Prediction Models of Retention Indices for Increased Confidence in Structural Elucidation during Complex Matrix Analysis: Application to Gas Chromatography Coupled with High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry

Monitoring of volatile and semivolatile compounds was performed using gas chromatography (GC) coupled to high-resolution electron ionization mass spectrometry, using both headspace and liquid injection modes. A total of 560 reference compounds, including 8 odd n-alkanes, were analyzed and experiment...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Analytical chemistry (Washington) 2016-08, Vol.88 (15), p.7539-7547
Hauptverfasser: Dossin, Eric, Martin, Elyette, Diana, Pierrick, Castellon, Antonio, Monge, Aurelien, Pospisil, Pavel, Bentley, Mark, Guy, Philippe A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 7547
container_issue 15
container_start_page 7539
container_title Analytical chemistry (Washington)
container_volume 88
creator Dossin, Eric
Martin, Elyette
Diana, Pierrick
Castellon, Antonio
Monge, Aurelien
Pospisil, Pavel
Bentley, Mark
Guy, Philippe A.
description Monitoring of volatile and semivolatile compounds was performed using gas chromatography (GC) coupled to high-resolution electron ionization mass spectrometry, using both headspace and liquid injection modes. A total of 560 reference compounds, including 8 odd n-alkanes, were analyzed and experimental linear retention indices (LRI) were determined. These reference compounds were randomly split into training (n = 401) and test (n = 151) sets. LRI for all 552 reference compounds were also calculated based upon computational Quantitative Structure–Property Relationship (QSPR) models, using two independent approaches RapidMiner (coupled to Dragon) and ACD/ChromGenius software. Correlation coefficients for experimental versus predicted LRI values calculated for both training and test set compounds were calculated at 0.966 and 0.949 for RapidMiner and at 0.977 and 0.976 for ACD/ChromGenius, respectively. In addition, the cross-validation correlation was calculated at 0.96 from RapidMiner and the residual standard error value obtained from ACD/ChromGenius was 53.635. These models were then used to predict LRI values for several thousand compounds reported present in tobacco and tobacco-related fractions, plus a range of specific flavor compounds. It was demonstrated that using the mean of the LRI values predicted by RapidMiner and ACD/ChromGenius, in combination with accurate mass data, could enhance the confidence level for compound identification from the analysis of complex matrixes, particularly when the two predicted LRI values for a compound were in close agreement. Application of this LRI modeling approach to matrixes with unknown composition has already enabled the confirmation of 23 postulated compounds, demonstrating its ability to facilitate compound identification in an analytical workflow. The goal is to reduce the list of putative candidates to a reasonable relevant number that can be obtained and measured for confirmation.
doi_str_mv 10.1021/acs.analchem.6b00868
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1835581726</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1835581726</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a446t-db1c08377e1f06ef0221e2023ba33ab813b2da6c7188f2b475354f2851cc64b73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNks9u1DAQhy0EotvCGyBkiQuXLGM7f1xuq1VpK7UCtXCOHHuy6yqJg-2o3VfkqfA22yJxQJxs2d83M7J_hLxjsGTA2Selw1INqtNb7JdlAyBL-YIsWMEhK6XkL8kCAETGK4AjchzCHQBjwMrX5IhXOYhKsAX59c2jsTpaN9BrZ7AL1LX0BiMOj2eXQ7rFQFvn0157VAENXbuhtQYHjdQO9Db6ScfJq46edZO2Rj2qZvJ22CS2Hzt8oNcqevtAV2nkXbDhM12NY2f1zEZHz1Wg6613vYpu49W43SV1Sqqh9zZu6YXdbLMbDK6b5mlVCPR2RB2Tg9Hv3pBXreoCvj2sJ-THl7Pv64vs6uv55Xp1lak8L2NmGqZBiqpC1kKJLXDOkAMXjRJCNZKJhhtV6opJ2fImrwpR5C2XBdO6zJtKnJCPc93Ru58Thlj3NmjsOjWgm0LNpCgKySpe_geafg1yyPfoh7_QOzf59Fh7ijF-WvDqNFH5TGnvQvDY1qO3vfK7mkG9j0WdYlE_xaI-xCJp7w_Fp6ZH8yw95SABMAN7_U_jf9X8DdeSyoM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1811295279</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Prediction Models of Retention Indices for Increased Confidence in Structural Elucidation during Complex Matrix Analysis: Application to Gas Chromatography Coupled with High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry</title><source>ACS Publications</source><creator>Dossin, Eric ; Martin, Elyette ; Diana, Pierrick ; Castellon, Antonio ; Monge, Aurelien ; Pospisil, Pavel ; Bentley, Mark ; Guy, Philippe A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Dossin, Eric ; Martin, Elyette ; Diana, Pierrick ; Castellon, Antonio ; Monge, Aurelien ; Pospisil, Pavel ; Bentley, Mark ; Guy, Philippe A.</creatorcontrib><description>Monitoring of volatile and semivolatile compounds was performed using gas chromatography (GC) coupled to high-resolution electron ionization mass spectrometry, using both headspace and liquid injection modes. A total of 560 reference compounds, including 8 odd n-alkanes, were analyzed and experimental linear retention indices (LRI) were determined. These reference compounds were randomly split into training (n = 401) and test (n = 151) sets. LRI for all 552 reference compounds were also calculated based upon computational Quantitative Structure–Property Relationship (QSPR) models, using two independent approaches RapidMiner (coupled to Dragon) and ACD/ChromGenius software. Correlation coefficients for experimental versus predicted LRI values calculated for both training and test set compounds were calculated at 0.966 and 0.949 for RapidMiner and at 0.977 and 0.976 for ACD/ChromGenius, respectively. In addition, the cross-validation correlation was calculated at 0.96 from RapidMiner and the residual standard error value obtained from ACD/ChromGenius was 53.635. These models were then used to predict LRI values for several thousand compounds reported present in tobacco and tobacco-related fractions, plus a range of specific flavor compounds. It was demonstrated that using the mean of the LRI values predicted by RapidMiner and ACD/ChromGenius, in combination with accurate mass data, could enhance the confidence level for compound identification from the analysis of complex matrixes, particularly when the two predicted LRI values for a compound were in close agreement. Application of this LRI modeling approach to matrixes with unknown composition has already enabled the confirmation of 23 postulated compounds, demonstrating its ability to facilitate compound identification in an analytical workflow. The goal is to reduce the list of putative candidates to a reasonable relevant number that can be obtained and measured for confirmation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-2700</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-6882</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.6b00868</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27403731</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ANCHAM</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Chemical Society</publisher><subject>Analytical chemistry ; Chemical compounds ; Chromatography ; Computer programs ; Confidence intervals ; Correlation analysis ; Gas chromatography ; Ionization ; Mass spectrometry ; Mathematical models ; Training</subject><ispartof>Analytical chemistry (Washington), 2016-08, Vol.88 (15), p.7539-7547</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2016 American Chemical Society</rights><rights>Copyright American Chemical Society Aug 2, 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a446t-db1c08377e1f06ef0221e2023ba33ab813b2da6c7188f2b475354f2851cc64b73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a446t-db1c08377e1f06ef0221e2023ba33ab813b2da6c7188f2b475354f2851cc64b73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/acs.analchem.6b00868$$EPDF$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.analchem.6b00868$$EHTML$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,2751,27055,27903,27904,56716,56766</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27403731$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dossin, Eric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martin, Elyette</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Diana, Pierrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Castellon, Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Monge, Aurelien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pospisil, Pavel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bentley, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guy, Philippe A.</creatorcontrib><title>Prediction Models of Retention Indices for Increased Confidence in Structural Elucidation during Complex Matrix Analysis: Application to Gas Chromatography Coupled with High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry</title><title>Analytical chemistry (Washington)</title><addtitle>Anal. Chem</addtitle><description>Monitoring of volatile and semivolatile compounds was performed using gas chromatography (GC) coupled to high-resolution electron ionization mass spectrometry, using both headspace and liquid injection modes. A total of 560 reference compounds, including 8 odd n-alkanes, were analyzed and experimental linear retention indices (LRI) were determined. These reference compounds were randomly split into training (n = 401) and test (n = 151) sets. LRI for all 552 reference compounds were also calculated based upon computational Quantitative Structure–Property Relationship (QSPR) models, using two independent approaches RapidMiner (coupled to Dragon) and ACD/ChromGenius software. Correlation coefficients for experimental versus predicted LRI values calculated for both training and test set compounds were calculated at 0.966 and 0.949 for RapidMiner and at 0.977 and 0.976 for ACD/ChromGenius, respectively. In addition, the cross-validation correlation was calculated at 0.96 from RapidMiner and the residual standard error value obtained from ACD/ChromGenius was 53.635. These models were then used to predict LRI values for several thousand compounds reported present in tobacco and tobacco-related fractions, plus a range of specific flavor compounds. It was demonstrated that using the mean of the LRI values predicted by RapidMiner and ACD/ChromGenius, in combination with accurate mass data, could enhance the confidence level for compound identification from the analysis of complex matrixes, particularly when the two predicted LRI values for a compound were in close agreement. Application of this LRI modeling approach to matrixes with unknown composition has already enabled the confirmation of 23 postulated compounds, demonstrating its ability to facilitate compound identification in an analytical workflow. The goal is to reduce the list of putative candidates to a reasonable relevant number that can be obtained and measured for confirmation.</description><subject>Analytical chemistry</subject><subject>Chemical compounds</subject><subject>Chromatography</subject><subject>Computer programs</subject><subject>Confidence intervals</subject><subject>Correlation analysis</subject><subject>Gas chromatography</subject><subject>Ionization</subject><subject>Mass spectrometry</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Training</subject><issn>0003-2700</issn><issn>1520-6882</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNks9u1DAQhy0EotvCGyBkiQuXLGM7f1xuq1VpK7UCtXCOHHuy6yqJg-2o3VfkqfA22yJxQJxs2d83M7J_hLxjsGTA2Selw1INqtNb7JdlAyBL-YIsWMEhK6XkL8kCAETGK4AjchzCHQBjwMrX5IhXOYhKsAX59c2jsTpaN9BrZ7AL1LX0BiMOj2eXQ7rFQFvn0157VAENXbuhtQYHjdQO9Db6ScfJq46edZO2Rj2qZvJ22CS2Hzt8oNcqevtAV2nkXbDhM12NY2f1zEZHz1Wg6613vYpu49W43SV1Sqqh9zZu6YXdbLMbDK6b5mlVCPR2RB2Tg9Hv3pBXreoCvj2sJ-THl7Pv64vs6uv55Xp1lak8L2NmGqZBiqpC1kKJLXDOkAMXjRJCNZKJhhtV6opJ2fImrwpR5C2XBdO6zJtKnJCPc93Ru58Thlj3NmjsOjWgm0LNpCgKySpe_geafg1yyPfoh7_QOzf59Fh7ijF-WvDqNFH5TGnvQvDY1qO3vfK7mkG9j0WdYlE_xaI-xCJp7w_Fp6ZH8yw95SABMAN7_U_jf9X8DdeSyoM</recordid><startdate>20160802</startdate><enddate>20160802</enddate><creator>Dossin, Eric</creator><creator>Martin, Elyette</creator><creator>Diana, Pierrick</creator><creator>Castellon, Antonio</creator><creator>Monge, Aurelien</creator><creator>Pospisil, Pavel</creator><creator>Bentley, Mark</creator><creator>Guy, Philippe A.</creator><general>American Chemical Society</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SE</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H8G</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160802</creationdate><title>Prediction Models of Retention Indices for Increased Confidence in Structural Elucidation during Complex Matrix Analysis: Application to Gas Chromatography Coupled with High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry</title><author>Dossin, Eric ; Martin, Elyette ; Diana, Pierrick ; Castellon, Antonio ; Monge, Aurelien ; Pospisil, Pavel ; Bentley, Mark ; Guy, Philippe A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a446t-db1c08377e1f06ef0221e2023ba33ab813b2da6c7188f2b475354f2851cc64b73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Analytical chemistry</topic><topic>Chemical compounds</topic><topic>Chromatography</topic><topic>Computer programs</topic><topic>Confidence intervals</topic><topic>Correlation analysis</topic><topic>Gas chromatography</topic><topic>Ionization</topic><topic>Mass spectrometry</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Training</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dossin, Eric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martin, Elyette</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Diana, Pierrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Castellon, Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Monge, Aurelien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pospisil, Pavel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bentley, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guy, Philippe A.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Corrosion Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Copper Technical Reference Library</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Analytical chemistry (Washington)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dossin, Eric</au><au>Martin, Elyette</au><au>Diana, Pierrick</au><au>Castellon, Antonio</au><au>Monge, Aurelien</au><au>Pospisil, Pavel</au><au>Bentley, Mark</au><au>Guy, Philippe A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Prediction Models of Retention Indices for Increased Confidence in Structural Elucidation during Complex Matrix Analysis: Application to Gas Chromatography Coupled with High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry</atitle><jtitle>Analytical chemistry (Washington)</jtitle><addtitle>Anal. Chem</addtitle><date>2016-08-02</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>88</volume><issue>15</issue><spage>7539</spage><epage>7547</epage><pages>7539-7547</pages><issn>0003-2700</issn><eissn>1520-6882</eissn><coden>ANCHAM</coden><abstract>Monitoring of volatile and semivolatile compounds was performed using gas chromatography (GC) coupled to high-resolution electron ionization mass spectrometry, using both headspace and liquid injection modes. A total of 560 reference compounds, including 8 odd n-alkanes, were analyzed and experimental linear retention indices (LRI) were determined. These reference compounds were randomly split into training (n = 401) and test (n = 151) sets. LRI for all 552 reference compounds were also calculated based upon computational Quantitative Structure–Property Relationship (QSPR) models, using two independent approaches RapidMiner (coupled to Dragon) and ACD/ChromGenius software. Correlation coefficients for experimental versus predicted LRI values calculated for both training and test set compounds were calculated at 0.966 and 0.949 for RapidMiner and at 0.977 and 0.976 for ACD/ChromGenius, respectively. In addition, the cross-validation correlation was calculated at 0.96 from RapidMiner and the residual standard error value obtained from ACD/ChromGenius was 53.635. These models were then used to predict LRI values for several thousand compounds reported present in tobacco and tobacco-related fractions, plus a range of specific flavor compounds. It was demonstrated that using the mean of the LRI values predicted by RapidMiner and ACD/ChromGenius, in combination with accurate mass data, could enhance the confidence level for compound identification from the analysis of complex matrixes, particularly when the two predicted LRI values for a compound were in close agreement. Application of this LRI modeling approach to matrixes with unknown composition has already enabled the confirmation of 23 postulated compounds, demonstrating its ability to facilitate compound identification in an analytical workflow. The goal is to reduce the list of putative candidates to a reasonable relevant number that can be obtained and measured for confirmation.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Chemical Society</pub><pmid>27403731</pmid><doi>10.1021/acs.analchem.6b00868</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0003-2700
ispartof Analytical chemistry (Washington), 2016-08, Vol.88 (15), p.7539-7547
issn 0003-2700
1520-6882
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1835581726
source ACS Publications
subjects Analytical chemistry
Chemical compounds
Chromatography
Computer programs
Confidence intervals
Correlation analysis
Gas chromatography
Ionization
Mass spectrometry
Mathematical models
Training
title Prediction Models of Retention Indices for Increased Confidence in Structural Elucidation during Complex Matrix Analysis: Application to Gas Chromatography Coupled with High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T23%3A36%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Prediction%20Models%20of%20Retention%20Indices%20for%20Increased%20Confidence%20in%20Structural%20Elucidation%20during%20Complex%20Matrix%20Analysis:%20Application%20to%20Gas%20Chromatography%20Coupled%20with%20High-Resolution%20Mass%20Spectrometry&rft.jtitle=Analytical%20chemistry%20(Washington)&rft.au=Dossin,%20Eric&rft.date=2016-08-02&rft.volume=88&rft.issue=15&rft.spage=7539&rft.epage=7547&rft.pages=7539-7547&rft.issn=0003-2700&rft.eissn=1520-6882&rft.coden=ANCHAM&rft_id=info:doi/10.1021/acs.analchem.6b00868&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1835581726%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1811295279&rft_id=info:pmid/27403731&rfr_iscdi=true