A comparison of low-pressure and supercharged operation of polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell systems for aircraft applications
Multifunctional fuel cell systems are competitive solutions aboard future generations of civil aircraft concerning energy consumption, environmental issues, and safety reasons. The present study compares low-pressure and supercharged operation of polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells with respect...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Progress in aerospace sciences 2016-08, Vol.85, p.51-64 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 64 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 51 |
container_title | Progress in aerospace sciences |
container_volume | 85 |
creator | Werner, C. Preiß, G. Gores, F. Griebenow, M. Heitmann, S. |
description | Multifunctional fuel cell systems are competitive solutions aboard future generations of civil aircraft concerning energy consumption, environmental issues, and safety reasons. The present study compares low-pressure and supercharged operation of polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells with respect to performance and efficiency criteria. This is motivated by the challenge of pressure-dependent fuel cell operation aboard aircraft with cabin pressure varying with operating altitude. Experimental investigations of low-pressure fuel cell operation use model-based design of experiments and are complemented by numerical investigations concerning supercharged fuel cell operation. It is demonstrated that a low-pressure operation is feasible with the fuel cell device under test, but that its range of stable operation changes between both operating modes. Including an external compressor, it can be shown that the power demand for supercharging the fuel cell is about the same as the loss in power output of the fuel cell due to low-pressure operation. Furthermore, the supercharged fuel cell operation appears to be more sensitive with respect to variations in the considered independent operating parameters load requirement, cathode stoichiometric ratio, and cooling temperature. The results indicate that a pressure-dependent self-humidification control might be able to exploit the potential of low-pressure fuel cell operation for aircraft applications to the best advantage. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.paerosci.2016.07.005 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1835580112</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0376042116300513</els_id><sourcerecordid>1835580112</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-ae024c97b4aad3beb9ef06d7ca572f7586e83ae817ad2cb6325c96a7f517ff6e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkM1u2zAQhImiAeq6eYWCx1ykkqIlSrcaRn4KGMglPRMrapnQkEx2KbXwOS9eOk7PPe0uMDOY_Rj7KkUphWy-HcoISCFZX1b5LoUuhag_sJVstSqkrjYf2Uoo3RRiU8lP7HNKByGE6tp6xV633IYpAvkUjjw4PoY_RSRMaSHkcBx4WiKSfQF6xoGHvMPsL9IYxtOExHFEO1M-ZuQTTj3BEblbcOQWx5GnU5pxStwF4uDJEriZQ4yjt29R6Qu7cjAmvH6fa_bz7vZp91DsH-9_7Lb7wqpOzQWgqDa20_0GYFA99h060QzaQq0rp-u2wVYBtlLDUNm-UVVtuwa0q6V2rkG1ZjeX3Ejh14JpNpNP54q5b1iSka2q61ZIWWVpc5HaDDYROhPJT0AnI4U5UzcH84-6OVM3QptMPRu_X4yYH_ntkUxW4NHi4ClTMkPw_4v4C5I-k4c</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1835580112</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A comparison of low-pressure and supercharged operation of polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell systems for aircraft applications</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Werner, C. ; Preiß, G. ; Gores, F. ; Griebenow, M. ; Heitmann, S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Werner, C. ; Preiß, G. ; Gores, F. ; Griebenow, M. ; Heitmann, S.</creatorcontrib><description>Multifunctional fuel cell systems are competitive solutions aboard future generations of civil aircraft concerning energy consumption, environmental issues, and safety reasons. The present study compares low-pressure and supercharged operation of polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells with respect to performance and efficiency criteria. This is motivated by the challenge of pressure-dependent fuel cell operation aboard aircraft with cabin pressure varying with operating altitude. Experimental investigations of low-pressure fuel cell operation use model-based design of experiments and are complemented by numerical investigations concerning supercharged fuel cell operation. It is demonstrated that a low-pressure operation is feasible with the fuel cell device under test, but that its range of stable operation changes between both operating modes. Including an external compressor, it can be shown that the power demand for supercharging the fuel cell is about the same as the loss in power output of the fuel cell due to low-pressure operation. Furthermore, the supercharged fuel cell operation appears to be more sensitive with respect to variations in the considered independent operating parameters load requirement, cathode stoichiometric ratio, and cooling temperature. The results indicate that a pressure-dependent self-humidification control might be able to exploit the potential of low-pressure fuel cell operation for aircraft applications to the best advantage.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0376-0421</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-1724</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.paerosci.2016.07.005</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Aircraft ; Aircraft auxiliary power ; Aircraft fuels ; Balance of plant ; Cooling ; Demand ; Devices ; Fuel cells ; Mathematical models ; Multifunctional fuel cell system ; Operating pressure ; Polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell ; Proton exchange membrane fuel cells ; System efficiency</subject><ispartof>Progress in aerospace sciences, 2016-08, Vol.85, p.51-64</ispartof><rights>2016 Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-ae024c97b4aad3beb9ef06d7ca572f7586e83ae817ad2cb6325c96a7f517ff6e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-ae024c97b4aad3beb9ef06d7ca572f7586e83ae817ad2cb6325c96a7f517ff6e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paerosci.2016.07.005$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Werner, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Preiß, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gores, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Griebenow, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heitmann, S.</creatorcontrib><title>A comparison of low-pressure and supercharged operation of polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell systems for aircraft applications</title><title>Progress in aerospace sciences</title><description>Multifunctional fuel cell systems are competitive solutions aboard future generations of civil aircraft concerning energy consumption, environmental issues, and safety reasons. The present study compares low-pressure and supercharged operation of polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells with respect to performance and efficiency criteria. This is motivated by the challenge of pressure-dependent fuel cell operation aboard aircraft with cabin pressure varying with operating altitude. Experimental investigations of low-pressure fuel cell operation use model-based design of experiments and are complemented by numerical investigations concerning supercharged fuel cell operation. It is demonstrated that a low-pressure operation is feasible with the fuel cell device under test, but that its range of stable operation changes between both operating modes. Including an external compressor, it can be shown that the power demand for supercharging the fuel cell is about the same as the loss in power output of the fuel cell due to low-pressure operation. Furthermore, the supercharged fuel cell operation appears to be more sensitive with respect to variations in the considered independent operating parameters load requirement, cathode stoichiometric ratio, and cooling temperature. The results indicate that a pressure-dependent self-humidification control might be able to exploit the potential of low-pressure fuel cell operation for aircraft applications to the best advantage.</description><subject>Aircraft</subject><subject>Aircraft auxiliary power</subject><subject>Aircraft fuels</subject><subject>Balance of plant</subject><subject>Cooling</subject><subject>Demand</subject><subject>Devices</subject><subject>Fuel cells</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Multifunctional fuel cell system</subject><subject>Operating pressure</subject><subject>Polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell</subject><subject>Proton exchange membrane fuel cells</subject><subject>System efficiency</subject><issn>0376-0421</issn><issn>1873-1724</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkM1u2zAQhImiAeq6eYWCx1ykkqIlSrcaRn4KGMglPRMrapnQkEx2KbXwOS9eOk7PPe0uMDOY_Rj7KkUphWy-HcoISCFZX1b5LoUuhag_sJVstSqkrjYf2Uoo3RRiU8lP7HNKByGE6tp6xV633IYpAvkUjjw4PoY_RSRMaSHkcBx4WiKSfQF6xoGHvMPsL9IYxtOExHFEO1M-ZuQTTj3BEblbcOQWx5GnU5pxStwF4uDJEriZQ4yjt29R6Qu7cjAmvH6fa_bz7vZp91DsH-9_7Lb7wqpOzQWgqDa20_0GYFA99h060QzaQq0rp-u2wVYBtlLDUNm-UVVtuwa0q6V2rkG1ZjeX3Ejh14JpNpNP54q5b1iSka2q61ZIWWVpc5HaDDYROhPJT0AnI4U5UzcH84-6OVM3QptMPRu_X4yYH_ntkUxW4NHi4ClTMkPw_4v4C5I-k4c</recordid><startdate>201608</startdate><enddate>201608</enddate><creator>Werner, C.</creator><creator>Preiß, G.</creator><creator>Gores, F.</creator><creator>Griebenow, M.</creator><creator>Heitmann, S.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201608</creationdate><title>A comparison of low-pressure and supercharged operation of polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell systems for aircraft applications</title><author>Werner, C. ; Preiß, G. ; Gores, F. ; Griebenow, M. ; Heitmann, S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-ae024c97b4aad3beb9ef06d7ca572f7586e83ae817ad2cb6325c96a7f517ff6e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Aircraft</topic><topic>Aircraft auxiliary power</topic><topic>Aircraft fuels</topic><topic>Balance of plant</topic><topic>Cooling</topic><topic>Demand</topic><topic>Devices</topic><topic>Fuel cells</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Multifunctional fuel cell system</topic><topic>Operating pressure</topic><topic>Polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell</topic><topic>Proton exchange membrane fuel cells</topic><topic>System efficiency</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Werner, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Preiß, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gores, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Griebenow, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heitmann, S.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Progress in aerospace sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Werner, C.</au><au>Preiß, G.</au><au>Gores, F.</au><au>Griebenow, M.</au><au>Heitmann, S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A comparison of low-pressure and supercharged operation of polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell systems for aircraft applications</atitle><jtitle>Progress in aerospace sciences</jtitle><date>2016-08</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>85</volume><spage>51</spage><epage>64</epage><pages>51-64</pages><issn>0376-0421</issn><eissn>1873-1724</eissn><abstract>Multifunctional fuel cell systems are competitive solutions aboard future generations of civil aircraft concerning energy consumption, environmental issues, and safety reasons. The present study compares low-pressure and supercharged operation of polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells with respect to performance and efficiency criteria. This is motivated by the challenge of pressure-dependent fuel cell operation aboard aircraft with cabin pressure varying with operating altitude. Experimental investigations of low-pressure fuel cell operation use model-based design of experiments and are complemented by numerical investigations concerning supercharged fuel cell operation. It is demonstrated that a low-pressure operation is feasible with the fuel cell device under test, but that its range of stable operation changes between both operating modes. Including an external compressor, it can be shown that the power demand for supercharging the fuel cell is about the same as the loss in power output of the fuel cell due to low-pressure operation. Furthermore, the supercharged fuel cell operation appears to be more sensitive with respect to variations in the considered independent operating parameters load requirement, cathode stoichiometric ratio, and cooling temperature. The results indicate that a pressure-dependent self-humidification control might be able to exploit the potential of low-pressure fuel cell operation for aircraft applications to the best advantage.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.paerosci.2016.07.005</doi><tpages>14</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0376-0421 |
ispartof | Progress in aerospace sciences, 2016-08, Vol.85, p.51-64 |
issn | 0376-0421 1873-1724 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1835580112 |
source | Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | Aircraft Aircraft auxiliary power Aircraft fuels Balance of plant Cooling Demand Devices Fuel cells Mathematical models Multifunctional fuel cell system Operating pressure Polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell Proton exchange membrane fuel cells System efficiency |
title | A comparison of low-pressure and supercharged operation of polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell systems for aircraft applications |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T12%3A30%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20comparison%20of%20low-pressure%20and%20supercharged%20operation%20of%20polymer%20electrolyte%20membrane%20fuel%20cell%20systems%20for%20aircraft%20applications&rft.jtitle=Progress%20in%20aerospace%20sciences&rft.au=Werner,%20C.&rft.date=2016-08&rft.volume=85&rft.spage=51&rft.epage=64&rft.pages=51-64&rft.issn=0376-0421&rft.eissn=1873-1724&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.paerosci.2016.07.005&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1835580112%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1835580112&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0376042116300513&rfr_iscdi=true |