Do time-averaged, whole-building, effective volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions depend on the air exchange rate? A statistical analysis of trends for 46 VOCs in U.S. offices

We used existing data to develop distributions of time‐averaged air exchange rates (AER), whole‐building ‘effective’ emission rates of volatile organic compounds (VOC), and other variables for use in Monte Carlo analyses of U.S. offices. With these, we explored whether long‐term VOC emission rates w...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Indoor air 2016-08, Vol.26 (4), p.642-659
Hauptverfasser: Rackes, A., Waring, M. S.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 659
container_issue 4
container_start_page 642
container_title Indoor air
container_volume 26
creator Rackes, A.
Waring, M. S.
description We used existing data to develop distributions of time‐averaged air exchange rates (AER), whole‐building ‘effective’ emission rates of volatile organic compounds (VOC), and other variables for use in Monte Carlo analyses of U.S. offices. With these, we explored whether long‐term VOC emission rates were related to the AER over the sector, as has been observed in the short term for some VOCs in single buildings. We fit and compared two statistical models to the data. In the independent emissions model (IEM), emissions were unaffected by other variables, while in the dependent emissions model (DEM), emissions responded to the AER via coupling through a conceptual boundary layer between the air and a lumped emission source. For 20 of 46 VOCs, the DEM was preferable to the IEM and emission rates, though variable, were higher in buildings with higher AERs. Most oxygenated VOCs and some alkanes were well fit by the DEM, while nearly all aromatics and halocarbons were independent. Trends by vapor pressure suggested multiple mechanisms could be involved. The factors of temperature, relative humidity, and building age were almost never associated with effective emission rates. Our findings suggest that effective emissions in real commercial buildings will be difficult to predict from deterministic experiments or models.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/ina.12224
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1835606849</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1804867474</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-i5234-806bc0a08194082a78fe9d4203354cb1b6a399693f5dc5bea7c3dcca414198393</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNks9u1DAQxiMEokvhwAugkbgUqdn6XxznVK22sBSVVgIKR8txJrsu2Xixk7b7XLwgplt64FRfbHl-3yfNfJNlrymZ0nSOXG-mlDEmnmQTKgnJiZTqaTYhFSlyWYlyL3sR4xUhtOQVf57tMUkoYVROst8nHga3xtxcYzBLbA7hZuU7zOvRdY3rl4eAbYt2cNcI174zg-sQfFia3lmwfr3xY9_AwfeL-TvAtYvR-T5CgxtM376HYYVgXAC8tSvTLxGCGfAYZhCH5BUHZ00HpjfdNroIvoUhJGWE1gcQEpJvBNfD5fTrNFVbZzG-zJ61pov46v7ezy4_vP82_5ifXSxO57Oz3BWMi1wRWVtiiKKVIIqZUrVYNYIRzgtha1pLw6tKVrwtGlvUaErLG2uNoIJWKg1qPzvY-W6C_zViHHTqz2LXmR79GDVVvJBEKvEYlCjJKsGLx6BCyVKUIqFv_0Ov_BjSrHYUI5ViKlFv7qmxXmOjN8GtTdjqfyEn4GgH3KTstg91SvTf7dFpe_Td9ujT89ndIynynSIFhLcPChN-alnystA_zhf604KV4jP7ok_4H2w_w9Y</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1804209828</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Do time-averaged, whole-building, effective volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions depend on the air exchange rate? A statistical analysis of trends for 46 VOCs in U.S. offices</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Rackes, A. ; Waring, M. S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Rackes, A. ; Waring, M. S.</creatorcontrib><description>We used existing data to develop distributions of time‐averaged air exchange rates (AER), whole‐building ‘effective’ emission rates of volatile organic compounds (VOC), and other variables for use in Monte Carlo analyses of U.S. offices. With these, we explored whether long‐term VOC emission rates were related to the AER over the sector, as has been observed in the short term for some VOCs in single buildings. We fit and compared two statistical models to the data. In the independent emissions model (IEM), emissions were unaffected by other variables, while in the dependent emissions model (DEM), emissions responded to the AER via coupling through a conceptual boundary layer between the air and a lumped emission source. For 20 of 46 VOCs, the DEM was preferable to the IEM and emission rates, though variable, were higher in buildings with higher AERs. Most oxygenated VOCs and some alkanes were well fit by the DEM, while nearly all aromatics and halocarbons were independent. Trends by vapor pressure suggested multiple mechanisms could be involved. The factors of temperature, relative humidity, and building age were almost never associated with effective emission rates. Our findings suggest that effective emissions in real commercial buildings will be difficult to predict from deterministic experiments or models.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0905-6947</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1600-0668</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/ina.12224</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26010216</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Air Pollution, Indoor - analysis ; Chemical sources ; Commercial buildings ; Emission ; Emissions ; Emissions model ; Environmental Monitoring ; Exchange ; Filtration - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Indoor air quality ; Mathematical models ; Monte Carlo ; Monte Carlo Method ; Office buildings ; Offices ; Organic compounds ; Risk assessment ; Statistical analysis ; United States ; Ventilation rate ; VOCs ; Volatile compounds ; Volatile organic compounds ; Volatile Organic Compounds - analysis ; Workplace - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><ispartof>Indoor air, 2016-08, Vol.26 (4), p.642-659</ispartof><rights>2015 John Wiley &amp; Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><rights>2015 John Wiley &amp; Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 John Wiley &amp; Sons A/S</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fina.12224$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fina.12224$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26010216$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rackes, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Waring, M. S.</creatorcontrib><title>Do time-averaged, whole-building, effective volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions depend on the air exchange rate? A statistical analysis of trends for 46 VOCs in U.S. offices</title><title>Indoor air</title><addtitle>Indoor Air</addtitle><description>We used existing data to develop distributions of time‐averaged air exchange rates (AER), whole‐building ‘effective’ emission rates of volatile organic compounds (VOC), and other variables for use in Monte Carlo analyses of U.S. offices. With these, we explored whether long‐term VOC emission rates were related to the AER over the sector, as has been observed in the short term for some VOCs in single buildings. We fit and compared two statistical models to the data. In the independent emissions model (IEM), emissions were unaffected by other variables, while in the dependent emissions model (DEM), emissions responded to the AER via coupling through a conceptual boundary layer between the air and a lumped emission source. For 20 of 46 VOCs, the DEM was preferable to the IEM and emission rates, though variable, were higher in buildings with higher AERs. Most oxygenated VOCs and some alkanes were well fit by the DEM, while nearly all aromatics and halocarbons were independent. Trends by vapor pressure suggested multiple mechanisms could be involved. The factors of temperature, relative humidity, and building age were almost never associated with effective emission rates. Our findings suggest that effective emissions in real commercial buildings will be difficult to predict from deterministic experiments or models.</description><subject>Air Pollution, Indoor - analysis</subject><subject>Chemical sources</subject><subject>Commercial buildings</subject><subject>Emission</subject><subject>Emissions</subject><subject>Emissions model</subject><subject>Environmental Monitoring</subject><subject>Exchange</subject><subject>Filtration - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Indoor air quality</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Monte Carlo</subject><subject>Monte Carlo Method</subject><subject>Office buildings</subject><subject>Offices</subject><subject>Organic compounds</subject><subject>Risk assessment</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>Ventilation rate</subject><subject>VOCs</subject><subject>Volatile compounds</subject><subject>Volatile organic compounds</subject><subject>Volatile Organic Compounds - analysis</subject><subject>Workplace - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><issn>0905-6947</issn><issn>1600-0668</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNks9u1DAQxiMEokvhwAugkbgUqdn6XxznVK22sBSVVgIKR8txJrsu2Xixk7b7XLwgplt64FRfbHl-3yfNfJNlrymZ0nSOXG-mlDEmnmQTKgnJiZTqaTYhFSlyWYlyL3sR4xUhtOQVf57tMUkoYVROst8nHga3xtxcYzBLbA7hZuU7zOvRdY3rl4eAbYt2cNcI174zg-sQfFia3lmwfr3xY9_AwfeL-TvAtYvR-T5CgxtM376HYYVgXAC8tSvTLxGCGfAYZhCH5BUHZ00HpjfdNroIvoUhJGWE1gcQEpJvBNfD5fTrNFVbZzG-zJ61pov46v7ezy4_vP82_5ifXSxO57Oz3BWMi1wRWVtiiKKVIIqZUrVYNYIRzgtha1pLw6tKVrwtGlvUaErLG2uNoIJWKg1qPzvY-W6C_zViHHTqz2LXmR79GDVVvJBEKvEYlCjJKsGLx6BCyVKUIqFv_0Ov_BjSrHYUI5ViKlFv7qmxXmOjN8GtTdjqfyEn4GgH3KTstg91SvTf7dFpe_Td9ujT89ndIynynSIFhLcPChN-alnystA_zhf604KV4jP7ok_4H2w_w9Y</recordid><startdate>201608</startdate><enddate>201608</enddate><creator>Rackes, A.</creator><creator>Waring, M. S.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Hindawi Limited</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7U7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201608</creationdate><title>Do time-averaged, whole-building, effective volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions depend on the air exchange rate? A statistical analysis of trends for 46 VOCs in U.S. offices</title><author>Rackes, A. ; Waring, M. S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-i5234-806bc0a08194082a78fe9d4203354cb1b6a399693f5dc5bea7c3dcca414198393</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Air Pollution, Indoor - analysis</topic><topic>Chemical sources</topic><topic>Commercial buildings</topic><topic>Emission</topic><topic>Emissions</topic><topic>Emissions model</topic><topic>Environmental Monitoring</topic><topic>Exchange</topic><topic>Filtration - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Indoor air quality</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Monte Carlo</topic><topic>Monte Carlo Method</topic><topic>Office buildings</topic><topic>Offices</topic><topic>Organic compounds</topic><topic>Risk assessment</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>Ventilation rate</topic><topic>VOCs</topic><topic>Volatile compounds</topic><topic>Volatile organic compounds</topic><topic>Volatile Organic Compounds - analysis</topic><topic>Workplace - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rackes, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Waring, M. S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Indoor air</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rackes, A.</au><au>Waring, M. S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Do time-averaged, whole-building, effective volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions depend on the air exchange rate? A statistical analysis of trends for 46 VOCs in U.S. offices</atitle><jtitle>Indoor air</jtitle><addtitle>Indoor Air</addtitle><date>2016-08</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>642</spage><epage>659</epage><pages>642-659</pages><issn>0905-6947</issn><eissn>1600-0668</eissn><abstract>We used existing data to develop distributions of time‐averaged air exchange rates (AER), whole‐building ‘effective’ emission rates of volatile organic compounds (VOC), and other variables for use in Monte Carlo analyses of U.S. offices. With these, we explored whether long‐term VOC emission rates were related to the AER over the sector, as has been observed in the short term for some VOCs in single buildings. We fit and compared two statistical models to the data. In the independent emissions model (IEM), emissions were unaffected by other variables, while in the dependent emissions model (DEM), emissions responded to the AER via coupling through a conceptual boundary layer between the air and a lumped emission source. For 20 of 46 VOCs, the DEM was preferable to the IEM and emission rates, though variable, were higher in buildings with higher AERs. Most oxygenated VOCs and some alkanes were well fit by the DEM, while nearly all aromatics and halocarbons were independent. Trends by vapor pressure suggested multiple mechanisms could be involved. The factors of temperature, relative humidity, and building age were almost never associated with effective emission rates. Our findings suggest that effective emissions in real commercial buildings will be difficult to predict from deterministic experiments or models.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>26010216</pmid><doi>10.1111/ina.12224</doi><tpages>18</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0905-6947
ispartof Indoor air, 2016-08, Vol.26 (4), p.642-659
issn 0905-6947
1600-0668
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1835606849
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Air Pollution, Indoor - analysis
Chemical sources
Commercial buildings
Emission
Emissions
Emissions model
Environmental Monitoring
Exchange
Filtration - statistics & numerical data
Indoor air quality
Mathematical models
Monte Carlo
Monte Carlo Method
Office buildings
Offices
Organic compounds
Risk assessment
Statistical analysis
United States
Ventilation rate
VOCs
Volatile compounds
Volatile organic compounds
Volatile Organic Compounds - analysis
Workplace - statistics & numerical data
title Do time-averaged, whole-building, effective volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions depend on the air exchange rate? A statistical analysis of trends for 46 VOCs in U.S. offices
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T03%3A08%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Do%20time-averaged,%20whole-building,%20effective%20volatile%20organic%20compound%20(VOC)%20emissions%20depend%20on%20the%20air%20exchange%20rate?%20A%20statistical%20analysis%20of%20trends%20for%2046%20VOCs%20in%20U.S.%20offices&rft.jtitle=Indoor%20air&rft.au=Rackes,%20A.&rft.date=2016-08&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=642&rft.epage=659&rft.pages=642-659&rft.issn=0905-6947&rft.eissn=1600-0668&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/ina.12224&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1804867474%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1804209828&rft_id=info:pmid/26010216&rfr_iscdi=true