A comparison of low-pressure and supercharged operation of polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell systems for aircraft applications

Multifunctional fuel cell systems are competitive solutions aboard future generations of civil aircraft concerning energy consumption, environmental issues, and safety reasons. The present study compares low-pressure and supercharged operation of polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells with respect...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Progress in aerospace sciences 2016-08, Vol.85, p.51-64
Hauptverfasser: Werner, C., Preiß, G., Gores, F., Griebenow, M., Heitmann, S.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 64
container_issue
container_start_page 51
container_title Progress in aerospace sciences
container_volume 85
creator Werner, C.
Preiß, G.
Gores, F.
Griebenow, M.
Heitmann, S.
description Multifunctional fuel cell systems are competitive solutions aboard future generations of civil aircraft concerning energy consumption, environmental issues, and safety reasons. The present study compares low-pressure and supercharged operation of polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells with respect to performance and efficiency criteria. This is motivated by the challenge of pressure-dependent fuel cell operation aboard aircraft with cabin pressure varying with operating altitude. Experimental investigations of low-pressure fuel cell operation use model-based design of experiments and are complemented by numerical investigations concerning supercharged fuel cell operation. It is demonstrated that a low-pressure operation is feasible with the fuel cell device under test, but that its range of stable operation changes between both operating modes. Including an external compressor, it can be shown that the power demand for supercharging the fuel cell is about the same as the loss in power output of the fuel cell due to low-pressure operation. Furthermore, the supercharged fuel cell operation appears to be more sensitive with respect to variations in the considered independent operating parameters load requirement, cathode stoichiometric ratio, and cooling temperature. The results indicate that a pressure-dependent self-humidification control might be able to exploit the potential of low-pressure fuel cell operation for aircraft applications to the best advantage.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.paerosci.2016.07.005
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1835580112</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0376042116300513</els_id><sourcerecordid>1835580112</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-ae024c97b4aad3beb9ef06d7ca572f7586e83ae817ad2cb6325c96a7f517ff6e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkM1u2zAQhImiAeq6eYWCx1ykkqIlSrcaRn4KGMglPRMrapnQkEx2KbXwOS9eOk7PPe0uMDOY_Rj7KkUphWy-HcoISCFZX1b5LoUuhag_sJVstSqkrjYf2Uoo3RRiU8lP7HNKByGE6tp6xV633IYpAvkUjjw4PoY_RSRMaSHkcBx4WiKSfQF6xoGHvMPsL9IYxtOExHFEO1M-ZuQTTj3BEblbcOQWx5GnU5pxStwF4uDJEriZQ4yjt29R6Qu7cjAmvH6fa_bz7vZp91DsH-9_7Lb7wqpOzQWgqDa20_0GYFA99h060QzaQq0rp-u2wVYBtlLDUNm-UVVtuwa0q6V2rkG1ZjeX3Ejh14JpNpNP54q5b1iSka2q61ZIWWVpc5HaDDYROhPJT0AnI4U5UzcH84-6OVM3QptMPRu_X4yYH_ntkUxW4NHi4ClTMkPw_4v4C5I-k4c</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1835580112</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A comparison of low-pressure and supercharged operation of polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell systems for aircraft applications</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Werner, C. ; Preiß, G. ; Gores, F. ; Griebenow, M. ; Heitmann, S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Werner, C. ; Preiß, G. ; Gores, F. ; Griebenow, M. ; Heitmann, S.</creatorcontrib><description>Multifunctional fuel cell systems are competitive solutions aboard future generations of civil aircraft concerning energy consumption, environmental issues, and safety reasons. The present study compares low-pressure and supercharged operation of polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells with respect to performance and efficiency criteria. This is motivated by the challenge of pressure-dependent fuel cell operation aboard aircraft with cabin pressure varying with operating altitude. Experimental investigations of low-pressure fuel cell operation use model-based design of experiments and are complemented by numerical investigations concerning supercharged fuel cell operation. It is demonstrated that a low-pressure operation is feasible with the fuel cell device under test, but that its range of stable operation changes between both operating modes. Including an external compressor, it can be shown that the power demand for supercharging the fuel cell is about the same as the loss in power output of the fuel cell due to low-pressure operation. Furthermore, the supercharged fuel cell operation appears to be more sensitive with respect to variations in the considered independent operating parameters load requirement, cathode stoichiometric ratio, and cooling temperature. The results indicate that a pressure-dependent self-humidification control might be able to exploit the potential of low-pressure fuel cell operation for aircraft applications to the best advantage.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0376-0421</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-1724</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.paerosci.2016.07.005</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Aircraft ; Aircraft auxiliary power ; Aircraft fuels ; Balance of plant ; Cooling ; Demand ; Devices ; Fuel cells ; Mathematical models ; Multifunctional fuel cell system ; Operating pressure ; Polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell ; Proton exchange membrane fuel cells ; System efficiency</subject><ispartof>Progress in aerospace sciences, 2016-08, Vol.85, p.51-64</ispartof><rights>2016 Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-ae024c97b4aad3beb9ef06d7ca572f7586e83ae817ad2cb6325c96a7f517ff6e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-ae024c97b4aad3beb9ef06d7ca572f7586e83ae817ad2cb6325c96a7f517ff6e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paerosci.2016.07.005$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Werner, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Preiß, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gores, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Griebenow, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heitmann, S.</creatorcontrib><title>A comparison of low-pressure and supercharged operation of polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell systems for aircraft applications</title><title>Progress in aerospace sciences</title><description>Multifunctional fuel cell systems are competitive solutions aboard future generations of civil aircraft concerning energy consumption, environmental issues, and safety reasons. The present study compares low-pressure and supercharged operation of polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells with respect to performance and efficiency criteria. This is motivated by the challenge of pressure-dependent fuel cell operation aboard aircraft with cabin pressure varying with operating altitude. Experimental investigations of low-pressure fuel cell operation use model-based design of experiments and are complemented by numerical investigations concerning supercharged fuel cell operation. It is demonstrated that a low-pressure operation is feasible with the fuel cell device under test, but that its range of stable operation changes between both operating modes. Including an external compressor, it can be shown that the power demand for supercharging the fuel cell is about the same as the loss in power output of the fuel cell due to low-pressure operation. Furthermore, the supercharged fuel cell operation appears to be more sensitive with respect to variations in the considered independent operating parameters load requirement, cathode stoichiometric ratio, and cooling temperature. The results indicate that a pressure-dependent self-humidification control might be able to exploit the potential of low-pressure fuel cell operation for aircraft applications to the best advantage.</description><subject>Aircraft</subject><subject>Aircraft auxiliary power</subject><subject>Aircraft fuels</subject><subject>Balance of plant</subject><subject>Cooling</subject><subject>Demand</subject><subject>Devices</subject><subject>Fuel cells</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Multifunctional fuel cell system</subject><subject>Operating pressure</subject><subject>Polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell</subject><subject>Proton exchange membrane fuel cells</subject><subject>System efficiency</subject><issn>0376-0421</issn><issn>1873-1724</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkM1u2zAQhImiAeq6eYWCx1ykkqIlSrcaRn4KGMglPRMrapnQkEx2KbXwOS9eOk7PPe0uMDOY_Rj7KkUphWy-HcoISCFZX1b5LoUuhag_sJVstSqkrjYf2Uoo3RRiU8lP7HNKByGE6tp6xV633IYpAvkUjjw4PoY_RSRMaSHkcBx4WiKSfQF6xoGHvMPsL9IYxtOExHFEO1M-ZuQTTj3BEblbcOQWx5GnU5pxStwF4uDJEriZQ4yjt29R6Qu7cjAmvH6fa_bz7vZp91DsH-9_7Lb7wqpOzQWgqDa20_0GYFA99h060QzaQq0rp-u2wVYBtlLDUNm-UVVtuwa0q6V2rkG1ZjeX3Ejh14JpNpNP54q5b1iSka2q61ZIWWVpc5HaDDYROhPJT0AnI4U5UzcH84-6OVM3QptMPRu_X4yYH_ntkUxW4NHi4ClTMkPw_4v4C5I-k4c</recordid><startdate>201608</startdate><enddate>201608</enddate><creator>Werner, C.</creator><creator>Preiß, G.</creator><creator>Gores, F.</creator><creator>Griebenow, M.</creator><creator>Heitmann, S.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201608</creationdate><title>A comparison of low-pressure and supercharged operation of polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell systems for aircraft applications</title><author>Werner, C. ; Preiß, G. ; Gores, F. ; Griebenow, M. ; Heitmann, S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-ae024c97b4aad3beb9ef06d7ca572f7586e83ae817ad2cb6325c96a7f517ff6e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Aircraft</topic><topic>Aircraft auxiliary power</topic><topic>Aircraft fuels</topic><topic>Balance of plant</topic><topic>Cooling</topic><topic>Demand</topic><topic>Devices</topic><topic>Fuel cells</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Multifunctional fuel cell system</topic><topic>Operating pressure</topic><topic>Polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell</topic><topic>Proton exchange membrane fuel cells</topic><topic>System efficiency</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Werner, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Preiß, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gores, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Griebenow, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heitmann, S.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Progress in aerospace sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Werner, C.</au><au>Preiß, G.</au><au>Gores, F.</au><au>Griebenow, M.</au><au>Heitmann, S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A comparison of low-pressure and supercharged operation of polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell systems for aircraft applications</atitle><jtitle>Progress in aerospace sciences</jtitle><date>2016-08</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>85</volume><spage>51</spage><epage>64</epage><pages>51-64</pages><issn>0376-0421</issn><eissn>1873-1724</eissn><abstract>Multifunctional fuel cell systems are competitive solutions aboard future generations of civil aircraft concerning energy consumption, environmental issues, and safety reasons. The present study compares low-pressure and supercharged operation of polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells with respect to performance and efficiency criteria. This is motivated by the challenge of pressure-dependent fuel cell operation aboard aircraft with cabin pressure varying with operating altitude. Experimental investigations of low-pressure fuel cell operation use model-based design of experiments and are complemented by numerical investigations concerning supercharged fuel cell operation. It is demonstrated that a low-pressure operation is feasible with the fuel cell device under test, but that its range of stable operation changes between both operating modes. Including an external compressor, it can be shown that the power demand for supercharging the fuel cell is about the same as the loss in power output of the fuel cell due to low-pressure operation. Furthermore, the supercharged fuel cell operation appears to be more sensitive with respect to variations in the considered independent operating parameters load requirement, cathode stoichiometric ratio, and cooling temperature. The results indicate that a pressure-dependent self-humidification control might be able to exploit the potential of low-pressure fuel cell operation for aircraft applications to the best advantage.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.paerosci.2016.07.005</doi><tpages>14</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0376-0421
ispartof Progress in aerospace sciences, 2016-08, Vol.85, p.51-64
issn 0376-0421
1873-1724
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1835580112
source Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Aircraft
Aircraft auxiliary power
Aircraft fuels
Balance of plant
Cooling
Demand
Devices
Fuel cells
Mathematical models
Multifunctional fuel cell system
Operating pressure
Polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell
Proton exchange membrane fuel cells
System efficiency
title A comparison of low-pressure and supercharged operation of polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell systems for aircraft applications
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T12%3A30%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20comparison%20of%20low-pressure%20and%20supercharged%20operation%20of%20polymer%20electrolyte%20membrane%20fuel%20cell%20systems%20for%20aircraft%20applications&rft.jtitle=Progress%20in%20aerospace%20sciences&rft.au=Werner,%20C.&rft.date=2016-08&rft.volume=85&rft.spage=51&rft.epage=64&rft.pages=51-64&rft.issn=0376-0421&rft.eissn=1873-1724&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.paerosci.2016.07.005&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1835580112%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1835580112&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0376042116300513&rfr_iscdi=true