects ; Polymerase Chain Reaction ; Propagation ; Rheological properties ; Saccharomyces cerevisiae ; Saccharomyces cerevisiae - growth &amp; development ; Sourdough ; sourdough microbiota ; Species composition ; Species Specificity ; Substrates ; Taxa ; Triticum ; Triticum aestivum ; Wheat ; Whole Grains ; Yeast ; Yeasts</subject><ispartof>Journal of food science, 2016-08, Vol.81 (8), p.M1996-M2005</ispartof><rights>2016 Institute of Food Technologists</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5452-a011b8244d97efd807f162fe8b58bc7bb2cab4aef361efeba90bfd8af203ef043</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5452-a011b8244d97efd807f162fe8b58bc7bb2cab4aef361efeba90bfd8af203ef043</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2F1750-3841.13372$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2F1750-3841.13372$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,1414,27907,27908,45557,45558</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27332783$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Taccari, Manuela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aquilanti, Lucia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Polverigiani, Serena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Osimani, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garofalo, Cristiana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Milanović, Vesna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clementi, Francesca</creatorcontrib><title>Microbial Diversity of Type I Sourdoughs Prepared and Back-Slopped with Wholemeal and Refined Soft (Triticum aestivum) Wheat Flours</title><title>Journal of food science</title><addtitle>Journal of Food Science</addtitle><description>The fermentation of type I sourdough was studied for 20 d with daily back‐slopping under laboratory and artisan bakery conditions using 1 wholemeal and 2 refined soft wheat (Triticum aestivum) flours. The sourdough bacterial and yeast diversity and dynamics were investigated by plate counting and a combination of culture‐dependent and culture‐independent PCR‐DGGE approach. The pH, total titrable acidity, and concentration of key organic acids (phytic, lactic, and acetic) were measured. Three flours differed for both chemical and rheological properties. A microbial succession was observed, with the atypical sourdough species detected at day 0 (i.e. Lactococcus lactis and Leuconostoc holzapfelii/citreum group for bacteria and Candida silvae and Wickerhamomyces anomalus for yeasts) being progressively replaced by taxa more adapted to the sourdough ecosystem (Lactobacillus brevis, Lactobacillus alimentarius/paralimentarius, Saccharomyces cerevisiae). In mature sourdoughs, a notably different species composition was observed. As sourdoughs propagated with the same flour at laboratory and artisan bakery level were compared, the influence of both the substrate and the propagation environment on microbial diversity was assumed. Practical Applications Bakery foods made from wholemeal flours have many health benefits, mainly due to their high content of bran fiber. However, wholemeal flours are poorly utilized in breadmaking due to their low leavening ability and richness in antinutrients (phytates). The use of wholemeal sourdoughs might represent an alternative to baker's yeast for future development of more nutritious cereal‐based foods.</description><subject>Acidity</subject><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>Bacteria - growth &amp; development</subject><subject>Bakery products</subject><subject>Baking yeast</subject><subject>Bread</subject><subject>Bread - microbiology</subject><subject>Candida</subject><subject>Fermentation</subject><subject>Flour</subject><subject>Flour - analysis</subject><subject>Flour - microbiology</subject><subject>Food</subject><subject>Food Handling - methods</subject><subject>Food Microbiology</subject><subject>Food science</subject><subject>high extraction rate flour</subject><subject>high-fiber breadmaking</subject><subject>high-fiber sourdough</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Lactobacillus - growth &amp; development</subject><subject>Lactobacillus alimentarius</subject><subject>Lactobacillus brevis</subject><subject>Lactococcus lactis</subject><subject>Leuconostoc</subject><subject>Microbiology</subject><subject>Microorganisms</subject><subject>Organic acids</subject><subject>PCR-DGGE</subject><subject>pH effects</subject><subject>Polymerase Chain Reaction</subject><subject>Propagation</subject><subject>Rheological properties</subject><subject>Saccharomyces cerevisiae</subject><subject>Saccharomyces cerevisiae - growth &amp; development</subject><subject>Sourdough</subject><subject>sourdough microbiota</subject><subject>Species composition</subject><subject>Species Specificity</subject><subject>Substrates</subject><subject>Taxa</subject><subject>Triticum</subject><subject>Triticum aestivum</subject><subject>Wheat</subject><subject>Whole Grains</subject><subject>Yeast</subject><subject>Yeasts</subject><issn>0022-1147</issn><issn>1750-3841</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkr9v1DAUxyMEokdhZkOWWMqQ1j8S2xlpy5VW14K4Q5VYLDt55twml9ROWm7mH8fptTcwQL1Yfv68j_zkb5K8JXifxHVARI5TJjOyTxgT9Fky2VaeJxOMKU0JycRO8iqEKzyeGX-Z7FDBGBWSTZLf5670rXG6RsfuFnxw_Rq1Fi3WHaBTNG8HX7XDz2VAXz102kOF9KpCh7q8Tud123WxcOf6JbpctjU0ED3j_TewbhWv5q3t0d7Cu96VQ4M0hN7dDs2HiIPu0bSO_vA6eWF1HeDNw76bfJ9-Whx9TmdfTk6PPs7SMs9ymmpMiJE0y6pCgK0kFpZwakGaXJpSGENLbTINlnECFowusImYthQzsDhju8nextv59maIT1GNCyXUtV5BOwRFJMs5FlnBn4CSnBeUEPoUFEueywxH9P1f6FWcfxVnVqSQuChEwf9NRVdOZX7vOthQ8ftC8GBV512j_VoRrMZsqDEJakyCus9G7Hj34B1MA9WWfwxDBPgGuHM1rP_nU2fT4_mjOd00utDDr22j9teKCyZydXlxog7PL2ZE_DhTGfsDKQnRYw</recordid><startdate>201608</startdate><enddate>201608</enddate><creator>Taccari, Manuela</creator><creator>Aquilanti, Lucia</creator><creator>Polverigiani, Serena</creator><creator>Osimani, Andrea</creator><creator>Garofalo, Cristiana</creator><creator>Milanović, Vesna</creator><creator>Clementi, Francesca</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201608</creationdate><title>Microbial Diversity of Type I Sourdoughs Prepared and Back-Slopped with Wholemeal and Refined Soft (Triticum aestivum) Wheat Flours</title><author>Taccari, Manuela ; Aquilanti, Lucia ; Polverigiani, Serena ; Osimani, Andrea ; Garofalo, Cristiana ; Milanović, Vesna ; Clementi, Francesca</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5452-a011b8244d97efd807f162fe8b58bc7bb2cab4aef361efeba90bfd8af203ef043</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Acidity</topic><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>Bacteria - growth &amp; development</topic><topic>Bakery products</topic><topic>Baking yeast</topic><topic>Bread</topic><topic>Bread - microbiology</topic><topic>Candida</topic><topic>Fermentation</topic><topic>Flour</topic><topic>Flour - analysis</topic><topic>Flour - microbiology</topic><topic>Food</topic><topic>Food Handling - methods</topic><topic>Food Microbiology</topic><topic>Food science</topic><topic>high extraction rate flour</topic><topic>high-fiber breadmaking</topic><topic>high-fiber sourdough</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Lactobacillus - growth &amp; development</topic><topic>Lactobacillus alimentarius</topic><topic>Lactobacillus brevis</topic><topic>Lactococcus lactis</topic><topic>Leuconostoc</topic><topic>Microbiology</topic><topic>Microorganisms</topic><topic>Organic acids</topic><topic>PCR-DGGE</topic><topic>pH effects</topic><topic>Polymerase Chain Reaction</topic><topic>Propagation</topic><topic>Rheological properties</topic><topic>Saccharomyces cerevisiae</topic><topic>Saccharomyces cerevisiae - growth &amp; development</topic><topic>Sourdough</topic><topic>sourdough microbiota</topic><topic>Species composition</topic><topic>Species Specificity</topic><topic>Substrates</topic><topic>Taxa</topic><topic>Triticum</topic><topic>Triticum aestivum</topic><topic>Wheat</topic><topic>Whole Grains</topic><topic>Yeast</topic><topic>Yeasts</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Taccari, Manuela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aquilanti, Lucia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Polverigiani, Serena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Osimani, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garofalo, Cristiana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Milanović, Vesna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clementi, Francesca</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of food science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Taccari, Manuela</au><au>Aquilanti, Lucia</au><au>Polverigiani, Serena</au><au>Osimani, Andrea</au><au>Garofalo, Cristiana</au><au>Milanović, Vesna</au><au>Clementi, Francesca</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Microbial Diversity of Type I Sourdoughs Prepared and Back-Slopped with Wholemeal and Refined Soft (Triticum aestivum) Wheat Flours</atitle><jtitle>Journal of food science</jtitle><addtitle>Journal of Food Science</addtitle><date>2016-08</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>81</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>M1996</spage><epage>M2005</epage><pages>M1996-M2005</pages><issn>0022-1147</issn><eissn>1750-3841</eissn><coden>JFDSAZ</coden><abstract>The fermentation of type I sourdough was studied for 20 d with daily back‐slopping under laboratory and artisan bakery conditions using 1 wholemeal and 2 refined soft wheat (Triticum aestivum) flours. The sourdough bacterial and yeast diversity and dynamics were investigated by plate counting and a combination of culture‐dependent and culture‐independent PCR‐DGGE approach. The pH, total titrable acidity, and concentration of key organic acids (phytic, lactic, and acetic) were measured. Three flours differed for both chemical and rheological properties. A microbial succession was observed, with the atypical sourdough species detected at day 0 (i.e. Lactococcus lactis and Leuconostoc holzapfelii/citreum group for bacteria and Candida silvae and Wickerhamomyces anomalus for yeasts) being progressively replaced by taxa more adapted to the sourdough ecosystem (Lactobacillus brevis, Lactobacillus alimentarius/paralimentarius, Saccharomyces cerevisiae). In mature sourdoughs, a notably different species composition was observed. As sourdoughs propagated with the same flour at laboratory and artisan bakery level were compared, the influence of both the substrate and the propagation environment on microbial diversity was assumed. Practical Applications Bakery foods made from wholemeal flours have many health benefits, mainly due to their high content of bran fiber. However, wholemeal flours are poorly utilized in breadmaking due to their low leavening ability and richness in antinutrients (phytates). The use of wholemeal sourdoughs might represent an alternative to baker's yeast for future development of more nutritious cereal‐based foods.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>27332783</pmid><doi>10.1111/1750-3841.13372</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-1147
ispartof Journal of food science, 2016-08, Vol.81 (8), p.M1996-M2005
issn 0022-1147
1750-3841
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1835607496
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Acidity
Bacteria
Bacteria - growth & development
Bakery products
Baking yeast
Bread
Bread - microbiology
Candida
Fermentation
Flour
Flour - analysis
Flour - microbiology
Food
Food Handling - methods
Food Microbiology
Food science
high extraction rate flour
high-fiber breadmaking
high-fiber sourdough
Humans
Laboratories
Lactobacillus - growth & development
Lactobacillus alimentarius
Lactobacillus brevis
Lactococcus lactis
Leuconostoc
Microbiology
Microorganisms
Organic acids
PCR-DGGE
pH effects
Polymerase Chain Reaction
Propagation
Rheological properties
Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Saccharomyces cerevisiae - growth & development
Sourdough
sourdough microbiota
Species composition
Species Specificity
Substrates
Taxa
Triticum
Triticum aestivum
Wheat
Whole Grains
Yeast
Yeasts
title Microbial Diversity of Type I Sourdoughs Prepared and Back-Slopped with Wholemeal and Refined Soft (Triticum aestivum) Wheat Flours
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T10%3A03%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Microbial%20Diversity%20of%20Type%20I%20Sourdoughs%20Prepared%20and%20Back-Slopped%20with%20Wholemeal%20and%20Refined%20Soft%20(Triticum%20aestivum)%20Wheat%20Flours&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20food%20science&rft.au=Taccari,%20Manuela&rft.date=2016-08&rft.volume=81&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=M1996&rft.epage=M2005&rft.pages=M1996-M2005&rft.issn=0022-1147&rft.eissn=1750-3841&rft.coden=JFDSAZ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/1750-3841.13372&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1980997960%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1810528540&rft_id=info:pmid/27332783&rfr_iscdi=true